HAL Id: hal-02621402
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02621402
Submitted on 26 May 2020
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License
Perioperative management of adult diabetic patients.
Preoperative period
Gaelle Cheisson, Sophie Jacqueminet, Emmanuel Cosson, Carole Ichai,
Anne-Marie Leguerrier, Bogdan Nicolescu-Catargi, Alexandre Ouattara, Igor
Tauveron, Paul Valensi, Dan Benhamou
To cite this version:
Gaelle Cheisson, Sophie Jacqueminet, Emmanuel Cosson, Carole Ichai, Anne-Marie Leguerrier,
et al..
Perioperative management of adult diabetic patients.
Preoperative period.
Anaes-thesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Elsevier Masson, 2018, 37 (Supplement 1), pp.S9-S19.
�10.1016/j.accpm.2018.02.020�. �hal-02621402�
Guidelines
Perioperative
management
of
adult
diabetic
patients.
Preoperative
period
Gae¨lle
Cheisson
a,
Sophie
Jacqueminet
b,c,
Emmanuel
Cosson
d,e,
Carole
Ichai
f,g,
Anne-Marie
Leguerrier
h,
Bogdan
Nicolescu-Catargi
i,
Alexandre
Ouattara
j,k,
Igor
Tauveron
l,m,n,o,
Paul
Valensi
d,
Dan
Benhamou
a,*
,
working
party
approved
by
the
French
Society
of
Anaesthesia
and
Intensive
Care
Medicine
(SFAR),
the
French
Society
for
the
study
of
Diabetes
(SFD)
aServiced’anesthe´sie–re´animationchirurgicale,hoˆpitauxuniversitairesParis-Sud,AP–HP,78,rueduGe´ne´ral-Leclerc,94275LeKremlin-Biceˆtre,France b
Institutdecardio-me´tabolismeetnutrition,hoˆpitaldelaPitie´-Salpeˆtrie`re,AP–HP,75013Paris,France
c
De´partementdudiabe`teetdesmaladiesme´taboliques,hoˆpitaldelaPitie´-Salpeˆtrie`re,75013Paris,France
d
De´partementd’endocrinologie-diabe´tologie-nutrition,hoˆpitalJean-Verdier,universite´ Paris13,SorbonneParisCite´,CRNH-IdF,CINFO,AP–HP,93140Bondy, France
e
SorbonneParisCite´,UMRU1153INSERM/U1125INRA/CNAM/universite´ Paris13,93000Bobigny,France
fServicedere´animationPolyvalente,hoˆpitalPasteur2,CHUdeNice,30,voieRomaine,06001Nicecedex1,France gIRCAN(INSERMU1081,CNRSUMR7284),UniversityHospitalofNice,06001Nice,France
h
Servicedediabe´tologie-endocrinologie,CHUdeRennes,CHUHoˆpitalSud,16,boulevarddeBulgarie,35056Rennes,France
i
Serviced’endocrinologie–maladiesme´taboliques,hoˆpitalSaint-Andre´,CHUdeBordeaux,1,rueJean-Burguet,33000Bordeaux,France
j
DepartmentofAnaesthesiaandCriticalCareII,MagellanMedico-SurgicalCenter,CHUdeBordeaux,33000Bordeaux,France
k
INSERM,UMR1034,BiologyofCardiovascularDiseases,universite´ Bordeaux,33600Pessac,France
l
Serviceendocrinologiediabe´tologie,CHUdeClermont-Ferrand,58,rueMontalembert,63000Clermont-Ferrand,France
mUFRme´decine,universite´ Clermont-Auvergne,28,placeHenri-Dunant,63000Clermont-Ferrand,France
nUMRCNRS6293,INSERMU1103,ge´ne´tiquereproductionetde´veloppement,universite´ Clermont-Auvergne,63170Aubie`re,France o
Endocrinologie-diabe´tologie,CHUG.Montpied,BP69,63003Clermont-Ferrand,France
ARTICLE INFO Articlehistory:
Availableonline17March2018 Keywords:
Diabetes Perioperative HbA1c Gastroparesis
Cardiacautonomicneuropathy Antidiabeticdrugs
ABSTRACT
Indiabeticpatientsundergoingsurgery,werecommendassessingglycaemiccontrolpreoperativelyby assessingglycatedhaemoglobin(HbA1c)levelsandrecentcapillarybloodsugar(glucose)levels,andto adjustanytreatmentsaccordinglybeforesurgery,payingparticularattentiontospecificcomplications ofdiabetes. Gastroparesiscreatesarisk ofstasis andaspiration ofgastriccontentat inductionof anaesthesiarequiringtheuseofarapidsequenceinductiontechnique.Cardiacinvolvementcanbe dividedintoseveraltypes.Coronarydiseaseischaracterisedbysilentmyocardialischaemia,presentin 30–50% of T2Dpatients. Diabetic cardiomyopathyis arealcause ofheart failure. Finally, cardiac autonomicneuropathy(CAN),althoughrarelysymptomatic,shouldbeinvestigatedbecauseitcausesan increasedriskofcardiovasculareventsandariskofsuddendeath.SeveralsignsaresuggestiveofCAN, andconfirmationcallsforcloseperioperativesurveillance.Chronicdiabetickidneydisease(diabetic nephropathy)aggravatestheriskofperioperativeacuterenalfailure,andwerecommendmeasurement of the glomerular filtration rate preoperatively. The final step of the consultation concerns the managementofantidiabetictherapy.Preoperativeglucoseinfusionisnotnecessaryifthepatientisnot receivinginsulin.Non-insulindrugsarenotadministeredonthemorningoftheinterventionexceptfor metformin,whichisnotadministeredfromtheeveningbefore.Theinsulinsareinjectedattheusual dosetheeveningbefore.Theinsulinpumpismaintaineduntilthepatientarrivesinthesurgicalunit.It shouldberememberedthatinsulindeficiencyinaT1Dpatientleadstoketoacidosiswithinafewhours.
C 2018TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierMassonSASonbehalfofSocie´te´ franc¸aised’anesthe´sieetde
re´animation(Sfar).ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/).
* Correspondingauthor.
E-mailaddress:dan.benhamou@aphp.fr(D.Benhamou).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2018.02.020
2352-5568/ C2018TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierMassonSASonbehalfofSocie´te´ franc¸aised’anesthe´sieetdere´animation(Sfar).Thisisanopenaccessarticleunderthe
1. Evaluationofglycaemiccontrolinadiabeticpatient
PracticalsheetBsummarisesthemainelementsofthistext.
Many studieshavebeencarriedoutindiabeticpatientsat
thetimeofsurgery,buttheyhavemainlybeeninterestedinthe
cardiovascular risk and not in the management of diabetes
itself. Glycaemic control is recommended before admission
accordingtoobjectivesadaptedtoeachpatient[1]inorderto
avoidhyperglycaemiaandhypoglycaemia.Glycaemic
variabil-ity should also be monitored during the hospital stay
[2]. Glycaemic variability is common due to fasting, stress,
developmentofinfection,useofglucocorticoids,etc.Glycaemic
controlisevaluatedduringtheanaesthesiaconsultationusing
twocriteria:(i)glycatedhaemoglobin(HbA1c);and(ii)blood
sugar (glucose) levels. Hypoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic
episodes should be treated because they may have harmful
preoperativeconsequences andmay leadto the intervention
beingpostponed.
Fig. 1 summarises the management that we recommend
depending on overall glycaemic control (HbA1c), blood sugar
levelsbeforesurgery,therecentdevelopmentofhypo-and
hyper-glycaemicepisodes,particularlythosewithassociatedketosis.
1.1. HbA1c
Inatreateddiabeticpatient,HbA1cwhichreflectsmeancontrol
over the previous 3months allows to estimate the quality of
glycaemic control before the consultation and adaptation of
treatmenttofixedobjectives[1].Somestudiesindicatethatraised
HbA1cin a diabeticpatient is associated withhigh morbidity/
mortalityandanincreasedriskofmyocardialinfarctionandearly
postoperativeinfection[3].Foreach1%increaseinHbA1c,therisk
increasesby40%[4].Theriskofsternalinfectionis5-foldhigher
(OR=5.3) when HbA1c level is greater than 7.8%. HbA1c>7%
appears to have a negative prognostic value in unrecognised
diabeticpatients[5].AcorrelationexistsbetweenHbA1candmean
bloodsugar levels(AppendixA). Itis wise topostponesurgery
(exceptinanemergencysituation) ifHbA1cisveryhigh(>9%)
becauseitdemonstratesalackofglycaemiccontrolandthepatient
is thus exposed to acute metabolic complications in the
perioperative period. Using the same reasoning, HbA1c<5%
indicatesprobablerecurrentseverehypoglycaemicepisodesina
patient treated withinsulin or hypoglycaemic sulphonamides/
glinidesandwealsorecommendpostponingsurgeryinthiscase
(Fig.1).
