Agenda Ordre du jour

(1)

Vision: The City of Greater Sudbury is a growing, world-class community bringing talent, technology and a great northern lifestyle together.

Vision: La Ville du Grand Sudbury est une communauté croissante de calibre international qui rassemble les talents, les technologies et le style de vie exceptionnel du Nord.

Agenda

Ordre du jour

Councillor / Conseillère Frances Caldarelli

Chair / Président(e)

Councillor / Conseiller André Rivest

Vice-Chair / Vice-président(e)

For the Planning Committee meeting to be held

Pour la réunion du

Comité de la planification qui aura lieu

Tuesday, October 6

^th

, 2009 mardi 6

^e

octobre 2009

at 5:30 pm

à 17h 30

Council Chamber, Tom Davies Square dans la Salle du conseil, Place Tom Davies

(2)

For the 57th Planning Committee Meeting to be held on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 Council Chamber, Tom Davies Square at 5:30 pm

COUNCILLOR FRANCES CALDARELLI, CHAIR

André Rivest, Vice-Chair

4:45 P.M. Planning Committee "Closed Meeting"

COMMITTEE ROOM C-12

To deal with: One Acquisition/Disposition of Land Matter: Declaration of Surplus Vacant Lands and Transfer, Coulson Street, Capreol.

5:30 P.M. Regular Planning Committee Meeting

COUNCIL CHAMBER, TOM DAVIES SQUARE

(PLEASE ENSURE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS ARE TURNED OFF)

The Council Chamber of Tom Davies Square is wheelchair accessible. Please speak to the City Clerk’s Office prior to the meeting if you require a hearing amplification device. Persons requiring assistance are requested to contact the City Clerk’s Office at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting if special

arrangements are required. Please call (705) 674-4455, extension 4209. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TTY) (705) 688-3919. Copies of Agendas can be viewed on the City’s website at

www.planningsudbury.com

DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF

MATTERS ARISING FROM THE "CLOSED MEETING"

At this point in the meeting, the Chair of the “Closed Meeting”, Councillor Rivest, will rise and report the results of the “Closed Meeting". The Committee will then consider any

recommendations.

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA

PLANNING COMMITTEE (57^th) (2009-10-06) - 1 -

(3)

PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. Report dated September 9, 2009 from the Acting General Manager of Growth

& Development / Planning Director regarding Application for Rezoning to permit the development of 20 single detached dwellings, Mallard's Landing Drive and Trailview Drive, Sudbury - Dalron Construction Limited.

(RECOMMENDATION PREPARED)

8 - 16

2. Report dated September 18, 2009 from the Acting General Manager of Growth

& Development / Planning Director regarding Application for site specific rezoning in order to permit a total of 640 units or 800 beds, or a combination thereof, on the Finlandia Village site, 233 Fourth Avenue, Sudbury - Sudbury Finnish Rest Home Society Inc.

17 - 34

·Letter of objection dated May 29, 2009 from Patricia Giroux.

DELEGATIONS / PRESENTATIONS

CONSENT AGENDA

(For the purpose of convenience and for expediting meetings, matters of business of repetitive or routine nature are included in the Consent Agenda, and all such matters of business contained in the Consent Agenda are voted on collectively.

A particular matter of business may be singled out from the Consent Agenda for debate or for a separate vote upon the request of any Councillor. In the case of a separate vote, the excluded matter of business is severed from the Consent Agenda, and only the remaining matters of business contained in the Consent Agenda are voted on collectively.

Each and every matter of business contained in the Consent Agenda is recorded separately in the minutes of the meeting.)

MINUTES

C-1. Report No. 7, Municipal Heritage Committee Meeting Minutes of June, 8, 2009.

35 - 39

ROUTINE MANAGEMENT REPORTS

C-2. Report dated September 15, 2009 from the Acting General Manager of Growth & Development / Planning Director regarding Extension to Draft Approval - Riverdale Subdivision, Township of Waters - Riverglen Developments Ltd.

40 - 49

(4)

C-3. Report dated September 18, 2009 from the General Manager of

Infrastructure Services regarding Rescinding of Recommendation #2006-146 and Recommendation #2008-105.

50 - 53

(The report recommends that the City of Greater Sudbury rescind recommendations

#2006-146 and #2008-105, declaring properties on Levack Drive, Levack and Front Street, Capreol surplus to the City’s needs.)

C-4. Report dated September 9, 2009 from the Acting General Manager of Growth & Development / Planning Director regarding Extension to approval for rezoning application, Waters Township, Sixth Avenue, Lively - 1257620 Ontario Ltd (Sixth Avenue Golf Course).

54 - 56

CORRESPONDENCE FOR INFORMATION ONLY

REGULAR AGENDA

REFERRED AND DEFERRED MATTERS

MANAGERS' REPORTS

ADDENDUM

10:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT (RECOMMENDATION PREPARED) (Two-thirds majority required to proceed past 10:00 P.M.)

LISA OLDRIDGE, Deputy Clerk

LIZ COLLIN, Planning Committee Secretary

(5)

Pour la 57e réunion du Comité de la planification qui aura lieu le 6 octobre 2009

dans la Salle du conseil, Place Tom Davies, à 17h 30

CONSEILLÈRE FRANCES CALDARELLI, PRÉSIDENT(E)

André Rivest, Vice-président(e)

16H 45 Séance à huis clos du comité de la planification Salle de réunion C-12

Objet : traiter de un acquisitions / aliénations de terrains 17H 30 Réunion ordinaire du comité de la planification

Salle du Conseil, Place Tom Davies

(VEUILLEZ ÉTEINDRE LES TÉLÉPHONES CELLULAIRES ET LES TÉLÉAVERTISSEURS) La salle du Conseil de la Place Tom Davies est accessible en fauteuil roulant. Si vous désirez obtenir un appareil auditif, veuillez communiquer avec la greffi re municipale, avant la réunion. Les personnes qui prévoient avoir besoin d’aide doivent s’adresser au bureau du greffier municipal au moins 24 heures avant la réunion aux fins de dispositions spéciales. Veuillez composer le 705-674-4455, poste 4209;

appareils de télécommunications pour les malentendants (ATS) 705-688-3919. Vous pouvez consulter l’ordre du jour au site Web de la Ville au www.planningsudbury.com.

