HAL Id: jpa-00247759
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247759
Submitted on 1 Jan 1992
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Mesoscopic structure of polymer mediated microemulsion networks
D. Vollmer, U. Hofmeier, H.-F. Eicke
To cite this version:
D. Vollmer, U. Hofmeier, H.-F. Eicke. Mesoscopic structure of polymer mediated microemulsion networks. Journal de Physique II, EDP Sciences, 1992, 2 (9), pp.1677-1681. �10.1051/jp2:1992227�.
�jpa-00247759�
J. Phys. II France 2 (1992) 1677-1681 SEPTEMBER 1992, PAGE1677
Oassification Physics Abstracts
82.70K 61.25H 61.16D 61.42
Short Communication
Mesoscopic structure of polymer mediated microemulsion networks
D. Vollmer, U. Hofmeier and H.-F. Eicke
Universit£t Basel, Klingelbergstr. 80, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
(Received 6 July 1992, accepted in final form 15 July1992)
Abstract. Water in oil microemulsions containing block-copoly(oxyethylenelisoprene/oxy- ethylene)
areinvestigated by freeze fracture electron microscopy. Contrary to pure microemul-
sions, where the droplets
areirregularly arranged, they
areclosed packed in these systems and show medium range order. This feature makes polymer containing microemulsions
an
interesting system to study disorder to order transitions,
asit combines typical features of colloidal particle and block-copolymer systems.
1. Introduction.
Recently the study of order-disorder transitions as a function of interaction range and strength
has attracted much attention, as liquids containing supramolecular objects form specifically
useful systems to investigate these transitions experimentally [ii. In particular spherical col- loidal particles [2, 3] and block copolymer systems [4, 5] are frequently studied in this context.
Spherical colloidal particles (e. g. latex particles) in a solvent form excellent approximations
to hardcore systems [6, ii. They allow straightforwardly to test theoretical and numerical predictions for these systems. In particular one observes
afluid to crystal transition as function of particle density, pressure and temperature [2, 7, 8]. This order to disorder transition
canbe
influenced by suitable modifications of particle surface properties, thereby manipulating the interaction potential [9].
Block copolymers are composed of sequences of chemically distinct, homogeneous polymer
chains. Their microstructure is essentially determined by the overall degree ofpolymerisation
N and by the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter x of the monomers building up the blocks [4, 10]. Transitions between ordered and disordered states
canbe obtained by varying the
product XN. In the strong segregation limit (large xN) seven ordered phases were identified.
Two of them show lattice like symmetries [4, iii.
1678 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II NOg
In this paper
we report on preliminary results of ordering in microemulsion mediated polymer
networks [12] obtained by freeze fracture electron microscopy. These systems combine typical
features of both, colloidal particle and block-copolymer systems. In water-I-oil microemulsions [13] water droplets of well defined size [14, 15] are dispersed in an oil medium. These systems are
frequently viewed as macrofluids, with droplets interacting via hard core potentials [16]. The
droplets are irregularly arranged with a tendency to agglomeration [18]. Microemulsions form
a selective solvent for both components of block-copoly(oxyethylenelisoprene/oxyethylene),
I-e- a triblock copolymer build up by a hydrophilic(POE)-hydrophobic(PI)-hydrophilic(POE)
sequence. At high enough copolymer concentration this system forms viscoelastic networks [19] that exhibit medium range [21] close packed order.
2. Experimental procedure.
2, I PREPARATION OF BLOCKCOPOLYMER-MICROEMULSION DISPERSIONS. ROT and ISOOc-
tone are of hi ghest grade commercially available from Fluka. Water is purified with the Alpha-Q Reagent Grade system, Millipore. The triblock copolymer consists of two POE blocks with number average molecular weight Mn
=11000 g mol~~ each, a PI block with Mn
=39000 g mol~~ and
a
POE/PI (weight/weight) ratio of 36/64. 4.6 x 10~~ g ml~~ copolymer are added to a microemulsion (H20/ACT (mol/mol)
=
61.8, [ACT]
=0.9 mol dm~~), yielding on the average 16.5 copolymers per droplet (R
=
16.5). The dispersion is stirred (4 5 days) with
amagnetic stirrer at 313 K until it becomes homogeneously transparent. At
roomtemperature the sample forms a single phase.
