HAL Id: jpa-00247496
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247496
Submitted on 1 Jan 1991
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Atomic parameters for transitions involving Rydberg states of singly ionized alkaline earths
Mohamed Djerad
To cite this version:
Mohamed Djerad. Atomic parameters for transitions involving Rydberg states of singly ionized alkaline
earths. Journal de Physique II, EDP Sciences, 1991, 1 (1), pp.1-9. �10.1051/jp2:1991135�. �jpa-
00247496�
J.
Phys.
II1(1991)
1-9 JANVIER1991, PAGEClassification
Physics
Abstracts32.70C
Atomic parameters for transitions involving Rydberg states
of singly ionized alkaline earths
Mohamed Tahar
Djerad
Dkpartement
dePhysi#ue,
Facultk des Sciences, 1060 Tunis, Tunisia(Received
itJuly,
1990,accepted
8 October,1990)
Rksumk. En utilisant des fonctions d'onde de la thkorie du dkfaut
quantique,
nous avonscaiculk les kikments de matrice radiaux mettant en jeu les ktats de
Rydberg
des atomes alcalineuxterreux une fois ionisks. Dans le but de tester les rksultats, nous avons calculk les
probabilitks
detransitions, ies forces d'oscillateurs et ies durkes de vie radiative des ktats S, P, D et F
jusqu'i
n ~
30
( *).
Lesprobabilitks
de. transitions sont en bon accord avec ies rksultatsdisponibles.
Nousprksentons
les durkes de vie eh terrre de lois d'kcheiles du type r~i=
ro(n*)~.
La variation des forces d'oscillateurs en fonction du nombrequantique
effectif n* est discutke.Abstract.
Using quantum-defect theory
wave functions, we have computeddipole
radial matrix elementsinvolving Rydberg
states of thesingly-ionized
alkaline-earth atoms. In order. to test the results, we have calculated a set of transitionprobabilities, absorption
oscillator strengths and radiative lifetimes for S, P, D, and F states up to n 30(**). Transitionprobabilities
are ingood agreement
with available data. We report the lifetimes in terms of scaling relations of type r~i =r~(n*)~.
The variation of oscillatorstrengths
with respect to the effectiveprincipal quantun~
number n* is discussed.1. InUoducdon.
Study
of theproperties
of atomicRydberg
states is of current interest. Excited atomic states arepertinent
toapplications
in diverse fields such asastrophysics, plasma physics,
spacephysics,
etc.Knowledge
of transitionprobabilities,
oscillatorstrengths
and radiative lifetimes is often needed. Whenavailable,
measurements of these parameters aregenerally
limited tolow-lying
states.Thus,
a theoretical treatmentincluding highly
excited-states is of interest.The calculation of any of these
parameters requires dipole
radial matrix elements. Extensivecalculations, involving
the use of elaborate theoretical modelrequires prolonged computation
(*)
L'ensemble des rksultats estdisponible
sur demande adresske I l'auteur.(**)
These extensive data are available upon request from the author.2 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
II Mtimes.
Therefore, only approximate
methods areusually
considered. The mainproblem
is todevelop
a method forobtaining satisfactory
and convenient wave functions for thehighly
excited-states. The traditional way of
describing Rydberg-state
wave functions isbj uie
of thequantum-defect theory,
which wasinaugurated by
Bates andDamagaard
in their classic paper[I]. Using
a numericalapproach
toBates-Damagaard
methodLindgard
and Nielsen[2]
evaluated transition
probabilities
for the alkali isoelectronic sequences for states withn w12. To our
knowledge,
the atomic parameters are notpresently
available forhigh-n-
excited states ofquasihydrogenic systems,
except alkali atoms for which exist extensivepredictions [3].
We considersingly-ionized
alkaline-earths. We have usedanalytical
wavefunc- tions[4],
which were shown toprovide
agood compromise
for detailed atomic calculations and accuracy[5].
The paper is
organised
as follows. In section2,
webriefly
summarise the method. In section3,
we determine theparameters required
for thecomputations.
In the lastsection,
wecomment on the results. All the results are not listed here but are available upon request from
the author. Atomic units are used
throughout
unless otherwise statedexplicitly,
2. Method.
Kostelecky
et al.[4] proposed
anexactly
solvablepotential
modeladapted
to theproblem
of one-electron atoms. Webriefly
summarise the main feature of the model andgive
theworking equations.
