• Aucun résultat trouvé

The role of rubber agroforestry

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The role of rubber agroforestry"

Copied!
16
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Workshop

“Climate Change

and Natural

Rubber Systems”

The role of rubber agroforestry

in farming systems and its effect

on households.

Adaptation strategies to climate

change risks ?

Eric Penot, CIRAD, UMR innovation Bénédicte Chambon, CIRAD, UR 34 Jérome Sainte Beuve , CIRAD UMR IATE

+IRRI/ICRAF/Indonesia and TSU/KKU/Thailand colleagues

(2)

What do we expect from rubber agroforestry

systems in terms of sustainability ?

• Income diversification (rubber + fruits + timber …) = better economic resilience = economic sustainability

• No impact of agroforestry practices on rubber production (kg/tree/ha/year) as long as no trees above rubber canopy : rubber production is generally not in competition with associated crops • Reservoir of local biodiversity and « forest effect » on climate if large areas : environnemental

impact and positive effect on climate change : potential mitigation but still to be assessed

• Less soil erosion and better use of water as vegetal biodiversity increases a « forest like behavior » • Soil fertility maintenance or improvement if soil is covered by grasses and shrubs

• Possibility of timber production : rubber farmers might be the very next timber producers as timber can be easily cropped with rubber (up to 50 trees/ha)

• more globally environmental friendly : re internalizing externalities is a real challenge. *including

impact of climatic change

• Rubber trees do not require high quantities of fertilizers during mature period and almost pesticides : rubber is already « bio compatible »

• Effect of high temperatures on physiology of rubber trees and NR production : agroforestry may play a positive role to maintain good climatic conditions

(3)

RAS 1 : an improved extensive jungle rubber RAS 2 : an intensive system with intercrops RAS 3 : rehabilitation of Imperata grasslands

Rubber Agroforestry Systems (RAS)= diversification inside one cropping system

SRAP projects

1994 to 2007

Rubber planting density

similar to that of monoculture

SRAP research programme

1997/2007 with IRRI and ICRAF

Indonesia

Low cost of establishment Low management High productivity Intensive Intercropping In immature period More diversified

(4)

The situation in 2019 in West Kalimantan

Indonesia

From rubber to oil palm

• priority to oil palm from 1997

• Rubber remains for diversification

and family labour use

70 % oil palm

20 % clonal rubber : monocultulture , RAS/AF,

10 % remains of old jungle rubber

and tembawang

Probably around 25 % of farmers have AF systems

(5)

Some

AF systems

in

Southern

Thailand

TSU/Phattallung

Highly diversified AF systems

Linked to a local context

During rubber mature period

(6)

Gross margin/ha/year for

various AFS types and rubber monoculture in Thailand (2015)

฿46 605 ฿70 020 ฿37 904 ฿76 082 ฿109 329 ฿75 465 ฿38 729 ฿53 145 ฿ 0 ฿20 000 ฿40 000 ฿60 000 ฿80 000 ฿100 000 ฿120 000

MatAFMx MatAFFr MatAFTb MatAFVg MatAFLv A MatAFLv B 1stTap MatMono

GM /h a Clonal Monoculture source: Stroesser et al 2018.

-type MatAFVeg: mature rubber trees only associated with vegetable species, - Type MatAFFr: mature rubber trees associated with fruit and sometimes vegetable species,

- Type MatAFTb: mature rubber trees only associated with timber species, - Type MatAFMx: mature rubber trees associated with fruit, vegetable and/or timber species,

- Type MatAFLv: mature rubber trees associated with livestock and other plant species.

(7)

Figure 10 - Comparison of variants Mono, Comb and AF

for the eight farm types, in an « average » rubber price

context (RubA) (Indicator: Farm Gross Margin)

Monoculture : clonal rubber Comb : current situation with 25 to 63 % of rubber in SAF AF = all plots in SAF GM = farm gross Margin = gross annual agricultural income

(8)

Impact of low rubber price

• Rubber price very low since 2013

• Decrease in rubber interest

• No quality pricing → move from slab

production (less contamination) to

cuplump. Abandon of hand-mangle

use in kalimantan

• Do limit momentarily rubber

replantation interest for most farmers

however it has never a real impact on

long term plantation trend

(9)

Thailand and Indonesia : farmers suffers from rubber

prices volatility → high interest to income diversification

and agroforestry practices = long term economic

sustainaibility

Rubber low prices

Highest interest for diversification/Agroforestry

Any link with

climatic

(10)

In Thailand important diversification for the

rubber based households

7 9 9 2 14 27 16 3 28 18 27 37 49 46 46 58 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Total sample [1162] Centre-east [153] South [668] Northeast [341]

