• Aucun résultat trouvé

From the Guest Editor

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "From the Guest Editor"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

292 American Journal of Epidemiology

Copyright © 2002 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved

Vol. 156, No. 3

Printed in U.S.A.

PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

BOOK REVIEWS

From the Guest Editor

Here is more on “the book that does not exist,” as Winkel-stein has put it (1). A text on the history of epidemiology is badly needed. Meanwhile, a collection of papers, written by both professional historians and epidemiologists, has become available (2–8) and can provide useful material for courses dedicated to history in the teaching curriculum of epidemi-ology scholars. Social and Preventive Medicine (Interna-tional Journal in Public Health) started publishing these papers in January 2001. Most were presented at a workshop on the history of epidemiology, entitled “Measuring Our Scourges,” held in Annecy, France, on July 1–10, 1996.

The Annecy workshop focused on the history of epidemio-logic methods rather than on specific achievements of epide-miology in controlling plagues such as cholera, tuberculosis, malaria, typhoid fever, or lung cancer. The rationale was the following: Students of epidemiology learn successfully how to describe the states of health of populations and how to investigate outbreaks. Then they will learn, with increasing degrees of complexity, to understand and to apply the design of prospective and retrospective studies, and the concepts of bias, confounding, and interaction. They also come to think in terms of causation, with different levels of sophistication. Because they have mastered this set of methods and concepts, are able to adapt them to specific research questions, and can make them evolve when encountering new types of prob-lems, these students become (and are given positions as) “epidemiologists” rather than any other kind of scientist.

In this context, it is crucial to understand the historical process that led to the emergence and formalization of the methods we use today. Methods, just as diseases or scientists do, have their own history. Being aware of their genesis and of the context in which they were developed not only is of cultural interest but also is indispensable for their critical appraisal. Our methodological tools were often developed while trying to solve specific problems in specific social and scientific environments. The concept of confounding, for example, seems to have been borrowed largely from

statis-tics and sociology and refined as part of the controversy about recognizing the harmful effect of tobacco (9).

To offer support to people who would like to use this material for teaching purposes, the publisher of this journal (Birkhäuser Verlag AG, Basel, Switzerland) has authorized us to place the published papers, along with the related editorials, in pdf format on a Web site (http://www.epidemiology.ch/history). If you do use this material, please share with us your joys as well as your frustrations. Remember: the book does not exist.

REFERENCES

1. Winkelstein W Jr. From the Editor. (Editorial). Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:776.

2. Comstock GW. Cohort analysis: W. H. Frost’s contributions to the epidemiology of tuberculosis and chronic disease. Soz Praventivmed 2001;46:7–12.

3. Doll R. Cohort studies: history of the method. II. Retrospective cohort studies. Soz Praventivmed 2001;46:152–60.

4. Doll R. Cohort studies: history of the method. I. Prospective cohort studies. Soz Praventivmed 2001;46:75–86.

5. Eyler JM. The changing assessments of John Snow’s and Wil-liam Farr’s cholera studies. Soz Praventivmed 2001;46:225–32. 6. Vandenbroucke JP. Changing images of John Snow in the

his-tory of epidemiology. Soz Praventivmed 2001;46:288–93. 7. Hardy A. Methods of outbreak investigation in the “era of

bac-teriology” 1880–1920. Soz Praventivmed 2001;46:355–60. 8. Eyler JM. Constructing vital statistics: Thomas Rowe Edmonds

and William Farr, 1835–1845. Soz Praventivmed 2002;47:6– 13.

9. Vandenbroucke J. History of confounding. Soz Praventivmed (in press).

Alfredo Morabia

Clinical Epidemiology Division University Hospital

1211 Geneva 14 Switzerland

Cancer Precursors: Epidemiology, Detection, and Prevention

Edited by Eduardo L. Franco and Thomas E. Rohan

ISBN 0-387-95188-1, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York (Telephone: 800-777-4643, Fax: 201-348-4505, Web site: www.springer-ny.com), 2002, 464 pp., $89 (hardcover)

Recent advances in epidemiologic and laboratory research have contributed to our understanding of the molecular and

morphologic characteristics underlying neoplastic progres-sion of cancer. As new methodologies improve our ability to

Références

Documents relatifs

group of the six Borrelia species; (iii) and the third analyzed symbiont and pathogen associations, for which we analyzed possible interactions between all pathogens (the

DFTXpUDQWGHFH IDLW XQ VWDWXW PpGLFDO /HV VDJHVIHPPHV SUHQQHQW DORUV XQH SODFH GH SOXV HQ SOXV

Finally, as stated by the WHO position paper on cholera vaccines 1 and suggested by our additional analysis of Sévère and others data, WASH activities remain the corner stone of

Because rat/gerbil and flea blooms are favored by climate conditions not recorded from Eurasia to Europe (Lionello, 2012; Kushnir and Stein, 2019), and as rats were scarce in

When in november 2011 i was asked to be guest editor of the bulletin of tibetology, this was an opportunity for me to continue a work i had happily accepted in the past for

In this paper, we propose a simple interpretation of the most standard focused presentation of MELL, showing how the structure of focused proofs can be described by refined

To sum up, Chalmers’s proposal of an early mandatory support by a qualified majority of national parliaments would result in greater domination by governments in the legislative

Life history traits of the fish community in lake Annecy: evidence from the stable isotope composition of otoliths... DOI: