• Aucun résultat trouvé

Supporting primary care: Tool kit for the future

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Supporting primary care: Tool kit for the future"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vol 53:  february • féVrier 2007 Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

369

President’s Message

College

Collège

Supporting primary care

Tool kit for the future

Tom Bailey

MD CCFP FCFP

L

ess  than  a  decade  ago,  family  doctors  across  Canada  began  to  hear  whispers  about  “primary  care  reform”  (PCR).  The  meaning  wasn’t  initially  evident, and perhaps it still remains obscure.

The  term  “primary  care”  is  not  well  understood  by  the  public,  or  perhaps  even  by  the  professionals  actu- ally working in the domain. While primary care defines  first-contact  services,  family  doctors  provide  services  to  their  patients  at  primary,  secondary,  and  even  ter- tiary  care  levels.  Family  medicine  is  much  more  than  primary care. 

As  professionals  working  to  keep  up  with  increas- ing demands, family doctors might wonder why primary  care is in need of reform.

First,  good  evidence  suggests  that  primary  care  matters  to  the  health  outcomes  of  populations.  The  work  of  Dr  Barbara  Starfield  in  particular  has  high- lighted  the  benefits  of  a  strong  primary  care  system  that  includes  family  doctors.  Countries  with  strong  primary care systems have better health outcomes. 

Second,  there  is  evidence  of  substantial  variation  in  outcomes  within  the  primary  care  system.  As  the  stan- dards of care for different populations vary widely, it is  evident that the system could do better.

Third,  evidence  suggests  the  health  needs  of  popula- tions  are  changing  and  will  continue  to  change  in  the  future. The aging baby boomer cohort is but one exam- ple of changing system demographics to which primary  care must adapt.

So  in  a  very  real  sense,  PCR  is  “evidence-based.” 

For  all  of  the  above  reasons,  primary  care  needs  both  renewal  and  reform.  And  since  most  patients  do  not  require  health  care  services  beyond  primary  care,  it  should  not  be  surprising  that  so  much  of  health  policy  focuses on this part of the system. 

A  lot  has  happened  since  the  advent  of  PCR.  Most  family physicians in the country have been affected in  some  way,  and  many  claim  the  reform  has  not  gone  far enough. 

In  response,  the  College  of  Family  Physicians  of  Canada  (CFPC)  began  an  intensive  examination  of  the  future of family medicine in 2000. An important outcome  of  this  was  a  position  paper  entitled Family Medicine in Canada—Vision for the Future,  released  in  November  2004. This paper calls for the need to value, support, and  strengthen  the  family  doctor’s  role  in  primary  care  as  well as other parts of the health care system.

With  the  support  of  Health  Canada,  the  CFPC  has  also led 4 projects to strengthen this role:

1. Family Medicine Interest Groups;

2. Increasing  the  Role  of  Family  Medicine  in  the  Undergraduate Curriculum;

3. Family Physicians and Other Specialists—Working and  Learning Together; and

4. Increasing  Support  for  Family  Physicians  in  Primary  Care.

While  each  of  these  projects  has  made  valuable  contributions to family medicine in Canada, Increasing  Support for Family Physicians in Primary Care tackles  an  overarching  issue—the  very  nature  of  the  practice  of  family  medicine  in  the  future.  Without  adequate  support  for  family  practice—despite  all  the  evidence  for its pivotal role in health care delivery—we stand at  the brink of a crisis. There is no need to interest medi- cal  students  in  family  medicine  or  become  more  rec- ognized in the medical school curriculum if we cannot  sustain the core practice of family medicine.

This  project  has  brought  together  family  physician  leaders from across the country to assist family doctors  as  they  become  more  involved  in  PCR  activities.  The  project  resulted  in  creation  of  a  primary  care  tool  kit  built  around  a  framework  of  5  key  themes:  remunera- tion,  governance,  interdisciplinary  collaboration,  conti- nuity and comprehensiveness of care, and information  technology. 

Other projects in the last few years have focused on  some or all of these activities, but few have come close  to mastering them. The tool kit provides an overview of  each  of  the  themes  and  describes  the  key  success  fac- tors and pitfalls related to each. In addition, the tool kit  provides resource documents.

The  tool  kit  is  available  from  the  CFPC  website  (http://toolkit.cfpc.ca).  Resources  will  be  added  as  they become available. Users will also be able to print or  e-mail documents from the tool kit.

The  tool  kit  is  intended  to  be  dynamic  and  inter- active.  This  website  will  help  guide  family  doctors  as  they continue to tackle the many challenges of system  change and development. Much work remains in PCR. 

We hope this primary care tool kit will help many fam- ily  doctors  to  better  understand  both  the  complexity  of  change  and  some  of  the  approaches  available  for  dealing with it successfully. 

Références

Documents relatifs

Cherry AL, Dillon ME, Baltag V. International Handbook on Adolescent Health and Development: The Public Health Response. Health Literacy and Child Health Outcomes: Promoting

Da análise realizada, relativamente à satisfação dos utentes, conclui-se que em termos gerais se encontram satisfeitos com as alterações introduzidas e que se

While the physician is traditionally focused on the clinical aspects of care, the increasing emphasis on team-based care required that the physician provide additional support

Problem addressed Family physicians have long understood that social factors infuence the health of individuals and communities; however, most primary care organizations have yet

New guidelines and position statements, including those from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, 4 the North American Menopause Society, 7 and

This analytic capability could advance prevention and care of chronic disease and enable primary care practitioners to function as leading agents for public health and

However, population health outcomes for people with chronic diseases managed in primary care are similar to outcomes in specialized care, with lower costs and better quality..

Improved reporting tools for population man- agement can transform EMR data into more meaning- ful information, helping primary care groups identify and address needs based on