Amino
acid
modulation
of
lifespan
and
reproduction
in
Drosophila
Katja
M
Hoedjes,
Marisa
A
Rodrigues
and
Thomas
Flatt
1Manipulatingaminoacid(AA)intakeinDrosophilacan
profoundlyaffectlifespanandreproduction.Remarkably,AA
manipulationcanuncouplethecommonlyobservedtrade-off
betweenthesetraits.Thisfindingseemstochallengetheidea
thatthistrade-offisduetocompetitiveresourceallocation,but
herewearguethatthisviewmightbetoosimplistic.Wealso
discussthemechanismsoftheAAresponse,mediatedbythe
IIS/TORandGCN2pathways.Elucidatinghowthesepathways
respondtospecificAAwilllikelyyieldimportantinsightsinto
howAAmodulatethereproduction-lifespanrelationship.The
Drosophilamodelofferspowerfulgenetictools,combinedwith
optionsforprecisedietmanipulation,toaddressthese
fundamentalquestions.
Address
DepartmentofEcologyandEvolution,UniversityofLausanne,UNIL Sorge,Biophore,CH-1015Lausanne,Switzerland
Correspondingauthor:Flatt,Thomas(thomas.fl[email protected]) 1
Presentaddress:DepartmentofBiology,UniversityofFribourg, CheminduMuse´e10,CH-1700Fribourg,Switzerland.
Introduction:
dietary
effects
on
lifespan
and
reproduction
Nutritionplaysaprimaryroleinshapingthephysiology,
life history and behavior of organisms, and nutritional
interventions can have substantial health benefits [1].
Dietary restriction (DR),that is, the reduced intake of
nutrientswithoutmalnutrition,hasbeenthemostwidely
studiednutritionalinterventionsince the1930swhenit
wasfirstdemonstratedthatDRextendslifespaninrats.
Since then, a large body of research has established
positive effects of DR on longevity and age-related
pathology in numerous organisms, ranging from yeast
and worms to insects and mammals.At the same time,
DRtypicallyreducesreproductiveoutput[2,3].Thefact
thatreducedfoodintakeextendslifespanattheexpense
of reproduction makes thestudy of DR,and of dietary
effectsmoregenerally,ofkeysignificanceforour
under-standing of the commonly observed trade-off between
reproductionand longevity[4,5].
Originally,reduced intakeofcalorieswasthoughtto be
responsibleforthelifespan-extendingeffectsofDR,but
this view began to shift when studies in Drosophila
showed that lifespan extension under DR does not
dependoncaloricrestriction[5,6].Bytesting dietswith
different nutrient compositions (‘nutritional geometry
framework’) [7], it was found that the ratio of proteins
tocarbohydrates(P:Cratio),notoverallenergeticcontent,
affects lifespan and reproduction in Drosophila [8,9].
Today,thereisgrowingevidencethatespeciallydietary
proteinsplayamajorroleinmediatingtheeffectsofDR
[10,11](butsee[12]).Remarkably,beyondtheeffectsof
the proteins themselves, recent work suggests that the
buildingblocksof proteins, thatis,specificamino acids
(AA),canprofoundlyimpactlifespanandassociatedtraits.
Forexample,inbothfliesandmice,restrictionofdietary
methioninecanextendlifespantothesameextentasDR
[13–16].
Here,wegiveabriefreviewofhowAAmodulatelifespan
andreproduction,andthetrade-offbetweenthesetraits.
Wealsoprovideashortoverviewofthemolecular
mech-anisms bywhich AAmight control thesetwo traitsand
their relationship. We focus on recent research in the
Drosophilamodel,giventhatthissystemcombines
unri-valedgenetictools,asolidunderstandingoftheeffectsof
nutritional interventions, and the availability of holidic
diets that now allow researchers to precisely control
individualdietarycomponents[14,17–19].
Amino
acids
significantly
impact
lifespan
and
reproduction
The finding that protein restriction can mediate the
effects of DR opens up thepossibility thatspecific AA
might be responsible for the effects on lifespan and
reproduction. Consistent with this idea, restriction of
dietarymethioninehasbeenfoundtopromotelongevity
inratsandmice[13,20].Similarly,Troenetal.observed
thatreduceddietarylevelsof methionineoptimize
Dro-sophilalifespan,althoughtoolowlevelsweredetrimental
[14].
