• Aucun résultat trouvé

Comment nec:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Comment nec:"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

CONTENTS 13.05.10

NewCivilEngineer

nec:

www.nce.CO.UK New CivilEngineer

lstFloor,GreaterLondonHouse HampsteadRoad,LondonNWl 7EJ EDITORIALENQUIRIES Tel: (020) 77284544 (fax4666) Email: [email protected] EDITOR1Antony Oliver (020) 77284541 antony.oliver DEPUTYEDITOR1JackieWhitelaw (020) 77284542 jackie.whitelaw MANAGINGEDITOR1MarkHansford (020) 77284543 mark.hansford NEWSEDITOR1AlexandraWynne (020) 77284540 alexandra.wynne

SENIOR REPORTER1Ed Owen (020) 7728 4545 ed.owen REPORTER1Jo Stimpson (020) 7728 4544 jo.stimpson REPORTER1DeclanLynch (020) 7728 4546 declan.lynch ADVERTISING

DISPLAYADVERTISING1SamBattes

(020) 7728 4521

RECRUITMENT1Victoria Williams (020) 77283825

le 26

www.nce.co.uk1 13.05.10 NEW CIVILENGINEER 3

05

NEWS

Wembley roof problems Experts claim new roof is to blame for continued pitch problems.

06

NEWS

Tube Lines sellsup PPP agreement with London Underground finally cornes to an end in buy-out.

22

MAJORPROJEa5

Saline Solution

NCE takes a look at Australia's newest attempt to offset their urgent water needs.

Alsoin thisissue

06 News

Boris brands failed PPP "Byzantine"

08 News

Industry fears for spending post -election

10 News

Luton Busway deal is full steam ahead

14 Letters

Transport, water, low carbon

18 Water Special

What will new regulations mean for the sector?

26 ICENews

Celebratingthe ForthRoad Bridge

Comment

AntonyOliver

liA

raftof publicspending austerity is just around the corner,and perhaps sooner than we think"

Publicspending efficiency needsprivatesedorsupport

Amongst all the political uncertainty at the moment, one thing is pretty much guaran- teed - a raft of public spending austerity is just around the corner.

Perhaps sooner than we think. Perhaps in areas that were previously thought safe. The purchase of London Underground upgrade contractor Tube Lines by Transport for London (Tf1) and cancellation of the contro- versial public private partnership (PPP) is a worrying public spending milestone.

As the end of a major Gordon Brown- inspired investment vehicle it could also be an ominous taste of what is to corne. It could be a pointer towards future public sector policywhich makes this relatively small development on London's Tube very impor- tant to everyone living outside the capital.

Because while there is absolutely no doubt that the decision to par f310M to wrestle contraI away from the private sector was hugely politically motiva ted, it does raise

some big questions about how public clients manage future infrastructure investments.

Not least because if a client like Tf1 is prepared to invest hundreds of millions of pounds to buy themselves out oflong term commitments with the private sector rather than investing in the relationship, we really could aIl be in trouble. It is clear that under Labour the public sector has been allowed to gel too big and needs to be slimmed. But simply removing "expensive" private sector expertise is flot the long term solution. Tf1 maintains that handing f310M to Tube Lines shareholders was clone to drive better value into the Tube.

It also maintains that, having taken Metronet, the other original PPP contractor, back in-house IWOyears ago, London Under- ground has the skills to manage the Tube Lines contract.

WeIl the jury's still very much out on that one and besicles, the Tube Lines con tract is

a much more complex affair. Whether or flOt the public sector can retain the necessary management skills is yet to be seen. Funda- mentally, as the PPP Arbiter pointed out last week, Tf1 has a massive hole in ils budget.

To star within ils spending constraints it has ta de-scope ils upgrades, maintenance and renewals across the network. Spending f310M tearing up a contract t!tat it failed to manage properly is surely throwing good (public) money after bad and will hardly endear a future govhnment. .,~"

NCE has talked a lot abbut "delivering more for less" and ensuring th~t every single

'. ~ pound of public cash'is invested eff'ectively.

At the heart of this will be the public sector working closeiy and constructively with ils private sector partners. Unless clients embrace meaningful relationships with the private sector we risk seeing this mantra translated into simply "delivering less".

. AntonyOliverisNCE'seditor

Références

Documents relatifs

During the course of the PAEPARD project, consortia partnerships shifted considerably. Some partnerships were strengthened, while others came to an end and new partnerships

• (iii) the high diversity of plant species associated to cocoa (more than 40 species have been invento- ried), the lack of efficient design in their repartition on the plot

For example, the financial impact of construction risks are generally limited to the pre-completion period and the early years of the project; operating, demand

In fact, f can be chosen to be surjective on objects, so that the pro- simplicial promotion of the ´ etale homotopy type is still ”parameterized by hypercoverings”.. In particular

Though the women who originated from KEVI School, Birmingham, proceeded on the well-trod path to Newnham College, Cambridge, there were some women chemists at Mason College,

The tool allows rapid retrieval of user- selected data for each annotated Arabidopsis gene providing, in any combination, data on the following features: predicted protein

Pour certains rayons cathodiques, J .-J. Thomson trouve qu’il suf- firait, pour obtenir la même courbure, d’un champ :.. La déviation des rayons Becquerel était

courant direct, tandis que la force électromotrice à l’électrode néga- tive, d’environ 6 volts, est dans le sens du courant direct : c’est donc une