• Aucun résultat trouvé

Evolution of online gambling practices in France over the past 5 years: lessons for the regulation and prevention of problem gambling.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Evolution of online gambling practices in France over the past 5 years: lessons for the regulation and prevention of problem gambling."

Copied!
26
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

J e a n - M i c h e l C o s t e s

F r e n c h M o n i t o r i n g C e n t r e o n G a m b l i n g , F r a n c e

6 t h I n t e r n a t i o n a l C o n f e r e n c e o n P a t h o l o g i c a l G a m b l i n g a n d B e h a v i o r a l A d d i c t i o n s

W a r s a w , 1 9 - 2 0 N o v e m b e r 2 0 1 8

Evolution of online gambling practices in France over the past 5 years: lessons for the regulation and prevention of

problem gambling.

(2)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Plan

ü  Introduction

ü  Online gambling in France in 2017

ü  Evolution 2012/2017

ü  Conclusions and perspectives

19/11/2018

2

(3)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Legal framework before 2010

19/11/2018 3

jm.costes@orange.fr

(Tables(games,(

Slot(machines) Poker

Off(line (Française( FDJ(

des(jeux)

FDJ(

(Française(

des(jeux)

PMU((Pari(

mutuel(

urbain)

On(line (Française( FDJ(

des(jeux)

(=(State(monopolies (=(Private(operators (=(Prohibited

Gambling(legal(framework(in(France( before&2010 Casinos

Authorization/

Concession

Lotteries Sports(

betting

Horse(

racing

(4)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Legal framework after 2010

19/11/2018 4

(Tables(games,(

Slot(machines) Poker

Off(line (Française( FDJ(

des(jeux)

FDJ(

(Française(

des(jeux)

PMU((Pari(

mutuel(

urbain)

On(line operators Licensed( (Française( FDJ(

des(jeux)

Licensed(

operators

Licensed(

operators

(=(State(monopolies (=(Private(operators (=(Prohibited

Gambling(legal(framework(in(France(after&2010 Casinos

Lotteries Sports(

betting

Horse(

racing

Authorization/

Concession

9,8 % GR

24,5% GR

90,2 % GR

9,5% GR 24,5% GR

41,5% GR

(5)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Gambling expenditure in France

19/11/2018 5

jm.costes@orange.fr

1,5%

3,4%

8,8%

9,8%

133,8 €

178,5 €

167,8 €

186,5 €

192,7 €

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

130 € 135 € 140 € 145 € 150 € 155 € 160 € 165 € 170 € 175 € 180 € 185 € 190 € 195 €

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Spending per capita gambling expenditure (GGR) and share of Internet spending

Share of overall gambling spending on the Internet Overall gambling spending per capita 18 years old and over (€)

(6)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Online gambling spending by games

19/11/2018 6

16,3% 14,1%

35,4%

37,2%

29,7%

23,8%

25,4%

38,4%

23,3%

21,1% 17,8% 17,5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Breakdown of online gambling spending by gaming activity

Sports betting Horses racing Poker Lotery

(7)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

e-Games France 2017 survey, ODJ

•  eGames international project: France, Canada, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Poland (gambling & related gaming)

eGames 2017 France

•  Based on “Web Users Panel - « Le Carré des Médias » Médiamétrie - nearly 1 million internet users

•  Time survey: 7 weeks, from 5 January to 24 February 2017

•  Sample: 22,700 French Internet users aged 18 and over

•  Quotas to ensure its representativeness (on the criteria: sex, age) based on data from the Monitoring survey of Internet use by the French population (Médiamétrie, 4th quarter 2016)

•  Final sample was weighted according the initial quotas

•  Scope of these analyze on gamblers’ sample: Internet users who reported having gambled on the Internet at least one time in the last 12 months (N = 6,200; 6,380 weighted)

19/11/2018 7

jm.costes@orange.fr

Symposium Glücksspielforschung und Glücksspielpolitik

24.03.2016, Edmund-Siemers-Allee 1, Hörsaal ESA M 8.30Uhr Begrüßung

Professor Dr. Thorsten Teichert, Universität Hamburg 08.35Uhr Grußworte

Prodekan Professor Dr. Cord Jakobeit, Universität Hamburg 08.40Uhr Grußworte

Dr. Thomas Gößl, Vorsitzender Glückspielkollegium

08.45Uhr Methodische Probleme bei der Wohlfahrtsbewertung von Glücksspielen Professor Dr. Michael Adams, Universität Hamburg, Fachbeirat Glücksspielsucht

9.30Uhr The «responsible gambling» policy model: a strategy based on the regulation of a legal supply.

