R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
R. K. R AINA M AMTA B OLIA
Characterization properties for starlike and convex functions involving a class of fractional integral operators
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 97 (1997), p. 61-71
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1997__97__61_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1997, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
and Convex Functions Involving
aClass
of Fractional Integral Operators (*).
R. K.
RAINA(**) -
MAMTABOLIA (***)
ABSTRACT - This paper studies the characterization
properties
satisfiedby
a classof fractional
integrals
of certainanalytic
functions in the open unit disk to be starlike or convex. Further characterization theorems associated with the Hadamardproduct
(or convolution) are alsoinvestigated
1. - Introduction.
A new class of fractional
integral operators
with aparticular
case ofFox’s H-function in the kernal was introduced
by Kiryakova [4]
and[5]
(see
also[3]). Subsequently,
thisgeneralized
fractionalintegral
opera- tor was extended and studied in a wider context on McBride spacesFp~ ~
andby
Raina andSaigo [9] (see
also[12]). Recently,
severalclasses of distortion theorems have been obtained
involving
certainfractional
integral operators by Srivastava, Saigo
and Owa[15].
Distor-tion
inequalities
associated with the new class of fractionalintegral operators [5]
have veryrecently
been consideredby
Raina and Bo-lia [ 10].
This paper is devoted to
studying
thesufficiency
conditions satis- fiedby
a class of fractionalintegral operators (defined by
eq.(5) below)
(*) Dedicated to the memory of Late Professor Bertram Ross of New Ha-
ven
University,
U.S.A.(**) Indirizzo dell’A.:
Department
of Mathematics, C.T.A.E.Campus
Udai-pur,
Udaipur,
313001Rajasthan,
India.(***) Indirizzo dell’A.:
Department
of Mathematics,College
of Science, Su- khadiaUniversity, Udaipur,
313 001Rajasthan,
India.AMS
Subject
Classification (1991): 26A33, 30C45, 30C99, 33C40of certain
analytic
functions in the open unit disk to be starlike or con- vex. Further characterizationproperties
associated with the Hadamardproduct (or convolution)
are also considered. The class of fractionalintegral operators incorporates
several well-knownintegral operators like;
the Riemann-Liouvilleoperator,
Kober fractional inte-gral, Erd6lyi
fractionalintegral,
Love fractionalintegral, Saigo
frac-tional
integral
and their variousgeneralizations.
One may refer to[9]
for
comprehensive
details of these abovespecial
cases. The results of this paper arewidely applicable
to several fractionalintegral operators including
the one discussed in[7].
,The paper is
organised
as follows: Section 2gives preliminary
de-tails and definitions of starlike and convex
analytic functions,
and gen- eralized fractionalintegral operators.
In Section 3 we state first the results which arerequired
in oursequel
and then establish our maincharacterization
properties
in the form of Theorems 1 and 2.Lastly,
Section 4 considers the characterization
properties
associated with the Hadamardproduct.
2. - Preliminaries and definitions.
Let
T(n)
denote the class of functions of the formwhich are
analytic
in the unit disk!7={~: I z I 1 }.
Then a functionf(z)
eT(n)
is said to be in the classS(n)
if andonly
ifFurther,
a functionf(z) e T(n)
is said to be in the classK(n)
if andonly
ifIt is
easily
verified thatand that and are the well known classes of starlike and con- vex functions.
We
give
now below the definition of a class of fractionalintegral
op- erators[3]
and[4] (see
also[5], [9]
and[12]):
DEFINITION. Let
Then the
integral operator
is said to be a
multiple
fractionalintegral operator
of Riemann-Liou- villetype
of multiorder 3 =(61,
... ,d m).
Here andelsewhere,
the setof
nonnegative integers
is denotedby
N.R means the real field andR + - ( 0, ~ ),
and C denotes thecomplex
number field.The H-function
involving
in(5)
is aspecial
case of Fox’sHP y-func-
tion
[2] (see
also[8,
Sect.8.3])
which is defined as follows:’
and aj,
bi
e Cand a i , e
R + ( j
=1,
... , q; i =1,
9 ... ,~ ).
The H-functionoccurring
inthe paper is defined
by ([2, p. 408]):
where
the contour L is
suitably
chosen and anempty product,
if it occurs, is taken to be one. The details of this function may be foundin [1], [6,
Chapter 1], [8,
Sect.8.3]
and[14, Chapter 2].
Thesymbol
denotesthe usual Pochhammer
symbol
3. - Chracterization
properties.
We first introduce a class of fractional
integral operators
asfollows:
The fractional
integral operator
is definedby
where
flj, 6j
ER + and yj
eR, Vj
=1,
... , m; such thatand n is a
positive integer
so chosen thatIn order to establish the characterization
properties
satisfiedby
theoperator (8)
of certainanalytic functions,
werequire
thefollowing
results:
LEMMA 1.
If
thefunction f(z) defined by (1) satisfies
then
f(z)
eS(n).
Theequality
in(11)
is attainedby
thefunction
LEMMA 2.
If
thefunction f(z) defined by (1) satisfies
then
f(z)
EK(n).
Theequality
in(13)
is attainedby
thefunction
Lemmas 1 and 2 stated in
[7, p. 420]
are easy consequences of thecorresponding
results due to Silverman[13].
LEMMA 3
[5,
p.261].
LetThen the
operator I(ym), (Bm); (dm) m
maps the classX/1(G)
intoitselfpreserv- ing
the power = zP up to a constantmultiplier,
name-ly:
We prove now the
following:
THEOREM 1. Under the conditions stated in
(8), (9),
and(10),
letthe
function f(z) defined by (1) satisfy
Then
PROOF.
Applying suitably
Lemma3,
we have from(1)
and(8):
where
The function is a
non-increasing
functionof k,
since we observethat
under the conditions stated in
(8), (9),
and(10).
Now(17)
and(20) gives
Therefore, by
Lemma1,
we conclude thatand the theorem is
proved.
REMARK 1. A function
,f(z) satisfying (17)
can be considered to be of the formIn an
analogous
manner, we can prove with thehelp
of Lemma 2 thefollowing
result which characterizes the classK(n):
THEOREM 2. Under the constraints stated in
(8), (9)
and(10),
letthe
function f(z) defined by (1) satisfy
Then
REMARK 2. A function
f(z) satisfying (23)
can be considered to beof the form
4. - Characterization
properties
associated with the Hadamardproduct.
Then the Hadamard
product
or convolutionWe recall here the
following
result due toRuscheweyh
andSheil-Small
[11]:
LEMMA 4. Let
g(z), h(z)
beanalytic
in U andsatisfy
the condi- tionSuppose
also thatfor
a and b on the unit circle.Then, for
afunction F(z) analytic
in Uand
satisfying
theinequality:
By making
use of Lemma4,
we prove thefollowing:
THEOREM 3. Let the conditions stated in
(8), (9)
ccnd(10) hold,
andsuppose that
the function f(z) defined by (1)
is suchthat f(z)
eS(n)
andsatisfies
for
a and b on the unitcircle,
wherethen e also.
PROOF. We observe from
(18)
and(30)
thatThis
gives
By putting g(z)
=w(z), h(z) = f(z),
andF(z)
=zf’(z)/f(z)
in Lemma 4above,
we find thatTHEOREM 4. Under the conditions stated in
(8), (9)
and(10), if
thefunction f(z) defined by (1)
is suchthat f e K(n)
andfor
a and b on the unitcircle,
wherew(z)
isgiven by (30),
thenPROOF. From
(4)
and Theorem(3),
it follows thatwhich proves Theorem 4.
Our next characterization
property
uses thefollowing
result:LEMMA 5
(Ruscheweyh
and Sheil-Small[11]).
Letg(z)
be convexand let
h(z)
be starlike in U. Thenfor each function F(z) analytic
in Usatisfies
theinequality:
THEOREM 5. Under the conditions
(8), (9)
and(10),
where
w(z)
isgiven b y (30).
PROOF. The theorem which is based upon Lemma 5 above can be
proved analogously
to Theorem 3.Lastly,
we also have thefollowing:
THEOREM 6. Under the conditions
(8), (9)
and(10),
where
w(z)
isgiven by (30).
