C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
L. K ATZARKOV T. P ANTEV
Stable G
2bundles and algebraically completely integrable systems
Compositio Mathematica, tome 92, n
o1 (1994), p. 43-60
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1994__92_1_43_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1994, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions gé- nérales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une in- fraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Stable G2 bundles and algebraically completely integrable systems
L. KATZARKOV and T. PANTEV
Department of Mathematics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6395, USA Received 30 September 1992; accepted in final form 10 April 1993
©
0. Introduction
The moduli spaces of stable bundles over a smooth curve have been a focus of interest for several years now. One of their remarkable
properties
was dis-covered
recently by
Hitchin. Heproved [Hl], [H2]
that for anysimple
group G thecotangent
bundle of the moduli space of stableprincipal
G-bundles overan
algebraic
curve is acompletely integrable system. Furthermore,
for a classical Lie group G he described the exactgeometry
of thegeneric
level setof this
integrable system -
it turns out that it can becompactified
to a certainJacobian or
Prym variety.
In this paper we
study
thegeometry
of the level sets of thecorresponding integrable system
when the group G is theexceptional
Lie groupG,.
We prove that in this case thegeneric
level set can be embedded as a Zariski open set ina suitable
Prym-Tjurin variety
of analgebraic
curve endowed with correspon- dence - aspectral
curve.The paper is
organized
as follows. In the first section we set up the notations and recall some basic facts about the moduli space ofprincipal Higgs
bundles.The second section discusses the Hamiltonian structure on the moduli space uN of
Higgs
bundles. In Section 3 we associate aspectral
curvetogether
witha
correspondence
on it to thegeneric
level set of uN andidentify
aninteresting
abelian
subvariety
in the Jacobian of this curve - itsPrym-Tjurin variety.
Thelast section contains the
proof
of the main theorem - that thegeneric
level setcan be embedded as a Zariski open set in the associated
Prym-Tjurin variety.
The
Appendix explains
theseemingly arbitrary
choice ofcorrespondence
wehave made and makes another connection with the
theory
ofintegrable systems.
After this work was finished we came across the
preprints [D], [BK]
wheresimilar results are obtained.
1. Some définitions and basic facts
Let C be a smooth
complex algebraic
curve of genus g. Let G be acomplex simple
Lie group with Liealgebra
g. Denoteby NG
the moduli space of semistabletopologically
trivialprincipal
G bundles. Recall thatNG
is a normalprojective algebraic variety
of dimensiondim NG = (dimc G)(g - 1).
Its smoothlocus
NG g
consists of theequivalence
classes of the stable bundles whoseautomorphism
group coincides with the center of G. Unlike the vector bundlecase the
variety NG
can besingular
even at a stablepoint (see
e.g.[R]).
The total space .A
T*N"g
of thecotangent
bundle of the smoothpart NregG
of the moduli space is in a natural way aholomorphic symplectic
manifold. Inhis paper
[H2],
Hitchinproved
that .A is acompletely integrable
Hamiltoniansystem,
i.e. that there exists a foliation H:M ~ B of M over a vector space B whose fibers areLagrangian
submanifolds in M.DEFINITION 1.0.1. The
Lagrangian
fibration H:M ~ B is said to bealgebraically completely integrable
if there exists apartial compactification .lt
of M over B:
so that the fibers of
are isomorphic
to abelianvarieties,
the fibers of e are Zariski open sets in them and the Hamiltonian vector fields on Wcorrespond- ing
to functions constantalong
the fibers of Jf extend toglobal holomorphic
vector fields
along
the fibers ofif.
Following
Hitchin’s ideas from[Hl]
C.Simpson
has constructed[S]
anatural
compactification àh : -Ù -
B of A overB,
where71
is the moduli space of semistableprincipal Higgs
G-bundles on M. In thepresent
paper we aredescribing
the fibers ofif
in the case G =G2.
Thegeometric picture
we obtaingeneralizes
the one obtainedby
Hitchin[H2]
for a classical Lie group G andyields
thealgebraic complete integrability
of A =T*NG2.
2. The Hitchin map for the Hamiltonian
system
-4fLet N be the moduli space of stable
holomorphic principal G2-bundles.
Foreach
point
E E Nreg thecotangent
spaceT*EN
isisomorphic
to the vector spaceH°(C, g, 0 KC),
where 9E: E x ad g. The bundle gE is associated to Eby
theadjoint representation
and hence any Ad-invarianthomogeneous polynomial
p on 92 of
degree
dgives
rise to a map:The
ring
of Ad-invariantpolynomials
on 92 hasbasis {p,q} where p
ishomogeneous
ofdegree
2and q
ishomogeneous
ofdegree
6(cf. [Sch]).
