• Aucun résultat trouvé

Community based forest management plans in the Brazilian Amazon: current barriers threatening long term economic viability

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Community based forest management plans in the Brazilian Amazon: current barriers threatening long term economic viability"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

~ 51 ~

IUFRO International ConferenceResearch Priorities in Tropical Silviculture: Towards New paradigms? November 2011 –France - Abstracts

23. Community based forest management plans in the Brazilian Amazon: current barriers threatening long term economic viability

Drigo Isabel Garcia1, Piketty Marie-Gabrielle2, Pena Wagner3,

Sist Plinio2,

Community-based forest management (CBFM) projects are often seen as an alternative to protect forest and at the same time to provide incomes for small landholders. Since the mid-1990s, the number of CBFM projects has increased in the Brazilian Amazon although most of them face several difficulties despite significant public support. Four CBFM plans were analyzed between 2005 and 2010 to assess the evolution of the socioeconomic arrangements and the main barriers threatening their long term viability. The CBFM plans are located in the State of Acre (West Amazon) and in the State of Para (Eastern Amazon). The community forest producers studied live in settlements. The tenure rights model over land and forests varies from one type of settlement to another. New federal regulation issued in 2010 has added more bureaucratic steps to communities applying for rights to explore their portions of forests. The first important barrier to successfully implementation of CBFM is the complex legal framework: it currently takes at least 2 to 3 years to get a plan approved. Moreover management plan elaboration and implementation process is costly. None of the CBFM plan could have been successfully implemented without external national and international financial supports, as well as technical assistance. Community forest certification has decreased and stagnated in the period analyzed. Finally, in the current Amazonian market context, timber harvest only represents a limited complementary income for small farmers, even if forest covers 80 % of their landholding. Market access is very uncertain and small holders communities do not systematically succeed in selling their timber at remunerative prices. Minimum remunerative public prices should be guaranteed for timber from such CBFM plans to make them a truly economic alternative for the Amazon smallholders.

Keywords :

Brazilian Amazon, Community-based Forest Management,tropical timber

Orator : Marie-Gabrielle Piketty

Complete Authors adresses including Institution :

1) PhD in Environmental Science, Member of Socio-environmental Economics Research Center (NESA-USP), isabel.drigo@gmail.com

2) Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, - (UR

Green) (marie-gabrielle.piketty@cirad.fr)- Unité de Recherche "Gestion des Ressources Naturelles

et Environnement" - UR Biens et services des ecosystèmes forestiers tropicaux (plinio.sist@cirad.fr)

Références

Documents relatifs

Sini Savilaakso Center for International Forestry Research; s.savilaakso@cgiar.org Manuel Guariguata Center for International Forestry Research; m.guariguata@cgiar.org César

The understanding of the main factors driving the chemistry of soil solutions led therefore to a simplification of fertilization regimes over huge areas of eucalypt plantations on

First, we developed a semi-automatic remote sensing methodology to detect forest degradation using multi-temporal Landsat images (spatial resolution of 30m) covering the

companies that reportedly implemented forestry management plans had higher and more stable wood production rates, which resulted in more extensive forest road

Information concerning the potential household income derived from each project comes from two main sources: (1) the net benefits of timber production (i.e., gross annual

The maximum annual income from the forest is insignificant if calculated with respect to the mean area of the forest reserve (R$43/ha, US$24) and compared to that of the

The detailed costs supported by the communities are thus only available for CANOR and have been distributed amongst: administra- tion covering the annual spending to accompany

Around 135 million hectares, or 10 percent of all forests, are designated for multiple-use, defined as forest “managed for any combination of goods production, soil and