Inoneofthemostcomprehensivestudiestodate,
Grand-ison and colleagues fed flies a lifespan-extending
restricted diet (i.e. DR) and then added back specific
nutrientstodeterminewhichnutrientswouldrestorethe
http://doc.rero.ch
Published in "Current Opinion in Insect Science 23 (): 118–122, 2017"
which should be cited to refer to this work.
reducedlifespanandhighfecundityoffullyfedflies[15].
Whileaddingbackcarbohydrates,lipidsorvitaminshad
no effect, adding back all AA to the restricted diet
shortened lifespan and restored fecundity to the level
seeninfullyfedflies.Furtherexperimentsshowedthat
thislifespan-shorteningandfecundity-increasingeffectis
mainly due to essential AA (EAA, i.e. those AA that
cannotbesynthesizedbythebodyandmustbesupplied
bythediet)andnotduetonon-essentialAA.Next,the
authors investigated the role of individual AA. While
adding back all EAA (DR+EAA) shortened lifespan
and restored fecundity, adding back all EAA minus
methionine(DR+EAA M)failedtoshorten lifespan,
indicating that methionine restriction canpromote
lon-gevity.Remarkably,bymanipulatingeachEAA
individ-uallyGrandisonandcoauthorsfoundthatadding
methi-onine alone to the restricted diet (DR+M) restores
fecunditytonormallevelsbutwithoutreducingthelong
lifespanofDRflies(alsosee[21]).Thesefindingssuggest
thatmethionineis—atleastpartly—responsibleforthe
lifespan-shortening effect of full feeding, even though
methionine alone (DR+M) might be insufficient to
reducelongevity.Insupportofthisidea,Leeand
colla-boratorshaverecentlyfoundthatthelifespan-extending
effectof methionine restriction dependson the overall
concentration of otherAAand requires alowAA status
[16].Also, theeffects of AA onlifespan in Queensland
fruitfliesdependonothernutrients,includingvitamins,
mineralsandcholesterol[22].
Themostfascinatingimplicationof theworkof
Grand-isonetal.isthatfine-tuningthelevelsofspecificdietary
AAcanapparently increase lifespanwithoutany loss of
fecundityorfertility[15].Lifespanextensionmightthus
berealizedwithoutcostsbyprovidingan‘optimal’diet.
Toachievesuchadiet,Piperetal.[23]usedinformation
on the exome, that is, all protein-coding genes in the
genome,todeterminewhichproportionsofAAananimal
requires. The authors found that this exome-matched
diet extends lifespan without costs in terms of growth
or reproduction.Moreover, acomparison of the
exome-baseddiettoayeast-baseddietrevealedthatmethionine
isthemostlimitingAA,whichmightexplainwhy
fecun-dity is particularly sensitive to this specific AA [23].
However,in sterile workers of theArgentine ant
(Line-pithemahumile)ant,anexome-baseddietfailedtoincrease
lifespan[24].Whetherthisfailuremightsomehowhave
to do with the fact that the workers were sterile, thus
renderingnutrientallocationtoreproductionimpossible,
remainsanopenquestion.
Dietary
uncoupling
of
the
reproduction-lifespan
trade-off
Thereproduction-lifespan trade-offassociated withDR
isofteninterpreted intermsof differentialallocationof
resourcesbetweenthecompetingdemandsof
reproduc-tionversussomaticmaintenance(the‘resourceallocation’
model).SinceDRtypicallypromotesadultsurvivalatthe
costofdecreasedfecundityorfertility,DRmight
repre-sentanadaptiveplasticresponsethatallowsorganismsto
survive poor dietary conditions by reallocating energy
away from reproduction to somatic maintenance and
survival until optimal conditions have returned
[4,5,25,26]. Alternatively, the ‘direct constraints’ model
postulatesthatreproductiveprocessescausedirect
dam-ageor impairmaintenanceandsurvival [4,5].
