• Aucun résultat trouvé

Assessment of 'one-step' versus 'sequential' embryo culture conditions through embryonic genome methylation and hydroxymethylation changes (vol 31, pg 2471, 2016)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Assessment of 'one-step' versus 'sequential' embryo culture conditions through embryonic genome methylation and hydroxymethylation changes (vol 31, pg 2471, 2016)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02365178

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02365178v2

Submitted on 26 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial| 4.0 International License

Assessment of ’one-step’ versus ’sequential’ embryo culture conditions through embryonic genome

methylation and hydroxymethylation changes (vol 31, pg 2471, 2016)

Juliette Salvaing, Nathalie Peynot, Mohamed Negash Bedhane, Sophie Veniel, Emilie Pellier, Claire Boulesteix, Nathalie Beaujean Bobineau, Nathalie

Daniel, Véronique Duranthon

To cite this version:

Juliette Salvaing, Nathalie Peynot, Mohamed Negash Bedhane, Sophie Veniel, Emilie Pellier, et al..

Assessment of ’one-step’ versus ’sequential’ embryo culture conditions through embryonic genome

methylation and hydroxymethylation changes (vol 31, pg 2471, 2016). Human Reproduction, Oxford

University Press (OUP), 2017, 32 (4), pp.967-967. �10.1093/humrep/dex020�. �hal-02365178v2�

(2)

CORRIGENDUM

Assessment of ‘ one-step ’ versus

‘ sequential ’ embryo culture conditions through embryonic genome

methylation and hydroxymethylation changes

J. Salvaing

1,2,

*, N. Peynot

1

, M. N. Bedhane

1,3

, S. Veniel

1

, E. Pellier

1,4

, C. Boulesteix

1

, N. Beaujean

1,5

, N. Daniel

1

, and V. Duranthon

1,

*

1UMR BDR, INRA, ENVA, Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France2Present address: Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale (LPCV), UMR 1417 INRA / UMR 5168 CNRS-CEA-UGA, Bioscience and Biotechnology Institute of Grenoble (BIG), Commissariat á lEnergie Atomique at aux Energies Renouvelabes (CEA), 38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France3Present address: Jigjiga University, Ethiopia

4Present address: Faculté de Médecine, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex C5, France5Present address: INSERM U1208, INRA USC1361 Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute Department of Pluripotent Stem Cells in Mammals, 18 Avenue Doyen Lépine, 69675 Bron, France

*Correspondence address. UMR BDR, INRA, ENVA, Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.

E-mail: veronique.duranthon@inra.fr (V.D.)/juliette.salvaing@cea.fr (J.S.)

HumReprod2016;31:2471–2483

The authors would like to apologize for an error in a section of the Materials and methods of the above article. The section titled Recovery of rabbit embryos stated thatin vivo embryos were col- lected from oviducts at the 1-cell, 2-cell, 4-cell, 8-cell, 16-cell, mor- ula and blastocyst stages. The time point stated for collection of

in vivo8-cell embryos was mistakenly stated as 49 hpc (hours post- coitum). The correct time point for collection of in vivo 8-cell embryos is 39 hpc.

The authors would like to assure readers that this error does not affect any other content of the article.

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Human Reproduction, Vol.32, No.4 pp. 967, 2017

Advanced Access publication on February 8, 2017 doi:10.1093/humrep/dex020

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-abstract/32/4/967/2975235 by INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique) user

on 12 February 2018

Références

Documents relatifs

Elle restitue ensuite les principaux résultats des analyses conduites : tout d’abord concernant l’analyse de l’offre programmatique de façon à prendre la mesure de ce qui a

A partir de quelques exemples, nous discuterons des difficultés liées à la calibration et à la validation des modèles dynamiques en écologie et en sciences

The main aim of the presentation is to discuss a few conceptual problems arising in modelling of flow and transport in highly heterogeneous aquifers such as: the non-uniqueness

1 UMR STLO INRA Rennes 2 UMR BIA INRA Nantes 3 UMR SECALIM INRA Nantes 4 UMR GMPA INRA Grignon 5 URTAL INRA Poligny 6 LRF INRA Aurillac 7 MICALIS INRA Jouy-en Josas 8

Malheureusement, les déclarations du Président de la République jeudi dernier concernant une éventuelle transformation du CNRS en agence de moyens, suivies de votre

(affiche, résumé étendu). CoSAC, un projet pour la Conception de Stratégies durables de gestion des Adventices dans un contexte de Changement : climat, pratiques

[r]

Saussure a certainement saisi l’occasion du congrès de Genève pour réaliser deux opérations conjointes : (i) faire reconnaître la place de la linguistique indo-européenne, en