DÉCLARATION D’INTÉRÊTS PÉCUNIAIRES ET LEUR NATURE GÉNÉRALES QUESTIONS DÉCOULANT DE LA SÉANCE À HUIS CLOS

Le président de la séance à huis clos, le conseiller Rivest, se lève maintenant et en présente les résultats. Le Comité examine ensuite les recommandations.

COMITÉ DE LA PLANIFICATION ORDRE DU JOUR

COMITÉ DE LA PLANIFICATION (57^e) (2009-10-06) - 1 -

(6)

AUDIENCES PUBLIQUES

1. Rapport Directeur général intérimaire de la Croissance et du Développement / directeur de la Planification, daté du 09 septembre 2009 portant sur Demande de rezonage afin de permettre l’aménagement de 20 maisons unifamiliales, promenades Mallard's Landing et Trailview, Sudbury – Dalron Construction Limited.

(RECOMMANDATION PRÉPARÉE)

8 - 16

2. Rapport Directeur général intérimaire de la Croissance et du Développement / directeur de la Planification, daté du 18 septembre 2009 portant sur Demande de rezonage propre au site afin de permettre un total de 640 logements ou 800 lits, ou une combinaison des deux, à Finlandia Village, 233, 4e Avenue,

Sudbury - Sudbury Finnish Rest Home Society Inc.

17 - 34

DÉLÉGATIONS / PRÉSENTATIONS

Ordre du jour des résolutions

(Par souci de commodité et pou accélérer le déroulement des réunions, les questions d'affaires répétitives ou routinières sont incluses a l’ordre du jour des résolutions, et on vote collectivement pour toutes les question de ce genre. A la demande d’une conseillère ou d’un conseiller, on pourra traiter isolément d’une question d’affaires de l’ordre du jour des résolutions par voie de débat ou par vote séparé. Dans le cas d’un vote séparé, la question d’affaires isolée est retirée de l’ordre du jour des résolutions ; on ne vote collectivement qu’au sujet des questions à l’ordre du jour des résolutions. Toutes les questions d’affaires à l’ordre du jour des résolutions sont inscrites séparément au procès-verbal de la réunion)

PROCÈS-VERBAL

C-1. Report No. 7, procès-verbal de la réunion du 8 juin 2009 du Comité municipal du patrimoine.

35 - 39

RAPPORTS DE GESTION COURANTS

C-2. Rapport Directeur général intérimaire de la Croissance et du Développement / directeur de la Planification, daté du 15 septembre 2009 portant sur

Prolongation de l’approbation de l’ébauche du plan de lotissement Riverdale, canton de Waters – Riverglen Developments Ltd.

40 - 49

(7)

C-3. Rapport du directeur général des Services d'infrastructure, daté du 18 septembre 2009 portant sur Annuler les recommandations 2006-146 et 2008-105.

50 - 53

(Le rapport recommande que la Ville du Grand Sudbury annule les

recommandations 2006-146 et 2008-105 déclarant excédentaires les propriétés sur la promenade Levack, à Levack, et la rue Front, à Capreol, par rapport aux besoins de la municipalité.)

C-4. Rapport Directeur général intérimaire de la Croissance et du Développement / directeur de la Planification, daté du 09 septembre 2009 portant sur

Prolongation de l’approbation d’une demande de rezonage, canton de Waters, 6e Avenue, Lively – 1257620 Ontario Ltd. (Sixth Avenue Golf &

Country Club).

54 - 56

CORRESPONDANCE À TITRE D'INFORMATION

Ordre du jour ordinaire

QUESTIONS RENVOYÉES ET QUESTIONS REPORTÉES

RAPPORTS DES GESTIONNAIRES

ADDENDA

LEVÉE DE LA SÉANCE À 22 H (RECOMMENDATION PRÉPARÉE) (Une majorité des deux tiers est requise pour poursuivre la réunion après 22 H.) LISA OLDRIDGE, Greffière adjointe

LIZ COLLIN, Secrétaire du Comité de la planification

(8)

Public Hearings

Request for Decision

Application for Rezoning to permit the

development of 20 single detached dwellings, Mallard's Landing Drive and Trailview Drive, Sudbury - Dalron Construction Limited

Recommendation

1. That the application by Dalron Construction the owner of PINS 73478-0991 and 73478-0992, Part of Parcels 50208 and 2205 SES, Lot 4, Concession 6, Township of Broder, to rezone the subject lands from "R2", Double Residential Zone and "FD", Future Development to "R1", Single Residential Zone be

approved subject to the following:

a) That prior to the enactment of the amending by-law the owner provide the City with a registered survey of the lands to be rezoned.

2. That the conditions of draft approval for the draft plan of subdivision for the reminder of Parcel 2205 SES, Lot 4, Concession 6, Broder Township, File 780-6/088020, be amended as follows:

a) By adding the following section (b) to condition 1: “1 (b)The draft plan is further amended by adding Block 35, Plan

53M-1313 and Part of Parts 1, 2, 4, 5 and 11 in Plan 53R-14358 and modifying the layout as shown on the plan attached as Sketch #1 to the October 6, 2009 Planning Committee meeting.

STAFF REPORT Applicant:

Dalron Construction Location:

PINS 73478-0991 and 73478-0992, Part of Parcels 50208 and 2205 SES, Lot 4, Concession 6, Township of Broder

Presented To: Planning Committee Presented: Tuesday, Oct 06, 2009 Report Date Wednesday, Sep 09, 2009 Type: Public Hearings

File Number: 751-6/09-13

Signed By

Report Prepared By Eric Taylor

Senior Planner

Digitally Signed Sep 22, 09 Reviewed By

Art Potvin

Manager of Development Services Digitally Signed Sep 22, 09 Recommended by the Division Bill Lautenbach

Acting General Manager of Growth and Development / Planning Director Digitally Signed Sep 22, 09 Recommended by the C.A.O.

Doug Nadorozny

Chief Administrative Officer Digitally Signed Sep 22, 09

Page 8 of 56

(9)

Broder

Application:

To amend By-law 95-500Z, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the (former) City of Sudbury by rezoning the subject lands from "R2", Double Residential Zone and "FD", Future Development to "R1", Single Residential Zone.

