• Aucun résultat trouvé

Synchronizability of Communicating Finite State Machines is not Decidable

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Synchronizability of Communicating Finite State Machines is not Decidable"

Copied!
15
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 1 System of Example 1 and Theorem 3.
Figure 2 The FIFO automaton A of Example 5 and its associated systems S A = hP 1 , P 2 , P 3 i and S A,m0 = hP 1 , P 20 , P 3 i
Figure 3 Language 1-synchronizability does not imply language synchronizability for 1-∗ (mailbox) communications à la [1, 4].

Références

Documents relatifs

Dans notre série un traitement anti-TNF à base d’Infliximab (Remicade®) a été indiqué chez deux patientes ayant une maladie de Crohn fistulisante associée à des LAP

Data Availability Both blockchain and content-addressable distributed le system are based on the peer-to-peer network. Users of EthDrive are in the Ethereum blockchain network and

The simulator takes as input a configu- ration file that describes the simulation environment, i.e., information about: the number of peers in the simulated network; the number

An infinitesimal increase of the volume ∆v brings an increase in p int , so that the piston moves until another equilibrium point with a bigger volume. On the other hand, a

Based on the results obtained, we can conclude that the traffic shape for the Gnutella protocol is self-similar in the area of lower m for all message types.. Indeed, the

The centralized part supports evaluation of the peer degree, routing cost, arrival cost, departure cost, index management load balancing, and storage load balancing.. To ensure

We observed the performance of the storage load balancing method subject to three fac- tors : the storage utilization ratio, the peer dynamicity, and the storage load transfer

Fabien Mathieu