Therapeutic adjustments,after advicefroma general
practi-tioner(GP)oradiabetologist,shouldbediscussedforHbA1cvalues
between8%and9%(chronic,butnotthreatening,hyperglycaemia
requiring therapeutic reinforcement) or between 5% and 6%
(repeated hypoglycaemic episodes requiring to reduce the
intensityofantidiabetictherapy).
1.2. Recentbloodandcapillaryglycaemicvalues
Some studies have demonstrated a correlation between
glycaemiaatadmission(>2g/Lor11mmol/L)andpostoperative
morbidity/mortality [6–8], as well as a 10-fold higher risk of
complications when glycaemic imbalance exists before surgery
[9]. Measurement of blood sugar levels allows, for example,
stratificationoftheriskofsternalinfectionaftercardiacsurgery:a
bloodsugarlevel<1.80g/L(10mmol/L)beforetheintervention
decreasestheriskofdeath,infectionanddurationofstay[10].
Duringthepreoperativeconsultationandinthedays
immedi-ately precedingtheintervention,werecommend monitoring of
capillary blood sugar levels.A recentdisequilibrium (hyper- or
hypo-glycaemia)couldhaveaneffecton perioperative
manage-ment,evenifanadequateHbA1cvalueisobserved[11].Inthis
case, therelationHbA1c/mean blood sugar(AppendixA)isnot
applicable.
1.3. Identificationofepisodesofhypoglycaemia(sheetB)
Hypoglycaemiaisatherapeutichazardinalltreateddiabetics,
with the risk being particularly high in hospitalised diabetic
patients,duetomoresevereglycaemicvariations[12].Evenifthe
specificroleofanaesthesiaorsurgeryhasnotbeenestablished,
these situations of instability can contribute to anomalies in
glucose regulation,suchas hypoglycaemia.Hypoglycaemiais a
frequentconsequenceoftreatmentwithinsulinsecretors
(hypo-glycaemic sulphonamides/glinides) or insulin therapy (sheets E
andF).ItmainlyoccursinT1DpatientsbutalsoinT2Ddiabetics,at
anytime.
Thecut-offbloodsugarleveldefininghypoglycaemiahasbeen
thesubjectofdebate;neverthelesscurrentconsensussuggestsa
plasma bloodsugar levelof<0.7g/L (3.9mmol/L) ina diabetic
patient.Inpractice,forhealthcareteams,anyunexplainedmalaise
in a diabeticpatient shouldbe considered as a hypoglycaemic
episodeuntilprovenotherwise,evenifthebloodsugarlevelatthe
timeitismeasured(sometimesseveralminutesafterthestartof
the malaise) appears to be normal. Serious hypoglycaemia is
definedbytheneedforassistanceofanotherperson,whateverthe
bloodsugarlevel.Somehypoglycaemicepisodesarenotaseasily
apparent, particularly when hypoglycaemia occurs frequently,
diabetesisalreadyalong-lastingdiseaseorwhendysautonomiais
present.Thissituationoccursinnearly40%ofT1Dpatients,10%of
T2DpatientsoninsulinandoccasionallyinT2Dpatientsonoral
antidiabeticdrugs[13].
Episodesofhypoglycaemiaresultfromanimbalancebetween
insufficient carbohydrate supply and poorly adapted insulin or
insulin-secretor treatment. These situations are particularly
frequentintheperioperativeperiod,forexampleduetoprolonged
fastingorirregularfoodintake.Itisnecessarytobevigilantabout
theadministrationofdrugs,whichhaveadirect hypoglycaemic
effectorthosewhichincreasetheactionoforalantidiabeticdrugs
(forexamplequinolones, heparin,
b
-blockersortrimethoprime-sulfamethoxazole).Deteriorationofrenalorhepaticfunctionmay
decreasetheclearanceofantidiabeticdrugsandincreasetheriskof
hypoglycaemia.
1.4. Identificationofrecentepisodesofhyperglycaemiaandketosis
(sheetB)
Ifglycaemicdisequilibriumisdetectedduringtheanaesthesia
consultation(basedonHbA1c),therapeuticadjustmentshouldbe
considered.ForexampleinT2Dpatientsonoralantidiabeticdrugs,
intensificationoftreatmentshouldbeconsidered.Therearemany
therapeutic strategies that can be considered, including those
establishedinFrancebytheHauteAutorite´ deSante´[1],andalsoby
internationalsocieties[14],validatedbytheFrenchSocietyforthe
studyof Diabetes(SFD).Intensification ofhypoglycaemic
treat-ment should be personalised and validated on by an expert
prescriber.
InT2DandT1Dpatientstreatedwithinsulin,thetimesatwhich
hyperglycaemiaoccursshouldbeassessedusingan
auto-surveil-lance booklet and the doses of insulin should be modified
accordingly.Ifnecessary,insulintherapy(transientorpermanent)
maybeproposed,particularlyifketosisisdetected.
2. Specificcomplicationsofdiabetes(sheetB)
Indiabeticpatients,theperioperativeriskmaybeincreasedby
gastroparesisand/orheartdiseaseand/orkidneydisease.
2.1. Gastroparesis
Thisdiabeticcomplicationisthemostfrequentmanifestation
ofdigestivedysautonomia,definedasdelayedgastricemptying
in the absence of mechanical obstruction. It usually affects
diabetic patients with other neuropathic diseases, affecting
30–50% of patients with T1D or T2D. Symptoms classically
includeanorexia,nausea,vomiting,abdominalpain,sensationof
bloating,earlysatietyorslowingofdigestion[15].Itmayhave
adverserepercussionsontheabsorptionofdrugsadministered
by mouth. However, there is a weak correlation between
symptomsandthe rate ofgastricemptying.Inmany diabetic
patients,gastricemptyingisevenacceleratedalthoughpatients
present with similar symptoms. Finally, some patients have
symptoms without abnormalgastric emptying. Gastroparesis
may be a factor for post-prandial glycaemic dysregulation.
Furthermore,acutehyperglycaemiaslowsdowngastric
empty-ing.Thereisthereforeareciprocalinterrelationbetweengastric
emptyingandglycaemia[16].Clinicalexaminationmayreveal
abdominal distension with classic ‘clapotement’ onan empty
stomach, a late sign of gastroparesis. Upper gastro-intestinal
endoscopy isusedasthe first-line non-clinicalassessment.It
helpstoeliminateothercausesofupperdigestivesymptomsand
torevealthe presenceoffood remaininginthestomachafter
nightfasting.Abariummealmayrevealgastricresidueoreven
phytobezoards.Thereferencediagnosticexaminationisgastric
scintigraphy carried out using a calibrated meal, preferably
solid, labelledwithtechnetium99m[15].Othertestsmaybe
proposed such as the respiratory test for carbon 13-labelled
octanoicacid.
During theanaesthesiaconsultation,gastroparesisshouldbe
investigatedbecauseitcreatesariskofstasis(fullstomach)and
aspirationatanaestheticinduction.Ataminimum,questioningof
thediabeticduringtheanaesthesiaconsultationshouldfocuson
theclassic clinicalmanifestations ofgastroparesis (sheetB and
Fig. 2). If clinicalsigns suggestive of gastroparesis are present,
measurement of the gastric antral area by ultrasound can
distinguishwhetherthestomachisfullornot[17].Echography
canalsovisualisesolidresidues.Incaseofdoubt,rapidsequence
inductionshouldbecarried out.Erythromycinand
metoclopra-mide, which can help accelerategastric motility,may be used
[18,19].
Fig.2.Preoperativeassessmentofthespecificcomplicationsofdiabetes.PH:previoushistory;UB:urinestrip;ECG:electrocardiogram;HR:heartrate;HRV:heartrate variability;MI:myocardialinfarction;SMI:silentmyocardialinfarction;MET:metabolicequivalent;ABP:arterialpressure.
2.2. Effectsofdiabetesontheheart
2.2.1. Cardiovascularriskofdiabetes
Approximately75%ofdiabeticpatientsdiefromcomplications
ofatherosclerosis.However, thedegreeof cardiovascularriskis
heterogeneous within the diabetic population, linked to
co-existingriskfactorssuchasarterialhypertension,lipid
abnormali-ties,smoking,familialhistory of earlycardiovascularproblems,
andalsotospecificfactorssuchasglycaemiccontrol,theduration
of diabetes and presence of nephropathy in particular.
Micro-albuminuriaisassociatedwithanincreasedcardiovascularriskin
bothT1DandT2D,andtheriskisevengreaterinthepresenceof
macroproteinuriaor renal failure [20]. The presence ofarterial
damageinoneareaisclearlyassociatedwithanincreasedriskthat
arteriopathicdamagealsoexistselsewhere.
