HAL Id: jpa-00208793
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00208793
Submitted on 1 Jan 1978
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Laser plasma density profile modification by ponderomotive force
R. Dragila, J. Krepelka
To cite this version:
R. Dragila, J. Krepelka. Laser plasma density profile modification by ponderomotive force. Journal
de Physique, 1978, 39 (6), pp.617-623. �10.1051/jphys:01978003906061700�. �jpa-00208793�
LASER PLASMA DENSITY PROFILE MODIFICATION
BY PONDEROMOTIVE FORCE (*)
R. DRAGILA and J. KREPELKA
Faculty
of Nuclear Science andPhysical Engineering,
Department
ofPhysical
Electronics, Brehova 7, 115 19 Praha1, Tchécoslovaquie (Reçu
le 23 décembre1977, accepté
le22 février 1978)
Résumé. 2014 La modification du profil de la densité du plasma
produite
par la force pondéro-motrice est analysée par un traitement numérique du système auto-cohérent des équations hydro-
dynamiques
et des équations de Maxwell dans une géométrie plane. On prévoit des oscillations dupouvoir
réflecteur en fonction du temps à cause des oscillations du profil de densité au cutoff.Abstract. 2014 The plasma
density profile
modification due to theponderomotive
force isanalysed
by numerical treatment of a consistent systemof hydrodynamical
and Maxwell equations in a plane geometry. Reflectance temporal oscillations are proposed as a result of density profile oscillations at the cutoff.Classification Physics Abstracts 52.50J - 52.40D - 52.65
1. Introduction. - In
present
laser fusion expe- riments the conditions under which thepondero-
motive force
[1]
dominates the thermokinetic pressureare obtained. In such a case, noticeable
changes
inplasma density profile
andexpansion dynamics
can beexpected [2]. Experimentally, plasma density
variationshave been observed at the cut-off
region by
Zakha-renkov et al.
[3]
andprofile steepening indirectly
evidenced
by
Manes et al.[4]
from observations thedegree
ofpolarization
rotation of the backscatteredlight.
The noticeablesteepening
of thedensity profile
can
produce
substantial modifications inabsorption
processes and can
exchange
the role ofparametric
and resonance processes at
oblique
incidence[5].
Using
the WKBapproximation
in the under-denseregion
andestimating
the electric fieldintensity
at thecut-off
neighbourhood,
where the WKBapproxi-
mation
fails,
Brueckner and Janda[6]
simulated thedynamics
of irradiatedpellets
with resultsqualitatively
close to those of Lee et al.
[7],
where alocally stationary density profile
in the framemoving
with thedensity step assuming
isothermal flow was outlinedanaly- tically
for aplane geometry.
Mulser and van Kessel[8]
analytically analysed
asteady-state spherical
modelsolving plasma continuity
and motionequations together
with a waveequation omitting absorption,
(*) This paper has been reported at llth European Conference
on Laser Interaction with Matter, Oxford 19/23 September 1977.
however Virmont et al.
[9]
have shown that theseprofiles
are unstable except for very small laser fields.The correct treatment of the
phenomena
consideredrequires
the consistent system ofgasdynamical
andMaxwell
equations
to be solvedsimultaneously, including
theponderomotive
force in the momentumand energy balance
equations
for systemplasma-
radiation.
2.
Physical
model. - For laser radiation fluxesin a range qo z
1013-1016
Wcm-2
the massvelocity
of the
expanding
corona is of order ofmagnitude
of u N 107-108 cm s -1
and, consequently,
the zeroorder
approximation
in a small parameterule «
1(c-velocity
oflight)
usedthroughout
the present paper isjustified
andyields
theponderomotive
force in theform
(Dragila 1978)
e-dielectric constant, E-electric field
intensity.
Suchthe force will dominate a thermokinetic pressure, if
where p = n. mi is mass
density,
m; ion mass, T tem-perature, pe critical
density
and where pressure has been assumed to scale with Aspatially,
at least at somecutoff
neighbourhood.
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:01978003906061700
618
Assuming
a weakabsorption
in the corona, whichis consistent with the
expected
steepdensity
pro- file and normal incidence ofradiation,
i.e.setting e 1/2E 2 E5,
the condition for the threshold radia- tion fluxdensity
qo,, for theponderomotive
force todominate at the cutoff
neighbourhood,
readswhere > Â
indicates aspatial
average overÂ, providing
thedensity gradient
characteristiclength
is of the same order of
magnitude. Thus,
for Ndglass
laser
(n,, * 1021 cm -3, T, ;:t 1
keV for a range of laser fluxesconsidered, 1 e 1 >’/’ ;:t 0.1)
it becomeswhile for
C02
laserTo
verify
the role of theponderomotive
force in thedynamics
of a laser-inducedplasma,
thefully
ionizedplanar plasma layer
with initial thickness z = zo andhomogeneous density p(z, t
=0)
= po, 0 z , zo is assumed to be irradiatedby
laserlight represented by
anelectromagnetic plane
wavewhere
X(z)
represents the electric ormagnetic
fieldcomponent and co is an
angular frequency.