Proposal:

The applicant proposes to rezone lands within a draft approved plan of subdivision (Mallard’s Landing) from

"R2", Double Residential Zone to "R1", Single Residential Zone. Approximately 1.1 ha (2.7 acres) of abutting lands to the west are proposed to be rezoned from "FD", Future Development to "R1", Residential Zone to complete the lotting pattern. Eighteen lots and parts of two other lots are proposed within the lands to be rezoned. Ten lots would be located adjacent to the cul-de-sac intersecting with Trailview Drive and 10 lots would have frontage onto a cul-de-sac which would form a westerly extension of Mallards Landing Drive.

Site Description & Surrounding Land Uses:

The subject lands comprise approximately 2.7 ha (6.7acres).

To the west are lands owned by MTO which currently are accessed via an easement over the subject lands.

A telecommunications tower which was located at the top of the rock outcrop on the MTO property has recently been removed. To the north are lands owned by the applicant which are zoned "M2", Light Industrial. To the east are single detached dwellings on lots zoned "R2", Double Residential Zone fronting onto Mist Hollow Drive.

To the south are single detached dwellings on lots zoned "R2", Double Residential Zone fronting onto Trailview Drive.

Official Plan Conformity:

The subject lands are designated "Living Area 1" in the Official Plan for the City of Greater Sudbury,

permitting the full range of residential unit types from single detached dwelling to multiple unit apartments.

The application conforms with the Official Plan.

Departmental & Agency Comments Development Engineering

Development Engineering has reviewed the above noted application and have reviewed construction drawings for this location. This site is not presently serviced with municipal water or sanitary sewer. We have no objection to changing the zoning classification from “R2”, Double Residential and “FD”, Future Development to “R1”, Single Residential to permit the development of the remaining portions of the Trailview and Mallard’s Landing subdivisions.

Traffic and Transportation Roads – No concerns

Page 9 of 56

(10)

Traffic – No concerns Operations – No concerns

Public Consultation

The owner has advised Planning staff that instead of conducting a neighbourhood meeting, they sent letters to the neighbouring residents with a plan outlining their proposed rezoning. The letter included that the residents contact the owner if they had any questions or if they wanted clarification.

Planning Considerations

A majority of the subject lands are zoned "R2", Double Residential, permitting the construction of either a single detached dwelling, duplex dwelling or semi-detached dwellings on each of the lots to be created.

One proposed lot and portions of five proposed residential lots are zoned "FD", Future Development and will complete the lotting pattern of the two proposed cul-de-sacs to the easterly limit of the MTO property.

Most of the lands subject to the rezoning are located within the Mallards Landing draft plan of subdivision which was draft approved in 1988. Several phases of the subdivision have been registered over the years with the most recent phase (Plan 53M-1313) registered on June 3, 2004. The subject lands are the last lands remaining in the plan of subdivision to be registered. The draft approval is scheduled to lapse on October 5, 2011.

Compatibility

The rezoning of the subject lands from "R2", Double Residential Zone to "R1", Single Residential Zone would only allow for single detached dwellings to be built whereas the current R2 zoning would allow for either single detached, semi-detached or duplex dwellings. While the abutting lots to the east are zoned

"R2", Double Residential Zone, they were originally built as single detached dwellings. The proposed R1 zoning would be compatible with the existing single detached housing forms in the area. The rezoning of the "FD", Future Development Lands to

"R1", Single Residential, will allow for the owner’s lands located to the east of the Ministry of Transportation (MTO), property to be incorporated into the lotting pattern for the plan of subdivision. Planning Staff agree that these lands should be included in the subdivision plan as opposed to being left as a remnant

undeveloped parcel.

Plan of Subdivision

The Mallards Plan of subdivision currently includes a cul-de-sac at the end of Mallard’s Landing Drive with a Block 43 shown on the plan to the west of the lots fronting onto Mist Hollow Drive, along with five lots

fronting onto the north side of Trailview Drive. The plan is proposed to be revised to include a cul-de-sac with ten lots, north of Trailview Drive in the general area of Block 43.

An easement for access purposes in favour of MTO is currently located on the subject lands. Planning Staff understand that the owner is proposing to provide an alternative access to MTO over the owner’s lands to the north. Prior to the registration of the plan of subdivision, legal access either in the existing location or in a new location will need to be provided to the MTO lands, in order to ensure that the Ministry’s property does not become landlocked.

Page 10 of 56

(11)

The Algonquin II plan of subdivision is located immediately to the west and south of the subject lands. An

“L-shaped” parcel, being Block 64 on the draft plan dated August 12, 2003, was registered in 2004 as Block 35 on Plan 53M-1313 and is proposed to form portions of two lots to the west of the cul-de-sac north of Trailview Drive. For purposes of efficiency it is proposed that Block 35, Plan 53M-1313 be included in the draft plan conditions applying to the amended Mallard’s draft plan.

Conclusion

In consideration of the above, Planning staff are satisfied that the application conforms with the Official Plan, and will be compatible with the existing and permitted uses in the area, and should be approved. The Mallard’s Landing draft plan approval should be amended to include the additional lands and to reflect the revised layout as proposed in this report. Should the Planning Committee concur, the recommendation as set out in this report should be adopted.

Page 11 of 56

(12)

751-6-09-013 location sketch 1/1 Page 12 of 56

(13)

751-6-09-013 site plan 1/1 Page 13 of 56

(14)

Photo 1 FROM TRAILVIEW DRIVE LOOKING NORTH AT THE SUBJECT LANDS

Photo 2 FROM TRAILVIEW DRIVE LOOKING NORTHWEST AT SUBJECT LANDS

751-6/09-13 Photography Sept 16, 2009

751-6-09-013 Photos 1/3 Page 14 of 56

(15)

Photo 3 FROM TRAILVIEW DRIVE, SUBJECT LANDS AND REAR YARDS OF ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL

PROPERTIES FRONTING ONTO MIST HOLLOW DRIVE

Photo 4 SINGLE DETACHED DWELLINGS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MIST HOLLOW DRIVE

751-6-09-013 Photos 2/3 Page 15 of 56

(16)

Photo 5 LOOKING WEST FROM MALLARD’S LANDING DRIVE AT THE SUBJECT LANDS

751-6-09-013 Photos 3/3 Page 16 of 56

(17)

Request for Decision

Application for site specific rezoning in order to permit a total of 640 units or 800 beds, or a

combination thereof, on the Finlandia Village site, 233 Fourth Avenue, Sudbury - Sudbury Finnish Rest Home Society Inc

Recommendation

That the application by Sudbury Finnish Rest Home Society Inc.

to amend By-law 95-500Z being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the (former) City of Sudbury by changing the zoning classification of lands described as PIN 73578-0397,

73577-0016, 73577-0048, 73577-0112, 73577-0651 &

73577-0652 in Lots 11 & 12, Concession 3, Township of Neelon from "R4-19", Multiple Residential Special and "FD", Future Development to a modified "R4-19", Multiple Residential Special be approved subject to the following conditions:

A. i) That prior to the enactment of the amending by-law the owner will be required to contribute 50% of the cost to urbanize Fourth Avenue from Bancroft Drive to the subject property, complete with a sidewalk along the west side of the road; and, ii) That prior to the enactment of the amending by-law the owner will undertake a Traffic Impact Study and agree to contribute towards the cost of any improvements or upgrading identified in the study, including Second Avenue, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Infrastructure Services.