Noticethat
Finally
we define the Hitchin mapwhere E E N and 0e
H0(C,
gE QKC).
The fibers of themap e
areLagrangian
subvarieties in A
(see [Hl]).
We shall use the standard 7-dimensional
representation
p : g2 ~End(V)
ofthe Lie
algebra
92 for a more detaileddescription
of the Hitchin map. For every E E N denoteby VE
theholomorphic
rank 7 vector bundle associated to Eby
p. Since therepresentation
p is faithful we have an inclusion of vector bundleswhich allows us to consider any 0 e
H°(C,
gEO Kc)
as an element ofH0(C, End(VE) (x) Kc).
Furthermore,
therepresentation
p isorthogonal,
and every matrix fromg2 End(V)
haseigenvalues: 0, 03BB1, ,12’ 03BB3, -03BB1, -03BB2, -03BB3,
whichsatisfy
thecondition:
A
basis {p, ql of C[g2]G2
can be describedexplicitly
in these terms(see [Sch]):
3.
Spectral
curves,correspondences
andPrym-Tjurin
varieties3.1
To
identify
the fiber of the Hitchin map for the Hamiltoniansystem
JI we will need anauxiliary geometric object -
thespectral
curve.Spectral
curves havebeen a convenient
geometric
tool in thestudy
of the moduli space ofHiggs
bundles
[Hl], [H2], [S]
and the moduli space of vector bundles[BNR].
Herewe
adopt
a construction of thespectral
covers which wasoriginally developed by
V. Kanev[Kl]
for thestudy of algebraic
tori over function fields and is the most suitable one fordealing
withprincipal
bundles.Let
(E, 0)
be aprincipal
irreducibleHiggs
bundle over C. Theholomorphic
section 0 E
H°(C,
gEQ KC) gives
anendomorphism
of vector bundlesDEFINITION 3.1.1. The
Higgs
bundle(E, 0)
is calledregular
when thecoherent subsheaf
ker(ade)
c g, has rankequal
to the rank of the Liealgebra
g.
Similarly (E, 0)
is calledregular
andsemisimple
if there exists a Zariski opensubset
Co
c C for whichker(ado)lco
is a subbundle of Cartansubalgebras
in9EIC-’
Let
(E, 0)
beregular
andsemisimple G2
bundle. Denoteby bE
the saturiz- ation of the sheafker(ad03B8),
thatis,
theunique
vector bundle of rank two, contained in this sheaf. Therepresentation
p defines a multisection 5 of the dualbundle b§
over the open setCo.
The values of 5 at apoint 03BE
ECo
are the sixextremal
weights of 03C1:{03BB1(03BE),...,03BB6(03BE) ~ (h~E)03B6.
Let C’ be the Zariski closureof 5(Co)
in the total space ofh~E. Following
Kanev(see [Kl])
we define thespectral
curve determinedby (E, 0)
as the normalization C’v of C’. The curveC/v is a six sheeted cover of
C,
unramified over the setCo.
One can construct another
geometric
model of thespectral
cover C’v(see [Hl], [BNR]).
Start with the natural map:The
image io(C’)
isagain covering
of C which lies in the total space of the vector bundleKc.
Forregular
andsemisimple Higgs
bundles the mapio :
C’ ~i03B8(C’)
isclearly
a birationalisomorphism
since in this case theoperator
p(0)(j)
will beregular
andsemisimple
forgeneric ç E C,
i.e. all of its different extremaleigenvalues
will havemultiplicity
one.We can look at the
covering ie(C’)
from a differentangle.
Consider thevector
Higgs
bundle(VE, 03C1(03B8))
associated to(E, 0) by
therepresentation
p. Let X : =Tot(Kc)
be the total space ofKc,
and let03BB ~ H0(X, p*(KC))
be thetautological
section. We can considerp(0)
as anendomorphism
ofVE
withcoefficients at the tensor
algebra
ofKC
and we can form the elementdet(03C1(03B8) - 03BB·idVE) ~ H0(X, p*(K~7C)).
The zero scheme of the sectiondet(p(0) -
À.idvE)
is a subscheme inX,
finite over C. It has two irreduciblecomponents corresponding
to theWG2-orbits
in the set ofweights
of therepresentation
p. The first one of themcorresponds
to the orbitconsisting
ofthe zero
weight
and isjust
the zero scheme of03BB ~ H0(X, p*(KC)).
The secondone
corresponds
to the orbit of the six extremalweights
and isexactly
the curvei03B8(C’).
The curve
i03B8(C’) actually depends only
on theimage
of(E, 0)
under theHitchin map.
Indeed,
let b =(b1, b2) ~ B : = H0(C, K~2C) C H0(C, K~6C)
and let(E, 0)
E Yt -1(b). By using
ourexplicit
base of thering
of invariantpolynomials,
we can write
Therefore
ie(C’)
issimply
the zero schemeCb
of the sectionLEMMA 3.1.1. For a
generic
b ~ B the curveCb
is smooth and hence is thespectral
curve associated withthe fibçr H-1(b).
Proof.
Fixb1 ~ H0(C, K~2C).
Then the formula(3.1.2)
determines a linearsubsystem Pb1
c|p*KC|, isomorphic
toP(p*H0(C, K~6C)). By
Bertini’s theorem it suffices to prove that the base locusBXPb of Pb is empty
forgeneric b 1.
Thesection
À 6 - bl . À4
+(b21/4) · À4
=03BB2·(03BB2 - bl/2)2 belongs
toPbi.
ThereforeBXPbi
is contained in the unionOn the other hand
and
where p :
Sb
1 ~ C is the two sheeted cover of Cgiven by
the zero scheme of thesection
)B, 2 - b1/2. Using again
Bertini’s theorem and the fact that the linearsystem |K~2C|
does not have basepoints
onC,
oneeasily
deduces thatSb,
issmooth for
generic b 1.
But
p(BSb1p*|KC|)
cBCK~6C
=0
and henceBXPb
=0
forgeneric bl.
DREMARK 3.1.1. The
spectral
covers described above have aspecial
structure, inherited from the combinatorics of theweight
lattice of the rootsystem G2.
For
instance, if j
ECo
is a basepoint,
one can show that themonodromy
map Mon:03C01(C0, 03BE) ~ G6
factorsthrough
the action of theWeyl
groupWG2:
(see [Kl]
for moredetails).
3.2
Having
found thespectral
curveCb
attached to the fiberH-1(b)
weproceed
with the
proof
of thecomplete integrability
of JI. Thekey idea,
which is dueto Hitchin
[H1],
is to construct anisomorphism
between the fibere - ’(b)
andcertain abelian
subvariety
P inthe jacobian J(Cb).
Such P must arisenaturally
from the
geometry
of the cover :Cb ~ CI
whichsuggests
that we look for it among the abelian subvarieties ofJ(Cb) coming
fromsymmetric
corre-spondences
onCb preserving
x. To construct some of the latter we will use thepeculiar
combinatorial structure of the fibers of03C0:Cb~C. By choosing (E, 0)
EH- 1(b)
we canidentify
thepoints
in the fibern - 1( ç)
over ageneric 03BE
E C with the extremalweights
of therepresentation
p :G2 ~
V withrespect
to the Cartansubalgebra ker ad03B8(03BE)
C(9E)ç.
Therefore thepoints
in03C0-1(03BE)
canbe labeled
(compare
with the end of Section3)
as03BB1, 03BB2, 03BB3, -03BB1, -03BB2,
-
03BB3
E(ker ado(ç»V
where03BB1, 03BB2, 03BB3
aresubject
to the conditionSince
Cb
cTot(Kc)
we can add and subtract thepoints
in the fiber of03C0:
Cb ~
C to obtainpoints
in the fiber ofKC ~
C.Moreover,
thelinearity
ofthe contraction
map Le
and the relation(3.2.1) yield
that for any x in thegeneric 03C0-1(03BE)
thepoint - x belongs again
to03C0-1(03BE)
and that there areexactly
twomore
points
y,z ~ 03C0-1(03BE)
with theproperty
x + y + z = 0. Denote nowby 03941, 03942, 03943
the reduced divisors inCb
xCb given by:
Clearly
any divisor of the forma·03941 + b·03942 + c·03943 ~ Div(Cb Cb)
is asymmetric correspondence (with valence)
on the curveCb
which preserves the fibers of n. Consider the divisor D = 2 ·A2
+ 3 ·A3.
Leti : J°(Cb) ~ J0(Cb)
bethe
endomorphism
of the JacobianJ0(Cb)
inducedby
D. In the next section wewill show that every connected
component
of the fiberH-1(b)
iscanonically isomorphic
to thePrym-Tjurin variety
associated with theendomorphism
i.REMARK 3.2.1. The
correspondences 03941, 02, A3
are attached to the curveCb
in a functorial way.