%

o

f far

m

e

rs on-farm & off-farm diversification

on-farm diversification off-farm diversification Only rubber

But high rubber

contribution to total

household income:

70% in average in 2013

(SD = 31%)

(11)

In Thailand, despite their interest, rubber

agroforestry systems remains underdeveloped

9.9

3.3

16.3

0.3

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Total sample [1162]

Centre-east [153] South [668] Northeast [341]

% o f far m ers

In % of total

For farmers with AFS, adoption

is not systematic on all the

mature rubber plantations

Agroforestry practices only on the south

(12)

The lessons learned…In Indonesia and Thailand

Indonesia

• Rubber agroforestry trials in Indonesia came right in time in 1994 with a strong demand from

farmers for low cost clonal systems with income diversification : the right time at the right place

BUT….

• Oil palm came in 1997 with a very strong pressure from companies (through the policy of

concessions) providing an interesting alternative to rubber with full credit (but loss of land ! )

and better return to labour

• Interest in agroforestry practices remain high for old men but poor interest from younger

generation…what will be the future ?

• Time for rubber replantation and the same old story remains (poor access to planting material

…….) and serious need for training and technical information on tapping

• Poor tapping practices in Indonesia limit rubber lifespan to less than 25 years

• Impact important of white root diseases in areas with forest or old jungle rubber before

plantation…

Thailand

• Low rubber prices do not help to maintain interest in rubber … BUT raises interest for

agroforestry/diversification in Thailand…

• So far in Thailand diversification is more at the farm or household level than at the rubber plot

level

(13)

So : impact of agroforestry on possibility to

adapt/mitigate the climatic change ?????

• Globally : more trees , more

biomass will create a more local

humid and probably less hot

micro climate at plot level that

would be more efficient to

mitigate climatic change …

• It is expected and probable …

• But still has to be measured and

verified

(14)

BUT some trade-off might arise

Competition for water between

rubber trees and associated trees

or crops:

• immature period

• Mature period (some trees are

not adapted…)

• Particularly accurate toppic for

Myanmar for instance , and may

be South Sumatra, Cambodia

outside « red soils » …. or similar

areas

For shade: all associated trees should be

below rubber canopy…

Possible development of some panel

disease due to moisture (phytophtora

observed in Jambi in 2005 in

RAS 1 SAF systems)

Possible allelopathy for some tree/tree

Associations ???

(15)

What next ? The very next future ?

Research

• Propose and suggest rubber SAF designs adapted to local

markets and demand…

• Explore the intercropping possibilities during immature

period linked with the local context and constraints to generate income at a critical period.

• Identify the cash crop or timber species with various type of

rubber density : double spacing might be economically interesting for smallholders according to local markets

• Explore the different strategies for income diversification:

cropping system, farming system or activity system leve

Institution/Development

• Most farmers are capable to implement rubber SAF but

might lack initial capital and access to , cash crop/timber plants (if poor availability)

• National regulation should recognize the right of the farmer

to sell timber and any product (tree tenue policy is unfavorable in RCI…….

(16)

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Rubber + Mangoustan + Pakliang + Fishery Jungle

rubber Rubber + timber tree

Rubber + Mangoustan + tiber trees Rubber + Salak Rubber + Tiam + Pakliang Rubber + Longkong

Références

Documents relatifs

The question remains: what is the possible impact of agroforestry to the climatic change adaptation and mitigation? Globally, more trees and more biomass will create

We are back to the same problems and same situation that we faced in 1994: poor access to clonal planting material, no training on tapping frequency and practices but with some

ICRAF/SRAP workshop on RAS (Rubber Agroforestry Systems), September 1997, Bogor. “Environmental aspects of smallholder rubber agroforestry in Indonesia : reconcile production

On the other hand, a low diversification of plants associated with nitrogen-fixing trees increases the economic performance linked to the sales of cocoa but reduces fruit sales

0,0 0,5 1,0 SHDI trees Apple-ring acacias Palmyra palms All trees Neems Saopberry trees Baobabs 25. Effect of trees on

Although monocropped hevea can produce a satisfac- tory income when the price of rubber is high, negative impacts of monocropping are also possible: (1) loss of food security: in

In on-farm trial, rubber trees reached tappable size in 4.5 to 8.5 years after planting, and the rate of tree growth is understandably determined by management intensity.. The data

ICRAF is definitely involved in Farming Systems modelling using Olympe (both Indonesian and Thai partners) but it could be interesting to monitor the use of Olympe with