B. That the amending by-law contain the following site specific provisions:

(i) The only permitted uses shall be a senior citizens’ complex consisting of, but not necessarily restricted to, apartments, nursing homes, chronic care facilities, special care homes, recreational facilities and related accessory uses;

(ii) The built form may consist of multiple dwellings, row dwellings and institutional buildings such as a nursing home;

(iii) The development shall not exceed 640 units or 800 beds or a combination thereof. The formula for determining capacity shall be on the basis of 1.25 beds being the equivalent of 1 unit: 1.25 beds = 1 unit.

(iv) The maximum height of main buildings shall not exceed three (3) storeys; (v) Automobile parking shall Presented To: Planning Committee Presented: Tuesday, Oct 06, 2009 Report Date Friday, Sep 18, 2009 Type: Public Hearings File Number: 751-6/09-5

Signed By

Report Prepared By Mauro Manzon Planner

Art Potvin

Doug Nadorozny

Page 17 of 56

(18)

be provided on the basis of 1 parking space per 4 units or equivalent;

(vi) The following building setbacks shall apply:

1. No building for residential purposes shall be located closer than 60 metres from the centre line of the Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way;

2. 9 metres from Fourth Avenue except for a bus shelter or a waste disposal storage building;

3. 11.8 metres from the westerly lot line abutting single detached dwellings on Second Avenue (Lots 21-25 of Plan 53M-1323);

4. There shall be no minimum setback for internally shared property lines;

(vii) The existing frontage on Fourth Avenue is recognized.

STAFF REPORT Applicant:

Sudbury Finnish Rest Home Society Inc. (Agent: D.S. Dorland Ltd.) Location:

PIN 73578-0397, 73577-0016, 73577-0048, 73577-0112, 73577-0651 & 73577-0652 in Lots 11 & 12, Concession 3, Township of Neelon (233 Fourth Avenue, Sudbury)

Application:

To amend By-law 95-500Z being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the (former) City of Sudbury from

"R4-19", Multiple Residential Special and "FD", Future Development to a modified "R4-19", Multiple Residential Special.

Proposal:

Application for site specific rezoning in order to permit a total of 640 units or 800 beds, or a combination thereof, on the entire Finlandia Village site, as illustrated on the enclosed sketch. The rezoning applies to existing developed lands, as well as the undeveloped parcel currently zoned "FD", Future Development.

The following is a breakdown of existing and proposed facilities:

Existing:

Hoivakoti - 110 nursing beds Finlandia Koti - 90 apartment units

Palvelukoti - 46 supportive housing apartment units Rivitalo I, II, III - 31 townhouse units

Majatalo - 2 shared housing units

Proposed expansion on lands currently zoned R4-19:

Rivitalo IV - 6 townhouse units

Saari Tower - 15 apartment units; 45 nursing beds Lepokoti - 79 apartment units

Proposed expansion on lands currently zoned FD:

18 townhouse units

Page 18 of 56

(19)

85 apartment units

90 supportive housing apartment units 24 independent living apartment units Total beds: 155

Total units: 486

The current zoning utilizes a conversion factor of 1 unit = 1.25 beds. The above mix of nursing beds and dwelling units is therefore equivalent to 610 units, or alternatively, 763 beds:

155 beds + (486 units x 1.25) = 763 beds; or, 486 units + (155 beds / 1.25) = 610 units.

Allowing a combination of nursing beds and dwelling units provides the flexibility to modify the mix of accommodation based on evolving needs.

Official Plan Conformity:

The subject lands are designated as Living Area I in the Official Plan. A range of residential uses are permitted subject to the rezoning process. In addition, various neighbourhood institutional uses are permitted, such as schools, places of worship and retirement homes. Such uses are deemed to be compatible within a residential setting. The proposal conforms to the intent of the Official Plan.

Site Description & Surrounding Land Uses:

The Finlandia site encompasses both developed and undeveloped lands. The westerly portion is currently zoned "FD", Future Development and remains undeveloped. The easterly portion is zoned "R4-19", Multiple Residential Special. The developed portion of the property contains a long-term care facility and residential uses in various housing formats (see description of the proposal above). Public roads providing access to the development are not constructed to an urban standard (Fourth Avenue and Second Avenue South).

Total site area is 16.5 ha. Existing developed lands comprise 11.74 ha; the undeveloped portion currently zoned for Future Development is 4.8 ha. The lands have a varied topography, with rocky hilltop features, areas of relatively flat terrain, treed portions and a drainage course which flows in a southwesterly direction through Korpela Park. Based on the preliminary site plan, the southerly hilltop feature will be the site of the proposed Saari Tower, while the westerly hilltop will remain undeveloped.

The surrounding neighbourhood is comprised of low density housing, predominantly single detached dwellings. A draft plan of subdivision has been approved on the parcel southwest of the site (Dalron Construction). A public park abuts the northwesterly limit of the property (Korpela Park). The CPR rail corridor forms the northerly limit of the lands.

Departmental & Agency Comments:

Development Engineering

Development Engineering has reviewed the above noted application. Municipal water and sanitary sewer is presently available for this site. We will make detailed comments as part of the Site Plan Control

Agreement process. This would include but not limited to a review of the size of services required for the proposed development, lot grading, stormwater management and any work to be completed in the right-of-way.

We have no objection to changing the zoning classification from "R4-19", Multiple Residential Special and

"FD" Future Development to a modified "R4-19", Multiple Residential Special.

