• Aucun résultat trouvé

Inflation of a hyperelastic spherical balloon Problem is solved in spherical coordinate system Local orthonormal frame (basis vectors) is denoted (

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Inflation of a hyperelastic spherical balloon Problem is solved in spherical coordinate system Local orthonormal frame (basis vectors) is denoted ("

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Inflation of a hyperelastic spherical balloon

Problem is solved in spherical coordinate system

Local orthonormal frame (basis vectors) is denoted (𝐸𝑟, 𝐸𝜃, 𝐸𝜑) in the undeformed reference configuration and (𝑒𝑟, 𝑒𝜃, 𝑒𝜑) in the deformed configuration

No shear => (𝐸𝑟, 𝐸𝜃, 𝐸𝜑) = (𝑒𝑟, 𝑒𝜃, 𝑒𝜑)

𝐹(𝑟) = [

𝜕𝑟

𝜕𝑅 0 0 0 𝑟

𝑅 0 0 0 𝑟 𝑅]

Incompressibility assumption

𝑣 = 𝑉

(2)

𝑉 =4

3𝜋𝑅23−4 3𝜋𝑅13 𝑣 =4

3𝜋𝑟23−4 3𝜋𝑟13 𝑅23− 𝑅13= 𝑟23− 𝑟13

Initial thickness 𝐻, final thickness ℎ

(𝑅1+ 𝐻)3− 𝑅13= (𝑟1+ 𝐻)3− 𝑟13

(𝑅1+ 𝐻)3= (𝑅1+ 𝐻)(𝑅12+ 2𝑅1+ 𝐻2) = 𝑅13+ 2𝐻𝑅12+ 𝑅1𝐻2+ 𝐻𝑅12+ 2𝐻2𝑅1+ 𝐻3 𝑅23− 𝑅13= (𝑅1+ 𝐻)3− 𝑅13= 3𝐻𝑅12+ 3𝑅1𝐻2+ 𝐻3

𝑟23− 𝑟13= 3ℎ𝑟12+ 3𝑟12+ ℎ3

3𝐻𝑅12+ 3𝑅1𝐻2+ 𝐻3= 3ℎ𝑟12+ 3𝑟12+ ℎ3 Divide by 𝐻𝑅12

3 + 3𝐻 𝑅1+𝐻2

𝑅12 = 3ℎ𝑟12 𝐻𝑅12+ 3 ℎ

𝑅1 ℎ 𝐻

𝑟1

𝑅1+ℎ2 𝑅12

ℎ 𝐻

We introduce:

𝜆 = 𝑟1/𝑅1 𝜇 = ℎ

𝐻 3 + 3𝐻

𝑅1+𝐻2

𝑅12 = 3𝜆2

𝐻+ 3𝜆2ℎ 𝑟1

𝐻+ 𝜆22 𝑟12

ℎ 𝐻

3 + 3𝐻 𝑅1+𝐻2

𝑅12 = 3𝜆2𝜇 + 3𝜆𝜇2 𝐻

𝑅1+ 𝜇3𝐻2 𝑅12

1 + 𝐻 𝑅1+ 𝐻2

3𝑅12= 𝜆2𝜇 + 𝜆𝜇2 𝐻

𝑅1+ 𝜇3 𝐻2 3𝑅12

𝐻 𝑅1= 𝛾

(3)

Finally we obtain with incompressibility:

1 + 𝛾 +𝛾2

3 = 𝜆2𝜇 + 𝜆𝜇2𝛾 + 𝜇3𝛾2 3

Thin balloon: 𝛾 ≪ 1

𝜆2𝜇 = 1

𝐹(𝑟) = 𝐹 = [

𝜕𝑟

𝜕𝑅≈ 𝜇 0 0

0 𝑟

𝑅≈ 𝜆 0

0 0 𝑟

𝑅≈ 𝜆]

𝐹 = [

1/𝜆2 0 0

0 𝜆 0

0 0 𝜆

]

Cauchy stress:

𝜎 = [

𝜎𝑟𝑟 0 0 0 𝜎𝜃𝜃 0 0 0 𝜎𝜑𝜑

]

−𝑝 ≤ 𝜎𝑟𝑟≤ 0

𝜎𝜃𝜃 = 𝜎𝜑𝜑=?