Jean-Michel Costes, Observatoire des Jeux 10.15Uhr Kaffeepause

10.30Uhr Der Wohlfahrtseffekt von Glücksspielen: Ergebnisse für Deutschland Dr. Ingo Fiedler, Universität Hamburg

11.15Uhr Social Costs and benefits of gambling: A perspective from France Professor Sophie Massin, Université d’Artois

12.00Uhr Mittagspause

13.00Uhr Social Gambling im Jugendalter: Nutzungsmuster und Risiken Dr. Tobias Hayer, Universität Bremen

13.45Uhr Social Gam(bl)ing: Produktanalyse aus Sicht der Nachfrager Professor Dr. Thorsten Teichert, Universität Hamburg

14.30Uhr Kaffeepause

14.45Uhr Social Gam(bl)ing: Marktanalyse aus Sicht der Anbieter Dr. Ingo Fiedler, Universität Hamburg

15.30Uhr Podiumsdiskussion: Die Zukunft der Glücksspielforschung (in Deutschland) Moderation: Dr. Ingo Fiedler, Universität Hamburg

Teilnehmer:

Isabella von der Decken, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit

Benjamin Schwanke, Glücksspielaufsicht, Hamburger Behörde für Inneres und Sport Hans-Peter Knaack, Glücksspielaufsicht, Ministerium für Inneres und Sport Saarland Alice Schogger, Bundesministerium für Finanzen Österreich

Professor Dr. Christian Pfeiffer, Kriminologisches Forschungsinstitut Niedersachsen, Fachbei- rat Glücksspielsucht

Professor Dr. Michael Adams, Universität Hamburg, Fachbeirat Glücksspielsucht

16.30Uhr Ende der Veranstaltung

(8)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Online gamblers in France in 2017

19/11/2018 8

Internet

Users Gamblers Non-

gamblers

Test dif.

gamblers vs nongamblers

Gender

man 50,2 65,4 44,3 ***

woman 49,8 34,6 55,7 ***

Age

1-[18-34[ 28,4 37,8 24,7 ***

2-[35-54[ 39,0 43,7 37,1 ***

3-[55 +[ 32,7 18,5 38,2 ***

Professional activity

No 35,7 24,0 40,3 ***

Yes 64,3 76,0 59,7 ***

Graduation

< Highschool 17,9 15,1 18,9 ***

Highschool to college + 2 43,7 45,3 43,0 *

At least college + 3 24,8 24,8 24,8 NS

Household Financial Ressources (monthly)

≤ 1 500 € 25,2 22,4 26,4 ***

[ 1 500 € ; 3 000 € ] 36,7 36,9 36,6 NS

≥ 3 000 € 38,1 40,7 37,0 ***

2.4 to 2.9 million of online

gamblers in 2017 in France

(9)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Activities practiced in 2017

19/11/2018 9

jm.costes@orange.fr

19,0 3,2 3,8 4,3 6,1

10,0 13,0

20,5 17,0

30,6 36,2

62,1 70,3

100,0

0,0 20,0 40,0 60,0 80,0 100,0 120,0 overall non regulated games

gambling_online_other_games gambling_online_financial_betting gambling_online_e_sport gambling_online_casino gambling_online_slot_machines gambling_online_casino & slot_m gambling_online_poker gambling_online_horses-racing gambling_online_sports_betting gambling_online_scratch_cards gambling_online_drawing_games gambling_online_lottery gambling_online_overall

Activities practiced online

59,2 41,8 5,1

4,8 7,9 8,4 9,5

12,1

34,7 42,0

0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 mainly online activity

no offline activity jah_offline_other_games

jah_offline_casino jah_offline_poker jah_offline_sports_betting jah_offline_horses-racing jah_offline_slot_machines jah_offline_drawing_games jah_offline_scratch_cards