The outer electron is describedby
thefollowing
orthonormalized radialwave
functions, expressed
in terms of gamma(r)
functions~
~~~~
iP3r(n*
/* I(/))
>'2fir
j'.~-prj~n. ~ji,~>~, fir
~"'"
@
2r(n*
+ I* + I)
n* ~ n* 'where
p
= 2z~,
~~ is the netcharge
of thenucleus,
I*= 3
~j +
I(1), 3~j
is the quantum defect of a state nl)
andI(I )
is aphenomenological, non-negative integer
with the allowed range of variation determinedby
thefollowing
two conditions :(a)
the kinetic andpotential energies
areseparately normalisable,
whichimposes
the constraint 3(1)
-1-<
I(I (b)
2
Laguerre polynomials L)I '"it'~,
existonly
forI(I)
w n~,~ lI,
where n~~~ is theprincipal
quantum number of theground
state.For a transition from the level nj
ii
to the level n~l~),
the radialpart
of thedipole
matrix element isgiven by
(n,*)~" (nf)~~~
Jo ~ q~4
(n~ /~(
r ni/,)
= ~
F(I, f)
x4
z~(nj* nf
x
(r(n,* /~*) r(n? It r(n~*
+ /~* + i) r(n?
+It
+1))"2
~
p~jo ~o
PI q'
~(~l
~~~~~~) ~ n/~~~~~~j
~~~~i*~~ /~)ll'~
q + 2 '
where
F(I,f) =2ni*nf/(n~*+nf).
These matrix elements arecompletely analytic
andtherefore convenient for calculations. In the
Bates-Damagaard [I] model,
the radial matrix elements are obtainedby
numericalintegration.
Moreover,they depend
on a cutoff radius.Various research groups have been
implementing
various series cutoff criteria but noprecise
justification
could begiven.
M I RYDBERG STATES OF IONIZED ALKALINE EARTHS 3
3.
Applicadon
tosingly-ionized
alkaline-earth atoms.Einstein
coefficients,
oscillatorstrengths
and lifetimes have been calculated for severalquasihydrogenic
atoms(ions).
Ingeneral,
the calculations were limited tolow-lying
states of thesystems.
In thepresent work,
we include transitionsinvolving Rydberg
states of the secondspectra
of the alkaline earths. For agiven ion,
the basicparameters
of the method willnow be
specified.
3.I THE QUANTUM DEFECT. It is well known that the
singly-excited binding energies
ofmonovalent atoms
(ions)
in state(n/)
aregiven by hydrogen-like
formula~
Zj Zj
~~
2(n*
)~2(n
3~j)~
For a
particular angular
momentum/,
thequantum
defect &~i isnearly independent
ofn. To evaluate the
3~i
ofhigh
n states and thusE~j,
we have used a numerical fit andemployed
the extended Ritz formula :
&~,=a+hm~~+cm~~+dm~~
withm=n-30.
For each nl
series, 30
is constant and its value is determinedaccording
to anoptimisation technique.
The initial value is. thequantum
defect of the lowest ternJ. In most cases,30
could be obtainedby rounding
the initial value to the nearest 0.I. As recommendedby
Martin
[6],
the present Ritz formula is more convenient than oneexpressed
in powers ofn*,
which has beenfrequently.
Asinput data,
we have used availableexperimental
excitationenergies [7] only experimental
data for lower levels have been considered. Since weneglect
the fine structure of the
levels,
we have used the baricenter for each level associated with the two fine-structurecomponents.
In all cases, the fitreproduces
the observedenergies
to better than I fb. Forinstance,
for Baion,
there exist accurateexperimental energies [8]
up ton = 70 for ns, np,
nd,
and ngRydberg
series. We have verified that wereproduce
these values with excellent agreement. We have listed the fit parameters in table1.3.2 THE INTEGER
I(I). Recently, Kostelecky
etal.[9] predicted
the fine-structuresplittings
forquasihydrogenic
atoms(ions).
These are relevant to the short-distance behaviour becausethey
vary as r~ and r~ ~ anddepend
on theinteger
I(I )
in the model.First,
the authors of reference[9]
showed that the model constitutes agood approximation
forlarge
r and is therefore convenient for
Rydberg
states.Second,
the modelprovides good
predictions
of the fine-structuresplittings
forlight
atoms.Accordingly,
theexperimental
data for fine-structuresplittings
allow the determination of values of thephenomenological integer I(/ ).
In our case, thisapproach
works well for Be+only.