Moreover,
it is easy to see that for thegeneric pair (C, Cb)
the
subring
of thealgebra
ofcorrespondences
ofCb generated by
the0394i’s
coincides with the
ring
of allsymmetric correspondences preserving
03C0. There-fore the
correspondence
we arelooking for, ought
tobelong
to thissubring.
A motivation for our
particular
choice of D is Kanev’stheory
ofalgebraic
tori over function fields and its relation to the
integrable systems.
The relevant facts from thistheory
are collected in theAppendix.
3.3
Let b ~ B be a
generic point
in the sense of Lemma 3.1.1. Denoteby Jb
theJacobian
J°(Cb).
CLAIM 3.3.1. The
endomorphism
i EEnd(Jb) satisfies
the cubicequation
Proof. Let ç E Co
and let03C0-1(03BE) = {x1,...,x6}. According
to theprevious section,
for everyx ~ 03C0-1(03BE)
thepoints
of the fiber03C0-1(03BE)
can be labeled as03C0-1(03BE) = {x, y,
z, x -,y -, z-},
so thatUsing
these relations and the fact thatA3
is an involution it is easy toverify
that
Since the
image
of the curveC,
under the Abel-Jacobi mapgenerates
the JacobianJb
weget
On the other hand for
any 03BE
ECo
i.e.
The
identity (3.3.1)
in theproof of the
claimimplies
thatIm(i2
+ 4i -5idJb)
is
isogeneous
to the JacobianJ°(C).
Denoteby
K the connectedcomponent
ofthe identity of the abelian variety Ker((i - idJb)(l + 5idJb».
We can consider Kas a
complement
to the "inessential"piece 03C0*(J0(C))
of the JacobianJb.
Sinceby
definition 1 satisfies aquadratic equation
on K we can form thePrym- Tjurin variety P(i, K)
of thepair (K, i).
DEFINITION 3.3.1. The
Prym-Tjurin variety
associated with thespectral
curve
Cb
is thevariety
First we prove the
following proposition:
PROPOSITION 3.3.1. For the
generic
b E B thePrym-Tjurin variety Pb
hasdimension dim
Pb
=14(g - 1).
Proof
The differentialdio
of theendomorphism 9
of the JacobianJb
is anondegenerate
linearoperator acting
on the vector spaceH°(Jb, C).
It is clearfrom Claim 3.3.1 and from the definition of the
Prym-Tjurin variety
thatdl0
has characteristic
polynomial
We can use now Lefschetz fixed
point
formula for thecorrespondence
D(see [L])
tocompute
the dimension ofPb. According
to this formulawhere
trR(dl0)
is the trace of theoperator dl0
considered as anoperator
on theunderlying
real vector space.By using
theadjunction
formula on the surface X we cancompute
the genusg(Cb)
=36(g - 1)
+ 1 and hence obtainTherefore we can express the dimension of the
Prym-Tjurin variety Pb
in termsof the number of the fixed
points
of thecorrespondence
D:To
complete
theproof
of ourproposition
it remains to prove thefollowing
lemma:
LEMMA 3.3.1. The number
of the fixed points of
D is84(g - 1).
Proof.
It is clear from the construction of ourcorrespondence
that its fixedpoints
areexactly
the ramificationpoints
of thecovering
03C0:Cb ~
C. Thebranch divisor of this
covering
is the divisor of the discriminant of thepolynomial (3.1.2):
Choose local sections
03BB1, 03BB2, 03BB3 of Kc
such that)B’1’ 03BB2, )B’3’ - )B’1’ - )B’2’ - )B,3
are(locally)
theeigenvalues
of03C1(03B8) : VE ~ VE ~ Kc
for any(E, 0)
eye-1(b).
Thenthe discriminant section
Discr(b)
can beexpressed locally
in terms of the03BBi’s:
It is easy to see that for the
generic
b ~ B itscomponents b and b2
do not havecommon zeros and that
b2
and27b2 - (1/2)b31
haveonly simple
zeros.Furthermore,
from the definition of D and therepresentation (3.3.2)
of thediscriminant,
we can determine allpossible multiplicities
for the fixedpoints
ofD. Indeed
if 03BE
E C is a branchpoint,
then it is a zero ofDiscr(b)
and hence azero of one of the factors in the
right-hand
side of(3.3.2). If,
forexample, 03BE
issuch that
03BB1(03BE)
= 0= -À1(ç),
then sinceÀ1(ç)
+À2(ç)
+À3(ç) =
0 we have03BB2(03BE) = -03BB3(03BE).