Laplace law:

𝜎𝜃𝜃= 𝜎𝜑𝜑=𝑃𝑟1

2ℎ =𝑃𝜆3𝑅1 2𝐻 =𝑃𝜆3

2𝛾

(4)

𝜎 = 𝑃 [

< 1 0 0 0 𝜆3

2𝛾 0 0 0 𝜆3

2𝛾]

Thin balloon

𝛾 ≪ 1 1 𝛾≫ 1 𝜎𝑟𝑟≪ 𝜎𝜃𝜃 𝜎𝑟𝑟 ≪ 𝜎𝜑𝜑

𝜎 ≈𝑃𝜆3𝑅1

2𝐻 [

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ]

Incompressible Hyperelasticity

Strain energy density (equation 10.8 Beatty’s paper)

For Neo Hooke

𝛽 = 0 and ℎ(𝐼1− 3) =𝜇20(𝐼1− 3)

𝜎 = 𝜇0𝐹𝐹𝑇+ 𝑐𝐼

Equilibrium

𝜎 = [ 𝜇0

𝜆4+ 𝑐 0 0

0 𝜇0𝜆2+ 𝑐 0 0 0 𝜇0𝜆2+ 𝑐

] =𝑃𝜆3𝑅1

2𝐻 [

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ]

𝜎𝑟𝑟≈ 0

𝑐 = −𝜇0 𝜆4

(5)

𝜎 = [

0 0 0

0 𝜇0𝜆2−𝜇0

𝜆4 0

0 0 𝜇0𝜆2−𝜇0 𝜆4]

= 𝜇0(𝜆2− 1 𝜆4) [

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ]

Finally:

𝑃𝜆3𝑅1

2𝐻 = 𝜇0(𝜆2− 1 𝜆4)

𝑃 = 𝜇02𝐻 𝑅1 (1

𝜆− 1 𝜆7)

In Beatty’s paper:

There is a maximum pressure

Strain energy density of biological tissue 𝛽 = 0 and ℎ(𝐼1− 3) =𝜇2𝛾0[𝑒𝛾(𝐼1−3) − 1]

𝜎 = 2𝜕ℎ

𝜕𝐼1𝐹𝐹𝑇+ 𝑐𝐼

(6)

𝜎 = 𝜇0𝑒𝛾(𝐼1−3) 𝐹𝐹𝑇+ 𝑐𝐼

𝜎 = [

𝜇0𝑒𝛾(𝐼1−3)

𝜆4 + 𝑐 0 0

0 𝜇0𝑒𝛾(𝐼1−3) 𝜆2+ 𝑐 0

0 0 𝜇0𝑒𝛾(𝐼1−3) 𝜆2+ 𝑐]

𝐼1= 2𝜆2+ 1 𝜆4

𝑐 = −𝜇0𝑒𝛾(2𝜆2+

1 𝜆4−3)

𝜆4

𝜎 = 𝜇0𝑒𝛾(2𝜆2+

1 𝜆4−3)

(𝜆2− 1 𝜆4) [

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ]

𝑃 = 𝜇0𝑒𝛾(2𝜆2+

1

𝜆4−3) 2𝐻 𝑅1 (1

𝜆− 1 𝜆7)

When 𝜆 becomes large

𝑃 ≈ 𝜇0𝑒𝛾(2𝜆2−3) 2𝐻 𝜆𝑅1

(7)

Références

Documents relatifs

Finally, the shader computes I(ω 0 ) by applying the same code as the RZH shading (see previous shader), replacing the BRDF coefficients with the RZH-projected product of the envmap

In the case of the cyclic and generalised quaternion groups the existence of numerous free orthogonal actions on S2n-1 enables us to prove some- what

http://www.numdam.org/.. -— In the present paper we will introducé Bèzier curves and Bézier spline curves on algebraic surfaces, especially on a sphère. First we interpolate

The advected smoke layers over Europe are detected at both tropospheric and stratospheric heights, with the latter presenting non-typical values of the Linear

M ATTILA , Spherical averages of Fourier transforms of measures with fi- nite energy; dimension of intersections and distance sets, Mathematika, 34 (1987), pp.. M ATTILA , Geometry

In Section 3, we prove the following differentiable sphere theorem for compact manifolds with positive scalar curvature..

Our proof is a minor modification of Carleson's but orthonormality of Franklin functions permits us to replace the most delicate part of Carleson's considerations by

The construction of correlation models in a spherical coordinate system opens up new prospects for their use in the study of processes and phenomena, which are simpler described