L E T T E R S T O T H E E D I T O R
Single-port Cholecystectomy and Quality of Life
Michael CottonPublished online: 14 August 2013 Ó Socie´te´ Internationale de Chirurgie 2013
I was intrigued by the article by Wagner et al. [1] in the May 2013 issue of the World Journal of Surgery. The authors’ conclusions, inter alia, state that single-port cho-lecystectomy results in a better quality of life (QoL) score. This is based on a survey of the 222 patients in the study. Information on QoL is garnered from 131 completed questionnaires. This figure represents 59 % (not 69 %) of the patients. Thus, 91 did not reply or gave inadequate information. This figure is sufficiently large to make the conclusion based on the remaining questionnaires dubious at best.
Furthermore, single-port access (SPA) cholecystectomy was performed by consultant surgeons, whereas the stan-dard laparoscopic approach was used by several surgeons of varying experience, including those below consultant
status. The SPA procedure took longer even though per-formed by senior surgeons. Presumably, if perper-formed by less experienced operators, it would logically take even longer and therefore prove even more expensive. Thus, two planks of the conclusion in the aforesaid article are removed. It therefore appears to be in danger of tottering.
Reference
1. Wagner MJ, Kern H, Hapfelmeier A et al (2013) Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients. World J Surg 37:991–998. doi:10. 1007/s00268-013-1946-4
M. Cotton (&)
Me´decin Associe´, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Rue Bugnon, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
e-mail: mikeytha@gmail.com
123
World J Surg (2014) 38:264 DOI 10.1007/s00268-013-2170-y