• Aucun résultat trouvé

Optimization of Monte Carlo codes PENELOPE 2006 and PENFAST by parallelization and reduction variance implementation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Optimization of Monte Carlo codes PENELOPE 2006 and PENFAST by parallelization and reduction variance implementation"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Références

Documents relatifs

Thus, the purpose of our retrospective study was to evaluate the performance of a commercially available CAD program for the detection of pulmonary nodules on soft tissue

It can be seen that the parallelization of Monte Carlo simulations by splitting pseudorandom numbers generator sequences in a multitude of streams is a simple, rigorous and

We see that (i) with 30K sims/move, many versions play the semeai whenever it is useless, and all versions play it with significant probability, what is a disaster as in real

Many examples in the literature show that the EI algorithm is particularly interesting for dealing with the optimization of functions which are expensive to evaluate, as is often

Simulate one game until a node (=position) L of T (thanks to bandit algorithms); put this simulation S in memory..

Variance Reduction for Generalized Likelihood Ratio Method By Conditional Monte Carlo and Randomized Quasi-Monte Carlo... Variance Reduction for Generalized Likelihood Ratio Method

Nevertheless, since an analytic proof of this improvement brought by double Rao-Blackwellisation is too delicate to contemplate, we use an intensive Monte Carlo experiment to

This approach can be generalized to obtain a continuous CDF estimator and then an unbiased density estimator, via the likelihood ratio (LR) simulation-based derivative estimation