On the other hand for thegeneric point il
in a small diskaround ç
we haveBy letting ~ ~ 03BE
weget
that thepoint (03BE,0) = (03BE, 03BB1(03BE))
=(03BE, -03BB1(03BE)) ~ 03C0-1(03BE)
is a fixed
point
of D ofmultiplicity
3 and that thepoints (03BE,03BB2(03BE))=(03BE,-03BB3(03BE))~03C0-1(03BE)
and(03BE,-03BB2(03BE))=(03BE,03BB3(03BE) ~ 03C0-1(03BE)
are notfixed for D.
Similarly
one can find themultiplicities
for the varioustypes
of ramificationpoints
ofCb .
All thepossibilities
are listed in the table below.From the table and the
identity (3.3.2)
we see thatevery 03BE
E C which is a zeroof b2
appears as a zero ofDiscr(b)
withmultiplicity
3 and that over it lie three fixedpoints
of D with totalmultiplicity
3 + 0 + 0.Similarly,
over every zero of27b2 - (1/2)b31 there
are two fixedpoints
of D with totalmultiplicity
2 + 2.Therefore the number of the fixed
points
of D isThis finishes the
proof
ofProposition
3.3.1.4. The
algebraic complète integrability
of the Hamiltoniansystem
-4Y 4.1We will need another
interpretation
of thealgebra
g, and the vectorspace V
which we
proceed
to describe.Let Q be the
Cayley algebra
over thecomplex
numbers and letAut(O)
beits
automorphism
group. Thealgebra
0 is 8-dimensional and has an involutive C-linearantiautomorphism: a ~
a. Let 0° be thesubspace
ofpurely imaginary Cayley numbers,
i.e. those a ~ Q for which à = - a. For every element a e 0 denoteby Ra:Q ~
0 the linearoperator
ofright multiplication by
a. Definethe bilinear
symmetric
formB(·,·)
on theCayley algebra by B(a, b) : = tr(Ra.b).
This form is
nondegenerate
on the spaces 0 and 0° and is invariant under the groupAut(O).
The groupAut(O)
actstrivially
on C · 1 and thereforefaithfully
on 0° = ker tr. The
identity component Aut’(0)
ofAut(O)
isisomorphic
toG2
and itsrepresentation
inSO(C’, B)
isexactly
therepresentation
p. Thus we canidentify
the vector space V with 0° and thealgebra 03C1(g2)
with the Liealgebra Der(O)
of the derivations of 0.4.2
THEOREM 4.2.1. M is an
algebraically completely integrable
systemProof.
We will prove that thegeneric
fiber:Yt-1(b)
of the Hitchin map is aZariski open set in the
Prym-Tjurin variety Pb
of the fiber.Let
(E, 0)
EH-1(b).
LetVÈ
be theunique
vector bundle contained in thekernel of the bundle
morphism 03C1(03B8):VE ~ VE ~ KC.
Consider the vectorbundle
vi
defined as thequotient
For the
generic 03BE
E C themultiplicity
of zero as aneigenvalue
of the linearoperator p(0)(j)
isequal
to themultiplicity
of the zeroweight
in therepresentation
p: g2 ~End(V)
and therefore isequal
to 1.Consequently V’
isa vector bundle of rank 6 and since
VÉ
cker 03C1(03B8)
we obtain the induced map03C1(03B8):V1E~V1E~KC.
As in[Hl]
we define theeigenvector
line bundle corre-sponding
to(E, 0)
as theunique
line bundleL(E,()
contained in the sheafker(03C1(03B8) -
Îv.idV1L)
cp*(VÉ) (here
we use that(E, 0)
isregular
andsemisimple).
The
degree
ofL(E,03B8)
can becomputed
via the formula(5.19)
of[H1]
since thebundle
VE
is inparticular
aSO(7, C)
bundle. The result isdeg L(E.0)
=12(g - 1)
and thus we obtain a
morphism
We shall show that any connected
component
of the range of thismorphism
is
actually
contained in asuitable
translation ofPb
orequivalently
thatfor every
(E, 0)
EH-1 (b).
Let L =
L(E,8)
for some(E, 0)
EYt-1(b).
Since L is aneigenvector
bundle forp(8)
then forgeneric 03BE
the fibreL(03BE,03BBi(03BE)
can be identified with theweight subspace V03BBl(03BE). Therefore, using
the definition of thecorrespondence
D we canidentify
the fiber of the bundle i*LQ L~5
with some tensorproduct
ofweight subspaces
of K Forinstance,
for each i =1, 2,
3 the fibre(i*L Q L~5)(03BE,03BBi(03BE))
canbe identified with
where
{i, j, kl
={1, 2, 3}.