Activities practiced offline

(10)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Intensity of practices

19/11/2018 10

Type of games mean median Q90 Gini mean median Q90 Gini mean median Q90 Gini

Lottery 61 26 156 0,60 494 156 1340 0,71 170 4 57 0,96

Slot machines 107 52 210 0,64 1510 451 3120 0,78 572 20 253 0,94

Poker 78 26 210 0,58 871 180 2600 0,76 313 39 315 0,86

Other casino games 75 26 210 0,61 1307 260 2600 0,79 697 15 227 0,96

Horses racing 77 26 210 0,60 908 260 2100 0,74 57 10 130 0,82

Sports betting 74 26 210 0,64 1145 156 2612 0,80 72 5 130 0,87

e-sports betting 92 52 210 0,55 1205 260 3120 0,74 98 19 193 0,77

Financial betting 110 52 210 0,53 4453 780 10463 0,80 112 34 268 0,70

Overall gambling activites 118 38 290 0,69 1483 240 3120 0,83 324 9 223 0,94

Free games 108 26 210 0,73 92 10 130 0,87

PayToWin games 415 210 1040 0,56 188 42 390 0,76 389 117 895 0,76

Intensity of practices according to the type of game, in France, in 2017

Frequency (nbr of sessions p. Spending (in € per year) Playing duration (in h. per year)

(11)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Intensity of practices

19/11/2018 11

jm.costes@orange.fr

Type of games mean median Q90 Gini mean median Q90 Gini mean median Q90 Gini

Lottery 61 26 156 0,60 494 156 1340 0,71 170 4 57 0,96

Slot machines 107 52 210 0,64 1510 451 3120 0,78 572 20 253 0,94

Poker 78 26 210 0,58 871 180 2600 0,76 313 39 315 0,86

Other casino games 75 26 210 0,61 1307 260 2600 0,79 697 15 227 0,96

Horses racing 77 26 210 0,60 908 260 2100 0,74 57 10 130 0,82

Sports betting 74 26 210 0,64 1145 156 2612 0,80 72 5 130 0,87

e-sports betting 92 52 210 0,55 1205 260 3120 0,74 98 19 193 0,77

Financial betting 110 52 210 0,53 4453 780 10463 0,80 112 34 268 0,70

Overall gambling activites 118 38 290 0,69 1483 240 3120 0,83 324 9 223 0,94

Free games 108 26 210 0,73 92 10 130 0,87

PayToWin games 415 210 1040 0,56 188 42 390 0,76 389 117 895 0,76

Intensity of practices according to the type of game, in France, in 2017

Frequency (nbr of sessions p. Spending (in € per year) Playing duration (in h. per year)

(12)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Free games

19/11/2018 12

Prevalence 42,2

Micro payment

No 80,8

Yes 19,2

Time sequence: freegames/real gambling

Before gambling 24,8

After gambling 45,6

At the same time as gambling 29,6 Links: freegames lead to playing real money?

Yes 39,9

No 51,1

Don't know 9,0

Freegames pratice among online gamblers

18,3 16,8 10,5 7,8 4,2 4,0 1,4 1,4 1,1

42,2

0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0 gambling_online_lottery

gambling_online_poker gambling_online_slot_machines gambling_online_sports_betting gambling_online_horses-racing gambling_online_casino gambling_online_other_games gambling_online_financial_betting gambling_online_e_sport gambling_freegames_online_overall

Freegames pratice among online gamblers

(13)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

PayToWin gaming

PayToWin gaming –

is a social gaming activity characterized by the possibility to make payments during the game to significantly increase players’ chances to win or to help players better progress or faster progress in the game compared to players not paying; that is, players do not have to spend money to stay in the game, but they can pay to get privileges to increase their chances to win or advance to higher levels in the game.

19/11/2018 13

jm.costes@orange.fr

Pratices PayToWin games Play these games

59,2 %

Spend money on these games

15,4 %

(14)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Legal status of activities

19/11/2018 14

Gamblers activity according to the legal status of the sites practiced

in % * Lottery Poker Sports

betting

Horses racing

Play on at least one regulated site 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

Play on at least one unregulated site 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

Play on both types of sites 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

The nature of the activity is undetermined 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

* % calculated on individuals for whom the nature of the activity is determined

** Only games for which there is a regulated offer are present: lottery, poker, sports betting or horses racing on at least one licensed website. The other games are 100% played on unregulated websites.

Reading Guide: 90.2% of players playing lottery games play this type of game on at least one regulated website (here, the website of the FDJ), 13.0% on at least one unregulated lottery website . The sum of these two figures is greater than 100 because 3.2% play on both types of site. Whatever the nature of the game played, 33.8% of players play on at least one unregulated website, including games for which there is no regulated offer.

Type de jeu **

Overall

activities

(15)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Online problem gambling in 2017

19/11/2018 15

jm.costes@orange.fr

58,4 19,1

9,4 13,0

0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0

0 [1-2]

[3-7]

[8 +]

PGSI overall online gamblers

(16)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Problem gambling and intensity

19/11/2018 16

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

1 2 3 4

Pr ev al en ce p ro bl em g am bl in g- IP GS I 8 a nd + (% )

Intensity of practices (quartiles)

Frequency

Spending Duration

(17)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Problem gambling and games

19/11/2018 17

jm.costes@orange.fr

12,4 9,0

10,6 19,6 9,5

14,5 13,5

15,4 5,9

48,3 45,5 39,1 36,0 19,5

15,6 10,9 10,9 8,1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

slot_machines casino games financial_betting e_sport betting multiactivity poker horses racing sports betting lottery

PGSI and main activity played: prevalence of problem gambling (%)

PGSI [8;+] PGSI [3;7]

4,3 1,4

1,6 1,8

10,6 13,3 9,5

24,4

33,2

12,1 5,0

4,1 2,4

15,7 10,2

5,5

12,4

32,6

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

slot_machines casino games financial_betting e_sport betting multiactivity poker horses racing sports betting lottery

PGSI and main activity played: share of the total number of gamblers (%)

PGSI [8;+] PGSI [3;7]

(18)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Problem gambling related factors

19/11/2018 18

Associated factors for PGSI 8 and more

Problem gambling prevalence

(%)

OR Test

woman 9,9 ref. -

man 14,7 1,57 ***

18-34 years 21,1 6,64 ***

35-54 years 10,0 2,75 ***

55 years and more 3,9 ref. -

< Highschool 10,5 ref. -

Highschool to college + 2 15,3 1,54 ***

At least college + 3 13,2 1,29 *

Single 13,0 ref. -

Divorced or separated 14,7 1,16 ns

Widowed 6,4 0,45 **

Marital Life 13,4 1,04 ns

Actifs_lower prof. 14,3 5,00 ***

Actifs_higher prof. 16,2 5,79 ***

Actifs_median prof. 14,3 5,01 ***

Inactifs_unemployed 9,2 3,03 ***

Inactifs_students 21,0 7,96 ***

Inactifs_retired 3,2 ref. -

less than 1500 € 22,3 2,86 ***

1500-3000 € 14,1 1,64 ***

more than 3000 € 9,1 ref. -

Professional activity and social category

Income Gender Age

Education level

Marital status

Associated factors for PGSI 8 and more

Problem gambling prevalence

(%)

OR Test

lottery 8,1 ref. -

horses racing 10,9 1,39 ns

sports betting 10,9 1,39 *

poker 15,6 2,10 ***

casino games 45,5 9,50 ***

slot machines 48,2 10,61 ***

e_sport betting 35,9 6,37 ***

financial betting 39,1 7,31 ***

multiactiviy 19,5 2,76 ***

No 9,5 ref. -

Yes 32,5 4,59 ***

No 4,6 ref. -

Yes 24,5 6,71 ***

No 10,6 ref. -

Yes 14,8 1,47 ***

No 11,5 ref. -

Yes 27,4 2,91 ***

Practice offline gambling activities Spend money on PayToWin games Main game practiced

Use bonus Practice freegames

(19)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Evolutions on online gambling 2012-2017

ü  Players' profile moves: more masculine, more active, more privileged social backgrounds

ü  The activities practiced evolve: sports betting in strong progression, unregulated activities

ü  Internet activity becomes predominant (among online gamers)

ü  Practices intensify, problems increase

19/11/2018 19

jm.costes@orange.fr

(20)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Evolution on PGSI 2012-2017

19/11/2018 20

58,5

19,1

9,4 13,0

59,3

24,0

10,1 6,6

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

[0] [1-2] [3-7] [8-27]

PGSI evolution

2017 2012

(21)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Conclusions

In 5 years, the profile of players has changed, practices have been intensifying and problems related have been increasing

These results question the current strategies for

preventing problem gambling online. We should think about it seriously and change it deeply.

19/11/2018 21

jm.costes@orange.fr

(22)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Why is our strategy not more effective?

ü  Current system is based on the goodwill of the operators, these are only means obligations

19/11/2018 22

38,6

19,9

41,6

77,6

9,4 13,0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

[1-2] [3-7] [8 +]

Share of revenues and PGSI

Share of revenues (%) % of gamblers

(23)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

Why is our strategy not more effective?