For the otherions,
we have selected the values ofI(/)
thatgive
the best agreement withaccepted
values. Table II shows thephenomenological integers
we have used for various values off and for ions studiedby
us.4. Results and accuracy.
We have
performed
calculations on a Vax 785 computer. Theexpectation
values of radialintegrals
areexpressed
in terms of r function(see
Sect.2).
The use of doubleprecision
limited the calculations to n = 15.Quadrupole precision
was thereforeused, corresponding
to about 33 decimaldigits.
The radial wavefunction
depends
upon the energyE~,
of itscorresponding
state and the4 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
II NTable I. Excitation
energies of
thefit
parameters.Ion
3~
a h c ds 0.3 0.25826767 0.072383024 0.27282557 0.49940956
Be+ p
0.0'
0.049366057 0.016608201 0.30420470 0.73083270d 0.0
0.00071538i12
0.062185451 0.97974998 4.8120747f 0.0 0.00029005721 0.0051964801 0.0733184467 0.0
s
1[0 J.066)201
0.139601860.2898719§
0.91979468p 1.0 0.69639760 0.14831746 0.020831158 0.0
d 0.6 0.045457553 0.094118074 0.024890661 0.33961356
f 0.0 0.0035436391 0.037342068 0.73627400 6.6747470
g 0.0 0.0037441782
0.40812709
40.203358 075.3479s 2.0 1.7994976 0.29482222 0.67478645 1.7830194
p 1.9 1.4364885 0.29501835 0.0 0.0
Ca+ d 1.0 0.62281942 0.21231084 0.96863210 4.6014581
f 0.0 0.025947075 0.15336217 4.4063873 61.276630
g 0.0 0.006863834 1.1933397 43.406574 507.34344
s 3.0 2.7050006 0.30806586
0.278495f4
0.97451008p 3.45 2.3297160 0.16261426 0.0 0.0
Sr+ d 1.40 1.4505944 0.51244223 2,1281478 >27.432442
f 0.0 0.061722245 0.19285420 5.8515310 48.552032
g 0.0 0.98785323 £ 0.28638694 7.2725739 64.667908
s 4.0 3.5765221 0.36527434 0.15957843 0.62172544
p 3.95 3.191788 0.37837729 0.0 0.0
Ba+ d 2.40 2.3716066 0.91275573 4.928298 60.386803
f 3.0 0.85638016 0.73997784 0.58487803 0.78243428
g 3.4 0.020221187 0.040776726 0.13081138 0.16473958
ionization
potential
of the ion. It is obvious that the resultsdepend
upon the accuracy of theexperimental
level data.Obtaining
these data from the extended Ritz formula eliminates localaccidents.
In
assessing
the accuracy of atomic parameters it is necessary to consider whether the radialintegral
is sensitive to smallchanges
in the wave functions. Thesensitivity
isusually
determinedby
thedegree
of cancellation which occurs betweenpositive
andnegative
contributions to the radial
integral.
In order to obtain an indication about such
sensitivity
let us assume that all the excitationenergies
are determined within I fb thiscorresponds roughly
to aduncertainty
An thequantum
defect 0.03 w ha~j w 0.30 for the studied range of
n. We have varied
arbitrarily
thequantum
defects for initial or final states in the aforesaid range. We have observed that the radialintegrals
are stable withinroughly
I fb for all transitions. Of course, if we,take intoaccount final and initial states, the cancellation effects would have
larger
percentages.The transition
probability
forspontaneous
emission from the upper level (n~l~)
to a lowerM I RYDBERG STATES OF IONIZED ALKALINE EARTHS 5
Table II. Values
of
the parametersI(I),
a and To iR 10~ ~ s(see
the text)
and theasymptotic
quantumdefects 3,(1) for
valuesof
the quantum number I.I Parameter Be+
Mg+
Ca+ Sr+ Ba+1(0)
0 2 4 4s a 2.94 2.95 2.91 3.02 2.95
To 5.97 9,19 0.13 0.06 0.07
3(0)
0.258 1.066 1.800 2.705 3.5771(1)
0 2 2 3p a 2.92 2.96 2.89 2.87 3.08
T~ 9.53 0.239 0.27 1.0 0.80
3(1)
0.049 0.697 1.437 2.329 3.1921(2)
0 0 2d a 2.97 3.00 3.00 2.93 2.93
To 3.05 0.156 7.90 0.073 0.884
3(2)
0.001 0.045 0.623 1.451 2.3731(3)
0 0 0 0 0f a 2.97 3.02 2.93 3.17
To 6.50 0.528 0.055 0.320
3(3)
0.000 0.004 0.026 0.062 0.855g
1(4)
0 0 0 03(4)
0.000 0.003 0.006 0.988 0.020level
(n~l~)
for excitationenergies E~,j,
and E~~j~,respectively,
isgiven
in units ofl0~s~'by
2.026 x
10'~ (~i ~
~(~f~f~ '~
~~~ ~~~'~~~A
(ni
l~ ~n~l~)
=
~ ~ 2
(
+ 'where A
(in A)
is thewavelength
of the transition involved. The linestrength
(n~
l~( r(n~l~)
(~ is in atomic units. Intablet @IIa), (IIIb)
and(IIIC),
we list a set of our calculations fur the transitionprobabilities
forlight,
medium andheavy ions, namely, Be+,
Ca+ andBa+, respectively.