The finding that a simple dietary intervention, that is,
adjustingthelevels ofa single AA,canextendlifespan
without apparent growth or reproductive costs clearly
challenges both models [4,15,16,23,27]. For example,
Grandison etal. concludedthat—since adding
methio-nine back to a restricted diet can increase fecundity
without reducing lifespan—the reduction of lifespan
underfullfeedingdoesnotresultfromnutrient
realloca-tion away from survival and somatic maintenance to
reproduction[15].Insupportofthisidea,DRcanextend
Drosophila lifespan even when flies are made sterile,
suggesting that DR does not extend lifespan because it
reducesreproduction[28](butseeconflictingevidencein
Caenorhabditiselegans[29]).
While the above work clearly demonstrates that both
lifespanandreproductioncanbemaximizedunder
spe-cificdietaryconditions[15,16,23],itmightbepremature
to dismiss trade-offsas a proximateexplanation for the
effectsofDRaltogether.ThefactthatDRwith
methio-nine supplementation can restore high fecundity while
lifespanremainsextendeddoesnotlogicallyimplythat
DR-induced lifespan extension is independent of
resourcereallocation.Itrather suggeststhatmethionine
is a major limiting factor for egg production. Since on
averagemethioninedoesnotconsistentlyaffectlifespan
acrossdietaryconditionsyetgenerallyincreasesfecundity
[16], allocation or reallocation of methionine seems to
mainlyinfluencereproduction,notlifespan.Methionine
mightthusnotbedirectlysubjecttocompetitiveresource
allocationorreallocationbetweenreproductionversus
life-spanwhenconditionschangefromfullfeedingtoDR,or
viceversa.Infact, whenmethionineisraised toalevel
thatdoesnotlimiteggproductionanymore,the
lifespan-reproductiontrade-offisonceagainobserved:increasing
EAA levels further enhance fecundity at the cost of
reduced lifespan [15,16]. Together, these findings
sug-gestthatonaverageprobablymostEAAtendtonegatively
affect lifespan, while positively influencing fecundity.
Reproductionandsurvivalthusseemtohavecompeting
demandswithregardtoAAlevels:reproductionrequires
highAAlevels,but suchhighlevelsshortenlifespan.
However,oneaspectofthereproduction-longevity
trade-off that has often been overlooked is sex-specificity.
Typically, effects of DR on this trade-off have been
studied predominantly in females [8,9], presumably
duetothehigherinvestmentoffemalesthanmalesinto
reproduction. Interestingly, females and males differ
substantiallyintheirresponsetoDR[30–32];moreover,
the two sexes exhibit a dramatically different genetic
architecture of lifespan[33]. It will thus beinteresting
to see studies that contrast the physiological
conse-quences of specific dietary AA manipulations between
femalesand males.
Another open questionis how manipulationof
methio-nine or other AA affectsfitness components other than
lifespan and fecundity, for example stress resistance or
immunity. At the level of fitness, trade-offs might be
multidimensional and involvemore than twotraits. For
example,previousevidencesuggeststhatmethionine is
importantforproperfunctionalityoftheimmunesystem
[34]—methioninemightthusimproveimmunityatthe
expenseof longevity.
Altogether, the observations that single dietary AA can
have a profound impact on lifespan and reproduction,
combined with the finding that DR is independent of
caloriccontentitself[5,6],indicatethatthefieldshould
revise simplisticnotionsof‘resource’or ‘energy’
alloca-tion trade-offs. Further in-depth studies of how single
dietarycomponentsaffectvariousfitnesstraits,including
reproduction and lifespan, would provide a more
com-prehensive understanding of commonly observed
life-historytrade-offs[15,16,23].