Consider the
morphism
of line bundles03B2:
i*L0 L~5 ~ 03C0*K~6C
defined overeach
point (03BE, 03BBi(03BE))
ofCb by
where vA, is a
weight
vector, the form B is theG2 equivariant
form defined in Section5.1,
and themultiplication 03BD03BBJ·03BD03BB03BA
is themultiplication
in theCayley algebra.
We will provethat f3
is a well definedholomorphic
nonzeromorphism.
Therefore f3
defines a nonzeroholomorphic
section of thedegree
zero linebundle i*L*
Q (L*)°5 ~ 03C0*K~6C
whichyields
1*LQ L~5 ~ 03C0*K~6C.
The statement that
f3
is well defined and nonzero can be deduced in anobvious way from the
following algebraic
fact:CLAIM 4.2.1.
Let 0
E g2 cSO(O03BF, B)
be aregular, semisimple
element witheigenvalues 0, Â J, )B.2’ 03BB3, -03BB1, -)B.2’ -)B.3
and let vo, 03BD1, V2, V3’ V - 1, V-2’03BD-3 be
a basis
consisting
ofcorresponding eigenvectors
in O03BF. Consider the linear form03B3 ~ (V*)~3,
definedby 03B3(w1,
w2,W3) = B(w 1,
w2 ·W3).
Thefollowing
properties
hold:1. y is a skew
symmetric, G2-invariant
form on O°.2.
03B3(03BD1, 03BD2, 03BD3) ~ 0.
3. Thé forms
B(~(.),.)~(V*)~2
and03B3(~(.), ~(.),.)~03B3(.,.,~(.))~(V*)~6
determine well defined forms over the factor space
V = V/C·v0.
Proof.
Fix theeigenvectors Vi
for i =1, 2,
3 andnormatize {v-i}i=1,2,3
andvo, to obtain
B(v0,v0)
= 1 andB(vi, v-i)
= 1.Writing
B in terms ofCayley multiplication B(x, y)
=1 2· (x·y
+ y.x), gives
To
compute
theremaining products
of the elements of our basis let us note thatsince 0
acts on 0 as analgebra
derivation we have~(v2·v3) =
~(v2)·v3+v2·~(v3) = (03BB2 + 03BB3)v2·v3 = -03BB1v2·v3.
Thusv2·v3 is
aneigen-
vector
of 0
witheigenvalue -03BB1,
i.e. it isproportional
to v - 1. Therefore for each evenpermutation {i, j, k} of {1, 2, 3}
we can writewhere the a’s are
complex
numbers.Furthermore, using
theB-orthogonality
ofvo and vi and the fact that any
subalgebra
of CDgenerated by
two elements is associative one deduces the relations:where k =
1, 2,
3.Application
of theMoufang
identities to thetriples {v1, v2, V31, {v-1,
V-2’V-31
and{v-i,
Vi’vj}i~j
results in: al = a2 = a3 = a+;a-l 1 = a_2 = a_3 = a_;
a+.a_ = 2.
We are free to choose the base elements{vi}i =
1,2,3arbitrarily
in thecorresponding eigenlines.
Therefore we can renor-malize our basis so that all of the above
multiplication
relations remain trueand in additon
a_=1, a+ = 2. (For
theproperties
ofCayley algebra
usedabove see
[OGV].)
After these
general
considerations weproceed
with theproofs
of the three statements of Claim 4.2.1:1. The invariance of y is clear from the definition. The skew
symmetry
of y follows from the fact that for thepurely imaginary Cayley
numbers wehave
2. Consider the
Cayley number v2 ’
v3. From the abovedescription
of themultiplication
in 0 we can concludethat v2 ’
V3 is a nonzero(since a_ ~ 0) eigenvector of 0
witheigenvalue -03BB1.
Thisimplies
that03B3(v1,
V2,V3)
=B(v 1, v3·v2)
=a_·B(v1, v_1) ~
0. It is sufficient to prove that the form r =03B3(~(.),~(.),.) 0 ((., .,1(.))
is zero for everytriple (vil,
Vi2’
vi3)
such that at least one of them isequal
to vo. But this is obvious from the definition of r.This concludes the
proof
of the claim. DThus the
morphism (4.2.2)
maps any connectedcomponent
of the fibreH-1(b)
to somecomponent of Ker (l*
+5),
i.e. to a suitable translationof Pb .
If
H:M ~ B
is the relativecompactification
of A discussed at the end of Section2,
thenclearly (4.2.2)
extends to amorphism
since in the definition of
L(E,03B8)
we have not used thesemistability
of E. On the other hand from the construction ofL(E,03B8)
it is obvious that03C0*L(E,03B8) ~ vi
andthat the
pushforward
of thetautological
1-form Jwgives
the twisted homomor-phism p(0) : V1E ~ V1E~ Kc.
Next we can recover(V E, 03C1(03B8)) exactly
in the sameway as in Section 5.17 of
[Hl]. Taking
the frame bundle ofVE
andreducing
its structure group to
G2
we obtain(E, 0).
Thisprocedure
inverts themorphism
03A6 and hence
yields
anisomorphism
between any connectedcomponent
ofH-1(b)
andPb.
Combined with the fact that thepoints
inPb
whichcorrespond
to stable bundles form a Zariski open set this finishes the
proof
of thecomplete
integrability
of uH. nREMARK 4.2.1. When the structure group G is a classical Lie group the
generic
fiber F of Jf is connected.Indeed,
if G =GL(n, C)
then F is a Zariskiopen set in the Jacobian of the
spectral
curve(cf. [Hl])
and therefore is irreducible. When Gbelongs
to the seriesAn Beauville,
Narasimhan and Ramananproved
that F is a Zariski open set in the kernel of the norm mapNM03C0:J(Cb) ~ J(C)
and is connected(see [BNR]).
If Gbelongs
to one of theseries
Bn, Cn
orDn,
then thespectral
curveCb
possesses an involution 6 andaccording
to[Hl]
the fiber F isisomorphic
to a Zariski open set inker(l
+6*).
In all these cases the involution 6 has fixedpoints
and thegeneral theory
ofPrym
varietiesyields
the connectedness ofker(l
+6*) [B], [Sh].
In the case G =
G2
the abeliansubgroup ker(1
+5)
cJ(Cb)
is not connectedand so the connectedness of the fiber F is an open
problem,
which is reflectedin the
proof
of the theorem.Appendix:
Kanev’stheory
ofalgebraic
tori over function fieldsIn this
appendix
we willgive
a short summary of Kanev’stheory
whichinspired
our construction of thePrym-Tjurin variety
and willexplain
how onecan motivate our
particular
choice of thecorrespondence
D in the frameworkof this
theory.
Start with a
complex simple
Lie group G and let E be aprincipal
G bundleover the curve C. Let gE : = E x ad g be the associated bundle of Lie
algebras.
Suppose
we aregiven
the data(i)
A vectorsubbundle 9E
c gE whosegeneric
fibre is a Cartansubalgebra
in g,
(ii)
An irreduciblerepresentation
p : g ~End(V).
As in Section 4.1 we can associate to this data a
spectral
coverwhose
generic
fibre consists of the set of all extremalweights
of the represen- tation p withrespect
to thecorresponding
Cartansubalgebra.
In his work
[K1]
V. Kanev has shown that in the caseC = P1, E = g ~COP
1the
spectral
coverC
comesequipped
with a canonicalcorrespondence -9 preserving
the fibres of n.The construction goes as follows.
Let
cg be
a fixed Cartansubalgebra
and let
Q
c P~ h~
be its lattices of roots andweights respectively.
TheWeyl group W
actsabsolutely irreducibly
onQ
since g is asimple
Liealgebra.
Therefore the space of the
integral
valued W-invariantsymmetric
bilinear formson
Q
isisomorphic
to Z. Let(,)
be agenerator (over Z)
of this space.Fixing
an extremal
weight Â
E P of therepresentation
p allows us to construct a newW-module
N(Q, 03BB):
as a Z-module and the extended W-action is defined
by
Furthermore,
the form(,)
extends to asymmetric
bilinear and W-invariant form onN (Q, 2) by (03B2, 1) :
=(03B2, Jw)
for all03B2 ~ Q
and(1, 1)
= -1.One
easily
checks that(,) enjoys
theproperties:
(a) (f3, wl)
=(f3, w03BB)
forevery f3
EQ
and w E W(b)
The map v :N(Q, 03BB)
- P characterizedby
theproperty (f3, x) = (03B2, v(x))
for
any f3EQ
andx E N(Q, 03BB)
is well defined and W-invariant. It maps the orbit Wlbijectively
onto the orbit W03BB.THEOREM-DEFINITION Al
(cf. [K1])
1. The
monodromy of
thespectral covering ~
Cfactors through
the actionof
theWeyl
group W.2. Fix a base
point 03BE
E C and choose anidentification of the fibre 03C0-1(03BE)
withthe set W),
of
extremalweights of
p. For anyinteger
k ~ Zdefine
thesymmetric
divisorsDk
cè x C
as the reduced divisors characterizedby
theproperties
(i) If (x, y)
EDk, then n(x) = n(y).