2.2.2. Heartdisease
Heart diseasehasseveral characteristicsindiabeticpatients.
Myocardial infarction is usually silent and silent myocardial
ischaemia (SMI)can befoundin 30–50%of asymptomaticT2D
patients who have no cardiac history but who present with
cardiovascularriskfactors[20,21].Itsnegativeprognosticvalue
hasbeendemonstrated[22–24].InvestigationsforSMIarebased
onprovocationtests(exercisetolerancetest,myocardial
scintig-raphywithexerciseand/oradministrationofdipyridamole,stress
echographyoreven stressmagneticresonance imaging).IfSMI
detectionisfollowedbycoronarography,thisexaminationreveals
significantcoronarystenosisin30–70%ofpatients[20].Detection
ofheartdiseaseappearslogicaltopreventcardiacevents,butit
shouldbereservedforpatientswithaveryhighcardiovascularrisk
[20]. Measurement of the coronary calcium score by CT scan
(withoutinjectionof iodinatedproduct) contributestoevaluate
thecardiovascularrisk;ascoreof>400Agastonunitsisassociated
witha worse prognosisanda highprevalence ofSMI [25]and
shouldleadtoinvestigationsforSMI[20].However,itshouldbe
noted that many rigorousstudies have shown that systematic
coronaryrevascularisationbeforenon-cardiacsurgeryisnotuseful
toreducetherateofpostoperativemyocardialischemicepisodes
[26].Conversely,repeatedperioperativemeasurementoftroponin,
associatedwith ECG,allows to detectperioperativemyocardial
damageandhelpstoinitiatecardiovasculartreatment[27].
2.2.3. Heartfailure
Theriskofcongestiveheartfailure(CHF)is2–3-foldhigherin
diabeticpatients.Age,durationofdiabetes,heartdiseaseandthe
presenceofalbuminuriaareallassociatedwithanincreasedriskof
heartfailure[28].Althoughheartdiseaseandarterialhypertension
arethemainfactorsresponsibleforCHF,diabeticcardiomyopathy
is a well-established clinical entityand a provencause of CHF
[29].MortalityafterafirstepisodeofCHFis10-timeshigherinT2D
patients than in non-diabeticpatients. Atthe preclinicalstage,
structural and functional alterations of the left ventricle are
frequentlysuspectedontheECGinrelationtodiabetic
cardiomy-opathyandmightbeobservedevenintheabsenceofheartdisease
orhypertension.Leftventricularhypertrophyisoftenpresent,but
diastolicorsystolicdysfunctionmightalsobeobserved[30].
Mea-surementofbrainnatriureticpeptide(BNP)orpro-BNPlevelshas
goodsensitivitytodetectdiastolicorsystolicdysfunctionatthe
preclinicalstage[31].
2.2.4. Cardiacautonomyneuropathy(CAN)(AppendixB)
The dysautonomic cardiaccomplicationof diabetes israrely
expressed by clinical symptoms: permanent tachycardia and
orthostatichypotensioninparticular(whichisofteniatrogenicin
origin),post-prandialhypotensionorseverehypoglycaemiaswith
noeffects.ThesearesymptomsofsevereCAN.Attheinfra-clinical
stage,themostfrequentcomplicationsofCANincludeanomalies
of heart rate(HR) at baseline and abnormal variability during
standardisedtests.Theprevalenceoftheseabnormalitiesincreases
withthedurationofdiabetesand ifglycaemicdisequilibriumis
long-lasting [32]. In a French multicentre study, confirmed or
severeCANdefinedbytwoorthreetestsassessingvariationsinHR,
was present in 20% of patients and CAN was significantly
associatedwiththepresenceofmicroangiopathiccomplications
[33].TheriskslinkedtoCANincludemyocardialinfarction(MI),
which is painless or discovered only on a systematic ECG, an
increaseincardiovasculareventsandanincreaseinmortality.The
riskofsuddendeathsecondarytoseriouscardiacrhythmdisorders
shouldbenoted[32,34].Amongmechanismsimplicatedarethe
absenceofanocturnalfallinbloodpressure(non-dippingtypeor
evenreversedipping)duringambulatorybloodpressure
measu-rements,alterationsinventricularrepolarisationwithlengthening
oftheQTcinterval(>440ms)andtheco-existenceofSMI[32,35].
ThedetectionofCANattheinfra-clinicalstageisbasedonan
analysis of variationsin HR during standardisedtests for deep
respiration, active orthostatism and the Valsalva manoeuvre
[32].Thesetestsareusually carriedout witha simple ECGbut
shouldbeinterpretedasafunctionofage(duetothephysiological
reductioninHRvariabilitywithage).Althoughthesetestsarequite
easy to perform, they take time and manual calculation is
necessary, making their use limited outside a specialised
consultation,unlessasoftwareprogrammeisused.Variationsof
HRessentiallybutnon-specificallyrevealparasympatheticheart
damage. Current recommendations suggest carrying out these
testsinT1Dpatientswithknowndiseaseforatleast5yearsandin
allT2Dpatients,particularlyifmicroangiopathiccomplicationsof
diabetesexist[36].CANisgradedaccordingtotheresultofthese
tests[32].
If CAN is detected, drugs that may induce orthostatic
hypotension should be avoided, ambulatory measurement of
bloodpressureshouldbecarriedouttolookfornocturnal
non-dippingpatterns andthe QTinterval shouldbemeasured on a
standard ECG (at minimum). If it is prolonged, problems with
paroxysmalventricularrhythmshouldbedetectedby24-hECG
continuousmonitoring[32].
Anaesthesia, whether general (GA) or regional (RA), has
pronouncedeffectson perioperative sympatheticnervoustone
[37].Manyclinicalinvestigationshaveevaluatedtheinfluenceof
IV anaestheticagents onperipheralautonomicnervousinflux.
Microneurographyallowstoassesssympatheticnervousactivity
inlowerlimbmusclesbyplacingelectrodesintheperonealnerve
[37].StudieshavealsoassessedtheeffectsofRAonautonomic
nervoustone.Whateverthetypeofneuraxialanaesthesiaused,
spinalblockorepidural,theauthorsreportasignificantdecrease
insympatheticnervousinflux[38,39].Ithasalsobeenshownthat
postoperativeepiduraladministrationofmorphineafter
abdom-inal aortic surgery decreases postoperative hypertension by
reducingsympathetichyperactivity[40].Inthediabeticpatient,
andinthecaseofmetabolicsyndrome,peripheralsympathetic
hyperactivityoccurs[41].Interactionsbetweenanaesthesiaand
CAN leadtoan increasedriskof perioperative haemodynamic
instabilityalthoughmechanismsareunclear.Indiabeticpatients,
apreoperativedecreaseinrespiratoryHRvariability(respiratory
sinus arrhythmia) is associated with a risk of perioperative
haemodynamicinstability[42,43].Someauthorshavereported
that perioperative requirement for vasopressor support is
correlatedwiththedegreeofdysautonomia[44,45].Withregard
to its influence on perioperative haemodynamics, it is not
surprising to observe that perioperative dysautonomia has a
postoperative prognosticimpactonthediabeticpatientin the
long-term[44].Preoperativeevaluationofdiabeticpatientsusing
appears useful to identify patients at risk of perioperative
haemodynamicinstabilityandof cardiovascularcomplications
despitetheabsenceofclinicalsymptomsofCAN[32,44].Diabetic
patients suffering from dysautonomia also have a decreased
ventilatoryresponsetohypoxaemiaandhypercapnia[46]andto
perioperativehypothermia[47].Inthesepatients,more
sophisti-catedhaemodynamicmonitoringincluding a continuous
mea-surement of arterial pressure and cardiac index can be
recommended[48].
2.2.5. Cardiovascularassessmentattheanaesthesiaconsultation
Specificmanagementofapatientwithcoronaryarterydisease
undergoingnon-cardiacsurgeryhavebeendescribedindepthin
the2011SFAR/SFCGuidelines[49].Thepresentreportsummarises
theminimalcardiovascularassessmentandthepossibleadditional
assessmentsthatshouldbedoneinthediabeticpatient.
Questioningthepatientwilldetermine:
ifthepatientishypertensive;
ifthereisanycardiovascularhistory,inparticulartheexistence
ofheartdisease,cardiacischaemia(CI),arrhythmia,
cerebrovas-cularaccidentorlowerlimbsarteriopathy;
ifthepatientisunderthecareofacardiologist;
ifthepatienthasalready undergonecoronary,supra-aorticor
peripheralvascularrevascularisation;
if there are recent symptoms of angina, these may appear
atypicalormildsuchasdyspnoeaorexerciseepigastricpain,i.e.
symptoms suggesting cardiac ischaemia or of peripheral
arteriopathy,symptomssuggestingorthostaticorpost-prandial
hypotension,episodesofseriousunfelthypoglycaemia;
currenttreatments.