2.2 FREEZE-FRACTURE REPLICATION TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. A 400 mesh
copper TEM-grid is immersed into sample material (294 + 0.5 K) and then positioned between two gold plates of about 4 mm diameter, I.e. the liquid specimen is squeezed between the
plates (sandwich-method) [18]. The sandwiches
arehold together by stainless steel tweezers and quenched by hand plunging into
amixture of liquid 2-methylbutan and propan (volume
fractions: 1/3 2-methylbutan, 2/3 propan) at 81 K. Typical artifacts of hand plunging (phase separation, crystallization, aggregate segregation) [22] do not occur with these systems, as an
enhanced viscosity reduces the mobility of the droplets.
After quenching the sandwich is transferred into liquid nitrogen and clamped onto a brass block (Balzer). It is mounted
on aBalzer freeze edge device (BAF301) at 103 K and subse-
quently the pressure is reduced to 5 x 10~~ mbar. After evacuation the sample is fractured
by separating the gold-plates with a liquid nitrogen cooled microtome.
To enhance contrast of the surface structure, the sample is warmed up to 183 K and edged
for three minutes. During edging the cooled knife of the microtome is positioned close above the sample surface. It acts as a cold trap to prevent recondensation of volatiles on the fracture
surface. Thereafter the sample is cooled again to 103 K and its surface is shadowed with a 16 1 layer of W-Ta under
an
angle of 40°. In order to provide sufficient mechanical stability
of the W-Ta film, it is coated with
acarbon layer of about 400 1.
After the specimens are warmed up to room temperature and brought to atmospheric pres-
sure, the replica is washed in chloroform, dried in air and examined finally with
a HiTachi
H-8000 electron Jnicroscope operating at 100 kV.
N°9 MICROEMULSION NETWORKS 1679
3. Results and discussion.
Figure I shows a micrograph of a polymer containing w/o microemulsion at 294 + 0.5 K in the
one phase region. The figure demonstrates that the droplet structure is preserved and that the
droplets show medium range dose packed order at volume fraction id
"0.16 Their average radius and the center to center droplet distance can be measured directly from the micrograph, yielding 11 + 3 nm and 27 + 5 nm, respectively. The errors in the droplet size are mainly due to a slight polydispersity, a restricted visibility of droplets that are partially buried after the fracture and to difficulties to distinguish droplets from their surroundings. In contrast the variance in the average center to center distance is mainly due to defects in the ordering of the
sample.
Fig-I- Micrograph of
apolymer containing w/o microemulsion at 294 + 0.5 K in the
one
phase region. Close packed arranged water droplets
areimbedded in
anoil matrix. The length of the bar
corresponds to 200
nm.The influence of the polymers
ondroplet size and droplet-droplet distance can be estimated
by comparing the values obtained for a microemulsion with and without polymers. For pure microemulsions such data are available from both, dynamic light scattering measurements or
geometric parameters [14]. They are listed in table I. Measured and calculated droplet radii coincide within the error margin, whereas the droplet-droplet distance seems to be slightly
smaller for polymer containing systems. This may be due to evaporation of isooctane during
the preparation process, or to an increase in the number of particles die to a replacement of surfactant molecule by the copolymer. The arrangement of the droplets changes substantially through addition of the polymers, as can be seen by comparing figure I with micrographs
obtained for pure microemulsions [18, 22, 23]. Jahn and Strey observe that the arrangement of droplets in pure microemulsions is irregular with a slight tendency to agglomeration. The
droplets are still agglomerated in clusters of dilserent sizes for nearly twice the droplet volume
fraction (id
"0.322) and comparable droplet size (21.2 nm in the diameter) to
oursample.