Thedynamics
of the irradiatedplasma
has been describedby
means of a one-fluidtwo-temperature Lagrangian
model
including
electron pe andion p;
pressures, real and artificialviscosities,
electron heat conducti-vity,
electron-ionrelaxation,
laserlight
energyabsorp-
tion as the time
averaged
over2 n/co
Joule heat sourceterm 2 0’ 1 E l’
in the electron energy balance equa- tion and timeaveraged
over 2nlw ponderomotive
force
(1)
in the momentum conservation law(3).
Consequently,
thehydrodynamic equations
are asfollows :
(in
CGSunits, Ta
inkeV),
u is thevelocity, e,,,
the spe- cific internal energy(related
to unitmass), Ta
tempe- rature, E the electric fieldintensity, Ba
thespecific
heatcapacity,
xe, 110’Qo
coefficients of thermal conduc-tivity,
realviscosity
and electron-ionrelaxation, respectively,
y= -i (Poisson’s constant),
A is theatomic
weight,
Z thedegree
ofionization,
ln A the Coulomblogarithm, Qe
andQi
are artificial electron and ionquadratic
viscosities[10],
VI = 1 so that thereis no artificial
viscosity
included at the rarefaction wave, and Am is the mass of the cell in theLagrangian
différence scheme.
For a
plane
geometry,T,, > Ti typically, hence, according
to the relationxo;/xoe
=(me/mJI/2,
the ionheat conduction can
usually
beneglected (me, mi
arethe electron and ion
masses).
According
to therelation th > tm 2 nlOJ
betweenthe
hydrodynamical th
andMaxwellian tM
timescaling,
Maxwellequations
as well aselectromagnetic
energy conservation law can be treated in the
quasi-
stationary
form aswith E =
Ey
and H= Hx
the components of electric E =(0, Ey, 0)
andmagnetic
H =(Hx, 0, 0) fields,
e = el +
’82 complex
dielectricfunction,
el = 1 -pl Pc,
’62
p V e/w3, 0’
=we2/4
rcconductivity,
p,,, criticaldensity,
cop, and ve electronplasma
and collisionfrequencies, respectively.
Introduced in(6)
the effectiveconductivity
represents the energy
exchange
between theplasma
and
electromagnetic
field due to the power of aponderomotive
force[11].
Theequations (5)
have beensolved
using
the method evaluatedby Afanasyev
et al.
[12],
i.e.introducing
the reflectanceV(z) by
therelation
where
X+, X-
are incident and reflected waves res-pectively.
The collisionfrequency
ve should be understood in ageneralized
sense, i.e. aswhere
e and me are the electron
charge
and mass,and
Here V, (i)
represents the effective contribution to theabsorption
processes of thepossible
instabilitiesarising
at the cutoffneighbourhood (
pi, p,>, if
therelation qo > qth for the laser flux
density
qoholds,
with qth the threshold for the
instability
under consi- deration. In such a way, our model treats both collision(ve
=V("» absorption by
inversebremsstrahlung
andanomalous
heating (ve
=v(i».
Acomplete
table ofVef, qth, Pi and P2 can be found in
[12]. However,
the numerical calculations have shown that forparametric decay instability
was dominant withHowever,
in aninhomogeneous plasma,
the thresh- old for theinstability
considered becomes an increas-ing
function of adensity gradient.
At the cutoffneighbourhood
it istypically T,, > T;,
and thus theincreasing
of the threshold iseffectively
introducedby reducing
the anomalousabsorption region (
pl,P2 >
geometrical
width where thefrequency
and wave-vector
matching
conditions forparametric instability
to arise is fulfilled
[ 13].
The
bremsstrahlung
radiation losses can beneglected
because the absorbed energy in unit volume and unit time dominate the power of the radiation losses from the unit volume[14],
ifHence,
forTe
= 10 keV and hm = 1 eV(Nd laser)
it appears q., = 1012 W
cm - 2,
while it istypically T,,
1-10 keV inexperiments,
where3.
Computational
scheme. - The consistent system ofgasdynamic (2-5)
and Maxwell(6) equations
hasbeen
numerically
solvedusing
the finite differenceimplicit fully
conservativescheme,
which is the modification of code usedby Afanasyev
et al.[12].