Theresultsofearlierinvestigationsareexamined:mostrecent
ECGavailable,echocardiogram,arterialecho-Doppler,
investiga-tions made to detect SMI. A meticulousclinical cardiovascular
examinationiscarriedout.Orthostatichypotensionis
investigat-ed.Criticalischaemiaofthelowerlimbsisruledout.ECGisdone
againifthelastonehadbeencarriedoutseveralmonthsagoand
searches for signs of ischaemia or even SMI, tachycardia,
arrhythmia, prolonged QTc interval. Measurement of BNP or
pro-BNPlevels,oranimmediateECGmaybeprescribedinthecase
ofpossiblecardiacischaemia.
InvestigationsforSMIarethereforerecommendedinpatients
scheduledformajorsurgeryiftheLee(revisedcardiacriskindex)
scoreis2andiffunctionalcapacityis<4metabolicequivalents
(METs).Thepatientwillbereferredtoacardiologistforspecific
managementandfortestsforischaemia(sheetBandFig.2).Ifthe
patienthasno history nor anycoronarysymptoms, and in the
absenceofaspecificanomalyonECG,asilentheartdiseaseshould
be suspected in patients with a high cardiovascular risk, in
particular in the presence of other arterial damage, macro
proteinuria, renal failureand when thecoronary calciumscore
is>400Agastonunits[20].
WhenCANis suspectedduetothepresenceofsymptomsor
complications(permanenttachycardia,QTc>440ms,MIorSMI,
orthostatic or post-prandial hypotension, serious unfelt
hypo-glycaemia, absence of nocturnal decrease in blood pressure,
unexplained), it should be confirmed by tests analysing HR
variations. These tests should also be used to investigate CAN
when microangiopathic complications exist. The procedure
proposed includes theanalysis of HR variations during a deep
respiration test and a test for orthostatism (Appendix B). The
presenceofCAN,whenconfirmedbytwoabnormaltestsorwhen
symptomatic or complicated, should lead to intra- and
post-operativemonitoring (ina highdependency unit)(sheet Band
Fig.2).
2.3. Diabeticnephropathy
2.3.1. Epidemiology
Diabeticnephropathy(DN)isoneofthemostfrequentmicro
vascular complicationsof diabetes.Itoccursin30% ofT1D and
approximately 20% of T2D patients [50–52]. However, the
frequencyof thiscomplicationhasplateauedorevendecreased
overthepastfewyearsinsomecountriesduetoearlierandmore
appropriatemanagement[53,54].IntheUSA,therelativeriskof
DNhasdecreasedbyone-half(13.7to6.1%)in20years[55].The
riskfactorsforDNarewellknown:malesex,SouthAsianor
Afro-Caribbeanethnicityandprolongedevolutionofdiabetes.DNisthe
mostfrequentcause ofend-stage renalfailure,affecting45% of
individualswithrenalfailureintheUSA.Twenty-fourto50%of
patients receiving dialysis are diabetics with end-stage renal
failure [52].Theincidenceof end-stagerenal failureindiabetic
patients hasgreatly increased compared to non-diabetics with
renal failure [51,56]. This progression classically occurs more
frequentlyinapatientwithadvancedT1D;itisoftenassociated
with neuropathy and diabetic retinopathy (revealing micro
vascular complications) [50,51]. However, recent studies show
thatprogressionofDNtowardsend-stagerenalfailureappearsto
becomparableforthetwotypesofdiabetesandthatithasslowed
down overthepastfewyears:4to15%in20yearsand16% in
30years.TheriskfactorsforprogressionofDNtoend-stagerenal
failurearethefollowing[57]:raisedHbA1c,raisedbloodpressure,
presence ofalbuminuria, earlydecreasein glomerularfiltration
rate(GFR),age,durationofdiabetesandraisedlevelofuricacid.
DNincreasestheriskofmortalitywhateverthetypeofdiabetes
(relativerisk40–100-timeshigherthaninnon-diabetics)[51].In
theUK,themortalityrateofdiabeticpatientsbetween18and
44-yearsofage,ondialysis,reaches30%in5yearscomparedto11%in
dialysednon-diabeticpatients.Itisalsoamajorindependentrisk
factorforcardiovascularcomplications,atherosclerosisandinsulin
resistance,fullyjustifyingitsprevention[52,58].
2.3.2. Physiopathologyanddiagnosis
The physiopathological concept of DN and its management
have evolved greatly over the past few years, explaining the
reduction in its incidence and its consequences in terms of
morbidity/mortality. Untilthe start of thelast decade,DN was
considered tobecharacterisedbylesionsofnodular
glomerulo-sclerosisand progressingtowardsrenalfailure classifiedin five
stages of increasing severity based on GFR values (Fig. 3)
[50,51,59].Theclinicaldiagnosisdependsontheclassicaltrioof
microalbuminuria,arterialhypertensionandrenaldysfunction(of
variable severity). Histopathological data have advanced this
conceptandthetermDNhasbeenreplacedbydiabeticchronic
kidneydisease(DCKD).Alongsidetheclassicglomerulosclerosis,
therenallesionsobservedduringdiabetesmayaffectthetubules,
therenal interstitialtissueandthevessels[60].Thus, although
microalbuminuriaisthemostfrequentbiological anomaly,it is
notconstant(becauseitonlyrevealsglomerulardamage)anddoes
notnecessarilyreflecttheseverityofrenaldysfunction.There is
indeednocorrelationbetweenGFRandmicroalbuminuria,now
namedmoderatelyincreasedalbuminuria(valuesbetween30and
300mg/g).
The pathogenic mechanisms of diabetic kidney lesions are
complexandarelinkedtoanomaliesotherthanhyperglycaemia.
Glomerulosclerosis ismainly induced by hyperglycaemia,which
triggersmesangialexpansionandtubularhypertrophywithcellular
oedemaresponsible forinitialglomerular hyperfiltration.These
modifications resultinlocalactivation ofthe
renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with glomerular efferent arteriolar
vasocon-striction [51,57,58]. This reaction triggers many pathways of
production, oxidative stress, growth factors, etc. The structural
modifications which result include thinning of the basement
membrane,alterationofpodocytesandmesangialhyperplasia[58].
Measurementoftherenalexcretionrateofalbumin
(albumin-uria)ina24-hurinesamplehasbeenthe‘‘goldstandard’’forthe
earlydiagnosisofDNformanyyears.However,thisparameteris
unreliable and is affected by sampling conditions with an
appreciable intra-individual variability. Furthermore, this simple
measure,revealingtubularlesions,doesnotreflecttheseverityof
renaldysfunctionmeasuredbyGFR.Thereisnorelationbetweenthe
progressionofalbuminuriaandthedecreaseinGFR.Thus,apositive
diagnosisandtheseverityofDCKDisbasedonnew
recommenda-tions[61].Theratioofalbuminuriatourinarycreatinine(ACR)and
GFRallow the classification of DCKD. There are threestages of
increasingseverityofACR:stageA2(ACRbetween30and300mg/g)
corresponds to moderately high albuminuria previously termed
microalbuminuria.ThedecreaseinGFRisdefinedbyfivestagesof
increasingseverity(G1toG5)(Fig.3).Itisadvisedtomeasurethe
ACRandtheestimatedGFRononeurinesampleratherthanon24-h
urinesandtoperformatleast2or3measurementsin6monthsto
confirmthediagnosis[62].AlthoughtheestimatedGFRisusually
based on the MDRD formula, other formulae are also reliable
(CockroftandGault,CKD-EPI).Nevertheless,theyallunderestimate
theGFRforsubnormalrenalfunction(GFR90mL/min)[62].The
stagesA1/G1andA1/G2areconsideredstableandshouldleadto
annual measurements. For all the other stages, the risk of
progressiontowardchronicrenalfailureincreases,aswellasthe
cardiovascular risk. Follow-up with biological control should be
carriedout2–4timesa year asafunction ofseverity.Theearly
diagnosis and follow-up of DCKD should be facilitated by the
measurementofurinarybiomarkers.Theseareproteinsotherthan
albuminsuchascystatinC,
b
2-microglobulin,a
-1microglobulin,immunoglobulin G, transferrin, nephrin and metalloproteins,all
indicators of tubular or glomerular lesions. Even though some
studieshaveshownthatthesebiomarkersaremoresensitiveand
specific for the diagnosis of DCKD, their usefulness in clinical
practiceremainstobedemonstrated.