Page 19 of 56

(20)

"FD" Future Development to a modified "R4-19", Multiple Residential Special.

Transportation Engineering

The application is proposing the expansion of Finlandia Village to a total of 640 units or 800 beds, or a combination of the two. Currently, Finlandia Village has access onto Fourth Avenue. The site plan submitted with the application indicates a second entrance is proposed onto Second Avenue. This new entrance, if and when constructed, will likely change traffic patterns to and from the site.

Both Fourth Avenue and Second Avenue are constructed to a two lane rural standard, south of Bancroft Drive, without sidewalks. The owner will be required to contribute 50% of the cost to urbanize Fourth Avenue from Bancroft Drive to the subject property, complete with sidewalks along the west side of the road. In order to determine the impact of the proposed expansion on the area roads, including Second Avenue, it is recommended that the owner undertake a traffic impact study and agree to contribute towards the cost of any improvements or upgrading identified in the study to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Infrastructure Services.

Nickel District Conservation Authority

Please be advised that the Nickel District Conservation Authority has reviewed the above application and has no objection to same.

Background:

The site was first developed for seniors housing in 1984, based on zoning approvals first acquired in 1982.

Over the last two decades, uses have been expanded to include the following mix of long-term care and housing accommodation:

Finlandia Koti - 90 apartment units (1984) Palvelukoti - 46 apartment units (1991) Rivitalo I - 16 townhouse units (1994) Hoivakoti - 110 nursing beds (1999/2000) Rivitalo II - 7 townhouse units (2006) Majatalo - 2 shared housing units (2006) Rivitalo III - 8 townhouse units (2007)

Current zoning for the Finlandia site was implemented in 1993 (By-law # 93-218). The "R4-19", Multiple Residential Special zoning permits a mix of nursing beds and dwelling units subject to the following provisions:

(i) The only permitted uses shall be a senior citizens’ complex consisting of, but not necessarily restricted to, apartments, nursing home, chronic care facility, special care homes, recreational facilities and related accessory uses;

(ii) The built form may consist of multiple dwellings, row dwellings and institutional buildings such as a nursing home;

(iii) The development shall not exceed 340 units or 425 beds or a combination thereof. The formula for determining capacity shall be on the basis of 1.25 beds being the equivalent of 1 unit: 1.25 beds = 1 unit.

(iv) The maximum height of main buildings shall not exceed three (3) storeys;

Page 20 of 56

(21)

(v) Automobile parking shall be provided on the basis of 1 parking space per 4 units or equivalent;

(vi) The following building setbacks shall apply:

1. No building for residential purposes shall be located closer than 60 metres from the centre line of the Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way;

2. 9 metres from Fourth Avenue except for a bus shelter or a waste disposal storage building;

3. 7.5 metres from all other exterior lot lines and there shall be no minimum setback for internally shared property lines;

4. The existing frontage on Fourth Avenue is recognized.

The owners have recently submitted a site plan control application for a 79-unit apartment dwelling (Lepokoti) on lands identified on the rezoning sketch as the location of a future Wellness Centre.

Planning Considerations:

The proposal does not necessarily represent imminent development, but rather sets the stage for the long-term expansion of Finlandia Village. The proposed zoning would allow the owner to modify the mix of housing based on changing needs and demand.

The key issues related to this application are as follows:

1. The adequacy of infrastructure to accommodate the range of expanded uses, most notably the road linkages.

2. Land use compatibility with existing and proposed low density residential uses, as impacted by a substantial increase in the number of beds/dwelling units and changing traffic patterns.

Road network

The existing local road network is inadequate to support intensified development on the subject lands, as represented by a significant increase in the number of beds/dwelling units. Fourth Avenue and Second Avenue south of Bancroft Drive are not constructed to an urban standard, and have no sidewalks. The preliminary plan also proposes an alternate access from Second Avenue, which will potentially alter traffic patterns in the neighbourhood.

As a result, Roads and Transportation Section are requesting the following as conditions of the rezoning:

1. That the owner be required to contribute 50% of the cost to urbanize Fourth Avenue from Bancroft Drive to the subject property, complete with a sidewalk along the west side of the road; and,

2. That the owner undertake a Traffic Impact Study and agree to contribute towards the cost of any improvements or upgrading identified in the study, including Second Avenue, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Infrastructure Services.

For the information of the Committee, the road distance between Bancroft Drive and the main entrance on Fourth Avenue is approximately 650m; the distance between Bancroft Drive and the proposed alternate access on Second Avenue is approximately 566m.

Servicing

Servicing requirements are not available at this time. A detailed servicing analysis will occur at the site plan Page 21 of 56

(22)

Servicing requirements are not available at this time. A detailed servicing analysis will occur at the site plan control stage.

Land use compatibility a) Density

Since the entire site functions as one integrated development, residential density should be assessed based on the entire land holdings. Assuming the project is fully built out as proposed, the net density for the

Finlandia site would be 39 units per hectare. This is well below the maximum residential density of 90 units per hectare permitted in the Official Plan for medium density uses, and very close to the maximum 36 units per hectare permitted for low density neighbourhoods (singles, semis and duplexes).

The resultant density is considered appropriate given the location, which is surrounded by a low density neighbourhood. By capping the total number of units, the residential density is appropriately limited to 39 units per hectare.

b) Built form

No major land use conflicts have evolved related to land use compatibility with adjacent low density residential uses. This is largely due to the unique characteristics of the site, which is very large (+16 hectares) and naturally buffered by existing topography and vegetation. To control the scale, height and siting of buildings, site specific zoning provisions have been implemented.

Planning Services recommends that such provisions be extended to the undeveloped portion of the site.

Building height should be limited to three (3) stories, consistent with current zoning. This will limit the height of the proposed Saari Tower, which is situated on a hilltop feature and will directly abut lots zoned for single residential use. The preliminary site plan illustrates a setback of 11.8m for the building, which is felt to be adequate for buffering purposes.

Minimum setback requirements implemented through prior approvals should be generally maintained. In the westerly portion of the property, where proposed townhouse units will abut the rear yards of single detached dwellings on Second Avenue, a setback of 11.8m is recommended, as illustrated on the rezoning sketch, to include a 7.5m vegetative buffer.

Such requirements shall be implemented through the site plan control process.