Amino
acids
affect
lifespan
and
reproduction
via
nutrient
sensing
How, mechanistically, do AA affect reproduction and
lifespan? A prime candidate is the insulin/insulin-like
growthfactor1(IIS)/targetofrapamycin(TOR)signaling
pathway, which is known to be a major regulator of
longevityinworms,fliesandrodents[35].For example,
the centrally important transcription factor foxo
down-streamofIISmodulatestheDRresponseinflies[36,37],
and the translational repressor 4E-BP downstream of
TORisfunctionallyrequiredforlifespanextensionupon
DR [38]. Moreover, given that insulin secretion in
response to leucineand isoleucine uptake iscontrolled
throughaTOR-dependentmechanism[39],itis
tempt-ingtospeculatethatAAmightactthroughTORtoaffect
lifespanandfecundity.TheresultsofGrandisonetal.and
of Leeet al.corroboratethisidea[15,16].
Grandisonet al.found thatadding backessentialAAto
restricted diet decreases lifespan, but only to a minor
extentinfliescarryingadominant-negative(DN)formof
theinsulin-likereceptorInR, showingthatthenegative
effects of AAonlongevityrequireafunctionalreceptor
[15].Furthermore, dietary methioninesupplementation
isunabletopromotefecundityinthesemutants,
suggest-ing that the fecundity-promoting effects of methionine
alsorelyonInRfunction.Similarly,Leeandcolleagues
foundthatunderconditionswheremethioninereduction
extendslifespanof wildtypeflies, restrictionof
methio-ninenolongerextendslifespaninInRDNmutantsorin
fliesthatoverexpresstheTORantagonisttuberous
scle-rosiscomplex2(TSC2)[16].Moreover,arecentstudyby
EmranandcolleagueshasreportedthatTORsignaling,
butapparentlynotIIS,isrequiredfortheeffectsofEAA
on fecundityand lifespan[40]. These findingsare also
interesting given the observation that
methionine-defi-cient mice exhibit lowered levels of serum IGF-1 and
insulin[13].
In addition to IIS/TOR, a number of other genes and
pathwayshavebeenshowntoplayaroleinAAsignaling.
For example, the general control nonderepressible 2
(GCN2)proteinprovidesaconservedAAsensing
mech-anism that is independent of AA identity [11,41]. In
Drosophila larvae, GCN2 signaling in a small subset of
dopaminergic neurons is required for the avoidance of
dietswithunbalancedAAlevels,aprocessthatseemsto
beindependentofTORsignaling[42].Itwillbeclearly
ofgreatinteresttolearnwhetherandhowthismechanism
contributes to the AA modulation of reproduction and
lifespan.
Finally,it will beinterestingto studyhow sensory
per-ceptionofAAmodulateslifespanandreproduction,given
thatolfactoryperceptionandtastecanaffectthelifespan
of flies independent of theiractual foodintake [43,44].
ThesefindingsraisethepossibilitythatperceptionofAA
alonemightimpactlifespan.Thefirstgustatoryreceptor
forAAinflieshasrecentlybeenidentified[45].Inlarvae,
thisreceptor,IR76B,respondstoasubsetofAA,
includ-ingmethionine,andisrequiredforthebehavioral
attrac-tion tocertain AA. Theseresults demonstratethat flies
can sense and respond to specific AA. Furthermore,
internal AA status and reproductive state influence
whether flies select or reject a particular diet [46,47].
Itisparticularlynoteworthyinthiscontextthatlifespan
andfecundityhavedistinctoptimaatdifferentdietaryP:
Cratiosandthatfliescanself-regulateP:Cintakeinaway
that maximizes lifetime fecundity at the expense of
longevity [8].An improvedfutureunderstanding of the
interplay of these mechanisms might explain how flies
can maintain tight nutritional homeostasis and balance
reproductionandlifespaninawaythatoptimizesfitness.
Concluding
remarks
We endwith a potentially important caveat for
experi-mentsdesignedtostudytheeffectsofAAonlifespanand
reproduction.DietaryAAdonotoccurinisolation:most
AAin naturaldietsare partofdietaryproteins.Asseen
above, the effects of methionine on reproduction and
lifespan depend critically on the background status of
otherAAandothernutrients.Moreover,recentresearch
in ants suggests that directly providing free AA in a
defined diet shortens lifespan considerably more than
supplying the equivalent amount of AA via whole
pro-teins,potentiallyduetoadifferenceintheuptakeofAA
versus proteins, or by bypassing protein digestion. In
addition, providing free AA affects the chosen intake
ratio of proteins to carbohydrates, suggesting that the
perception of free AA and whole proteins differ [24].