Prevention and management of DCKD are currently well
codified. Many studies have shown that they depend on
multimodalmanagement,whichslowsdown theprogressionof
DCKDandreducesthecardiovascularcomplicationsandmortality
of these patients [51,58]. The two main objectives of this
management are the administration of antihypertensive
treat-ments and closer control of glycaemia. All antihypertensive
treatments havedemonstrated efficacy(
b
-blockers,a
-blockers,diuretics,hydralazine).However,blockersofthe
renin-angioten-sin-aldosteronesystemhavethegreatestefficacy.Thus,
angioten-sinconvertingenzymeinhibitors(ACEinhibitors)andangiotensin
antagonists(sartans)decreasemortality,slowdownthe
progres-sionof DCKD toend-stage renal failure and reduceglomerular
hyper filtration and its consequences. It is not currently
recommendedtocombineACEinhibitorswithsartansandthere
isnoproofofsuperiorefficacyofthiscombination[50,51,62].The
initiationoftreatment withACEinhibitorsor sartansis
recom-mended from stage A2 moderate albuminuria and strongly
recommendedincaseofseverealbuminuria(A3)and/orestimate
GFR<60mL/min/1.73m2 [63,64].These agentsare also
recom-mendedindiabeticpatientssufferingfromarterialhypertension.
No randomised study has been carried out to determine the
optimum arterial pressure cut-off value in these patients.
However, experts recommend to maintain arterial pressure at
lessthan140/85–90mmHg[20,64–66].Thesecond-linetherapy
forDCKDiscontrolofglycaemiaanditsefficacyonmicrovascular
complications has been widely established. Thus, the current
recommendationsadvisemaintainingHbA1c7%[64,67].Control
ofhyperlipidaemia isalsoimportant,reducing albuminuriaand
slowing down the decrease in GFR. This is carried out by
preferentialadministrationofstatins[51].Earlyrenal
transplan-tation before carrying out dialysis may also contribute to an
improvementinmorbiditylinkedtoDCKD.
2.3.3. ImpactofDCKDonanaesthesia
Diabetesisanindependentriskfactorforthedevelopmentof
acuterenalfailureintheperioperativeperiod.Thismaydevelopin
theabsenceofpreviousrenaldysfunctionorinpatientswithDCKD.
Postoperatively,thepresenceofDCKDincreasesthisrisk[68].The
perioperativeevaluationofACRandGFRisessentialduringmajor
surgery, as a matterof urgencyor if the patient presents with
diabeticinstabilityorpoorlycontrolledglycaemia.TheGFRcanbe
estimated usingclassicformulae (MDRD, CKD-EPI,Cockroft and
Fig.3.Evaluationofdiabeticchronickidneydisease(DCKD)anditsseverityusingtwoparameters:albumin/creatinineclearanceratio(ACR)andglomerularfiltrationrate (GFR)[61,62].InstagesA1/G1andA1/G2,thediseaseisstable.Theotherstages,1–4,indicateanincreaseinriskofprogressiontoend-stagerenalfailure.
Gault)ifthepatientisstablebutitshouldalsobemeasuredinother
situations.TheperioperativemanagementofDCKDisnotspecific.It
isnecessarytoavoidtheadministrationofnephrotoxicagentsor
drugs in the perioperative period. Haemodynamic optimisation
aims for a mean arterial pressure between 60 and 70mmHg
and>70mmHgifthe patientis hypertensive,tomaintain renal
perfusionpressure.Toachievethisobjective,itisrecommendedto
carryouthaemodynamicmonitoringinordertoevaluatethestroke
volume to guide vascular filling and the administration of
vasopressorsduringsurgicalproceduresassociatedwithariskof
haemodynamicinstability(haemorrhagicsurgery,majorsurgeryor
emergencysurgery)[68].Allotherstrategiesarenon-specificand
shouldfollowtherecommendationsforthemanagementofacute
renalfailure[68].Administrationofanaestheticagentsshouldtake
intoaccountthepharmacokineticandpharmacodynamic
modifi-cations resulting from chronic renal failure without particular
specificityinrelationtodiabetes.
3. Treatmentmanagement(sheetB)
3.1. Metformin(sheetsBandE)
Theefficacyofmetforminonglycaemiccontrolandreductionof
mortality and complications was demonstrated in the UKPDS
study [69]and confirmed in the meta-analysis of Selvin et al.
[70].ThisbeneficialeffectwasalsoobservedintheREACHregistry
in patients with moderate renal failure (creatinine clearance
between 30 and 60mL/min) or a history of heart failure (HF),
whichareclassiccontraindicationstoitsuse[71].Inthestudyof
Duncanetal.,postoperativecomplicationswereidentical
what-everthetreatmentused(metforminornot)[72].These
observa-tions have led to the restriction of contraindications and the
prescriptionofmetforminasfirst-linetherapyinT2D.
Howevertheriskoflacticacidosis,whosemaincauseisrenal
failure,shouldnotbeforgotten.Theincidenceofthiscomplication
is2–9/100,000patients/yearanditsmortalityraterangesfrom30–
50%.In France, the numberof casesof lactic acidosis linked to
metforminincreasedfrom10to72 peryearbetween2005and
2010:inmostcases,patientswereelderly(68%were>65years)
andtookahighdoseofmetformin(meanof2600mg/day).Analysis
of cases alsoshowed acute renal failure in almost all patients.
Progressiontowarddeathwasobservedin20%ofcases[73].
However,publishedstudiesarecontradictory:somehavefound
nocase[74,75]whileothershavefounditonlyinthepresenceof
risk factors [76]. Some authors have even reported a better
cardiovascularprognosisinpatientswithHF[77,78].Incontrast,
other studies have reported very severecases, but these were
alwaysduetotheuntimelyprescriptionofmetformin(severerenal
or heart failure)[79].It is thereforeimportant to lookfor risk
factorsbeforecarryingoutsurgery:
renalfailure(creatinineclearance<60mL/min);
administrationofiodinatedcontrastagents;
situationsthatcouldalterrenalfunction:dehydration,fastingor
medicaltreatments(ACEinhibitorsandsartans,diuretics,
non-steroidalanti-inflammatorydrugs(NSAIDs);
severeHF(leftventricularejectionfraction<30%);
Thepresenceoftheseriskfactorsalsomeansthatmetformin
shouldnotberestartedtooquicklyinthepostoperativeperiod.
Inpractice,werecommend:
stopmetforminthenightbefore;
donotrestartbefore48hformajorsurgeryandafterassuring
adequaterenalfunction;
donotstopincase ofminororambulatorysurgeryexceptif
thereissevererenalfailure.
3.2. Othernon-insulindrugs(sheetsBandE)
Theothernon-insulintreatmentsfordiabetesarenottakenon
themorningofminorormajorsurgeryandarecontinuedinthe
case ofambulatorysurgery. Hypoglycaemicsulphonamides and
glinides may cause hypoglycaemia. Taking these medications
beforeemergencysurgerymeansthataglucoseinfusionshouldbe
setupifthepatientremainswithanemptystomach.Thisisnotthe
casewiththeothernon-insulindrugs.
3.3. Insulins(sheetsBandF)
3.3.1. Subcutaneous(SC)injections
In T1D, basal insulin should never be stopped, whether
administered as one or two injections, due to the risk of
ketoacidosis.
3.3.2. Particularcaseofinsulinpump(sheetH)
Themainriskduringtheperioperativeperiodisketoacidosisin
T1D patients if continuation of insulin is not immediate after
stopping thepump (SCinjection by thebasal-bolus scheme or
continuousintravenousinsulininfusion).
Inthepreoperativeperiod,andwithpatientquestioning,itis
necessary to gain an understanding of ‘‘total basal delivery’’,
allowing the prescription of an analogue of long-acting (slow)
insulinifthepumpisstopped;ortonotethereplacementscheme,
whichshouldbeknownbythepatient(doseoflong-acting(slow)
insulinifthepumpisstopped).
Inthecaseofambulatorysurgeryorsurgeryofshortduration,
it is necessary to retain the pump which will continue to
administer the basal delivery (for example, patients on
long-acting(slow)insulinwhodonotstoptheirinsulinduringthese
types of surgery). Correction of hyperglycaemia during the
procedurewillbecarriedoutusingacorrectivebolus
adminis-teredbySCinjectionofanultra-rapidanaloguefollowinga
basal-bolusprotocol(sheetsLandQ).
4. Fasting
Ifthepatientneedstobeleftwithanemptystomachwhilehe/
sheistreatedwithinsulin,werecommendsettingupaglucose
infusion (from 7.00 a.m.) which is stopped if blood glucose
is>16.5mmol/L (sheetsG, H, K, L). Taking sulphonamides or
glinides before emergency surgery also requires a glucose
infusionif thepatient remainswith anempty stomach.If the
patientdoesnotuseinsulin,itisnotnecessarytoadministera
glucosesolution.
5. Choiceofagentsandanaesthesiatechniques
5.1. Agents
To date, there is no proof that any anaesthetic agent is
associatedabetteroutcomeindiabeticpatients.