Neighbourhood meeting

The proponents will be conducting a neighbourhood information session on September 29, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. at Finlandia Village.

As of the date of this report, several phone calls have been received seeking clarification on the application.

One written submission has been received, which is attached for review.

Summary

Current zoning provisions have worked well for the development, as no major land use conflicts have evolved over the last two decades. Planning Services recommends that these site specific provisions be

Page 22 of 56

(23)

carried forward.

The existing road network, however, is inadequate to support intensified development. As a condition of rezoning, it is recommended that the owner complete a Traffic Impact Study which shall identify necessary road improvements to support the scale of development. The owner shall be required to negotiate and enter into an agreement with the City to implement the study recommendations.

Planning Services recommends that the application for rezoning be approved subject to the above conditions.

Page 23 of 56

(24)

751-6-09-005 location sketch 1/1 Page 24 of 56

(25)

751-6-09-005 site plan 1/1 Page 25 of 56

(26)

Photo 1 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - VIEW OF FINLANDIA KOTI (SENIORS APTS)

Photo 2 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - VIEW OF HOIVAKOTI (LONG TERM CARE)

751-6/09-5 Photography July 8, 2009

751-6-09-005 Photos 1/7 Page 26 of 56

(27)

Photo 3 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - VIEW OF RIVITALO TOWNHOUSES

Photo 4 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FUTURE SOUTHERLY EXPANSION (RIVITALO AND SAARI TOWER)

751-6-09-005 Photos 2/7 Page 27 of 56

(28)

Photo 5 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - HILL BEHIND RIVITALO IV

Photo 6 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - WESTERLY VIEW (FUTURE TOWNHOUSES)

751-6-09-005 Photos 3/7 Page 28 of 56

(29)

Photo 7 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - NORTHWESTERLY VIEW (FUTURE SUPPORTIVE HOUSING)

Photo 8 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - NORTHERLY VIEW (FUTURE VILLAGE SQUARE AND SENIORS APTS)

751-6-09-005 Photos 4/7 Page 29 of 56

(30)

Photo 9 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - NORTHWESTERLY VIEW TO SECOND AVENUE

Photo 10 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - FOURTH AVENUE NORTHERLY VIEW

751-6-09-005 Photos 5/7 Page 30 of 56

(31)

Photo 11 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - FOURTH AVENUE SOUTHERLY VIEW

Photo 12 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - VIEW OF KORPELA PARK

751-6-09-005 Photos 6/7 Page 31 of 56

(32)

Photo 13 FINLANDIA VILLAGE, SUDBURY - KORPELA PARK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE

751-6-09-005 Photos 7/7 Page 32 of 56

(33)

751-6-09-005 letter of concern 1/2 Page 33 of 56

(34)

751-6-09-005 letter of concern 2/2 Page 34 of 56

(35)

Minutes

Report No. 7, Municipal Heritage Committee Meeting Minutes of June, 8, 2009.

Recommendation For Information Only

Presented To: Planning Committee Presented: Tuesday, Oct 06, 2009

Type: Minutes

Signed By

No signatures or approvals were recorded for this report.

Page 35 of 56

(36)

MHC (2009-06-08) 1

THE SEVENTH MEETING OF THE MUNICIPAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY

Boardroom C-12 Monday, June 8, 2009

Tom Davies Square Commencement: 5:00 p.m.

Adjournment: 7:08 p.m.

ORYST SAWCHUK IN THE CHAIR

Present Councillor Dutrisac; J. Drago; E. Landry; J. Larcher-Lalande; S.

Prusila; A. Salach; M. Steedman; M. Stefura; S. Thompson.

Staff P. Baskcomb; J.Ferrigan; K.Longston.

Others Councillor Berthiaume.

Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof

None declared.

Community Delegations Item 1

Councillor Berthiaume Chelmsford Convent

The Chair tabled a revised Agenda. Several other additions were made to the Agenda.

Recommendation #2009-17

Drago-Prusila: That the Agenda for the June 8, 2009 Meeting be amended by adding a new Item under Community Delegation titled

“Chelmsford Convent/Stakeholder Group”.

CARRIED Recommendation #2009-18

Steedman-Prusila: That the Agenda, as amended, be adopted.

CARRIED Community Delegations

Chelmsford Convent/

Stakeholder Group

Councillor Berthiaume updated the Committee on the status of the Chelmsford Convent Stakeholder Group. This small group has met on several occasions to discuss how to preserve the building by acquiring and adaptively re-using the building. The Group met with Ministry of Culture staff and volunteers at the Northern Ontario

Municipal Heritage Min June 8 1/4 Page 36 of 56

(37)

MHC (2009-06-08) 2

Community Delegations (cont’d) Chelmsford

Convent/

Stakeholder Group (cont’d)

Railway Museum and Heritage Centre in Capreol. The Group would like to see the building preserved. Funding is required to acquire the site, perform essential upgrades (e.g. new roof) and adaptively re-use the building. Some potential uses include a museum, tea house, rental space and/or archives. Fundraising for these activities would be difficult given existing fundraising drives underway in the community for the new Long Term Care Facility. The Group would like to explore the feasibility of the City acquiring the Convent and using it as a museum and/or library annex for one to two years.

This would help improve access to the building, raise awareness for its cultural heritage value, and provide the Group with time to raise the necessary funds. The Committee discussed the matter and felt that it should continue to be explored. City Planning Staff will arrange a meeting with City Library/Museum Staff to discuss the Group’s proposal.

Minutes Item 2 Adoption of Minutes May 11, 2009

Steedman - Landry: THAT the Minutes of the May 11, 2009 meeting be approved.

CARRIED Referred and Deferred Items

Item 3 Downtown Sudbury Street Signs and 1887 Village Plan

City Staff presented and described the 1887 Plan for the Village of Sudbury. The Committee discussed how this plan could be

reflected in the new street name signs, currently being considered for the Downtown Business Improvement Area. The Committee felt that there are four key elements from the Plan that should be shown on the new street name signs: boundaries; railway yards; grid and street names; and, Junction and Nolin Creeks.

Salach – Prusila: THAT the 1887 Village Plan is a critically important part of Greater Sudbury’s Heritage; and

THAT the Downtown Partnership be encouraged to celebrate the heritage of Downtown Sudbury in its revitalization work.