ü  Current system is based on the goodwill of the operators, these are only means obligations

ü  If certain measures, which have proved their effectiveness, have been deployed

ü  However, others which are equally effective, have not been implemented

ü  And, some measures with weak effectiveness or ineffectiveness have been widely deployed

19/11/2018 23

jm.costes@orange.fr

(24)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

19/11/2018

jm.costes@orange.fr

Effectiveness and efficacy of problem gambling prevention measures

24

Information, risk awareness

Health messages

Restricted publicity Cost of the game

(payout rate)

Restricted alcohol or tobacco consumption

Less addictive gambling games design Access forbidden to

minors

Self-exclusionGambling moderators

Limitations for spending and losses Early detection and

brief intervention

Restricted commercial relaunches Staff training on

responsible gambling

Restricted access

- efficacy ++

-- Ef fe ct iv en es s ++

(25)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

How to improve our regulation?

1)  A strong regulation / limitation of gambling advertising.

2)  A regulation based on an obligation of results. The digitized data of gaming activities offer us very good indicators of the results of the strategies "responsible game" of the operators

3)  More restrictive devices of limitations of bets or time spent

4)  The systematic provision when opening a tracking tools account of his gaming behaviour

5)  The systematic detection of excessive players to offer relevant help and effective evidence based.

19/11/2018 25

jm.costes@orange.fr

(26)

Online gambling in

France

Introduction Online gambling in

2017 Evolutions 2017 vs 2012 Conclusions

References

Survey

ü  Tovar, Marie-Line, Jean-Michel Costes, et Vincent Eroukmanoff. « Les jeux d’argent et de hasard sur Internet en France en 2012 ». OFDT, Tendances, no 85 (2013).

ü  Costes, J.-M., Eroukmanoff (2017). Evolution des dépenses aux jeux d’argent et de hasard sur la période 2000 - 2016. Observatoire des jeux, note ODJ n°8.

ü  Costes, J.-M., Eroukmanoff (2018).Les pratiques de jeux d’argent en France en 2017 . Observatoire des jeux, note ODJ n°9.

Efficacité

ü  Anderson, P., & Baumberg, B. (2006). Alcohol in Europe: a public health perspective : a report for the European Commission (p. 432). Luxembourg: Institute of Alcohol Studies (Great Britain).

ü  Babor, T. (Éd.). (2003). Alcohol: no ordinary commodity: research and public policy. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.

ü  Babor, T. (Éd.). (2010). Drug policy and the public good. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.

ü  Edwards, G., & Weltgesundheitsorganisation (Éd.). (1995). Alcohol policy and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

ü  Gilbert, A., & Cornuz, J. (2003). Which are the most effective and cost-effective interventions for tobacco control? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe (Health Evidence Network).

ü  McNeill, A., Ross, H., Joossens, L., Hastings, G., & Godfrey, F. (2004). Tobacco or health in the European Union: past, present and future. Report for European Commission. (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

ü  Organisation mondiale de la Santé. (2003). Convention-cadre de l’OMS pour la lutte antitabac. Genève.

ü  Ősterberg, E. (2004). What are the most effective and cost-effective interventions in alcohol control? (p. 14). WHO Regional Office for Europe (Health Evidence Network).

ü  Strang, J., Babor, T., Caulkins, J., Fischer, B., Foxcroft, D., & Humphreys, K. (2012). Drug policy and the public good: evidence for effective interventions. The Lancet, 379(9810), 71‑83.

ü  Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2012). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence and identified best practices.

Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.

19/11/2018

26

Références

Documents relatifs

We consider the problem of controlling the diffusion coefficient of a diffusion with constant negative drift rate such that the probability of hitting a given lower barrier up to

Taken together, these experi- mental approaches contrast with fMRI studies on gambling cue reactivity, which have often compared one sample of PrGs (either active or

Illegal behaviors related to gambling were removed as a diagnostic criterion in the last ver- sion of the DSM (DSM-5) [1], due to their low prevalence in clinical and

The ministry of health has improved the regulatory framework related to women and newborns and introduced of rotavirus (2010) and pneumococcal (2011) vaccines in the

Although this sys- tem will probably not change with the regulation in prog- ress, the cantons [15] and health and social professionals [12] have the common objective of obtaining

representative survey which aimed to estimate the prevalence of online gambling by the French 1 §A descriptive survey of the practices of online gamblers and associated problems 2..

•  The operators of online games, approximately 30, run licensed gambling sites covering three domains: sports betting, horse race betting, and poker. 10/09/2014

– Relates PG to established models of perception, learning and decision