REMARK 3. It is observed that the function
w(z)
definedby (30)
can be
expressed
in terms of thegeneralized hypergeometric
functionwhich converges
absolutely
in U. Further more, the series inm
(36)
converges also for z = 1when 2 6i
> 1.j=1
Several classes of characterization
properties
for various fractionalintegral operators
of certainanalytic
functions can be derived from the resultsgiven
in this paper. Forinstance, by noting
the connection([12, p.142])
thatwhere denotes the
Saigo operator (see [9]),
the results of the pa- per[7]
would follow from thecorresponding
resultspresented
in thispaper.
Acknowledgement.
The work of the first author wassupported by Department
of Science andTechnology,
Govt. ofIndia,
under Grant No.DST/MS/PM-001/93.
REFERENCES
[1] B. L. J. BRAAKSMA,
Asymptotic expansions
andanalytic continuations for
a cLass
of Barnes integrals, Compos.
Math., 15 (1964), pp. 239-341.[2] C. Fox, The G- and
H-functions as symmetrical
Fourier kernels, Trans.Amer. Math. Soc., 98 (1961), pp. 395-429.
[3] S. L. KALLA - V. S. KIRYAKOVA, An
H-function generalized fractional
cal-culus based upon
compositions of Erdélyi-Kober operators in Lp,
Math.Japon.,
35 (1990), pp. 1151-1171.[4] V. S. KIRYAKOVA, Fractional
integration
operatorsinvolving
Fox’sHm,0m,m-
function,
C. R.Bulg.
Acad. Sci., 41 (11) (1988), pp. 11-14.’
[5] V. S. KIRYAKOVA, Generalized
Hm,0m,m-function fractional integration
opera- tors in some classesof analytic functions,
Math. Vesnik, 40 (1988), pp.259-266.
[6] A. M. MATHAI - R. K. SAXENA, The H-Function with
Applications
in Statis-tics and other
Disciplines,
Halsted Press, New York, London,Sydney,
Toronto (1978).
[7] S. OWA - M. SAIGO - H. M. SRIVASTAVA, Some characterization theorems
for
starlike and convex
functions involving
a certainfractional integral
opera- tor, J. Math. Anal.Appl.,
140 (2) (1989), pp. 419-426.[8] A. P. PRUDNIKOV - JU. A. BRYCHKOV - O. I. MARICHEV,
Integrals
and Series, Vol. 3, MoreSpecial
Functions, Gordon and Breach, New York, Philadel-phia,
London, Paris, Montreux,Tokyo,
Melbourne (1990).[9] R. K. RAINA - M. SAIGO, Fractional calculus operators
involving
Fox’s H-function
on spacesFp,03BC
andF’p,03BC,
in Advances in Fractional Calculus (R.N. KALIA, Editor), Global Publ., Sauk
Rapids
(1993), pp. 219-229.[10] R. K. RAINA - M. BOLIA, On distortion theorems
involving generalized frac-
tional calculus operators,
Tamkang
J. Math., 27 (3) (1996), pp. 233-241.[11] S. RUSCHEWEYH - T. SHEIL-SMALL, Hadamard
products of
schlichtfunc-
tions and the
Pólya-Schoenberg conjecture,
Comment Math. Helv., 48 (1973), pp. 119-135.[12] M. SAIGO - R. K. RAINA - A. A. KILBAS, On
generalized fractional
calculus operators and theircompositions
withaxisymmetric differential
operatorsof the potential theory
on spacesFp,03BC
andF’p,03BC,
Fukuoka Univ. Sci.Reports,
23 (1993), pp. 133-154.
[13] H. SILVERMAN, Univalent
functions
withnegative coefficients,
Proc. Amer.Math. Soc., 51 (1975), pp. 109-116.
[14] H. M. SRIVASTAVA - K. C. GUPTA - S. P. GOYAL, The H-Functions
of
One andTwo Variables with
Applications,
South Asian Publ., New Delhi, Madras (1982).[15] H. M. SRIVASTAVA - M. SAIGO - S. OWA, A class
of
distortion theorems in-volving
certain operatorsof fractional
calculus, J. Math. Anal.Appl., 131
(2) (1988), pp. 412-420.Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 28