5.2. Techniques
Inparticular,thereisnoproofthatGAprovidesbetterresults
thanRAindiabeticpatients,evenifRAisassociatedwithaslight
increase in glycaemia preoperatively. Spinal and epidural
toahaemodynamicrisk.ThechoicebetweenGAandRAwillbe
madeasfor anyotherpatient.Peripheralnerveblocksare not
contraindicatedindiabeticpatients[80–82]buttheyshouldbe
carriedout after takingand recordingin the patient’s records
severalprecautions,whichare moreimportantthanin a
non-diabeticpatient:preoperativeclinicalexaminationwith
investi-gationsforsignsofdysautonomiaandpre-existing
polyneuropa-thy.
5.3. Investigationsfordifficultintubation
Preoperativeassessmentofrisksatintubationshouldbeclearly
specified because tracheal intubation may be difficult due to
densification of the periarticular collagen structures of the
temporomandibularand atlanto-occipital joints.Asthese
meta-boliccollagendisorders(non-enzymaticglycosylationand
anom-alies of metabolism) simultaneously affect the interphalangeal
joints,itisusuallyadvisedtoevaluatethedifficultiesintracheal
intubationusingthepalmprinttest inpatients withlong-term
diabetes.
Disclosureofinterest
Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhavenocompetinginterest.
The members of the working party have received support
from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Medicine(SFAR)andtheFrenchSocietyfortheStudyofDiabetes
(SFD)fortransportandaccommodationwhennecessary.Thetwo
nationalbodieshavealsoprovidedhonorariafortranslationof
thetexts.
AppendixA
EquivalencebetweenbloodglucoselevelsandHbA1c
ThereisadirectcorrelationbetweenHbA1clevelin%andmean
glycaemia over the previous 3months [11], according to the
formula:
Meanglycaemiag/L=[(28.7THbA1c%)–46.7]/100,or
Meanglycaemiammol/L=(1.5944THbA1c%)–2.5944
The table below shows the corresponding values for the
standardvaluesofHbA1c.
HbA1c Meanbloodglucoselevel
% g/L mmol/L 5 0.97[0.76–1.20] 5.4[4.2–6.7] 6 1.26[1.00–1.52] 7.0[5.5–8.5] 7 1.54[1.23–1.85] 8.6[6.8–10.3] 8 1.83[1.47–2.17] 10.2[8.1–12.1] 9 2.12[1.70–2.49] 11.8[9.4–13.9] 10 2.40[1.93–2.82] 13.4[10.7–15.7] 11 2.69[2.17–3.14] 14.9[12.0–17.5] 12 2.98[2.40–3.47] 16.5[13.3–19.3]
Thevaluesinbrackets[]arethecorresponding95%confidence
intervals.
AppendixB
Investigationsandgradingofcardiacautonomyneuropathyin
theanaesthesiaconsultation.
1.Investigationsfororthostatichypotension:
Measurebloodpressureafter10minofdecubitusandthen1,
2and3minafterchangingtoorthostatism.Orthostatic
hypoten-sionisdefinedbyadecreaseinsystolicbloodpressureofatleast
20mmHg(30mmHginhypertensivepatients)and/orofdiastolic
bloodpressureofatleast10mmHginorthostatism.Intheabsence
ofanyiatrogenicfactor,hypovolaemiaandanaemia,itspresenceis
indicativeofserioussympatheticdysautonomicdamage.
2.Testsexploringthecardio-vagalchangesinheartrate(HR):
Thesetestsshouldbeperformedatrestandlongaftercoffeeor
tobaccoconsumption.
Deep respiration tests: the patient is placed in decubitus
positionandshouldtrainbeforehandtothistypeofrespiration.
Thepatientisaskedtoperformsixcyclesofdeeprespirationin
1min:duringeachcycle,thepatientisstimulatedtoinspire(for
5 sec) and then expire (for 5 sec) deeply. ECG is recorded
continuouslyduringthetestandthebeginningofbothinspiration
(I)andexpiration(E)aremarkedonthetracing.
Physiologically,HRincreasesoninspiration(i.e.RRdecreases)
anddecreasesonexpiration(i.e.RRincreases).TheRR-Emaximum
andRR-Iminimumaremeasuredforeachcycle.TheratioRR-E/
RR-Iiscalculatedforeachcycle.
Forexample:2.3/2.1forthefirstcycle(1.0952=1.10).
Replace2.1or2.3squaresby21mmor23mm
Themeanoftheratiosfor6respiratorycyclescanbecalculated.
Forexample:(1.10+1.21+1.11+1.09+1.26+1.15)/6=1.15
Correlations (discontinuous line) between the RR ratio
duringthedeeprespirationtestandageforhealthysubjects.
Resultsforthepatientareanalysedbypositioningthemonthe
graph.Theyareabnormalifbelowthelineforthe5thpercentile
(continuousline)[83].Theresultisnormalifitisonorbelowthe
thickline.Forexample,thetestisnormalforapatient40yearof
agebutnotforayoungerpatient.
Orthostatictest:
After10minofdecubitus,thepatientstandsupquickly.The
ECGisrecordedcontinuouslybeforerisingandduringtheminute
following change to the standing position. The HR normally
increasesinthefirstsecondsfollowingpassagetoorthostatismto
reachitsmaximumtowardsthe15thsecond,thenslowsdownand
reachesit minimalvaluetowardsthe30thsecond.Theresultis
expressedbytheratioRR30/RR15.
Correlations (discontinuous line) between the RR ratio
duringtheorthostatictestandageinhealthysubjects.
Theresultsforthepatientareanalysedbypositioningthemon
thegraph.Theyareabnormalifbelowthelineforthe5thpercentile
(continuousbold line)[83].Inourexample,RR30/RR15=3.9/
3.3=1.18.Thisresultisthenprojectedonthecurveasafunctionof
age,forinterpretation.
3.Practicalprocedureproposed
Thepatientplaceshim/herselfindecubitusposition
AstandardECGisrecorded
After10minofrest,adeeprespirationtestiscarriedout
Measurearterialpressureandleavethebloodpressuremonitor
inplace
RestarttheECG
Thepatientstandsquickly
TheECGisrecordedfor1min
Arterialpressureismeasuredagainat1,2and3min.
4.GradingofCAN
Fromthesetests,itispossibletogradetheCAN:
-analteredcardio-vagaltestidentifiespossibleorearlyCAN
-definiteorconfirmedCANcorrespondstotwoaltered
cardio-vagaltests
-complicatedCANisidentifiedbythepresenceoforthostatic
hypotensionoranomaliesintheheartratetests
References
[1]HauteAutorite´ deSante´.Recommandationpopurlapratiqueclinique. Stra-te´gieme´dicamenteuseducontroˆleglyce´miquedudiabe`tedutype2;2013 [http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013-02/ 10irp04_reco_diabete_type_2.pdf].
[2]MeynaarIA,EslamiS,Abu-HannaA,vanderVoortP,deLangeDW,deKeizerN. Bloodglucoseamplitudevariabilityaspredictorformortalityinsurgicaland medicalintensivecareunitpatients:amulticentercohortstudy.JCritCare 2012;27:119–24.
[3]SatoH,CarvalhoG,SatoT,LattermannR,MatsukawaT,SchrickerT.The associationofpreoperativeglycemiccontrol,intraoperativeinsulinsensitivity, andoutcomesaftercardiacsurgery.JClinEndocrinolMetab2010;95:4338– 44.
[4]HalkosME,LattoufOM,PuskasJD,Kilgo P,CooperWA,MorrisCD, etal. ElevatedpreoperativehemoglobinA1clevelisassociatedwithreduced long-term survival after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:1431–7.
[5]O’SullivanCJ,HynesN,MahendranB,AndrewsEJ,AvalosG,TawfikS,etal. HaemoglobinA1c(HbA1C)innon-diabeticanddiabeticvascularpatients.Is HbA1Canindependentriskfactorandpredictorofadverseoutcome?EurJ VascEndovascSurg2006;32:188–97.
[6]LazarHL,ChipkinSR,FitzgeraldCA,BaoY,CabralH,ApsteinCS.Tightglycemic controlindiabeticcoronaryarterybypassgraftpatientsimproves periopera-tive outcomes and decreases recurrent ischemic events. Circulation 2004;109:1497–502.
[7]BhamidipatiCM,LaParDJ,StukenborgGJ,MorrisonCC,KernJA,KronIL,etal. Superiorityofmoderatecontrolofhyperglycemiatotightcontrolinpatients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:543–51.
[8]DesaiSP,HenryLL,HolmesSD,HuntSL,MartinCT,HebsurS.Strictversus liberaltargetrangeforperioperativeglucoseinpatientsundergoingcoronary arterybypassgrafting:aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial.JThorac cardiovascSurg2012;143:318–25.
[9]FishLH,WeaverTW,MooreAL,SteelLG.Valueofpostoperativebloodglucose inpredictingcomplicationsandlengthofstayaftercoronaryarterybypass grafting.AmJCardiol2003;92:74–6.
