• Aucun résultat trouvé

LEADERSHIP COLUMN Medication errors and shift to a culture of patient safety and high reliability

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "LEADERSHIP COLUMN Medication errors and shift to a culture of patient safety and high reliability"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

255

Canadian OnCOlOgy nursing JOurnal • VOlume 26, issue 3, summer 2016 reVue Canadienne de sOins infirmiers en OnCOlOgie

FEA TUR ES /R U bR iq UE S

leADersHiP cOluMN

Medication errors and shift to a culture of patient safety and high reliability

by Janice Chobanuk

M

edication errors with antineoplastic drugs can be disastrous to patients due to the drugs’ high toxicity and lim- ited therapeutic index. Cancer patients often require numerous complex and often toxic therapies for treatment, which requires careful coordination of care. In a study involving 6,607  antineoplastic pre- scriptions, the researchers found an error rate of 5.2%  (449). The highest errors were prescription errors  (91%), followed with pharmaceutical  (8%) and adminis- tration errors  (1%). The researchers esti- mated that 13.4% of these errors would have resulted in a patient injury, 2.6%

in permanent damage, and 2.6% would have affected the prognosis of the cancer patient. Gandhi et  al.  (2005) found the chemotherapy error rate was 3% in 3,200 chemotherapy orders for adult and pediat- ric patients. In a study involving pediatric and adult oncology patients, the authors found chemotherapy errors were 0.3 to 5.8 per 100 visits (Walsh et al., 2009).

Many oncology-nursing leaders are recognizing the importance of treating chemotherapy as a high-risk activity.

Nursing leaders are actively promot- ing transition to a patient safety and high-reliability culture in order to enhance patient safety in oncology set- tings (Ranchon et  al., 2012). This para- digm shift requires strong leadership support, the use of principles of high reliability and a patient-centric focus, as well as continuous quality improve- ment initiatives. The strategy involves leaders addressing issues such as inher- ent weaknesses in processes in the can- cer setting, clinical designs of buildings, the impact of computer programs, staff- ing levels, equipment issues, and other factors that influence the local working conditions. A focus on safety requires oncology leaders to move away from reactive responses to error reports, and reviewing individual actions and the error, to embrace a proactive sys- tem-wide preventative approach.

Globally, leaders in health care facilities are starting to incorporate the exper- tise and lessons learned from high- risk groups with low failure rates, such as aviation and nuclear power plants, into their safety strategic approach (Ranchon et al., 2012). These organiza- tions have developed an array of tools for assessing organizational factors that have the potential to lead to a failure or error. The tools address issues such as supervision, planning, communication, training, and maintenance. Instead of a retrospective analysis of adverse events, these tools enable oncology leaders to transition to a more proactive culture of

patient safety and monitor safety trends in the organization on a continual basis.

Chemotherapy management is a hazardous and challenging procedure that oncology leaders need to recog- nize as a high-risk activity. Mistakes can occur any time and at any stage in the process—from the prescription, prepa- ration, and dispensing to the adminis- tration. The increasing number of oral chemotherapy agents adds a new chal- lenge for oncology facilities. Shah et al.

(2016) reported that 22 interventions (35%) were required to prevent poten- tial errors in 63 oral medication orders over a seven-month period. Most of the errors were related to dosage adjust- ment, the identification of interacting drugs, and additional drug monitoring.

Oncology nursing leaders are well positioned to drive a culture shift to patient safety and high reliability. This change involves tactical strategies such as education, safety committees, safety protocols and procedures, use of tech- nology, a no blame atmosphere, and a focus on zero medication errors (Ranchon, McEachan, Giles, Sirriyeh, Watt, & Wright, 2012). Other examples of initiatives include independent double checks, bar codes, electronic order-en- try systems with decision support, and smart pump technology. Oncology nurs- ing leaders need to be actively engaged in patient safety improvement to impact on patients, employees, physicians, and other clinicians in the organization.

reFereNces

Gandhi,  T.K., Bartel,  S.B., Shulman,  L.N., Verrier,  D., Burdick,  E., Cleary,  A., … Bates, D.W. (2005). Medication safety in the ambulatory chemotherapy setting. Cancer, 104, 2477–2483. doi:10.1002/cncr.21442 Ranchon,  F., Salles,  G., Späth,  H.,

Schwiertz,  V., Vantard,  N., Parat,  S., … Rioufol,  C. (2011). Chemotherapeutic errors in hospitalised cancer patients:

Attributable damage and extra costs. BMC Cancer, 111(478), 2–10.

doi:10.1186/1471-2407-11-478

Ranchon,  L., McEachan,  R.C., Giles,  S.J., Sirriyeh,  R., Watt,  I.S., & Wright,  J.

(2012). Development of an evidence- based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: A systematic review. BMJ Quality and Safety, 21(5), 369–380.

doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000443

Shah,  N.N., Casella,  E., Capozzi,  D., McGettigan,  S., Gangadhar,  T.C., Schuchter,  L., & Myers,  J.S. (2016).

Improving the safety of oral

chemotherapy at an academic medical center. Journal of Oncology Practice, 12(1), 71–76. doi:10.1200/JOP.2015.007260 Walsh,  K.E., Dodd,  K.S., Seetharaman,  K.,

Roblin,  D.W., Herrinton,  L.J., Worley,  A.V., … Gurwitz,  J.H. (2009).

Medication errors among adults and children with cancer in the outpatient setting. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(6), 891–896. doi:10.1200/

JCO.2008.18.6072

AbOut tHe AutHOr

Janice Chobanuk, BScN, MN, CHPCN(C), CON(C), Director Ambulatory Care and Systemic Therapy, Community Oncology, Alberta Health Services, CancerControl Alberta Edmonton, Alberta

Références

Documents relatifs

88 D.2.1.1 Training records of staff trained in policies and procedures for waste segregation 89 D.2.1.2 Training records of staff trained in guidelines for management of sharps

Senior National Health Service professional describing the value of human factors to patient safety

The value of any reporting system – to identify risk and harm, to assess differences by place and over time, to serve as the starting point for investigations into causation,

1) Hospitals will be required to develop critical incidence reporting systems (CIRS) on a local basis. Th e federal government will defi ne the minimum data set, so that data can

Michael Cohen (Institute for Safe Medication Practices, USA), Ralph Edwards (WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring, Uppsala, Sweden), Martin Fletcher

High-risk (high-alert) medications Medication adherence Medication discrepancy Medication error Medication reconciliation Medication- related harm Medication review Medication

WHO’s unique convening role at the global level provides a vehicle for improving patient safety and managing risk in health care through inter- national collaboration, engagement

The overall aim of the approach is to improve patient safety, using a partnership model and to spread improvement beyond individual hospitals to national health systems.. The