1680 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N°9
Table I -Droplet size and droplet-droplet distance determined from the microgmph for a mi- croem«lsion containing polymer (R
=16.5, cw
=0.20, wo
"61.8, id
=0.16), respectively from dynamic light scattering meas«foments and from the geometric parameters for p«re microem«I- sion systems (cw
=0.20, wo
"61.8, id
"0.14).
droplet size droplet-droplet distance micrograph dynamic geometric micrograph geometric
light scattering parameters parameters
nm nm nm nm nm
12 + 2 13 + 2 11 + 2 27 + 5 33 + 4
4. Conclusions.
We conclude that the polymers
causemedium range ordering of microemulsion droplets into close packed arrangement, similar to the microphase behaviour of block-copolymer systems in the strong segregation limit. For our systems the interaction parameter X has to be replaced by a higher elsective interaction potential between the distinct polymer sequences, due to the
their preferred solubility in the water
oroil regions.
On the other hand the system can be considered as dispersion of spherical colloidal parti-
cles. For high polymer concentration the microemulsion droplets
aresurrounded by
ashell of
hydrophobic PI blocks (in average there are 16.5 PI blocks per droplet) [24]. This increases the elsective hard core radius of the droplets [17, 16], while attractive short term contributions
become much stronger for our systems, due to network formation caused by the copolymers.
Acknowledgements.
The authors wish to thank M. H£ner for help with the measurements at the Maurice E.- Miller Institute for High-Resolution Electron Microscopy. One of the authors (D.V.) would like to thank J. Vollmer, W. Sager and F. Stieber for many useful and stimulating discussions. They
also acknowledge financial support of the Swiss National Science Foundation
References
[ii H. N. W. Lekkerkerker, Physica A 176 (1991) 1.
[2] P. N. Pusey, W.
vanMegan, S. M. Underwood, P. Barlett and R. H. Ottewill, Physica A 176
(1991) 16.
[3] B. J. A. Ackerson, Physica A 174 (1991) 15.
[4] F. S. Bates, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41 (1990) 525.
[5] M. J. Folkes, Ed.; Processing, Structure and Properties of Block Cooolymers; Elsevier: New York
(1985).
[6] L. Anti, J. W. Goodwin, R. D. Hill, R. H. Ottewfll, S. W. Owens and S. Papworth, Call. Surf.
17 (1986) 67.
[7] D. Oxtoby, Nature 347 (1990) 725.
[8] M. Baus, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2 (1990) 2111.
[9] A. T. Skjeltorp and G. Hegelsen, Physica A 176 (1991) 37.
[lo] J. D. Ferry, Ed.; Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers; John Wilsey & Sons: New York (1980).
[Ill R. W. Richards and J. L. Thomason, Macromolecules 16 (1983) 982
N°9 MICROEMULSION NETWORKS 1681
[II] R. W. Richards and J. L. Thomason, Macromolecules 16 (1983) 982
[12] Ch. Quellet, H.-F. Eicke and W. Sager J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 5642; Ch. Quellet, H.-F. Eicke, G. Xu and Y. Hauger, Macromolecules 23 (1990) 3347; R. Hilfiker, H.-F. Eicke, Ch. Steeb and U.
Hoimeier, J. Phvs. Chem. 95 (1991)1478; R. Hilfiker, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991)
1227.
[13] P. G. de Gennes and C. Taupin, J. Phvs. Chem. 86 (1982) 2294;
W. Sager and H.-F. Eicke, Colloids and Surfaces 57 (1991) 343.
[14] M. Zulaui and H.-F. Eicke, J. Phys. Chem. 83 (1978) 480.
[15] M. Kotlarchyk, S. H. Chen and J. S. Huang, J. Phvs. Chem. 86 (1982) 3273; J. lli~ka, M. Borkovec and U. Hoimeier, J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1991) 8503.
[16] S. A. Sairan, I. Webman and G. S. Grest, Phys. Rev. A 32 (1984) 506.
[17] C. Robertus, J. G. H. Joosten and Y. K. Levine, Phys. Rev. A 42 (1990) 4820.
[18] W. Jahn and R. Strey, J. of Phys. Chem. 92 (1988) 2294.
[19] U. Z61zer and H.-F. Eicke, to be published.
[20] The triblock copolymer
wassynthesized and characterized at the Laboratoire de Chimie Macro- moleculaire, ENSCM, Mulhouse, France.
[21] cf. S. R. Elliot, Nature 354 (1991) 445 for
areview
on