• Aucun résultat trouvé

Automated fault detection without seismic processing

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Automated fault detection without seismic processing"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 1. Diagram of a fault trap (Creative Commons).
Figure 5. Example of a randomly generated velocity model with a multiple faults.
Table 1. Results obtained on several representative sets of simulated test data.
Figure 8. Example of 3D model with two 2D highlighted slices. In this top view,  two faults can be identified.
+2

Références

Documents relatifs

Once the transformer is connected to the bus bar, it will feed several lines where the loads are connected. The figure 2.4 represents a solidly grounded distribution network with

The results show that the simple representation, combined with an evolutionary design is better able to predict training times than a more random data generation process (with a

A novel method, named with Data Fine-pruning training, is developed to reduce the time consumption of training a model by sensibly and temporarily pruning a fraction of input

As in the case of the multivariate control charts ( T 2 or MEWMA), we will fix a threshold (limit) on the a posteriori probabilities allowing to take decisions on the process: if,

In order to evaluate the performances of our detection method with bayesian network, and to compare them to others detection methods (T² and MEWMA control charts), we have chosen

The section IV presents a new method in order to take into account non- Gaussian signal in the fault detection with Bayesian network.. We evaluate this proposed method on a

In fact, most of us (and I include myself here) have done rather worse than that – in that having identified the need to think beyond growth we have then reverted to the more

Unit´e de recherche INRIA Rennes, Irisa, Campus universitaire de Beaulieu, 35042 RENNES Cedex Unit´e de recherche INRIA Rhˆone-Alpes, 655, avenue de l’Europe, 38330 MONTBONNOT ST