Computing
the fieldspatial profile,
theabsorbing plasma
has beensplit
into tworegions :
a) (zo,
Zi 1zc)
where the WKBapproximation
holds and
b) (zl,
Z2 >zc)
the cutoffneighbourhood,
wherethe WKB
approximation
fails.(zo, Zc correspond
to theplasma
vacuumboundary
and the cutoff
plane, respectively),
to save compu- tation time. The treatment of Maxwellequations (6)
in the
region (
z l’Z 2 >
needs a finespatial
meshwith a
step Azm « Â,
while in theregion zo, z 1 >
where the WKB
approximation
is valid aspatial step AZWKB Â
is sufficient.As the scale
length
of theponderomotive
force(1) spatial
variation is of order of the local radiationwavelength Â,
thegasdynamic spatial step
should beAzG
 in theregion (zo, z2),
ingeneral,
or at leastin the
region
where theponderomotive
force domi- nates the thermokinetic pressure. Forinstance,
sucha
region
can be identified with a Maxwellianregion (zi, z2)
withtypically (z2 - ZI) ’;:t (3 : 6)
,1. In par- ticular, eachgasdynamic Lagrangian
cell(initial
sizeof which was of order  and
density po) in
theregion (z l’ Z2)
issuccessively split
so that theresulting
cellsfulfil the local condition
AzG
 andintegrated
backto one
big
cell afterpassing
the discussed zone,taking
care about mass, momentum and energy conservation.
4, Results and conclusions. - In all the numerical simulation further discussed, the
planar CD2
target with initialdensity
po =1.0 g cm - j
and laserlight
with a
wavelength Âo
= 1.06 pm has been considered.The
trapezium
form of the laserpulse
has been chosen with a standard rise-time LR = 33 ps.One of the
quantities
that can beexperimentally
verified which indicates the processes that
directly
orindirectly modify
theplasma
parameters at the cutoff620
neighbourhood
is a coefficient R ofreflexivity,
thetime-dependence
of which isplotted
onfigure
1.A noticeable difference can be observed between dashed and full curves
corresponding
to the sameFIG. 1. - Reflectance versus time, omitting ( ) and including (- - - -, ....) ponderomotive force (PMF). (-..-) correspond to
the case of only classical inverse bremsstrahlung (CIB) absorption
mechanism.
radiation flux
density
qo =1014 W cm-2
but without andincluding (PMF)
theponderomotive force,
res-pectively.
The relevantportion
of absorbedenergies
were
and
Besides the increase in reflected energy,
switching
on the
ponderomotive
forcebrings
about the charac- teristictemporal
oscillations of the coefficient R ofreflectivity
due to thedensity profile
oscillations at the cutoffneighbourhood,
as will be shown in whatfollows.
Consequently,
theperiod
of these oscillationscan be
expected
to be of the order ofmagnitude
ofwhere the local
wavelength Â
represents thedensity gradient
characteristiclength
and aPMF(8)
an addi-tional
plasma
acceleration due to theponderomotive
force. For qo =
1 O 14 W cm - 2, tos N 60 ps
in arough
agreement with the simulation results onfigure
1. In a realexperiment,
theexpanding plasma
flow is not
planar
ingeneral,
hence thevelocity
Uc issupposed
to decrease and tose to increase incomparison
with the
purely planar
case with the same laser fluxdensity
on the critical surface. Thenon-regular
variations in oscillation
amplitude
contain nophysics
and appear as a result
of splining.
The substantional fluctuations in
reflectivity
havealso been
predicted by
Brueckner and Janda[6], however,
as a result of fluctuations in the criticaldensity
radius(spherical model). Experimentally,
thetemporal
oscillations inreflectivity
have been observedby
Basov et al.[15],
with a modulation of order of30-50 %
of the maximum value andperiod
tose = 0.6 ± 0.1 ns for Al
planar target
and Ndglass
laser flux
density
qo = 7 x1012
W cm-2 on the target andexplained
as due totemporal
oscillationsof parametric instability
induced nonsteady
turbulentnoise.
The second effect
investigated
has been thedensity profile
variations due to théponderomotive
force.For
illustration,
two instantsof time tl
1 = 112 ps and t2 = 152 pscorresponding
to maximum and minimum of R for qo =1014Wcm-2,
have been chosen and relevantdensity profiles plotted
onfigures
2 and 3.In agreement with our
previous
estimation(see
section
2),
the threshold radiation fluxdensity
for theponderomotive
force to dominate is somewhere between1014-1015
W cm-2(Fig. 2a, 3a).