CARRIED

(38)

MHC (2009-06-08) 3

Managers’ Reports Item 4

2009 Strategic Action Plan Update

City Staff updated the Committee on the progress made towards the 2009 Strategic Directions and Actions. The Committee felt that the Navy League should be contacted to discuss the potential

designation of their property at 19 Regent Street.

Item 5

May 13, 2009 Copper Cliff Italian Club Site Visit Update

City Staff updated the Committee on their site visit to the Copper Cliff Italian Club and describe the existing conditions of the building.

The Committee discussed the building and felt that cultural heritage value assessment of the Club should be undertaken within the context of Little Italy.

Item 6

May 25, 2009 Ward 12 CAN (Uptown Chapter) Meeting

City Staff updated the Committee on their meeting with the Ward 12 (Uptown Chapter) CAN and discussed the key steps in the

preliminary cultural heritage value assessment process. The

Committee felt that in addition to establishing the boundaries for this area, the preliminary cultural heritage value assessment should also address the relationship between this area and Downtown Sudbury.

Item 7

Ontario Heritage Trust 2009 Recognition Program

City Staff tabled the request for nominations for the Ontario Heritage Trust’s 2009 Recognition Program and invited the Committee to consider nominees for the Youth Heritage Leaders and Community Leadership Programs. The Committee will consider potential nominees and advise City Staff.

Item 8

1933 Home Video of Flour Mill and Downtown Sudbury

S. Prusila shared a home video of the Flour Mill and Downtown Sudbury with the Committee. The Committee discussed the names of several figures in the video.

Addendum Item 9

Building Renewal Letters

S Prusila noted that several buildings with potential cultural heritage value have been upgraded in recent years including the DeMarco building, the Townehouse Tavern, the former Copper Cliff Hospital, the former Eaton’s building. It was suggested that the Committee should recognize property owners that undertake building upgrades that are sensitive to the cultural heritage value of the buildings in the form of a letter. City Staff will consider how to best implement this idea, including evaluation criteria and form letters.

(39)

MHC (2009-06-08) 4

Addendum (cont’d) Item 10

Farm Recognition Plaques

S. Prusila noted that several Ontario communities recognize long established farms with plaques posted along the roadside of the farm and suggested that consideration be given to developing and implementing a similar system in Greater Sudbury. The Committee discussed this suggestion and felt that it would be a useful way to recognize the heritage of Greater Sudbury’s agricultural community.

City Staff suggested that this idea be discussed with the City’s Agriculture and Topsoil Advisory Panel. S. Prusila will follow up with the Agriculture and Topsoil Advisory Panel.

Item 11 Downtown

Sudbury Heritage Conservation District.

S. Thompson suggested that Downtown Sudbury be subject to a preliminary cultural heritage value assessment exercise as outlined by City Staff. The Committee discussed the matter and agreed with the suggestion.

Drago – Thompson: THAT the Municipal Heritage Committee should initiate a preliminary assessment of the cultural heritage value of Downtown Sudbury, using the 1887 Village Plan as a starting point, with a report back in September 2009.

CARRIED Adjournment Recommendation #2009-22

Thompson - Salach: THAT this meeting does now adjourn.

Time: 7:08 p.m.

CARRIED

Jason Ferrigan, Secretary Oryst Sawchuk, Chair

(40)

Routine Management Reports

Request for Decision

Extension to Draft Approval - Riverdale Subdivision, Township of Waters - Riverglen Developments Ltd

Recommendation

That upon payment of the processing fee of $1,666.66 prior to the December 31st, 2009 lapsing date, the conditions of draft approval of the plan of subdivision of Part of Parcels 1880 & 416 S.W.S. in Lot 6, Concession 4, Township of Waters, be amended as follows:

a) By revising Condition # 21 and replacing it with the following:

"21. Draft approval shall lapse on December 31, 2011."

b) By modifying condition # 11 to read as follows:

Prior to the submission of servicing plans, the owner shall have a stormwater management report and plan prepared, signed, sealed, and dated by a professional engineer with a valid certificate of authorization. Said report shall establish how the quantity and quality of stormwater will be managed for the subdivision development and assess the impact of stormwater runoff from this developed subdivision on abutting lands, on the downstream storm sewer outlet systems and on downstream water courses. The report shall deal with the control of both the

1:5 year, 1:100 year, and Regional Storm events, so as to limit the volume of flow generated on the site to pre-development levels. The Regional Storm flow path is to be set out on the plan(s).

c) By modifying condition # 12 to read as follows:

The owner shall provide a detailed lot grading plan prepared, signed, sealed, and dated by a professional civil engineer with a valid certificate of authorization for the proposed lots as part of the submission of servicing plans. This plan must show finished grades around new houses, retaining walls, sideyards, swales, slopes and lot corners. The plan must show sufficient grades on boundary properties to mesh the lot grading of the new site to existing properties.

Presented To: Planning Committee Presented: Tuesday, Oct 06, 2009 Report Date Tuesday, Sep 15, 2009

Type: Routine Management

Reports File Number: 780-8/95006

Signed By

Report Prepared By Celia Teale

Senior Planner

Art Potvin

Doug Nadorozny

Page 40 of 56

(41)

Background:

The above noted draft plan of subdivision proposed the creation of 83 lots for single residential use on a parcel of land which is located on the north side of Black Lake Road at the southerly limits of the settlement of Lively, as shown on the attached sketch. This subdivision received draft approval on October 30th, 1995, which was subsequently amended on November 16th, 1998, October 5th, 2001, December 21st, 2001, September 15th, 2004 and November 21, 2006 (City Council’s Conditions to Approval of the Final Plan for Registration attached). Condition # 21. of this draft approval states that the draft approval shall lapse on December 31st, 2009.

An amending zoning by-law has been passed zoning the subject property "R1.D18", Single Residential in order to permit the proposed development. To date no phase of the subdivision has been registered.

However, ten lots have subsequently been created by way of the consent process (Consent File #’s B63/00, B68/ to B70/00, B25 to B27/2002, B57 to B60/2002 and B66/2004). Thus, these lands are considered to have been removed from the draft plan area.

On September 18th, 2006 the Planning Services Division received a request from the applicant that the draft plan be extended for a period of two (2) years.

The following agencies and departments were asked to review this proposed development and the

conditions of draft approval imposed by Council, and have subsequently provided the following comments:

Development Engineering

Development Engineering has reviewed the above noted application.

