• Aucun résultat trouvé

On the cover

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "On the cover"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vol 58: MARCH MARS 2012

|

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

253

Letters | Correspondance

On the cover

Y

ou know you have made it as a rock band or artist if you appear “on the cover of the Rolling Stone.” Well, now you know you have arrived as a family physician if you grace the cover of Canadian Family Physician.

This was a brilliant idea. It gives us a chance to “meet”

and learn about our family physician colleagues across Canada when we would not otherwise have a chance to do so. This adds to an already excellent medical jour- nal. Please keep up this new tradition, and we all thank you for your hard work in producing Canadian Family Physician. Rock on!

—Guy Robert Blais MD CCFP FCFP Edmonton, Alta

Competing interests None declared

World Health Organization position on breastfeeding

W

e read the article “Breastfeeding and maternal diet in atopic dermatitis,”1 published in the December 2011 issue of Canadian Family Physician. We wish to point out a factual error in the article.

Under the heading of “Breastfeeding,” the authors wrote that “The World Health Organization currently rec- ommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months and continuing to breastfeed, as well as introducing other foods, until 2 years of age.”1 The World Health Organization recommends “exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months and ... the timely introduction of adequate and safe complementary foods with continued breastfeeding up to two years or beyond.”2

—M. Shirley Gross MD CM CCFP

—Angela Berg MD CCFP Edmonton, Alta

Competing interests None declared References

1. Lien TY, Goldman RD. Breastfeeding and maternal diet in atopic dermatitis.

Can Fam Physician 2011;57:1403-5.

2. World Health Organization [website]. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 2003. Available from: www.who.int/nutrition/topics/global_strategy/en/index.html.

Accessed 2012 Jan 25.

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm

T

he Preventive Care Checklist Form© update by Duerksen et al in the January 2012 issue1 is an excel- lent summary of preventive care that would be useful for any family physician. One cannot help but notice the paucity of evidence behind many of the actions under- taken at the annual health checkup.

An area of preventive medicine that is often over- looked is the screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms

(AAAs). The evidence behind 1-time AAA screening for select populations (eg, male smokers aged 65 to 75 years) is equivalent to, if not better than, the evidence behind many of the strongest recommendations in this form. Consequently, select AAA screening has been sup- ported by the US Preventive Services Task Force,2 the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery,3 and the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee.4 Despite being cost effective and potentially lifesaving, the 1-time ultra- sound has not been adopted for routine screening by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care—

possibly because the last position statement was pub- lished in 1991.5

It might be prudent to include a reminder for selec- tive AAA screening in the next version of the Preventive Care Checklist Form.

—Mitch Vainberg MD Toronto, Ont

Competing interests None declared References

1. Duerksen A, Dubey V, Iglar K. Annual adult health checkup. Update on the Preventive Care Checklist Form©. Can Fam Physician 2012;58:43-7(Eng),e15-20(Fr).

2. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneu- rysm: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2005;142(3):198-202.

3. Mastracci TM, Cinà CS; Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Canada: review and position statement of the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 2007;45(6):1268-76, 1276.

e1-5.

4. Medical Advisory Secretariat. Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: an evidence-based analysis. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series 2006;6(2). Available from: www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/

program/mas/tech/reviews/pdf/rev_usaaa_010106.pdf. Accessed 2012 Feb 7.

5. Periodic health examination, 1991 update: 5. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. CMAJ 1991;145(7):783-9.

The top 5 articles read online at cfp.ca

1. Clinical Review: Zopiclone. Is it a pharmaco- logic agent for abuse? (December 2007) 2. Case Report: Chronic vulvar irritation: could

toilet paper be the culprit? (April 2010)

3. Practice: Annual adult health checkup: Update on the Preventive Care Checklist Form© (January 2012)

4. Motherisk Update: Exposure to fifth disease in pregnancy (December 2009)

5. Clinical Review: Treatment and prevention of herpes labialis (December 2008)

Make your views known!

To comment on a particular article, open the article at www.cfp.ca and click on the Rapid Responses link on the right-hand side of the page.

Rapid Responses are usually published online within 1 to 3 days and might be selected for publication in the next print edition of the journal. To submit a letter not related to a specific article published in the journal, please e-mail letters.editor@cfpc.ca.

Références

Documents relatifs

There is better value in a periodic (ie, according to risks and specifc test intervals) preventive visit with a primary care health professional (eg, family physician,

1 From 1979 to 1994, the task force published 9 updates, and in 1994 it published a landmark compilation, the Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care, also known

Objective To review the 2014 American College of Physicians (ACP) guideline on the use of pelvic examinations to screen for cancer (other than cervical), pelvic inflammatory

Quality of evidence The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care recommendations are the primary source of information, supplemented by relevant US Preventive Services Task

Although family physicians and other primary health care providers need not be aware of all the steps and processes involved in the development of CPGs using the GRADE

Recommendations are determined to be either strong or weak based on the balance between desirable and undesirable effects, the quality of evidence, and other

Health Canada’s National Committee on Colorectal Cancer Screening 1 has recently made recommendations, as has the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.. 2 The

• There is fair evidence (level II-1 and II-2) that uni- versal screening for group B streptococcal (GBS) colonization at 35 to 37 weeks’ gestation followed by