HAL Id: jpa-00246581
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246581
Submitted on 1 Jan 1992
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Structural study of amorphous polyaniline
M. Laridjani, Jean Pouget, A. Macdiarmid, A. Epstein
To cite this version:
M. Laridjani, Jean Pouget, A. Macdiarmid, A. Epstein. Structural study of amorphous polyaniline.
Journal de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1992, 2 (6), pp.1003-1010. �10.1051/jp1:1992193�. �jpa-00246581�
Phys.
classification
Physics
Abstracts61.40K
Structural study of amorphous polyaniline
M.
Laridjani ('),
J. P.Pouget ('),
A. G. MacDiarrnid(2)
and A. J.Epstein (3) (')
Laboratoire dePhysique
des Solides, Universit6 de Paris-Sud, 91405Orsay,
France (2)Department
ofchemistry, University
ofPennsylvania, Philadelphia,
PA 19104-6323, U-S-A- (3)Department
ofPhysics
andDepartment
ofPhysics,
The Ohio StateUniversity,
columbus,Ohio 432 lo- I106, U. S.A.
(Received 31
January1992,
accepted17 March 1992)R4sum4.
Beaucoup
de mat£riaux,sp6cialement
(espolym~res,
ont uneimportante
fraction de leur volume sons orate cristallin htongue port6e.
Bien que cesr6gions
soient souventappe16es amorphes,
ellespr6sentent fr6quemment
un ordre localcaract4ristique.
Nous ddcrivons et utilisons dons cepapier
une m6thode, basde sur unetechnique
de diffraction de rayons X nondispersive
en 6nergie, pour obtenir des fonctions d'interf6rence de bonne quaIit6 et, par transforrn6e de Fourier, la fonction de distribution radiate despolymbres amorphes.
Nousappliquons
cettetechnique
hplusieurs
614ments d'une mdme famille depolymbres 41ectroniques
d'int6rdt actuel (espolyanilines
6m6raldine bases. Nous montrons que l'ordre localpr£sente d'appr6ciables
diff6rences dans les mat6riaux de type I et II,pr6par6s respectivement
sous forme de sel et de base. cette Etude d6montrel'importance
des conditions deprdparation
sur lespropri£t6s physiques
dupolyaniline
et donne une base structurale aux effets observ6s dans les processus dedopage-d6dopage
de ces mat6riaux.Abstract,
Many
materials,especially polymers,
have a substantial volume fraction with nolong
range
crystalline
order.Though
theseregions
are often termedamorphous, they frequently
havea
specific
local order. We describe and use here a method, based on a non-energydispersive X-ray
diffraction
technique,
to obtaingood quality
interference functions and, by Fourier transform, radial distribution functions of theamorphous
structure ofpolymers.
Weapply
thisapproach
tomembers of a
family
of electronicpolymers
of current interest :polyaniline
emeraldine bases. We show that the local order exhibitssignificant
differences in type I and type II materials,precipitated
as salt and baserespectively.
These studies demonstrate theimportance
ofsample preparation
inevaluating
thephysical properties
ofpolyaniline,
andprovide
a structuralorigin
formemory effects observed in the
doping-dedoping
processes.I. Introduction.
The
X-ray
diffraction method has beenextensively applied
to determine the structure ofamorphous
solids. Structural information can«
only
» be obtainedby
the Fourier transform of the coherent part of the diffractedintensity [I].
To obtain this component the subtraction(*)
URA 02 CNRS.1004 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I N° 6of an incoherent
;cantering background, mainly
due toCompton ;cattering.
from the total scatteredintensity
I;required.
It is ~1major problem
to assess theintensity
of the coherent component atsuificiently large
K wave vectors (K=4ar sin 0/A)~ because for such K value; the coherentintensity
isgenerally
weaker than theCompton inten~ity.
This I;especially
the case ior low atomic number substances such asorganic polymers.
Thus thediiiiculty
inobtaining
the coherent diffractedintensity explains why
there arerelatively
fewX-ray
determination~ oi local order inamorphou; polymers
available in the literature(2].
It i~thereiore de;irable to remove the incoherent
scattering during
theexperimental
measurement itseli aseifectively
aspo»ible.
Such an elimination is facilitatedby
the use of a non-energydispersive X-ray
diffraction method(3].
