• Aucun résultat trouvé

IMT-A Evaluation by TCOE India:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "IMT-A Evaluation by TCOE India:"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

IMT-A Evaluation by TCOE India:

IEEE 802.16 IMT – Advanced Evaluation Group Coordination Meeting.

17 May 2010, Beijing, China

Kiran Kuchi, M S Padmanabhan, Prateek Kapadia, Abhay

Karandikar, Bhaskar Ramamurthi, K. Giridhar, Klutto Milleth, B Dhivagar, Shivakishore, R M Karthik, B. Srikrishna,Geordie

Contact Person: Kiran Kuchi (kkuchi@cewit.org.in)

(2)

Adopt forthcoming technologies to Indian context and environment

Helps in its role of policy advocacy to the Govt of India

Builds a critical mass of researchers & students

India is looking to IMT-A technologies to provide cost-effective Nationwide broadband connectivity

Wire line penetration is modest (40 Million)

Wireless cellular (610 Million)

A record 20.31 milion phones were added in March 2010!

Motivation for IMT-A Evaluation

(3)

Evaluation Team

TCOE

Faculty members & scientists from premier institutes all over India.

Research scholars and students

Centre of Excellence in Wireless Technology (CEWiT)

CEWiT actively participates in IEEE and 3GPP forums

Interacts with other EGs / proponents

Provides simulation support along with IITs.

TCOE India Evaluation

(4)

Sector Spectral Efficiency:

Cell Edge Spectral Efficiency

* control overhead is 13%, and pilot overhead is included.

Evaluation Results for Downlink, in Urban micro environment

OL-Rank1 precoding OL-SFBC Without Control overhead 0.1 bps/Hz 0.05 bps/Hz With Control Overhead 0.087 bps/Hz 0.044 bps/Hz

OL-Rank1 precoding OL-SFBC

Without Control overhead 2.55 bps/Hz 1.76 bps/Hz

With Control Overhead 2.21 bps/Hz 1.53 bps/Hz

(5)

Current Status

TCOE evaluation is well on way to meet targets

We expect to meet downlink spec-eff targets with 2 antennas at BS and MS.

Current results are reported only for Rank 1 Precoding and SFBC (inside OL Region) .

MU-MIMO provides a substntial additional benefit.

(6)

About the Final Report

TCOE India will report a single consolidated final report.

This report will include evaluation results for Indian rural

open area model. (Since this is not an ITU specified test case, these results will be informative and will appear in

Appendix.)

A combination of OL region, rank-1 precoding, MU MIMO and CDR is expected to exceed ITU requirements with 2-Tx

antennas in Downlink. These results will be included in the final evaluation report.

(7)

Appendix 1

Simulation assumptions

2Tx-2Rx Rank 1 precoding

MMSE Receiver.

Localised allocation (SLRUs).

CoFIP with 16.6% pilot density.

2Tx-2Rx SFBC

MRC Reciever.

Blk Distributed allocation (NLRUs).

Interlaced Pilots with 11% pilot density.

OL Region Enabled

CQI based on PP-SINR

PF scheduler with a Tc = 250 ms

CC HARQ is used. 90% packet success rate is maintained in the 1st

transmission.

(8)

Appendix 2

Post processing SINR, Urban micro

(9)

Appendix 3

Average User Throughput, Urban micro

* Pilot overhead is included

(10)

Appendix 4: Normalized Spectral

Efficiency, Urban micro

(11)

Appendix 5

Indian rural open area model

Références

Documents relatifs

Letter to IMT-Advanced Independent Evaluation Groups: Invitation to IEEE 802.16 IMT- Advanced Evaluation Group Coordination Meeting?.

• Currently working on a draft initial Evaluation Report to be submitted to ITU-R WP 5D meeting in February 2010. • No plans to develop simulation capabilities but will rely on input

The Global Network on Evaluation assessed how the evaluation reports had addressed gender, human rights and equality, as recommended in the WHO evaluation policy

The latter include an external evaluation of the United Nations REACH Partnership, commissioned by the evaluation office of the World Food Programme, with WHO as a

In response to questions raised by Member States on the system of quality control for evaluation products, the Network has established mechanisms and checklists to ensure that

The review and consultation process with internal and external stakeholders focuses on the following essential elements of strengthening evaluation and

This is somehow consistent with the results obtained in the monolingual task, where the best performance was obtained by simple ORing the terms of the query (previously stemmed

The setup was slightly modified from that of the live competition: rather than running the reasoners until they had processed all ontologies in the corpus, we set a strict timeout