[10]FurnaryAP,ZerrKJ,GrunkemeierGL,StarrA.Continuousintravenousinsulin infusionreducestheincidenceofdeepsternalwoundinfectionindiabetic patientsaftercardiacsurgicalprocedures.AnnThoracSurg1999;67:352–60 [discussion360-362].
[11]NathanDM,KuenenJ,BorgR,ZhengH,SchoenfeldD,HeineRJ,etal. Translat-ing theA1C assayinto estimatedaverage glucose values.DiabetesCare 2008;31:1473–8.
[12]BrutsaertE,CareyM,ZonszeinJ.Theclinicalimpactofinpatienthypoglycemia. JDiabetesComplications2014;28:565–72.
[13]SchopmanJE,GeddesJ,FrierBM.Prevalenceofimpairedawarenessof hypo-glycaemiaandfrequencyofhypoglycaemiaininsulin-treatedtype2diabetes. DiabetesResClinPract2010;87:64–8.
[14]InzucchiSE,BergenstalRM,BuseJB,DiamantM,FerranniniE,NauckM,etal. Managementofhyperglycemiaintype2diabetes:apatient-centered ap-proach:positionstatementoftheAmericanDiabetesAssociation(ADA)and theEuropean AssociationfortheStudyofDiabetes(EASD).DiabetesCare 2012;35:1364–79.
[15]KemplerP,AmarencoG,FreemanR,FrontoniS,HorowitzM,StevensM,etal. Managementstrategiesforgastrointestinal,erectile,bladder,andsudomotor dysfunction in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011;27:665–77.
[16]PhillipsLK,RaynerCK,JonesKL,HorowitzM.Measurementofgastric empty-ingindiabetes.JDiabetesComplications2014;28:894–903.
[17]BouvetL,MazoitJX,ChassardD, AllaouchicheB,BoselliE,BenhamouD. Clinicalassessmentoftheultrasonographicmeasurementofantralareafor
estimating preoperative gastric content and volume. Anesthesiology 2011;114:1086–92.
[18]JanssensJ, PeetersTL,VantrappenG,TackJ, UrbainJL,De RooM,etal. Improvementofgastricemptyingindiabeticgastroparesisbyerythromycin. Preliminarystudies.NEnglJMed1990;322:1028–31.
[19]EllishWS,KarthaV,FluderE,SlogoffS.Effectofmetoclopramideongastric fluidvolumesindiabeticpatientswhohavefastedbeforeelectivesurgery. Anesthesiology2005;102:904–9.
[20]Ryde´nL,GrantPJ,AnkerSD,BerneC,CosentinoF,DanchinN,etal.ESC Guidelinesondiabetes,pre-diabetes,andcardiovasculardiseasesdeveloped incollaborationwiththeEASD:theTaskForceondiabetes,pre-diabetes,and cardiovascular diseasesof theEuropean Societyof Cardiology(ESC) and developedincollaborationwiththeEuropeanAssociationfortheStudyof Diabetes(EASD).EuropHeartJ2013;34:3035–87.
[21]ValensiP,CossonE.Itisnotyetthetimetostopscreeningdiabeticpatientsfor silentmyocardialischaemia.DiabetesMetab2010;36:91–6.
[22]ValensiP,Parie`sJ,Brulport-CerisierV,TorremochaF,SachsRN,VanzettoG, etal.Predictivevalueofsilentmyocardialischemiaforcardiaceventsin diabeticpatients:influenceofageinaFrenchmulticenterstudy.DiabetesCare 2005;28:2722–7.
[23]CossonE,NguyenMT,ChanuB,BanuI,ChihebS,BaltaC,etal.Cardiovascular risk prediction is improved by adding asymptomatic coronary statusto routine risk assessment in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2011;34:2101–7.
[24]YoungLH,WackersFJ,ChyunDA,DaveyJA,BarrettEJ,TailleferR,etal.Cardiac outcomesafterscreeningforasymptomaticcoronaryarterydiseaseinpatients withtype2diabetes:theDIADstudy:arandomizedcontrolledtrial.JAMA 2009;301:1547–55.
[25]HackerM,BeckerC.Theincrementalvalueofcoronaryarterycalciumscoresto myocardialsinglephotonemissioncomputertomographyinriskassessment. JNuclearCardiol2011;18:700–11[quiz712-6].
[26]McFallsEO,WardHB,MoritzTE,GoldmanS,KrupskiWC,LittooyF,etal. Coronary-arteryrevascularizationbeforeelectivemajorvascularsurgery.N EnglJMed2004;351:2795–804.
[27]FoucrierA,RodsethR,AissaouiM,IbanesC,GoarinJP,LandaisP,etal.The long-termimpactofearlycardiovasculartherapyintensificationforpostoperative troponin elevation after major vascular surgery. Anesth Analg 2014;119:1053–63.
[28]NicholsGA,HillierTA,ErbeyJR,BrownJB.Congestiveheartfailureintype 2 diabetes: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors. Diabetes care 2001;24:1614–9.
[29]Amour J, Kersten JR.Diabetic cardiomyopathyand anesthesia:bench to bedside.Anesthesiology2008;108:524–30.
[30]PhamI,CossonE,NguyenMT,BanuI,GenevoisI,PoignardP,etal.Evidencefora SpecificDiabeticCardiomyopathy:anObservationalRetrospective Echocardio-graphicStudyin656AsymptomaticType2DiabeticPatients.InternJEndocrinol 2015;2015:743503.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/743503[EpubMay13]. [31]lbertiniJP, CohenR,Valensi P,SachsRN,CharniotJC. B-typenatriuretic
peptide,amarkerofasymptomaticleftventriculardysfunctionintype2 dia-beticpatients.DiabetesMetab2008;34(4Pt1):355–62.
[32]SpalloneV,ZieglerD,FreemanR,BernardiL,FrontoniS,Pop-BusuiR,etal. Cardiovascularautonomicneuropathyindiabetes:clinicalimpact, assess-ment,diagnosis,andmanagement.DiabetesMetabResRev2011;27:639–53.
[33]Valensi P, Paries J, Attali JR.Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetic patients: influence of diabetes duration, obesity, and microangiopathic complications – the Frenchmulticenter study. Metab Clin Experimental 2003;52:815–20.
[34]Pop-BusuiR,EvansGW,GersteinHC,FonsecaV,FlegJL,HoogwerfBJ,etal. EffectsofcardiacautonomicdysfunctiononmortalityriskintheActionto Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1578–84.
[35]ValensiP,SachsRN,HarfoucheB,LormeauB,PariesJ,CossonE,etal.Predictive valueofcardiacautonomicneuropathyindiabeticpatientswithorwithout silentmyocardialischemia.DiabetesCare2001;24:339–43.
[36]TesfayeS,BoultonAJ,DyckPJ,FreemanR,HorowitzM,KemplerP,etal. Diabeticneuropathies:updateondefinitions,diagnosticcriteria,estimationof severityandtreatments.DiabetesCare2010;33:2285–93.
[37]Neukirchen M,KienbaumP.Sympathetic nervous system:evaluationand importanceforclinicalgeneralanesthesia.Anesthesiology2008;109:1113–31.
[38]KirnoK,LundinS,ElamM.Effectsofintrathecalmorphineandspinal anaes-thesiaonsympatheticnerveactivityinhumans.ActaanaesthesiolScand 1993;37:54–9.
[39]LundinS,WallinBG,ElamM.Intraneuralrecordingofmusclesympathetic activityduringepiduralanesthesiainhumans.AnesthAnalg1989;69:788–93.
[40]BreslowMJ,JordanDA,ChristophersonR,RosenfeldB,MillerCF,HanleyDF, etal.Epiduralmorphinedecreasespostoperativehypertensionbyattenuating sympatheticnervoussystemhyperactivity.JAMA1989;261:3577–81.
[41]GrassiG,Dell’OroR,Quarti-TrevanoF,ScopellitiF,SeravalleG,PaleariF,etal. Neuroadrenergicandreflexabnormalitiesinpatientswithmetabolic syn-drome.Diabetologia2005;48:1359–65.
[42]Knu¨ttgenD,TrojanS,WeberM,WolfM,WapplerF.[Pre-operative measure-mentofheartratevariabilityindiabetics:amethodtoestimatebloodpressure stabilityduringanaesthesiainduction].DerAnaesthesist2005;54:442–9.
[43]HuangCJ,KuokCH,KuoTB,HsuYW,TsaiPS.Pre-operativemeasurementof heartratevariabilitypredictshypotensionduringgeneralanesthesia.Acta AnaesthesiolScand2006;50:542–8.
[44]LankhorstS,KeetSW,BulteCS,BoerC.Theimpactofautonomicdysfunctionon peri-operativecardiovascularcomplications.Anaesthesia2015;70:336–43.