With regards to the extension of draft approval, we ask that the following modification be made to the draft plan conditions:

Modify Condition # 11 to read as follows:

- Prior to the submission of servicing plans, the owner shall have a stormwater management report and plan prepared, signed, sealed, and dated by a professional engineer with a valid certificate of authorization.

Said report shall establish how the quantity and quality of stormwater will be managed for the subdivision development and assess the impact of stormwater runoff from this developed subdivision on abutting lands, on the downstream storm sewer outlet systems and on downstream water courses. The report shall deal with the control of both the 1:5 year, 1:100 year, and Regional Storm events, so as to limit the volume of flow generated on the site to pre-development levels. The Regional Storm flow path is to be set out on the plan(s).

Modify Condition # 12 to read as follows:

- The owner shall provide a detailed lot grading plan prepared, signed, sealed, and dated by a professional civil engineer with a valid certificate of authorization for the proposed lots as part of the submission of servicing plans. This plan must show finished grades around new houses, retaining walls, sideyards, swales, slopes and lot corners. The plan must show sufficient grades on boundary properties to mesh the lot grading of the new site to existing properties.

Transportation Engineering

The standard clause requiring a twenty (20) year design life for the road should be inserted. In addition, a Page 41 of 56

(42)

clause should be inserted stating that the subdivision will be constructed to City standards at the time of construction.

Nickel District Conservation Authority

Please be advised that the Nickel District Conservation Authority has no objection to the above noted extension.

Comment #16 refers to lots in the original draft plan approval.

Summary

There are no technical issues or land use matters which need to be addressed at this time.

It is accordingly recommended that a two year extension be granted upon payment of Council’s processing fee of $1,666.66 prior to the December 31st, 2009 lapsing date.

In accordance with City Council policy concerning the fee for a two year extension with respect to this subdivision the following calculation is provided:

Year 2009 Application Fee

Base Fee $1,820.00 50 lots X $64.00 per lot $3,200.00 23 lots X $34.00 per lot $ 782.00 Total Fee $5,802.00

50% of the total application fee represents $2,901.00, as such the $2,500.00 maximum fee for a draft approval request would apply. Therefore for a two year extension $1,666.66 will be the fee payable.

(Note: the original number of lots in the draft plan of subdivision were reduced from 83 to 73 for the

purposes of the above calculations in recognition of 10 lots which could be removed by way of the Consent process.)

Page 42 of 56

(43)

780-8-95006 location sketch 1/1 Page 43 of 56

(44)

780-8/95006 December 2006 CITY COUNCIL'S CONDITIONS APPLYING TO THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAN FOR REGISTRATION OF THE SUBJECT SUBDIVISION ARE AS FOLLOWS:

1. That this draft approval applies to the draft plan of subdivision of Part of Parcels 1880 and 416 S.W.S., Lot 6, Concession 4, Township of Waters, as shown on a plan prepared by Peter M. Bull, O.L.S. and dated March 27^th, 1995.

2. That the street(s) shall be named to the satisfaction of the Municipality.

3. That any dead-ends or open sides of road allowances created by this plan of subdivision shall be terminated in 0.3 metre reserves, to be conveyed to the Municipality and held in trust by the Municipality until required for future road allowances or the development of adjacent land.

4. That the lot areas, frontages and depths appearing on the final plan shall not violate the requirements of the Restricted Area By-laws of the Municipality in effect at the time such plan is presented for approval.

5. That the subdivision agreement be registered by the Municipality against the land to which it applies, prior to any encumbrances.

6. That such easements as may be required for utility or drainage purposes shall be granted to the appropriate authority.

7. That the owner agrees in writing to satisfy all the requirements, financial and otherwise, of the City of Greater Sudbury, concerning the provision of roads, installation of services and drainage.

8. That the subdivision agreement contain provisions whereby the owner agrees that all the requirements of the subdivision agreement including installation of required services be completed within 3 years after registration.

9. That 5% of the land included in the subdivision be deeded to the City of Greater Sudbury for parks purposes pursuant to Subsection 51.1(1) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 as amended.

10. That the plan described in Item 1. of this conditional approval be revised to provide an appropriate temporary turnaround incorporating a 0.3 metre reserve on A-Street and B-Street to the satisfaction of the City of Greater Sudbury Public Works Department.

...2

780-8-95006 conditions 1/4 Page 44 of 56

(45)

- 2 -

11. Prior to the submission of servicing plans, the applicant/owner shall have a stormwater management report and plan prepared by a consulting engineer with a valid certificate of authorization. Said report shall establish the drainage areas draining to and within this proposed subdivision and how stormwater will be managed within the subdivision development in order to limit the impact of stormwater both within the subdivision and on downstream receiving storm sewers, drainage channels and creeks. The report shall deal with sediment control and the control of both the 1:5 and regional storm events. The Regional storm path is to be set out on the plan. The report and plans shall be to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Public Works. The owner shall be responsible for the design and construction of any required stormwater management facility as part of the servicing plans for the subdivision and the owner shall dedicate the lands for the stormwater management facility as a condition of this development.

12. That prior to the signing of the final plan the owner shall submit a detailed Lot Grading Plan to the satisfaction of the City of Greater Sudbury Public Works Department.

13. That the subdivision agreement contain provisions whereby the owner agrees to construct a watermain loop from the existing watermain on Jacob Street to the existing watermain on Herman Mayer Drive, and that no building permits will be issued for lots not fronting Black Lake Road until such watermain loop

construction has been completed all to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Public Works.

14. That the owner prepare a sediment control plan for the construction phase of the project to the satisfaction of the Nickel District Conservation Authority.

15. That the owner prepare a lot grading/storm water management plan addressing stormwater runoff from this developed subdivision on Junction Creek to the satisfaction of the Nickel District Conservation Authority, and that any alterations to the creek that result in lots being created along the former creek bed will require an engineering study, to determine their feasibility for development.

16. That prior to the signing of the final plan, a detailed soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer, to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and the Nickel District Conservation Authority, with respect to those lands generally described as being Lots 13 and 14, 55 to 63 inclusive, and 76, 77 and 78 on the draft plan, and the area where the creek was located, outlining how any

problems associated with poor soil conditions can be overcome, and

construction techniques which will be required for the construction of homes on the subject lands.

...3

780-8-95006 conditions 2/4 Page 45 of 56