• Aucun résultat trouvé

(1) Proof of Lemma 1.3: it is assumed in the second paragraph thatBis locally free of constant rank, so no parenthetical appeal to the connectedness ofR is required

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "(1) Proof of Lemma 1.3: it is assumed in the second paragraph thatBis locally free of constant rank, so no parenthetical appeal to the connectedness ofR is required"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

Références

Documents relatifs

10. Another option was suggested during the general debate on the revision of the Operational Directives on periodic reporting at the twelfth session of the Committee in 2017. This

Any 1-connected projective plane like manifold of dimension 4 is homeomor- phic to the complex projective plane by Freedman’s homeomorphism classification of simply connected

In the cases which were considered in the proof of [1, Proposition 7.6], the case when the monodromy group of a rank 2 stable bundle is the normalizer of a one-dimensional torus

[r]

Nancy is ……… (intelligent) girl in

Previous research work has developed tools that provide users with more effective notice and choice [9, 18, 19, 31]. With increasing concerns about privacy because of AI, some

The quality of the corpus used to train the Latin word embeddings available through the SemioGraph interface 8 , on the other hand, is high: these embeddings are based on the

[3] O.Osagiede Beyond GDPR Compliance – How IT Audit Can Move from Watchdog to Strategic Partner, isaca.org [4] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons