• Aucun résultat trouvé

Fr¨ ohlich’s proof for this precise statement (Mathematika 9 (1962) 133-134) is given over k = Q, inspec- tion of the proof should give an analogous proof over any number field k.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Fr¨ ohlich’s proof for this precise statement (Mathematika 9 (1962) 133-134) is given over k = Q, inspec- tion of the proof should give an analogous proof over any number field k."

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

September 9th, 2020 A complement to the paper

Bayer-Fluckiger, Eva; Parimala, Raman, On unramified Brauer groups of torsors over tori. Doc. Math.

25 (2020), 1263–1284

Proposition Let K/k be a finite Galois extension of number fields, with group G. Then there exists a finite field extension L/k linearly disjoint from K/k, such that all decomposition groups of the field extension KL/L are cyclic.

Fr¨ ohlich’s proof for this precise statement (Mathematika 9 (1962) 133-134) is given over k = Q, inspec- tion of the proof should give an analogous proof over any number field k.

Theorem Let G/k be a connected reductive group over a number field k. Let X be a smooth compac- tification of G. Assume that for any finite field extension E/k we have Sha

1

(E, G) = 0. Then one has Br(X )/Br(k) = 0, and G satisfies weak approximation, and similarly over any finite field extension of k.

Proof. In [RFGA] I defined flasque resolutions of connected linear algebraic groups and proved their existence. Given G/k a connected reductive over a field k one shows that there exist exact sequences

1 → S → H → G → 1

with H quasitrivial (see definition there) and S a flasque k-torus – whose character group ˆ S up to addition of a permuation module can be taken to be Pic(X ×

k

k).

Extending the ground field from k to a field extension L/k gives a flasque resolution over L.

We have H

1

(k, S) ˆ ' Br(X )/Br(k).

Using subtle results of Kneser, Harder, Borovoi, one shows ([RFGA] Theorem 9.4) that for k a number field, such a resolution induces an isomorphism of abelian groups

A(G) ' Coker[H

1

(k, S) → ⊕

v

H

1

(k

v

, S)]

and a bijection

Sha

1

(k, G) ' Sha

2

(k, S).

By class field theory, Sha

2

(k, S) is dual to Sha

1

(k, S). ˆ From this one recovers Sansuc’s exact sequence [San]

0 → A(G) → Hom(Br(X )/Br(k), Q/Z) → Sha

1

(k, G) → 0.

generalizing Voskresenski˘ı’s exact sequence for tori.

Suppose now that we know Sha

1

(F, G) = 0 over any finite field extension F of the number field k.

Let K/k be a finite Galois field extension splitting the k-torus S. Let L/k be a field extension as in the Proposition. We have H

1

(k, S ˆ ) ' H

1

(L, S). ˆ

Because S/k is a flasque torus, we have H

1

(L, S) = ˆ Sha

1cycl

(L, S). ˆ

For L as in the Proposition, Sha

1cycl

(L, S) coincides with ˆ Sha

1

(L, S). By class field theory, the latter ˆ group is dual to Sha

2

(L, S) and, by assumption and [RFGA, Thm. 9.4] Sha

2

(L, S) vanishes.

Thus H

1

(L, S) = 0, hence ˆ H

1

(k, S) = 0, hence Br(X ˆ )/Br(k) = 0, and this also holds over any finite field extension of k, and then weak approximation for G holds over any finite field extension of k.

This proof of course specializes to the proof I had for tori (10 september 2016).

[BFP] Eva Bayer-Fluckiger, Raman Parimala, On unramified Brauer groups of torsors over tori. Doc.

Math. 25 (2020), 1263–128

[RFGA] JLCT, R´ esolutions flasques des groupes alg´ ebriques lin´ eaires, Crelle 618 (2008) 77–133.

[San] J.-J. Sansuc, Groupe de Brauer et arithm´ etique des groupes alg´ ebriques lin´ eaires sur un corps de

nombres, Crelle 327 (1981) 12–80.

Références

Documents relatifs

It formulates the notion of wait-free 61 implementation of an atomic multivalued shared vari- 62 able—written by a single writer and read by (another) 63 single reader—from

1.3.4. Empirical process theory. Using empirical process theory, Lecué and Mendel- son [26] gives a direct proof of NSP for matrices X with sub-exponential rows. Their result uses

tlaps is based on a hierarchical proof language that results in a clear proof structure and enables independent checking of the different proof obligations that arise in a proof..

recently been included in several group shows in Vancouver, including INDEX 2016 at Gallery 295 and the inaugural Lind Prize Exhibition curated by Presentation House Gallery as a

Granados, Charlene Heath, Zoe Jaremus, Alexandra Majerus, Caoimhe Morgan-Feir, Leila Timmins Design ALSO Collective Installation technician (Alex) Sandor Nagy Staff.

Negotiating the fine line between the accrued sedimentary process of layering and the vivification of the photographic surface via its erosion through the process of sanding

Gallery 44 would like to thank Proof 21 artists Aidan Cowling, Brett Gundlock, Lindsay Fisher, Megan Morman and Michelle O’Byrne, for their ability to fos- ter dialogue

1991 Mathematics Subject Classification.. Proposition 2.1 for the list of properties) then the Mackey formula holds: then, checking Proposition 2.1 in cases (3) and (4) of the