Texte intégral
General
Total number of students 24
Attended 20
Missed 4
Average grade 9.50
Standard deviation of grades 0.46
Grade distribution
Grade history
Attendance history
Comparison with last three years
Comments
• Some students made mistakes in calculating the velocities.
• Some students made mistakes in calculating ℎ𝑝𝑝 and, consequently, got a wrong value for 𝑃𝑃.
• Few students did not use the format or used it only partially.
Documents relatifs
[r]
- For P2.82, many students could not get the force acting point on the surface of the dam.. - For C1.4, many students set Tau’s sign as same as
[r]
• Some did not show that velocity is only a function of y-axis using continuity. • Some students did not assume
Some used conservation of volume flow rate (ignoring the change in density), some applied Bernoulli equation. • 30% of students did not consider the fuel flow rate in the
• Most of the students considered the left end of the pipe (located at -6m from the free surface) as section 1 when using the energy equation, instead of the free
• 97.56% of students did not solve the angular momentum equation including the relative motion term (- Rω) in order to determine the rotation rate if there is no
Instead they imposed the shear stress equal to zero. • Some students made