We haverecently applied [4]
with success such a method to determine the local order in severalamorphous
forms of afamily
of electronicpolymers
of current interestpolyaniline [5].
Here we extend this work to another(type
I) class ofpolyanilines
which differs from thepreviously
studied[4]
type II class of materials.Depending
upon the method ofpreparation,
two classes of the emeraldine form ofpolyaniline
can bedistinguished [6, 7].
Class I consists of materialsprepared
in theconducting doped
emeraldinesalt,
ES(Fig, lb), form,
while Class II consists of materialsprepared
in theinsulating
emeraldine base, EB(Fig. la),
form. Asprepared hydrochloride
ES-I films andpowders
aresubstantially
«crystalline
».Dedoping
of ES-I leads toessentially amorphous
emeraldine base EB-I.
Redoped
EB-Iyields
back thesubstantially
«crystalline
» EB-I.Depending
onpreparation
conditions EB-II can be eithersubstantially
«crystalline
»(case
ofpowders)
orcompletely amorphous (case
of most of the unstretched films andfibers). Upon doping
withHCI,
EB-II is convened into ES-II which can be,dependent
upon theoriginal
base structure, either
partially
«crystalline
» orcompletely amorphous,
butdedoped
ES-II isalways amorphous.
H
(0) ~p~
'~p~
' ~ ~ '/
x H
~
(b) ~i~cl~ii~l~ l' l'
x
H H
Fig.
I. Schematic illustration of thepolymer
repeat unit for : (a)polyaniline
emeraldine base (EB) (b)polyaniline
emeraldine HO salt (ES).The structure of the «
crystalline
» part ofEB-II,
ES-I and ES-II has been derived fromcomparison
between the diffraction pattem andintensity
calculations[7].
The average EB-II structure,figure
2a, is similar to that ofchemically analoguous polymers
such aspoly(p- phenylene sulfide)
andpoly(p-phenylene oxide).
The averagephenyl ring
tiltangle,
withrespect
to theplane
ofnitrogens,
is 4l~30° and the averagering-N-ring angle
is 3 ~130°. Anapproximate representation
of thehydrochloride
ES-I structure is shownfigure
2b. It is found that therings
arenearly
in theplane
of thenitrogens (4l 0-15°).
The4,8A
7.7A
a
@
v
b
@
4~ c'=5A C
@
~
l 2 3
b
a) b)
Fig.
2.Projection along
the chain axis and side view of the EB-II (a) and ES-I (b) s~uctures.polymer
chainsetting angle
is estimated at $r20-30°,
and the chains areprobably
tilted withrespect
to the(a, b)
basalplane. Hydrochloride
ES-II and ES-I differ from one another instmcture
[6, 7].
Thehydrochloride
ES-II structure is described in reference[7].
A recent non-energy
dispersive X-ray
diffractionstudy [4]
has shown thatamorphous
EB-II and ES-II unstretched films exhibit local chain arrayresembling
those shownby
the EB-II and ES-II «crystalline
» structuresrespectively.
This conclusion has been obtained from the closecorrespondence
between the average interatomic distances deduced from the radial distri- bution functions and distances calculated from the EB-II and ES-II «crystalline
» structures.It was also found that
dedoped
unstretched ES-II film has an increased interchain disorderthough
a local stmctural order intermediate between those ofamorphous
EB-II and ES-II.Here we
report
a similarinvestigation
ofamorphous
EB-Ipowder,
obtainedby dedoping
ofpartially
«crystalline
» ES-Ipowder,
in order to compare the EB-I local order with that of EB-II and to understand the stmctural basis of memory effects observed inpolyaniline namely
that whendoped
EB-I goes to ES-I anddoped
EB-II goes to ES-II.2.
Experimental.
2-1NON-ENERGY DISPERSIVE DIFFRACTOMETRY WITH A PARALLEL BEAM. In this
technique
a diffractometer has beenadapted
on aparallel X-ray
beam. In that case the scattered radiation for very smallBragg angles,
R, is not overshadowedby
the direct beamwhich is
considerably
more intense than the diffracted beam. In order toseparate
fluorescence and incoherent radiations from the coherent
component, I~(K),
the scattered beam is recordedby
an energydispersive
detector which is connected to apreamplifier
and apulse
processor. Thepulse
processor is asophisticated signal processing
unit whichprovides
linear
amplification,
noisefiltering, pulse pile-up rejection
and life-time correction. The combination of these functions is an essentialprerequisite
forachieving
accurateX-ray analysis.
Thepulses
are accumulated in a multidiannelanalyzer
interfaced with acomputer.
The solid state detector has an energy resolution of 150 eV at 8 kev and 230 eV at 20 kev. Its
high
resolution in energy notonly permit
the elimination of fluorescence radiation from thesample
but it alsopartially
removes the incoherentCompton scattering.
1006 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N° 6
The
experiment
is mounted at aAg X-ray
source. In thepresent study only
theA~~
=0.5609
I wavelength
was used. Thesample
was scanned from 2 R=
2° to 90°
(I,e.
from K
= 0.4
l~
' to 15l~
~) in transmissiongeometry.
The effective elimination of the
Compton scattering
is better achievedby selecting
the half-profile
ofhigher
energy of theAg
Ka characteristic spectmm. As the value of K increases there is less and lessoverlap
between the coherent andCompton profiles.
Forlarge
K values(above
7i~
inour
case)
IheCompton peak
can betotally separated
and the upper halfprofile
of Ku almostcompletely
consists of the coherentcomponent.
In this respectthe energy
analysis performed
has taken theplace
of an ideal monochromator in thediffracted beam. For smaller K values this
technique
leadsonly
to apartial
removal of theCompton scattering.
At low K values(below
5l~
inour
case)
theCompton
contribution to the Kuprofile
isnegligibly
smallcompared
to the strong coherentintensity.
There is thus a small range of K values where theexperimental
data must be corrected in order to eliminatecompletely
theCompton scattering.
This has been doneby
a classicalprocedure
of normalization. First the absolute value of theintensity
of the interference function :I~(K) J(K)
=
~ ~ ~
(i)
was obtained
by scaling
the atomic form factorf (K )
on thelarge
K data. Then small errors in the normalisation ofJ(K),
or morelikely
of the reduced interference function :F
(K )
= K
iJ(K )
i,
(2)
were detected and
corrected,
with thehelp
of the low Kdata,
in such a way that below the first correlationpeak,
the radial distribution function :W(r)
=r(P (r) 1)
=(2 w~po)~ j~
F(K)
sin Kr dK(3)
o
has a
slope
of I(I.e.
below thispeak
there is aprobability
P(r)
=
0 to find an atom at a distance r bom a reference
atom). Expressions (I)
to(3) apply
for a monoatomicisotropic amorphous
material, of mean atomic volumepi [Il.
This isnearly
the case ofpolyaniline
emeraldine base
(C~4Hj~N4)
because the carbon andnitrogen
atoms have similar form factors and theX-ray scattering by
thehydrogen
atoms isnegligible.
2.2 SAMPLE. The
study
has beenperformed
on a 15 x 10 x 3mrn~ parallelepiped
of EB-Ipressed powder. Type
I emeraldine base wasprepared by
theprocedure
outlined in reference[7].
3.
Experimental
results and discussion.Figure
3displays
the reduced interference functionF(K)
of EB-I. TheK~~ position
of thefirst interference
peak
occurs atl.41~~,
which agrees with the maximum of the broadamorphous
halo found in earlierinvestigations [6, 7]
of EB-I materials. The reduced interference function ofamorphous
asprepared
EB-II films exhibits the sameK~~~ value,
which alsocorresponds
toapproximately
theposition
of the(I lo)
reflection of thecrystalline part
of EB-II. This means that the average lst interchain distance ofamorphous
EB-I and ofas
prepared
EB-II are close to each other. A closecomparison
offigure
3 of this paper and offigure
3 of reference[4]
shows howeversignificant
differences in the Kdependence
ofF(K)
in EB-I and in EB-II.Fikl'~
i
a s
a
-a s
-I
-1. 5
6 2 4 6 8
~
k IA
laFig. 3. Reduced interference function F (K derived from the coherent part of the measured intensity
(Ag
Ku) of EB-I.The reduced radial distribution function of both materials also exhibits some differences.
Figures
4a and b compare theW(r)
of EB-I and of asprepared
EB-IIrespectively. Figure
4a is obtainedthrough
theexpression (3) by
the Fourier transform of F(K)
shownfigure 3,
andfigure
4b is taken from reference[4].
At the fkst interatomic distance andbeyond it, position- position
correlations lead to oscillations ofP(r)
andthus,
fromequation (3),
to oscillations ofW(r). Figure
4 shows that these oscillations have about the sameamplitude
in EB-I and in asprepared EB-II, indicating
thatposition-position
correlations are of similar range. However the maxima of oscillations(r~~)
are notexactly
at the samepositions
in the twoamorphous
materials,
which means that the average interatomic distance to the n-thneighbours slightly
differs. As in the
previous study
of type IImaterials,
it is useful todistinguish
between the intrachain and interchain contributions ofW(r).
For interatomic distances smaller than the Van der Waals diameter of a C atom, d~ =3.41 (Fig. 2a), only
intrachain correlationscontribute to the oscillations of
W(r).
Calculationsperformed
in reference[4]
show that interchain correlationsgenerally
dominate for r~d~.
For r~d~
theW(I)
of EB-Ipowder substantially
differs from theW(i-)
ofdedoped
unstretched ES-II film[4] by
theamplitude
of the oscillations and the i~~~peak positions.
EB-II obtainedby
thededoping
ofamorphous
ES-II exhibits a much stronger interchain disorder than EB-I obtained
by
thededoping
ofpartially crystalline
ES-I. Such a difference in the range ofposition-position
correlations observed afterdedoping
isprobably
related to theamorphous
orsubstantially crystalline
nature of the intermediate ES form
[12].
The weak oscillations ofW(I)
indedoped
unstretched ES-II film
correspond
to an interchain local order intermediate between those of Es-II and of EB-II[4].
Below
d~, W(r)
of EB-I shows 3 well definedpeaks
at r~~~=1.41, 2.41
and3.21
(Fig. 4a).
The first distance agrees with the average lstneighbor
atomic distance of the1008 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I N° 6win
~i s
i
a s
-a s
-I
-1-5
6 2 4 6 8
~
la
a)
~~~~
z-s
W(r)
z
i-s ; :..
a-s
-i.s
-z '
6 4
r IA )
b) Fig.
F(K)hown figure 3, (b) EB-II, ccording to eference
polyaniline chain,
shownfigure I,
d=
1.3751, according
to the structural refinements of salts of « tetramers » and « dimers » of anilinefl. 2.41corresponds
to the average 2ndneighbor
atomic distance of thechain,
close to d 3.Beyond
the 2ndneighbor
there is alarge spreading
of intrachain distancesessentially
due to the distribution ofring
tiltangles
4l and
zig-zag angles 8,
the two maindegrees
of freedom of thepolyaniline
chain[4].
Thecorresponding
r~~~ are located at(1.25, 1.8) A, 2.41
and2.951
in EB-II(Fig. 4b).
Theunphysical splitting
of the lst correlationpeak
of EB-II is believed to be causedby
an artifact due toimperfect Compton scattering
corrections in reference[4].
The 2nd correlationpeak
isfound,
asexpected,
at the sameposition
in EB-I and EB-11. The 3rd correlationpeak
has a differentposition~
whichcertainly
indicate that thepolymer
chainadopts
aslightly
differentconformation in the two
amorphous
base materials.W(r)
of EB-I and EB-II show someslight
differences for r
~
d~.
This isespecially
the case for i~ around 51.
This could be dueto some
change
in the relative orientation between chains in close contact(1-2
and 1-3 chains ofFig. 2a).
such a feature isexpected
if the conformation of thepolymer
chains differs in EB-I and in EB-II.Conversely
the conformation of the chains cannot be identical in the two base materials if the EB-I chain arraykeeps
some memory of the local orderadopted
in ES-Iwhere,
as shownby figure
2~ the relative orientation between chains differs from that inEB-II. A
previous study
of type Ipolyaniline [7]
has shown that there is a continuousstructural evolution from ES-I to EB-I upon
dedoping.
Nocomparison
between ther~~~ of
W(r)
of EB-I and calculated interchain distances forpolyaniline adopting
a local array intermediate between those of ES-I and EB-II has been done because the ES-I «crystalline
»structure is too
crudely
known. It is howeverinteresting
topoint
out that the oscillations ofW(r)
ofEB-I,
for r <5.51,
bearsome resemblance with those shown
by
the carbonblack,
which has agraphitic
like local order[13].
The
slight
difference of local order shownby W(r)
in the two classes of base materialsprovides
a structural basis of the memory effect observed inpolyaniline
where :doping
of EB-Iyields
the ES-I structure,doping
EB-IIyields
the ES-II structure andredoping dedoped
ES-IIgives
backagain
the ES-II structure,
without any
interchange
between the Class I and Class II branches of materials. Theconversion from Class I to Class II
polyaniline
isonly
achievedthrough
thedissolving
of thepolyaniline
EB, orby
the introduction and removal of solvent into thepolymer.
The differences in local order within
amorphous
EB-I andamorphous
EB-II suggest that there will be differences in the rates of gas diffusion[9] through
films of the twopolymers
and thatthey
may have different rates of ionexchange
withelectrolytes during
electrochemicalprocesses
[10],
otherproperties
such ascharge
conduction and processesinvolving
C~ ring
rotations about their N-N axes(for example,
in formation ofcharged polarons [I I])
may be affectedby
differences in the local order in EB-I and EB-II.Comparative
studies ofClass I and Class II materials are in progress in order to measure these differences.
Acknowledgment.
This work was
supported
in partby
an « Action Incitative CNRS-NSF». Laboratoire de
Physique
des Solides is associated to the Centre National de la RechercheScientifique.
J.Yue,
M. E. Jozefowicz and Z. Oblakowski are thanked for thesample preparation.
1010 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N° 6
References
Ill GUINIER A., Thdorie et
Technique
de laRadiocristallographie (3'd
Ed. Dunod, Paris, 1964).[2] KAKUDO M. and KASAI N.,
X-Ray
Diffractionby Polymers, (copublished by
Kodunshaltd,Tokyo
and Elsevier
Publishing Company
Amsterdam, 1972) ; WINDLE A. H., Pure andApplied Chemistiy
57/11 (1985) 1627.[3] LARIDJANI M. and SADOC J. F., J.
Phys.
Fiance 42 (1981) 1293.[4] LARIDJANI M., POUGET J.P., SCHERR E.M., MACDIARMID A.G., JozEfowicz M.E. and
EPSTEIN A. J., Ma<.iomole<.ule.v (May 1992).
[5] See, for
example,
Proc. Int. conf. on the Science andTechnology
ofSynthetic
Metals,Tubingen, Germany, Sept.
1990,(Synth.
Met. 41-43 (1991)) Santa Fe, USA, June 1988(Synth.
Met. 27- 29(1989)).
[6] JozEfowicz M. E., LAVERSANNE R., JAVADI H. H. S., EPSTEIN A. J., POUGET J. P., TANG X.
and MACDiARMiD A. G.,
Phys.
Rev. B 39 (1989) 12958.[7] POUGET J. P., JOzEFOWICz M. E., EPSTEIN A. J., TANG X. and MACDIARMID A. G., Macromole- cules 24 (1991) 779.
[8] BAUGHMAN R. H., WOLF J. P., ECKHARD M. and SHACKLETTE L. W.,
Synth.
Met. 25 (1988) 121.[9] ANDERSON M. R., MATTES B. R., ItEIss H. and KANER R. B., Science 252 (1991) 1412.
[10] GENIES E. M., BOYLE A., LAPKOWSKI M. and TSINTARIS c., Synth. Met. 36 (1990) 139 VILLERET B. and NECHTSCHEIN M.,
Phys.
Rev. Lett. 63(1989)
1285.[ll] GiNDER J. M. and EPSTEIN A. J.,
Phys.
Rev. B 41 (1990) 10674.[12] In this respect, it is interesting to
point
out that the recently determined radial distribution function W(r) ofamorphous
EB-IIpowder,
obtained from thededoping
ofpartly
«crystalline
» ES-IIpowder,
presents oscillations ofmagnitude comparable
to those of W(r) of EB-I, obtained from thededoping
ofpartly «crystalline»
ES-Ipowder.
In addition the oscillations ofW(r),
for r« 5
h,
show thatdedoped
ES-IIpowder
exhibits a local order very close to that found [4] in neverdoped
EB-II unstretched film (LARIDJANI M. et al., to bepublished).
[13] WARREN B. E., J. Chem. Phys. 2 (1934) 551.