in
Morand-Fehr P. (ed.).
Recent advances in goat research Zaragoza : CIHEAM
Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes; n. 25 1997
pages 9-16
Article available on lin e / Article dispon ible en lign e à l’adresse :
--- http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?ID PD F=97605950
--- To cite th is article / Pou r citer cet article
--- Rubino R., Haenlein G.F.W. Goat milk produ ction systems: Su b-systems an d differen tiation factors. In : Morand-Fehr P. (ed.). Recent advances in goat research. Zaragoza : CIHEAM, 1997. p. 9- 16 (Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes; n. 25)
---
http://www.ciheam.org/
http://om.ciheam.org/
GOAT
-
G.F.W.1
2 per la Zootecnia
-
BellaUniversity Delaware - 19717), USA.
The deals with the and
system analysis. many developping goat milk is not
subsistence. When the the use of
has caused an in is some difficulty due to the lack
in
Consequently such a system in in USA, 4 millions
goat's in 2.5
These data in volume the last 10
may most of the in cheese at the
skipped to a cheese which take the thanks to
investment, the milk allows the the whosale
to at the it possible to the the
the South of the
cheese quality as a of 20-30 %
.
sell is much linked to the milk which may
the milk quality to depends on
quality, fat and As kidding is seasonal, milk in
Consequently,, dynamic milk in opposite season by
adopting goatss mattings in advance of sexual season.
Actually the moving. developping the main objective is to
'- the maximum of hig
dietetic and extension
quality than quantity in
~
i Goats, systems,
A reading key for understanding the differences between the systems
of of the
i.e.
existing
so system.
of what in is called the
in of
data, taken
of us
available data we will to be exhaustive.
The sub-systems and principal differentiation factors
A no in the
same the in
of of
efficiency.
production for drinking
of the
skin, is the milk, family consumption put on the population, while in
East, some systems, e.g. of
has no in
the good
al., 1995).
is,
goats' milk the use of
in milk system, in
in linked to chances of placing the milk on
The long distance and the wide
the of
goat's
milk.
of milkmilk
goat's milk by people and infants with cow's milk
of goat's milk was substituted
cow's milk in
goat's milk, goat's milk
goat's milk milk (Teh, 1991), while 2.5
goat's of which half is sold
milk.
These data showa
in10
A goat's milk to goat's milk by
of goat's milk and because of lack
of of goat's milk in the
milk composition. The validity of the use of somatic cell
goat's milk goat's m i l l c
production for cheese rnaking
goat's the
cheese", among system economists as
goat's milk of
in USA
1 goat's
goat's milk weekly
500,000 kg $ 15 million,
At the
milk
et al, 1995).
of goat's milk
1). Spain 65 % in in
%, 52 % 75 % %).
is, final destination of the
milk.
1,500 it has
been shown that the 1) milk than
on those who sell it This means that milk
milk.
Amilk milk
of the limited level of specialization.
in 6 headsha show a
milk
costs.
milk
equal to about 50
milk
of in
pull
al, is simple and
in aims in this
the this was
achieved, the %
.
positive as the of milk) to
125 (using only one in 70 %
cities hotels.
The same is now found often in
At the dairy factories
milk milk in
on such a type of % of
the of of
(milk to the efficiency and capability of the
all
milk in the
2.7 centimedg fat and 7.4
is in this the capability and the
in which the milk depends on
the 1994) it may due
to:
The season. As kidding is seasonal, milk 2).
(1995) that in the to adopt new
technologies, and of the
2). The milk them into the flock in
The size daily factories. The the milk
3).
í'le milk
size, cheeses (Table 4).
Genetic improvement
of all systems, those which sell the milk it,
is the functioning of This is not only - in
in the last 30
-
but especiallyout the monthly milk
of innovative the
of
in 5 this
and, of milk
not only on milk on
in in
USA the milk í'le future scenario
moving. Obviously, the evolution speed to ?e development level of each system and the efficiency of the extension
Towards quality. This is of
sophisticated. Quality, in the case of
health, is milk cheeses, in
case the
milk a
the milk As
the aim in
in in
"one's own" quality.
Towards quantity.
milk
CAST, 1982. The U S . Ed.), Council
C.,
C., in South-East Asia. FAO Animal
El Aich, A., Landau, S . , A., in
al., Ed.), in the
Falagan, A.,
-
Cas de laSalon of the goat milk in the USA.
ewe's and goat's
milk,
of goat meat and milk in
in Ed.) "Sheep and goat
milk somatic cell count situation in J. Animal Sci. 10:305-310.
J.C., Soukehal, A., la technologie du
11'79.
Landau, S . , Y., A., in
al., Ed.), in
136-159.
1
goat's milk in
Nencioni, C., to identify the
et techniques des Saithanoo, S . ,
Yai,
E., in in the
Ed.) in
the
S . , Ed.),
Toussaint, G., et
vol. 8 , n.1.
"
"
4
r-:
v, m
2 %
W O
\D O O
g
o! m
2
f
4
m W O
Y
M O +l
m m m 2 %
W O
Lc!
O m
W O m
Table 3
-
-500 500-1 .O00 1.000-5.000 5.000-10.000 -f- 10.000 (1 .O00
3.17 3.11 2.93 3.06 2.99
3.11 3.18 3 .O5 3.06 3 .O2
Evolution in % -1.9% +2.2% +4.0% -0.1% +1.1%
Table 4 -
1993 3.25 2.96 2.83 3.14 2.94
3.34 2.99 2.92 3.14 3 .O3
Evolution in % +2.9% +1.1% +3.1% + O . l % f 1 . 5 %
Table 5 - of goats milk
Nation
Czechoslovakia Finland
Spain
U.S.A.
Total goat population 1000
32 500
100 50 2 . 1.196 36
12 1.252 34 69 600 2.300 89 1.500 -
-
5.780
females 150 687 3.000 1.475 .
156 240.000 1.741 1 .O80 13.692 400 30.392 400 16.000 619 4.934 14.961 5.489
%
0.5
o.
1 3.0 2.9 7.8 20.0 - 9 4 1 .o9 14.5 43.8 0.07 0.7 0.01 5.51
.o
of flocks 25 2 20 970 1 19 2.562 - 18 336 1 291 490 6 170 9 900 1
.o90
1
-
Estimation of the division of milk (Toussaint, 1995)l
100% Industrial transformationSpain
France
Greece
100% UK Belgium Others EU
i
At the
2- milk (L'annee economique 1994)
4.50
4.00
2.50
.(