• Aucun résultat trouvé

A S S O C I A T I O N O F C A N A D A L A N D S S U R V E Y O R S - B O A R D O F E X A M I N E R S W E S T E R N C A N A D I A N B O A R D O F E X A M I N E R S F O R L A N D S U R V E Y O R S A T L A N T I C P R O V I N C E S B O A R D O F E X A M I N E

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "A S S O C I A T I O N O F C A N A D A L A N D S S U R V E Y O R S - B O A R D O F E X A M I N E R S W E S T E R N C A N A D I A N B O A R D O F E X A M I N E R S F O R L A N D S U R V E Y O R S A T L A N T I C P R O V I N C E S B O A R D O F E X A M I N E"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

ASSOCIATION OF CANADA LANDS SURVEYORS - BOARD OF EXAMINERS WESTERN CANADIAN BOARD OF EXAMINERS FOR LAND SURVEYORS ATLANTIC PROVINCES BOARD OF EXAMINERS FOR LAND SURVEYORS ---

SCHEDULE I / ITEM 2

LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATION AND DATA ANALYSIS

February 2001 (1990 Regulations) This examination consists of __5__ questions on __2__ pages (Closed Book) Q. No. Time: 3 hours Marks

1. Perform a least squares adjustment of the following leveling network in which three height differences ∆hi, i = 1, 2, 3 were observed.

w = 5cm h1

h3

h2

The misclosure w is 5cm. Each ∆hi was measured with a variance of 2 cm2. 25

2. Given the following direct model for x and y as a function of l1, l2 and l3:







 

= −



 

3 2 1

1 3 5

1 2 4 y x

l l l

where the covariance matrix of the l’s is





=

2 1 1

1 2 2

1 2 4 Cl

Compute the covariance matrix for x and y. 15

3. Define and explain briefly the following terms:

a) Statistical hypothesis

b) Degree of freedom of a linear system c) Accuracy

d) Design matrix

e) Precision 10

(2)

4. Given the following mathematical models

2 2

1 1

0 ) ,

(

0 ) , (

2 1 2 2

1 1 1

x x

C C x

, x f

C C x

f

l l

l l

==

==

where f1andf2 are vectors of mathematical models, x1and x2 are vectors of unknown parameter, l1andl2 are vectors of observations,

2 1

2

1,C ,C and C

Cl l x x are covariance matrices.

a) Formulate the variation function.

b) Derive the most expanded form of the least squares normal equation

system. 25

5. The following residual vector rˆ and estimated covariance matrix C were computed from a least squares adjustment using five independent observations with a standard deviation of σ= 2mm and a degree of freedom υ =2:

[

4 2 3 9 5

]

rˆ= − − (mm)

16 1 3 2 5

1 4 2 3 3

3 2 4 1 2

2 3 1 1 1

5 3 2 1 9 C













= (mm2)

Given α = 0.01,

a) Conduct a global test to decide if there exists outlier or not.

b) If the test in a) fails, conduct local tests to locate the outlier.

The critical values that might be required in the testing are provided in the following tables:

α 0.001 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.10

2 2 ,υ=

χα 13.82 9.21 7.82 5.99 4.61

α 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.01 0.05 Kα 3.09 2.88 2.75 2.65 2.58 2.33 1.64 where χα2,υ=2 is determined by the equation 2 (x)dx

2 ,

= 2

=

υ

χα χ

α and Kα is

determined by the equation α= K e x /2dx

2

2 1 −−

∫∫α

π . 25

Total Marks: 100

(3)

Références

Documents relatifs

6 A trespasser shall not be prosecuted for committing a trespass except on an information laid by the owner or an authorized representative of the owner of the premises in respect

which are not independent, what can be done for a solution? Illustrate the situation with three simple equations. 5 8.a) What is the method of separation of variables for

It was however thought desirable to adhere to the familiar expressions since, as will be shown (a) each "vector" is uniquely determined by certain components, and

Later on the identity (6) was used to obtain estimates from below for analytic capacity [Me] and to describe uniform rectifiability via the mapping properties

From these estimates and the quasiadditivity of the Green energy we will obtain a Wiener type criterion for boundary layers in terms of capacity.. By cap we denote the

Last on the agenda, the Lasry-Lions approximates of functions f (defined on Hilbert space) which are locally convex up to a positive multiple of the square of

This test is related to other integral tests due to Benedicks and Chevallier, the former in the special case of a Denjoy domain.. We then generalise our test,

There exists a coarse moduli scheme M for the equivalence classes of semistable parabolic vector bundles (on an irreducible nonsingular complete curve X}.. of