Thesefindingsthusindicatethatresultsbasedon
manip-ulatingspecificAAinchemicallydefineddietsneedtobe
interpretedwithsomecaution.Nonetheless,therecanbe
nodoubtthatthebodyofworkwehavereviewedhereis
greatly advancing our understanding of how diets and
their components impact organismal reproduction and
lifespan.
Acknowledgements
WethankCarlosRibeiroandMattPiperfortheirkindinvitationto contributethispaper,andFelixZajitschekforhelpfulcomments.This paperwaswrittenaspartoftheresearchcarriedoutbytheDFG CollaborativeResearchUnit(RU)‘SocialityandtheReversalofthe Fecundity-longevityTrade-off’(DFGFOR2281).Ourresearchis supportedbytheSwissNationalScienceFoundation(SNSFgrants# PP00P3_133641;PP00P3_165836;310030E-164207toTF)andaMarie SklodowskaCurieFellowship(#701949)fromtheEUH2020program(to KMH).
References
and
recommended
reading
Papersofparticularinterest,publishedwithintheperiodofreview, havebeenhighlightedas:
ofspecialinterest ofoutstandinginterest
1. FontanaL,PartridgeL:Promotinghealthandlongevitythrough diet:frommodelorganismstohumans.Cell2015,161:106-118.
2. PartridgeL,GemsD,WithersDJ:Sexanddeath:whatisthe connection? Cell2005,120:461-472.
3. MairW,DillinA:Agingandsurvival:thegeneticsoflifespan extensionbydietaryrestriction.AnnuRevBiochem2008, 77:727-754.
4. FlattT:SurvivalcostsofreproductioninDrosophila.Exp Gerontol2011,46:369-375.
5. TatarM:Theplatehalf-full:statusofresearchonthe mechanismsofdietaryrestrictioninDrosophila melanogaster.ExpGerontol2011,46:363-368.
6. MinK-J,FlattT,KulaotsI,TatarM:Countingcaloriesin Drosophiladietrestriction.ExpGerontol2007,42:247-251.
7. SimpsonSJ,RaubenheimerD:TheNatureofNutrition:AUnifying FrameworkfromAnimalAdaptationtoHumanObesity.Princeton UniversityPress;2012.
8. LeeKP,SimpsonSJ,ClissoldFJ,BrooksR,BallardJWO, TaylorPW,SoranN,RaubenheimerD:Lifespanand reproductioninDrosophila:newinsightsfromnutritional geometry.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA2008,105:2498-2503.
9. SkorupaDA,DervisefendicA,ZwienerJ,PletcherSD:Dietary compositionspecifiesconsumption,obesity,andlifespanin Drosophilamelanogaster.AgingCell2008,7:478-490.
10. MinK-J,TatarM:Restrictionofaminoacidsextendslifespanin Drosophilamelanogaster.MechAgeingDev2006,127:643-646.
11. SoultoukisGA,PartridgeL:Dietaryprotein,metabolism,and aging.AnnuRevBiochem2016,85:5-34.
12. SpeakmanJR,MitchellSE,MazidiM:Caloriesorprotein?The effectofdietaryrestrictiononlifespaninrodentsisexplained bycaloriesalone.ExpGerontol2016,86:28-38.
13. MillerRA,BuehnerG,ChangY,HarperJM,SiglerR, Smith-WheelockM:Methionine-deficientdietextendsmouse lifespan,slowsimmuneandlensaging,altersglucose,T4, IGF-Iandinsulinlevels,andincreaseshepatocyteMIFlevels andstressresistance.AgingCell2005,4:119-125.
14. TroenAM,FrenchEE,RobertsJF,SelhubJ,OrdovasJM, ParnellLD,LaiCQ:Lifespanmodificationbyglucoseand methionineinDrosophilamelanogasterfedachemically defineddiet.Age2007,29:29-39.
15. GrandisonRC,PiperMDW,PartridgeL:Amino-acidimbalance explainsextensionoflifespanbydietaryrestrictionin Drosophila.Nature2009,462:1061-1064.