The results arecompared
with recent criticalcompi- lation[10].
Themajority
of thequoted
values are obtainedcalculationally
rather thanexperimentally. Typically,
these values areexpected
to be accurate to within about 25 fb inthe Be+ and Ca+ cases and within about 50 fb in the Ba+ case.
However,
we note certain poverty for ns ~ np and np ~ ns transitions. Forexample
the coefficient for Be +(4s
~2p)
transition is 1.5 greater than theaccepted
one. This isexpected
because these transitions involve thelargest quantum
defects and shouldprovide
the moststringent
test of the model.- Moreover the model does not take into accountpolarisation
effects. The results
conceming
the other levels are in the error bars and in certain cases to6 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II lK°
within a fraction of
percent.
This is due to the factthjt
these levels are almosthydrogenic,
even for the haviest ions. We
emphasize
that within thepresent'model,
we model lessaccurately low-lying
levels than those withlarger
values of n which are ofprimary
interest in thepresent
calculations.Thus,
theagreement
withaccepted
values may be seen as better than that shown in tables III.Table III.
Comparison of
our transitionprobabilities
withaccepted
valuesfor
the ionsof Be(IIIa), Ca(IIIb)
andBa(IIIC).
(a)
Transition Present
Accepted
(io8
~->)(io8 ~-l)
6s ~
4p
0.146 0.1025s
~
3p
0Al1 0.284s ~
2p
0.142 0.946p
~ 4s, 0.0228 0.02565p
~ 4s 0.0259 0.0305p
~ 3s 0.107 0.1424p
~ 3s 0.143 0.196d ~
4p
0.137 0.1435d
~
3p
0.576 0.594d ~
3p
1.13 1-13d ~
2p
11.6 9.2(b)
Transition Present
Accepted
(jo8
~->)(jo8 ~->)
7s ~
4p
0.201 0.3086s ~
4p
0A13 0.625s
~
4p
1.17 1.74p
~ 4s 1.32 1.477d ~
4p
0.227 0.2656d ~
4p
0.422 0.3545d ~
4p
0.968 0.974d ~
4p
3.62 3.6lK° RYDBERG STATES OF IONIZED ALKALINE EARTHS
Table
III(c).
Transition Present
Accepted
(108 s-') (108 s-')
I ls
~
8p
0.0456 0.0411Is ~
7p
0.0744 0.064II s
~
6p
0.160 0.1210s
~
6p
0.250 0.189s
~
7p
0.218 0.189s
~
6p
0.428 0.328s ~
6p
0.840 0.608p
~ 7s 0.0177 0.018
7p
~ 7s 0.181 0.207p
~ 6s 0.119 0.106p
~ 6s 1.04 1-118p
~ 6d 2.18 x 10-4 6.7 x 10-48p
~ 5d 0.0176 0.0346p
~ 5d 0.176 0.33210d
~
8p
0.0340 0.03710d
~
7p
0.0584 0.05810d ~
6p
0.138 0.139d
~
8p
0.0562 0.0639d
~
7p
0.0929 0.0939d
~
6p
0.214 0.208d ~
8p
0. I I1 0.138d ~
7p
0.164 0.168d ~
6p
0.360 0.407d ~
7p
0.361 0.446d
~
6p
1.77 1.809d ~ 5f 4.63 x 10-4 6.6 x 10-4
10f ~ 5d 0.0106 0.038
6f
~ 5d 0.124 0.22
The
absorption
oscillatorstrength
isgiven by
the dimensionlessquantity
303_75
(n~ lj
r(n~l~)
~ max((, l~)
~~~~ ~'~
~~~~~A 2 l~ +
It has
long
been established thatspectral
series ofquasihydrogenic species
revealsystematic
trends. A
relatively unique
aspect ofRydberg
series is theirregularity. They provide
anopportunity
for-systematic
and self-consistent studiesby
virtue of then-dependence
of8 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
II lK°it
id
~f
~~.1
0 IO 20 30
n~
Fig.
