• Aucun résultat trouvé

Literature on semantics and Pragmatics. Course

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Literature on semantics and Pragmatics. Course"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Literature on semantics and Pragmatics.

Course NPFL115: Reading in Semantics and Pragmatics Apresjan Ju.D. Lexical Semantics. 1992.

Austin J.L., 1962. How to do things with words.

Berlin B. & Kay P., 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution.

Bühler, Karl. Die Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Theory of language : the representational function of language / Karl Bühler. Transl. by Donald Fraser Goodwin. In collab. with Achim Eschbach.

Cruse, D.A. Lexical semantics. Cambridge, 1986.

Gordon, W. T. Semantic: a bibliography. 1965 – 1978; 1978 – 1985 Greimas, A.-J. Sémantique structural. Recherche de métode. 1966 Grice G.P., 1989. Logic and Conversation.

Fillmore C., 1971. Types of lexical information.

Fillmore C., 1982. Frame Semantics.

Frawley W. Linguistic semantics. 1992

Geeraerts, D. Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford 2010.

Hoffmann, T. R. Realms of meaning: an introduction to semantics. 1993.

Hurford, J. R., B. Heasley. Semantics: a course-book. 1983 Jackendoff R., 1993. Semantics and Cognition.

Jackendoff R., 1997. The architecture of the language faculty.

Jakobson R., "Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics," in Style in Language (ed. Thomas Sebeok), 1960.

Katz J.J., 1972. Semantic theory.

Katz, J.J. and J.A. Fodor 1963. The structure of a Semantic Theory, Language 39, 170-210 Kearns, Kate. Semantics. 2000.

Kempson, R. Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. Cambridge studies in linguistics, 15. 1975.

Kronasser, H. Handbuch der Semasiologie: kurze Einführung in die Geschichte, Problematik und Terminologie der Bedeutungslehre. 1952

Lakoff G., Johnson M., 1980. Metaphors we live by.

Lakoff G., 1987. Women, Fire, and dangerous things.

Leech, G. N. Semantics. 1974 Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics.

Lyons J., Semantics. 2 vols. 1977 Lyons J., 1995. Linguistic Semantics.

McCawley J., 1981. Everything that Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know About Logic (but were Ashamed to Ask).

Morris, Charles W. Signs, Language and Behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1946. Reprinted, New York: George Braziller, 1955. Reprinted in Charles Morris, Writings on the General Theory of Signs (The Hague: Mouton, 1971), pp.

73-397.

Palmer, F. R. Semantics. 1981

Portner, P and Partee, B. (eds.) Formal semantics. The essential reading. Oxford 2002.

Radden, G. & Kövecses, Z. 1999. Towards a Theory of Metonymy. In K.U. Panther and G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17-59.

Rosch, E.H. (1973). "Natural categories". Cognitive Psychology 4 (3): 328–50.

Reinhart T., 2002. The Theta System.

Riemer, N. (2010). Introducing semantics. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Riemer, N. (ed.). (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, UK.

Saced, J. I. Semantics. 1997

Sapir E., 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech.

Sapir E. 1983. Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality.

Searle J., 1969. Speech acts.

Searle, John - Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic.

Talmy, Leonard. toward a cognitive semantics. Vol 1,2. 1993.

Thomas, J. Meaning in interaction. An introduction to pragmatics. Essex. 1995.

Ullmann S., 1951. The principles of Semantics.

Ullmann, S. The principles of semantics. A linguistic approach to meaning. 1959.

Whorf B., 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf . Wierzbicka A., 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals.

Wierzbicka A., 1999. Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and universals

Références

Documents relatifs

We present a Bayesian network model for inter- preting a listener’s feedback signals in their dia- logue context. Taking a speaker-centric perspect- ive, the model keeps

The PROJ rule must be applied on a parallel vector available at the current level p. The resulting value is a closure which contains the content of the given vector. As expected,

Non-interference and directionality were proposed as desirable properties of argumentation semantics, conveying the idea that for some sets of arguments the selection of arguments

On such an account, if the presupposition that some relevant agent in the context uttered the quoted words can neither be bound to an antecedent nor accommodated – the two

1 Université de L6dZ (Pologne)... nominales, réelles ou autres. Pour motiver cette affirmation, on attire l’attention sur l’existence de trois notions différentes

The correspondence between a semantic representation (= a predicate-argument structure) and a syntactic representation (= a surface syntactic dependency tree) of a

Concluding Comment Finally, the account we provide has a strong method- ological import: editing phrases like ‘no’ and ‘I mean’ select inter alia for speech events that include

8 The question, here, is not to determine whether literature is more or less intermedial or transmedial—we claim that both intermediality and transmediality can be key features