[45]BurgosLG,EbertTJ,AsiddaoC,TurnerLA,PattisonCZ,Wang-ChengR,etal. Increasedintraoperativecardiovascularmorbidityindiabeticswith autonom-icneuropathy.Anesthesiology1989;70:591–7.
[46]SobotkaPA,LissHP,VinikAI.Impairedhypoxicventilatorydriveindiabetic patientswithautonomicneuropathy.JClinEndocrinolMetab1986;62:658– 63.
[47]KitamuraA,HoshinoT,KonT,OgawaR.Patientswithdiabeticneuropathyare atriskofagreaterintraoperativereductionincoretemperature. Anesthesiol-ogy2000;92:1311–8.
[48]KadoiY.Anestheticconsiderationsindiabeticpatients.PartI:preoperative considerationsofpatientswithdiabetesmellitus.JAnesth2010;24:739–47.
[49]Socie´te´ franc¸aised’anestyhe´sieetdere´animation(Sfar),Socie´te´ franc¸aisede cardiologie(SFC).[Perioperativeassessmentofcardiacriskpatientin non-cardiac,surgery].AnnFrAnesthReanim2011;30:e5–29.
[50]Martı´nez-CastelaoA,Navarro-Gonza´lezJF,Go´rrizJL,deAlvaroF.TheConcept andtheepidemiologyofdiabeticnephropathyhavechangedinrecentyears.J ClinMed2015;4:1207–16.
[51]EbohC,ChowdhuryTA.Managementofdiabeticrenaldisease.AnnTranslMed 2015;3:154.
[52]GhaderianSB,HayatiF,ShayanpourS,BeladiMousaviSS.Diabetesand end-stagerenal disease;a review article onnewconcepts. JRenal InjPrev 2015;4:28–33.
[53]BurrowsNR,LiY,GeissLS.Incidenceoftreatmentforend-stagerenaldisease amongindividualswithdiabetesintheU.S.continuestodecline.DiabetesCare 2010;33:73–7.
[54]DounousiE,Duni A,LeivaditisK,VaiosV,EleftheriadisT,LiakopoulosV. Improvementsinthemanagementofdiabeticnephropathy.RevDiabetStud 2015;12:119–33.
[55]GreggEW,LiY,WangJ,BurrowsNR,AliMK,RolkaD,etal.Changesin diabetes-related complications in the United States, 1990–2010. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1514–23.
[56]NarresM,ClaessenH,DrosteS,KvitkinaT,KochM,KussO,etal.Theincidence ofend-stagerenaldiseaseinthediabetic(comparedtothenon-diabetic) population:asystematicreview.PloSOne2016;11:e0147329.
[57]RadcliffeNJ,SeahJM,ClarkeM,MacIsaacRJ,JerumsG,EkinciEI.Clinical predictivefactorsindiabetickidneydiseaseprogression.JDiabetesInvestig 2017;8:6–18.
[58]MonteroRM,CovicA,GnudiL,GoldsmithD.Diabeticnephropathy:Whatdoes thefuturehold?InternUrolNephrol2016;48:99–113.
[59]Toth-ManikowskiS,AttaMG.Diabetickidneydisease:pathophysiologyand therapeutictargets.JDiabetesRes2015;2015:697010.
[60]TervaertTW,MooyaartAL,AmannK,CohenAH,CookHT,DrachenbergCB, etal.Pathologicclassification ofdiabeticnephropathy.JAmSocNephrol 2010;21:556–63.
[61]LeveyAS,deJongPE,CoreshJ,ElNahasM,AstorBC,MatsushitaK,etal.The definition,classification,andprognosisofchronickidneydisease:aKDIGO ControversiesConferencereport.KidneyIntern2011;80:17–28.
[62]KimSS,KimJH,KimIJ.Currentchallengesindiabeticnephropathy:early diagnosisandwaystoimproveoutcomes.EndocrinolMetab2016;31:245–53.
[63]TheRenalAssociation.UKRenalregisttry.Thesixtheenthannualreport;2013 [http://www.renalreg.org/reports/2013-the sixteenth-annual-report/. Last accessApril24,2017].
[64]AmericanDiabetesAssociation.9.Microvascularcomplicationsandfootcare. Diabetescare2016;39(Suppl.1):S72–80.
[65]BlacherJ, HalimiJM,Hanon O, MouradJJ, Pathak A,SchnebertB, etal. Managementofhypertensioninadults:the2013FrenchSocietyof Hyperten-sionguidelines.FundamClinPharmacol2014;28:1–9.
[66]EmdinCA,RahimiK,NealB,CallenderT,PerkovicV,PatelA.Bloodpressure loweringintype2diabetes:asystematicreviewandmeta-analysis.JAMA 2015;313:603–15.
[67]NationalKidney,Foundation.KDOQIclinicalpracticeguidelinefordiabetes andCKD:2012update.AmJKidneyDis2012;60:850–86.
[68]IchaiC,VinsonneauC,SouweineB,ArmandoF,CanetE,Clec’hC,etal.Acute kidneyinjuryintheperioperativeperiodandinintensivecareunits(excluding renalreplacementtherapies).AnaesthCritCarePainMed2016;35:151–65.
[69]Noauthors. Effectofintensiveblood-glucosecontrolwith metforminon complicationsinoverweightpatientswithtype2diabetes(UKPDS34).UK ProspectiveDiabetesStudy(UKPDS)Group.Lancet1998;352:854–65.
[70]SelvinE,Bolen S,Yeh HC,Wiley C, WilsonLM,Marinopoulos SS,etal. Cardiovascularoutcomesintrialsoforaldiabetesmedications:asystematic review.ArchInternMed2008;168:2070–80.
[71]RousselR,TravertF,PasquetB,WilsonPW,SmithJrSC,GotoS,etal.Reduction ofAtherothrombosisforContinuedHealth(REACH)RegistryInvestigators. Metforminuseandmortalityamongpatientswithdiabetesand atherothrom-bosis.ArchInternMed2010;170:1892–9.
[72]DuncanAI,KochCG,XuM,ManlapazM,BatdorfB,PitasG,etal.Recent metforminingestiondoesnotincreasein-hospitalmorbidityormortalityafter cardiacsurgery.AnesthAnalg2007;104:42–50.
[73]TrinkleyKE,MaloneDC,NelsonJA,SaseenJJ.Prescribingattitudes,behaviors andopinionsregardingmetforminforpatientswithdiabetes:afocusgroup study.TherapAdvChronicDis2016;7:220–8.
[74]SalpeterSR,GreyberE,PasternakGA,SalpeterEE.Riskoffatalandnonfatal lacticacidosis withmetforminuseintype2diabetesmellitus.Cochrane databasesystrev2010;4:CD002967.
[75]BandoK,OchiaiS,KunimatsuT,Deguchi J,KimuraJ,FunabashiH,etal. Comparisonofpotentialrisksoflacticacidosisinductionbybiguanidesin rats.RegulToxicolPharmacol2010;58:155–60.
[76]RendaF,MuraP,FincoG,FerrazinF,PaniL,LandoniG.Metformin-associatedlactic acidosisrequiringhospitalization.Anational10yearsurveyandasystematic literaturereview.EurRevMedPharmacolSci2013;17(Suppl.1):45–9.
[77]ScheenAJ,PaquotN.[Useofmetforminindiabeticpatientswithcardiac disease:benefit-riskbalance].RevMedSuisse2013;9:1527–33.
[78]ScheenAJ,PaquotN.Metforminrevisited:acriticalreviewofthebenefit-risk balanceinat-riskpatientswithtype2diabetes.Diabetesmetab2013;39:179–90.
[79]MerckerSK, MaierC, Neumann G, Wulf H.Lactic acidosis as a serious perioperativecomplicationofantidiabeticbiguanidemedicationwith met-formin.Anesthesiology1997;87:1003–5.
[80]GebhardRE, NielsenKC,PietrobonR,Missair A,Williams BA.Diabetes mellitus,independentofbodymassindex,isassociatedwitha‘‘higher success’’rateforsupraclavicularbrachialplexusblocks.Reganesthpain med2009;34:404–7.
[81]WelchMB,BrummettCM,WelchTD,TremperKK,ShanksAM,GuglaniP,etal. Perioperativeperipheralnerveinjuries:aretrospectivestudyof380,680 cases during a 10-year period at a single institution. Anesthesiology 2009;111:490–7.
[82]WilliamsBA,MurinsonBB.Diabetesmellitusandsubclinicalneuropathy:a call for new paths in peripheral nerve block research. Anesthesiology 2008;109(3):361–2.
[83]ValensiP,FeuvreayD,SachsRN.CoeuretDiabe`te.Priseenchargeetsuivides patientsdiabe´tiques.Paris,France:E´ditionsFrisonRoche;1999.