The relevantdetails of the
density profiles
within a fewwavelengths
of the cutoff
neighbourhood
shown infigures 2b,
3boffer an
interpretation
of thereflectivity oscillations, namely,
thematching
conditionsfor the
parametric decay instability
are fulfilledin a rather wider cutoff
neighbourhood
Az at theFIG. 2. - Plasma spatial density profile at t = 112. ps omitting ( and including (- - - -, ....) ponderomotive force (PMF).
a) Complete profiles ; b) Detail of a relevant few wavelengths
cutoff (z = zj neighbourhood.
FIG. 3. - Plasma spatial density profile at t = 152 ps omitting (-) and including (- - - -, ....) ponderomotive force (PMF).
a) Complete profiles ; b) Detail of a relevant few wavelengths cutoff (z = Zc neighbourhood).
instant
t2(Oz
=Oz2)
than at the instantti (Az Az,).
For
instance,
thematching
conditionAn,, ,ln,, 0. 1
holds for
Azi = /)o
butez2 x 10 Ào. However,
ifonly
collisional inversebremsstrahlung absorption
isincluded
(CIB),
the reflectance oscillations are also observed(Fig. 1)
withhigher time-averaged
over tossemagnitude of ; R ), particularly,
In this case, due to a lower
temperature Te
at thecutoff,
the
density profile
must be steeper for the thermo- kinetic pressure to compensate theponderomotive force,
incomparison
with the case where anomalousabsorption
was taken into account.Oscillating
such thesteepening modify
even collisionalabsorption
effi-ciency [4]
to oscillate. The oscillationsalone,
for bothclassical and anomalous
absorption mechanisms,
appears to be a result of temperature
temporal
oscillation
(Fig. 4),
and thuscompetition
between theponderomotive
force and the thermokinetic pressure.Once the
ponderomotive
forcesteepens
thedensity profile,
theintegral
coefficientof reflectivity
decreases,Fm. 4. - Electron T_ and ion Tic temperature at the cutoff versus
time.
however,
the localabsorption
coefficient does notchange
at the cutoff and thus lessparticles
are heatedat the same rate, i.e. to
higher temperature.
Conse-quently
the thermokinetic pressure increases which leads to theplasma expansion
andcooling
at thecutoff, decreasing integral
coefficient ofreflectivity, dominating ponderomotive force,
etc.Also,
thevelocity profile
has beeninvestigated
toverify
the relation of theponderomotive
force tounderdense
plasma
acceleration. As can be seen fromfigure 5,
a small amount of rare(p « pj plasma
isblown off from the cutoff when
qo >
qc simulta-neously during
theforming
of thesteepened density
FIG. 5. - Velocity spatial profiles at cutoff (z = zc) neighbourhood omitting (-) and including (- - - -, .... ) ponderomotive force
(PMF).
profile.
If theponderomotive
force is not consideredand
formally
the sameabsorption
rate assumed for qo =101-5
Wcm - 2,
thevelocity profile
would corres-pond
to theprolonged straight
part of the dottedcurve
(Fig. 5).
In such a way, our calculations arecomplementary
to those ofCampbell
et al.[16]
wherethe electrostatic acceleration of ions was
investigated
(KMS
Fusion codeTRHYD).
622
Most of the calculations
presented
here have alsobeen done for
CO2
laser(îo
= 10.6ym)
irradiatedtargets
toverify
thesensitivity
of the studiedphe-
nomena to the
wavelength.
We will not present theseparallel
resultshere,
as these can besimply
related tothe results
corresponding
toÂ.
= 1.06 gm.According
to
(1),
theplasma acceleration, assuming
a weakabsorption,
which is consistent with the condition qo > q,,,(see figure 1),
becomeswhere
Eo
is an electric fieldintensity
in vacuum.Then,
for
(qO)Nd = (qO)C02
the relation between the relevant accelerations readswhile the accelerations due to the thermokinetic pressure scales as
Hence,
similar results can beexpected
to be obtainedirradiating
thetarget by Âo
= 1.06 gm with(qo)Nd
= R’o andby Âo
= 10.6 gm but with(qo)co2 =
0.01 qo.This has been confirmed
by
the simulations and is illustrated infigure
6. Also the initialponderomotive
force induced
compression
times ratiozNd/ico2
scalesas
(8’),
whichmight
beimportant
in foilexperiments and/or
for ultrashort laserpulses.
When the
ponderomotive
force is not taken into account, theelectromagnetic
wavepenetrating
intothe
plasma
andreflecting
at the cutoff forms astanding
wave with non-zero nodes due to the
absorption
inan under-dense
plasma
with the last, in a directionfrom laser to target, maximum
of 1 E 12 being
theabsolute one 1 E l’ ab r,.
max and reached at p =ps Pc[ 1 7] .
