• Aucun résultat trouvé

used to study the Norman worlds of the Middle Ages

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "used to study the Norman worlds of the Middle Ages"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

   

       

The  historiography  of  the  Norman  worlds  (17th-­‐21st  centuries):    

construction,  influence,  evolution  

International  colloquium  at  Ariano  Irpino,  9-­‐10  May  2016   (resp.  :  P.  Bauduin,  E.  D’Angelo)  

This  colloquium  aims  to  examine  the  "historiographical  models"  used  to  study  the  Norman   worlds  of  the  Middle  Ages.  This  is  understood  to  mean  the  interpretative  frameworks  of  the   past  that  have  had  a  lasting  impact  on  our  reading  and  understanding  of  the  history  of  each   of  the  countries  or  regions  affected  by  Norman  expansion.  

With   regards   to   the   Viking   period   and   the   settlement   of   Scandinavians   in   various   parts   of   Europe,   the   questions   that   have   been   posed   are   different   and   the   responses   given   have   strongly  influenced  each  of  the  historiographies1.  Scandinavian  historiography  has  for  a  long   time   highlighted   above   all   else   the   cultural   homogeneity   of   Scandinavia   during   the   Viking   period,  and  its  history  has  often  been  seen  as  that  of  the  Danes,  the  Norwegians  and  the   Swedes,  as  well  as  of  their  respective  countries2.  As  for  France,  the  questions  have  for  a  long   time  concerned  the  impact  of  Viking  raids  on  the  internal  evolution  of  the  Frankish  world.  

The   history   of   the   beginnings   of   the   Norman   principality   has   been   built   on   two   historiographical  paradigms:  the  opposition/discontinuity  in  relation  to  Carolingian  Neustria   and  the  centre/periphery  model  in  the  construction  of  the  state  and  of  Norman  society.  In   England,  there  has  been  intense  debate  regarding  the  size  of  the  Viking  armies,  the  density   of  Viking  settlement  and  the  nature  of  the  social  structures  imported  or  consolidated.  With   regards   to   Ireland,   scholarly   attention   had   for   a   long   time   focused   on   the   profound   transformations   experienced   as   a   result   of   Viking   invasions.   In   Scotland,   questions   have   focused  repeatedly  on  the  means,  peaceful  or  otherwise,  by  which  the  Vikings  took  over  the   Scottish  islands  and  on  the  fate  of  the  Pictish  population.  Russia  has  known  intense  debates   since  the  18th  century  concerning  two  systems  (later  qualified  as  "Normannism"  and  "anti-­‐

Normannism"),  with  one  group  attributing  the  social  and  political  development  of  Russia  to   Scandinavian  factors,  and  the  other  stressing  the  indigenous  origins  (above  all  Slav)  of  the   Rus.  

The  "Norman  adventure"  of  the  11th  and  12th  centuries  (F.  Neveux)  aroused  admiration  and   pride   in   France   and   Italy,   where   historians   praised   the   fighting   spirit   of   the   conquerors   as                                                                                                                            

1  P.  Bauduin,  «  Migration,  intégration,  identités  :  les  fondations  scandinaves  en  question  (Orient-­‐Occident,   VIIIe-­‐XIe  siècle)  »,  in  Des  sociétés  en  mouvement.  Migrations  et  mobilité  au  Moyen  Age,  XLe  Congrès  de  la   SHMESP  (Nice,  4-­‐7  juin  2009),  Paris,  2010,  p.  45-­‐57.  

2  F.  Svanberg,  Decolonizing  the  Viking  age,  1,  Stockholm,  2003.  

(2)

well  as  their  sense  of  nation  and  then,  amid  criticism  of  colonialism,  the  cultural  cohabitation   of  communities,  for  which  Sicily  had  been  unique3.  Examination  of  the  historiography  of  the   Norman   Conquest4   recalled   the   importance   given   by   the   past   to   the   legal   legacy   of   the   Norman  period  and  to  its  place  in  the  political  agenda  of  England,  notably  in  the  bias  of  the  

"Norman  yoke"  theory  developed  in  the  17th  century.  The  evolution  of  research  issues  in  the   second   half   of   the   20th   century,   as   well   as   the   use   of   concepts   such   as   "empire"   –   the   expression  The   Norman   Empire   coined   by   Charles   Homer   Haskins   was   the   title   of   John   Le   Patourel's   famous   work   (1976)   –   and   "colonisation",   and   the   debates   that   these   have   inspired5,  have  profoundly  shaped  both  British  and  American  historiography  and  continue  to   witness  new  developments  to  this  day6.  The  place  and  positioning  of  these  historiographical   traditions   is   one   of   the   most   important   aspects   for   clearly   defining   the   position   of   observers7,   and   for   understanding   the   images   created   and   the   fascination   they   have   produced8.  