16. LeeBC,KayaA,MaS,KimG,GerashchenkoMV,YimSH,HuZ, HarshmanLG,GladyshevVN:Methioninerestrictionextends lifespanofDrosophilamelanogasterunderconditionsoflow amino-acidstatus.NatCommun2014,5:1-12.
17. TatarM:DietrestrictioninDrosophilamelanogaster.Interdiscip TopGerontol2007,35:115-136.
18. PiperMDW,BlancE,Leita˜o-Gonc¸alvesR,YangM,HeX, LinfordNJ,HoddinottMP,HopfenC,SoultoukisGA,NiemeyerC etal.:AholidicmediumforDrosophilamelanogaster.Nat Methods2014,11:100-105.
19. ReisT:Effectsofsyntheticdietsenrichedinspecificnutrients onDrosophiladevelopment,bodyfat,andlifespan.PLOSONE 2016,11:e0146758.
20. ZimmermanJA,MalloyV,KrajcikR,OrentreichN:Nutritional controlofaging.ExpGerontol2003,38:47-52.
21. DickKB,RossCR,YampolskyLY:Geneticvariationofdietary restrictionandtheeffectsofnutrient-freewaterandamino acidsupplementsonlifespanandfecundityofDrosophila. GenetRes2011,93:265-273.
22. FansonBG,TaylorPW:Additiveandinteractiveeffectsof nutrientclassesonlongevity,reproduction,anddiet consumptionintheQueenslandfruitfly(Bactroceratryoni).J InsectPhysiol2012,58:327-334.
23.
PiperJuricicMD,P,HeSoultoukisX,AtanassovGA,BlancI,SalmonowiczE,MesarosH,A,YangHerbertMetSL,al.: Matchingdietaryaminoacidbalancetotheinsilico-translated exomeoptimizesgrowthandreproductionwithoutcostto lifespan.CellMetab2017,25:610-621.
Onthebasisofprotein-codinggenesintheD.melanogastergenomethe authorsdevelopedanexome-matcheddiet.Remarkably,thisdietcan increaselifespanwithoutanycoststogrowthandreproduction,similarto theearlierfindingsofGrandisonetal.[15].
24.
ArgandaParsingtheSBS,lifeshorteningBazaziS,LeeffectsHesranofS,dietaryPugaC,protein:LatilGS,effectsDASJ:of individualaminoacids.ProcRSocB2017,284:2016-2052.
Theauthorscomparetheeffectsofawhole-proteindietversusafree-AA dietonlifespan,fatmetabolismandfeedingbehaviorinants.Thestudy showsthatfreeAAshortenlifespanmorethanproteins;andthat methio-nine,serine,threonineandphenylalanineseemtohavethemost detri-mentaleffectsonlifespan.
25. BoggsCL:Understandinginsectlifehistoriesandsenescence througharesourceallocationlens.FunctEcol2009,23:27-37.
26. FlattT:Plasticityoflifespan:areactionnormperspective.Proc NutrSoc2014,73:532-542.
27. FlattT:Ageing:dietandlongevityinthebalance.Nature2009, 462:989-990.
28. MairW,Sgro` CM,JohnsonAP,ChapmanT,PartridgeL:Lifespan extensionbydietaryrestrictioninfemaleDrosophila melanogasterisnotcausedbyareductioninvitellogenesisor ovarianactivity.ExpGerontol2004,39:1011-1019.
29. CrawfordD,LibinaN,KenyonC:Caenorhabditiselegans integratesfoodandreproductivesignalsinlifespan determination.AgingCell2007,6715–721.30.
30. MagwereT,ChapmanT,PartridgeL:Sexdifferencesinthe effectofdietaryrestrictiononlifespanandmortalityratesin femaleandmaleDrosophilamelanogaster.JGerontolABiolSci MedSci2004,59:3-9.
31. MaklakovAA,SimpsonSJ,ZajitschekF,HallMD,DessmannJ, ClissoldF,RaubenheimerD,BondurianskyR,BrooksRC: Sex-specificfitnesseffectsofnutrientintakeonreproductionand lifespan.CurrBiol2008,18:1062-1066.