For
higher
densities p >Ps, 1 E J2
goes to zero asymp-totically passing through
the critical surface.However, including
theponderomotive
force ingasdynamics,
the
electromagnetic
field infiltratedthrough
the upper shelfdensity region keeping
itsoscillatory
characteris then
aperiodically damped, passing
the last critical surface(see figure 7).
Nevertheless, the results obtainedFIG. 6. - Comparison of the density p and velocity u profiles for CD2 target irradiated by Nd (go = 1014 W cm-2) and C02 (qo = 1012 W cm-2) lasers at a few wavelength Â-o = 1.06 ktm,
Âo = 10.6 gm cutoff (z = zj neighbourhood, respectively. 1) p(z), Nd ; 2) p(z), Nd, PMF ; 3) u(z), Nd ; 4) u(z), Nd, PMF ; 5) p(z),
CO2 ; 6) p(z), C02, PMF ; 7) u(z), CO2 ; 8) u(z), CO2, PMF.
FIG. 7. - Field 1 E l’ and density spatial profiles illustrating the
presence of a sonic point at the density step and modulation of upper
shelf density.
still remain in a
qualitative
agreement with those of Lee et al.[7] just setting 1 Er ,1’ = JEJ’
max and thesonic
point
to p = ps. Transitionthrough
the subsonic tosupersonic
flow withrespect
to the framemoving
with the
density
step can be seen onfigure
7 as atransition from the coincidence
of 1 E l’
maxima anddensity
minima for p > p.and 1 E 12
maxima withdensity
maxima at the lower shelfdensity
p ps.Acknowledgment.
- The authors are indebted to Drs. Yu. V.Afanasyev
and V. B. Rozanov for valuable discussions.References [1] HORA, H., Laser Interaction and Related Plasma Phenomena
(Plenum Press) 1971, p. 383-426.
[2] KIDDER, R. E., Interaction of Intense Photon Beams with Plasmas (II), Proc. Japan-U.S. Seminar, Laser Interac- tion with Matter (1972) 24-29.
[3] ZAKHARENKOV, Yu. A., ZOREV, N. N., KROKHIN, O. N., MIKHAYLOV, Yu. A., RUPASOV, A. A., SKLIZKOV, G. V.
and SHIKANOV, A. S., Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. 21 (1975)
557-61.
[4] MANES, K. R., AHLSTROM, H. G., HAAS, R. A. and HOLZRICH- TER, J. F., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67 (1977) 717-26.
[5] MANHEIMER, W., 11th European Conference on Laser Inter- action with Matter, Oxford (19/23 Sept. 1977).
[6] BRUECKNER, K. A. and JANDA, R. S., Nucl. Fusion 17 (1977)
451-3.
[7] LEE, K., FORSLUND, D. W., KINDEL, J. M. and LINDMAN, E. L., Phys. Fluids 20 (1977) 51-4.
[8] MULSER, P. and VAN KESSEL, C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977)
902-5.
[9] VIRMONT, J., PELLAT, R. and MORA, P., 11th European Confe-
rence on Laser Interaction with Matter, Oxford (19/23 Sept. 1977).
[10] SAMARSKIY, A. A. and POPOV, Yu. P., Raznostniye skhemy
gazovoy dinamiki, Moskva, Nauka (1975) 131-4.
[11] DRAGILA, R., Submitted to J. Phys. D. 11 (1978).
[12] AFANASYEV, Yu. V., DEMCHENKO, N. N., KROKHIN, O. N. and ROZANOV, V. B., Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 72 (1977) 170-80.
[13] SILIN, V. P., Parametricheskoye vozdeystviye izlucheniya bolshoy
moshchnosti na plazmu, Moskva, Nauka (1973) 185.
[14] AFANASYEV, Yu. V., BASOV, N. G., VOLOSEVICH, P. P., KRO- KHIN, O. N., LEVANOV, E. I., ROZANOV, V. B. and SAMARS- KIY, A. A., Preprint FIAN66 (1972).
[15] BASOV, N. G., KROKHIN, O. N., PUSTOVALOV, V. V., RUPASOV, A. A., SILIN, V. P., SKLIZKOV, G. V., TIKHONCHUK, V. T.
and SHIKANOV, A. S., Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 67 (1974) 118-33.
[16] CAMPBELL, P. M., HAMMERLING, P., JOHNSON, R. R., KUBIS, J. J., MAYER, F. J. and SLATER, D. C., KMSF-U491 (1976).
[17] DRAGILA, R. and KREPELKA, J., J. Phys. D 11 (1978) 217-25.