(ii)
Let x, y EC
be such thatn (x) = n (y) =
il. Chose apath
inC/(branch
locus
of n)
whichconnects 03BE
and 11. Consider thebijective
mapThe
point (x, y) belongs
toD, if
andonly if
x =1= y and(03BC (x), 03BC(y))
=k.
(The
last condition isindependent
on the choiceof
thepath
becauseof
the part 1 and because(,)
isW-invariant).
3. The divisors
Dk
areeffective
and -q =LkEZ
k.Dk
is asymmetric
correspon- dence onC
which preserves n.Kanev discovered that the
correspondence -q
isclosely
related to thecompletely integrable
Hamiltoniansystems.
Heproved
thefollowing
theoremwhich stimulated our
investigations
of the Hitchinsystem
forG2:
THEOREM A2
(see [K1]). Suppose
E is a trivialprincipal
bundle and C =P1.
1. The
endomorphism
iof J(C)
inducedby
thecorrespondence -9 satisfies
thequadratic equation
where
with N =
deg D,
r = rank g and d is thedegree of
thespectral covering C ~ C.
2.
If the bundle bE
arises from a Laxpair
withspectral parameter on P1,
thenthe flow is linearized on the
Prym-Tjurin variety P(C, 1).
We can
apply
Theorem Al to the case G =G2, p-the
standard sevendimensional
representations
ofG2
and(1) E, 9E)
apair arising
from aregular
andsemisimple Higgs
bundle.Fixing
aWeyl
chamber in the fibre(hE)03BE
over thebase
point 03BE
we have thecorresponding simple
roots{03B11, 03B12}.
Thehighest weight
for therepresentation
p then coincides with the first fundamentalweight
)B, =
2a +
a2. The form(,)
isuniquely
determinedby
the normalization(03BB,03BB)
= - 8. Themultiplication
table for its extension onN (Q, Jw)
is shown inTable 1 .
Next,
from the definition of the extended action of theWeyl
groupon
N(Q, Jw)
we obtain that the elements of Wl are:Following
therecipe given
in the above theorem we can see from Table 2 belowthat D=2·D2+3·D3.
Furthermoreby writing explicitly
the isomor-phism
Table 2. The values of the form (, ) on the orbit Wl
we see that
D2
=02
andD3
=03
which motivates our choice of the corre-spondence
D.Acknowledgements
We would like to thank V.
Kanev,
A.Tjurin
and R.Donagi
forstimulating
conversations and advice.
References
[B] A. Beauville: Prym varieties and the Schottky problem, Invent. Math. 41 (1977) 149-196.
[BNR] A. Beauville, M. S. Narasimhan and S. Ramanan: Spectral curves and the generalized
theta divisor, J. reine angew. Math. 398 (1989) 169-179.
[BK] A. Beilinson and D. Kazhdan: Flat Projective Connections (1990) preprint.
[D] R. Donagi: Spectral covers, to appear in Journees de Geometrie Algebraique, Orsay.
[H1] N. Hitchin: Stable bundles and integrable systems, Duke Math. Journ. 54 (1987) 91-114.
[H2] N. Hitchin: The self-duality equations on the Riemann surface, Proc. London Math. Soc.
55 (1987) 59-126.
[K1] V. Kanev: Spectral curves, simple Lie algebras and Prym-Tjurin varieties, Proc. Symp.
Pure Math. 49(1) (1989) 627-649.
[K2] V. Kanev: Theta Divizors of Generalized Prym Varieties. I., Lect. Notes in Math. 1124, pp.
166-215 (Springer-Verlag) 1985.
[L] S. Lang: Abelian Varieties (Springer-Verlag) 1983.
[OGV] A. Onischik, V. Gorbatsevitch, E. Vinberg: The Structure of the Lie Groups and Algebras, Encycl. of Math. Sciences 41, ch. 5 (Springer-Verlag) 1992).
[Sch] G. Schwartz: Invariant theory of G2 and spin7, Comment. Math. Helvetici 63 (1988)
624-663.
[Sh] V. Shokurov: Prym varieties: theory and application, Math. USSR Izvestiya 23 (1984)
83-147.
[R] A. Ramanathan: Moduli for Principal Bundles, Lect. Notes in Math. 732, pp 527-533
(Springer-Verlag) 1979
[S] C. Simpson: Moduli of Representation of the Fundamental Group of a Smooth Projective Variety (1989) preprint.