Of  course,  in  many  respects  these  models  have  been  discarded  and  new  questions  brought   to   light,   in   particular   with   regards   to   themes   that   are   not   tied   down   by   local   or   national   concerns:   take,   for   example,   those   that   have   been   developed   concerning   questions   of   identity,   diasporas   (Viking   and/or   Noman),   the   "Europeanization   of   Europe",   frontiers,   centres  and  peripheries,  cultural  transfers,  etc.  Some  of  these  questions  reflect  the  influence   of   particular   movements   or   contemporary   historiographical   schools   (cultural   history,   postcolonial   history...),   as   well   as   the   preoccupations   of   our   societies   (globalisation,   European  construction...).  

The   gathering   organised   at   Ariano   Irpino   will   examine   in   particular   the   historiographical   constructions  developed  since  the  17th  century  by  looking  at  the  place  of  the  "Normans"  in   the  "national  story"  of  each  country.  It  will  also  evaluate  their  influence  on  our  knowledge  of   the   history   of   the   Norman   worlds.   What   axioms   have   influenced   the   historiographical   debates?   Beyond   their   identification   and   classification,   it   is   also   important   to   understand   their   genealogy,   their   implications,   their   pervasiveness,   their   rejection   and   their   deconstruction.  The  colloquium  will  also  look  to  explore  the  orientation  of  a  history  of  the   Norman  worlds  developed  from  questions  that  go  beyond  national  boundaries,  schools  and   academic  traditions.  

Comité  scientifique/  Scientific  committee/  Comitato  scientifico  :  Pierre  Bauduin  (Caen),     Edoardo  D’Angelo  (Napoli),  Daniel  Power  (Swansea),  Jón  Viðar  Sigurðsson  (Oslo),  Elisabeth   Van  Houts  (Cambridge),  Ortensio  Zecchino  (CESN)  

                                                                                                                         

3  A.  Nef,  Conquérir  et  gouverner  la  Sicile  islamique  aux  XIe  et  XIIe  siècles,  Rome,  2011,  p.  4  et  suiv.  

4  M.  Chibnall,  The  Debate  on  the  Norman  Conquest,  Manchester,  1999.  

5  F.  West,  «  The  colonial  history  of  the  Norman  Conquest  »,  History,  84,  1999,  p.  219-­‐236.  

6  D.  Bates,  The  Normans  and  Empire,  Oxford,  2013.  

7  D.  Crouch,  «  Les  historiographies  médiévales  franco-­‐anglaises  :  le  point  de  départ  »,  Cahiers  de  civilisation   médiévale,  48,  2005,  p.  317-­‐326  

8  R.  H.  C.  Davis,  The  Normans  and  Their  Myth,  Londres,  1976;  R.  R.  Davies,  The  First  English  Empire.  Power  and   Identities  in  the  British  Isles  1093-­‐1343,  Oxford,  2000.  

(3)

Proposals   for   papers   should   be   sent   by   the   15th   October   2015   to   the   following   address:  

pierre.bauduin@unicaen.fr  ;    edoardo.dangelo@unisob.na.it  

CESN  :  http://www.cesn.it/  

CRAHAM  :  http://www.unicaen.fr/craham/  

   

Références

Documents relatifs

Wednesday 22 nd September 9.00-9.15 Opening session Chair: José Francisco Preto MeIrInHOS (Universidade do Porto) 9.15-9.35 Maria Alessandra BILOTTA (IEM-NOVA/FCSH; PI of the

We invite original contributions that critically examine the role that Latin metaphors of illness played in medieval discourse as a tool of explaining reality and as a rhetorical

Scholars are invited to propose case studies addressing the use, reuse, recreation, invention, imagination and evocation of the medieval past, from the Middle

This enquiry could illustrate different degrees of exploitation of classical texts: from systematic excerption to scattered quotations naturalized in different

Late medieval shipbuilding in Catalonia followed the general Mediterranean tendency of using the skeleton-first shipbuilding principle and placing the planks of the

Carol has been a king for a long time without being anointed; he received the royal crown in 838, from his father, Louis the Pious, without having held any ecclesiastical ceremony

The develop- ing NABO (North Atlantic Bioarchaeology Organization) database project will make such comparisons and access to data easier and probably far more

Archaeological, iconographical and written sources for falconry in the Middle Ages from the Germanie as well as from the Slavic area are described. The possibility