I.Systematic
trend off values witlfin theMg+ (nS
-4P) (x)
and Sr+(nS
- 5P)
(A~
series.Plotted 18
(n*)~
f vs., the effectiveprincipal
quantum number n*./ ,
virtually
all atomicproprieties.
Forinstance,
the oscillatorstrengths
diminish as(n*)~~
sothat
(n*)~
f is constant. Anexample
of such anexpected systematic
trend isprovided
infigure
I for the transitionsMg+ (nS
~ 4P and Sr+
(nS
~ 5P
).
The mean lifetime of a
given (nl)
level thatdecays spontaneously
is definedby
I Tn< ~
£
A(nl
~ n'l'
)
n'l'
where the sommation holds [or all states
in'l') (E~,,,
<E~j)
that areradiatively
connected to the level(nl).
It is known that the mean lifetimes ofhigh-n-levels
ofquasihydrogenic
atoms are well
represented by
theformula[11] T~j=To(n*)~.
Tablell shows theTo and a
parameters
we obtained from a numerical fit of our results(10
w n w 30).
All of thea values are close to
3,
which is the valueexpected
in the limit of nlarge
from considerationon the
oscillator-strength
sum-rules[12].
5. Conclusion.
Primarily
radial matrix elements have beencomputed
forhighly-excited alkaline-earth, singly-ionised
atoms. Transitionprobabilities,
oscillatorstrengths
and lifetimes between a wide range of orbital I andprincipal
nquantum
numbers have been. evaluated.. Our modestobjective
was -toprovide
values of thesequantities
in nr~er to assistexperimentalists
inlK° RYDBERG STATES OF IONIZED ALKALINE EARTHS 9
estimating
the lifetimes of excited-states and theimportance
of relevant processes. It is ourhope
that the presentpredictions
will stimulate further accurateexperimental investigations, especially
forlarge
atomic numbers.References
[1] BATES D. R. and DAMAGAARD A., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Sect. A 242
(1949)
101.[2] LINDGARD A, and NIELSEN S. E., Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tables 19
(1977)
533.[3] THEODOSIOU C. E.,
Phys.
Rev. A 30(1984)
2881;GOUNAND F., J. Phys. France 40 (1979) 457 ;
LI B. et al., J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Phys. 21
(1988)
2205.[4] KOSTELECKEY V. A. and NIETO M. M.,
Phys.
Rev. A 32(1985)
3243 ; KOSTELECKEY V. A.,private
communication.[5] CLARK R. E. H. and MERETS A. L., JQSRT 38
(1987)
287.[6] MARTIN W.
C.,
J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70(1984)
784.[7] MOORE C. E., Atomic Energy Levels », Nat]. Bur. Stand. Washington D. C.
(1971).
[81 BOULMER J., CAMUS P., GAGNt J.-M. and PILLET P., J.
Phys.
B: At. Mol.Phys.
20 L(1987)
1467
JONES R. R. and GALLAGHER T. F., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6 (1989) 143.
[9] KOSTELECKY V. A., NIETO M. M. and TRUAX D. R.,
Phys.
Rev. A 38(1988)
4413.[10] WIESE W. L. and MARTIN G. A.,
«Wavelengths
and Transition Probabilities for Atoms and Atomic Ions », Part II, Natl. Bur. Stand.Washington
D. C.(1980)
p. 359.MILES B. M. and MIESE W. L.
(Academic
Press, Inc. 1, 1969) ;CORLISS C. H. and BOzMAN W. R., Experimental Transition Probabilities for
Spectral
Lines of Seventy Elements », N-B-S-Washington
D. C.(1962)
p. 9.[ll]
RADzIG A. A. and SMIRNOV B. M., Reference Data on Atoms, Molecules and Ions(Springer
Verlag,1985)
p. 256.[12] MARR G. V. and GREEK D. M., Proc. R. Soc. A 304 (1968) 245.