32. ZajitschekF,ZajitschekSR,FribergU,MaklakovAA:Interactive effectsofsex,socialenvironment,dietaryrestriction,and methionineonsurvivalandreproductioninfruitflies.Age2013, 35:1193-1204.
33. LehtovaaraA,SchielzethH,FlisI,FribergU:Heritabilityoflife spanislargelysexlimitedinDrosophila.AmNat2013, 182:653-665.
34. LiP,YinYL,LiD,KimSW,WuG:Aminoacidsandimmune function.BrJNutr2007,98:237-252.
35. PartridgeL,AlicN,BjedovI,PiperMDW:AgeinginDrosophila: theroleoftheInsulin/IGFandTORsignallingnetwork.Exp Gerontol2011,46:376-381.
36. MinKJ,YamamotoR,BuchS,PankratzM,TatarM:Drosophila lifespancontrolbydietaryrestrictionindependentof insulin-likesignaling.AgingCell2008,7:199-206.
37. GiannakouME,GossM,PartridgeL:RoleofdFOXOinlifespan extensionbydietaryrestrictioninDrosophilamelanogaster: notrequired,butitsactivitymodulatestheresponse.Aging Cell2008,7:187-198.
38. ZidBM,RogersAN,KatewaSD,VargasMA,KolipinskiMC,LuTA, BenzerS,KapahiP:4E-BPextendslifespanupondietary restrictionbyenhancingmitochondrialactivityinDrosophila. Cell2009,139:149-160.
39. Ge´minardC,RulifsonEJ,Le´opoldP:Remotecontrolofinsulin secretionbyfatcellsinDrosophila.CellMetab2009, 10:199-207.
40. EmranS,YangM,HeX,ZandveldJ,PiperMDW:Targetof rapamycinsignallingmediatesthelifespan—extending
effectsofdietaryrestrictionbyessentialaminoacidalteration. Aging2014,6:390-398.
41. GallinettiJ,HarputlugilE,MitchellJR:Aminoacidsensingin dietary-restriction-mediatedlongevity:rolesof signal-transducingkinasesGCN2andTOR.BiochemJ2013,449:1-10.
42. BjordalM,ArquierN,KniazeffJ,PinJP,Le´opoldP:Sensingof aminoacidsinadopaminergiccircuitrypromotesrejectionof anincompletedietinDrosophila.Cell2014,156:510-521.
43. LibertS,ZwienerJ,ChuX,VanvoorhiesW,RomanG,PletcherSD: RegulationofDrosophilalifespanbyolfactionand food-derivedodors.Science2007,315:1133-1137.
44. OstojicI,BollW,WatersonMJ,ChanT,ChandraR,PletcherSD, AlcedoJ:Positiveandnegativegustatoryinputsaffect DrosophilalifespanpartlyinparalleltodFOXOsignaling.Proc NatlAcadSciUSA2014,111:8143-8148.
45.
CrosetmolecularV,SchleyerandneuronalM,ArguellobasisJR,forGerberaminoB,acidBentonsensingR:Ainthe Drosophilalarva.SciRep2016,6:34871.
The authors describe a chemosensory receptor expressed in taste neurons of D. melanogaster larvae that is activated by specific AA, includingmethionine.Thesetasteneuronsmediatefeedingbehaviorin responsetodietaryAAimbalance.
46. ToshimaN,TanimuraT:Tastepreferenceforaminoacidsis dependentoninternalnutritionalstateinDrosophila melanogaster.JExpBiol2012,215:2827-2832.
47.
Corrales-CarvajalnutrienthomeostasisVM,FaisalbymodulatingAA,Ribeiroexploration-exploitationC:Internalstatesdrive trade-off.eLife2016,5:e19920.
Theauthorsusevideo-trackingtoexaminehowinternalAAstatusaffects feedingbehavioranddietchoice.VirginDrosophilafemalesfedan AA-deficientdietconsumemoreyeastthansucrose,whilevirginfemalesthat arenotAA-deficientdotheopposite.Moreover,AA-deficientfliesspend mostoftheirtimenearknownyeastpatches.