TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY FOLLOWING HIP FUSION!

29  Download (0)

Full text

(1)

TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY FOLLOWING HIP FUSION!

!

Indications, Surgical Technique, Results"

L Kerboull, M. Hamadouche, M. Kerboull"

Paris, France"

(2)

INTRODUCTION!

! Hip ankylosis"

- total loss of mobility"

- “spontaneous” VS surgical (arthrodesis)"

- degenerative or infectious process"

- young patients!

! Long-term:"

! !- over-stress related osteoarthritis"

! !- ipsilateral knee and low back pain"

"

! ! ! !(Callaghan et al JBJS 1985, Sponseller et al JBJS 1984)!

(3)

! Durable stable and painless hip!

! Conversion to total hip arthroplasty:"

- technically difficult"

- morbidity"

- hip stability and mobility"

- long-term results!

! Think twice +++!

???!

(4)

Malposition in adduction!

Medial femoro-tibial compartment!

Varus!

(5)

Malposition in abduction!

Lateral femoro-tibial compartment!

Valgus!

(6)

Malposition in flexion!

(7)

Malposition in rotation!

(8)

Anatomic modifications!

•  Frequently in high position (CDH)!

•  Protrusion!

•  Greater trochanter!

•  Gluteus muscles"

"

!

(9)

Indications!

•  Mobility!

•  Sitting / Walking disability!

•  Degenerative changes on the ipsilateral knee and low back requiring surgery"

"

! !Conversion of the fused hip to THA first!

•  Periarticular muscles (gluteus +++)"

- CT scan"

- electromyogram"

-

palpation of the contracting abductors"

and intra-operative findings!

(10)

Surgical technique!

Preoperative planning and templates +++!

Multiple radiographic views!

Approach: trans-trochanteric!

Specimen for cultures!

(11)

Templating: osteotomy level!

(12)

Surgical technique!

Inferior margin!

TRIAL REDUCTION!

GREATER TROCHANTER FIXATION! Specific antibiotics!

(13)

RESULTS !

•  45 THAs 1969 - 1993 (19 men, 36 women)!

•  Single surgeon series (MK)!

•  Initial diagnosis:"

TB 26, CDH: 9, septic: 5, OA: 3, Perthes: 1, unknown: 1 !

•  “Spontaneous” ankylosis ! ! 20 hips"

Surgical ankylosis ! !25 hips (intra 11, extra 10, comb 4)"

"

Exclusion criteria: fibrous ankylosis, ankylosing spondylithis !

(14)

•  Malposition in 36 hips (80%)!

•  Perceptible contraction of the abductors!

•  Indication for THA"

! ! !- isolated low back pain 22"

! ! !- isolated knee pain 6"

! ! !- association 15"

! ! !- walking disability 1!

•  Neighboring joints:"

! !Lumbar spine"

!moderate OA 20 , severe OA 6, OA + scoliosis 11"

! !Knee"

!Uni-compartmental femoro-tibial OA 14, TriC 7 (4 severe) "

!

(15)

•  Mean age : 55.8 ± 12.3 years (28-80)!

•  Mean duration: 35.7 ± 14.2 years (3-65)"

spontaneous 43.8 years VS 31.1 years arthrodesis"

! ! ! !(p = 0,004)

!

•  Prosthesis:

Mc Kee - Farrar 1,Charnley 5, CMK 39

!

(16)

•   Follow-up: 8.5 ± 3.4 years (5 to 20 years)!

•  LTFU: 0!

•  Five patients deceased 6.2 years (5-8)!

•  Revised: 2"

! - Stem migration and osteolysis (7 years)"

!- Unknown reason (8.6 years)!

(17)

COMPLICATIONS!

•  2 DVT associated to non fatal PE!

•  1 sciatic nerve palsy (complete recovery)!

•  1 deep hematoma!

•  1 inguinal abscess"

! !- Tuberculosis"

! !- untreated"

! !- specific ATB + lavage!

(18)

CLINICAL RESULTS!

•  Mean functional Merle d’Aubigné hip score:"

!- pre-operative:! !11,3 ± 0,7"

!- 1 year FU: ! !15,6 ± 0,4"

!- last FU: ! ! !16,5 ± 1,5!

•  Excellent: ! ! !12 ! !(26,6 %)"

Very good: ! ! ! 20 ! !(44,4 %)"

Good: ! ! ! ! 9 ! !(20 %)"

Fair: ! ! ! ! 2 ! !(4,4 %)"

Poor : ! ! ! ! 1 ! !(2,2 %)"

Bad: ! ! ! ! 1 ! !(2,2 %)!

p < 10-4 p = 0,02

(19)

0!

1!

2!

3!

4!

5!

6!

Pain! Walking ability! Mobility!

6" 5,9"

5,1" 5,4" 5,1" 5,3"

p = 0,157!

p = 0,049" p = 0,160!

1 year FU"

Last FU"

Mean flexion: 88°± 23° (30 - 130°)

(20)

•  Predictive factor"

! ! GLUTEUS MUSCLES!

•  Three categories (intra-operative findings)"

!Type 1: poor, very thin but continuous"

!Type 2: fair, pink, quite thin"

!Type 3: satisfactory, red, bleeding, quite thick!

(21)

0!

2!

4!

6!

8!

10!

12!

14!

Type 1! Type 2! Type 3!

Number oh hips!

Limp (Score 3 to 5)!

Normal gait (Score = 6)!

p < 0,02

(22)

•  Lower back pain:"

- reduced or unchanged (97 %)"

- increased 1 case with scoliosis"

! ! !lumbar arthrodesis at 6 years!

•  Knee pain:"

- reduced or unchanged (90 %)"

- increased 2 cases ! ! !"

! ! !"

! ! !total knee arthroplasty at 4 years and 14 years !

Results in the neighboring joints

(23)

Survival rate

Surv. Inf. 95 p. cent Surv. Sup. 95 p. cent

91.0 %

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Follow-up (years)

% not revised

Survival of the arthroplasty

Failure = Revision

(24)

Survival rate

Surv. Inf. 95 p. cent Surv. Sup. 95 p. cent

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Follow-up (years)

95.1 %

% not operated

Survival knee and spine

Failure = TKA and/or lumbar arthrodesis

(25)

•  Arthroplasty survival:"

!«#Spontaneous ankylosis#» !100% at 8 years"

!Arthrodesis ! ! ! !94.6% at 8 years"

! ! !Kilgus et al JBJS 1990, Strathy et al JBJS 1988"

! !"

! !Effective procedure"

! !Results maintained > 10 years"

! !Effective on neighboring joints"

! ! ! !Gluteus muscles state !

N.S.

(26)

Bal...preop Bal ...1 y

Bal...3 y Bal...7 y

(27)

Ber...preop Ber...8 y

(28)

Ble...preop Ble...15 y

(29)

Figure

Updating...

References

Related subjects :