ERRATUM
Erratum to: Postmortem computed tomography angiography
vs. conventional autopsy: advantages and inconveniences
of each method
Christine Chevallier
&Francesco Doenz
&Paul Vaucher
&Cristian Palmiere
&Alejandro Dominguez
&Stefano Binaghi
&Patrice Mangin
&Silke Grabherr
Published online: 30 November 2013 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Erratum to: Int J Legal Med
DOI 10.1007/s00414-012-0814-3
The original article, unfortunately, contained an error. All
author names were incorrectly formatted—given names were
captured as surnames and surnames were captured as given
names.
The correct names are presented above.
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s00414-012-0814-3.
C. Chevallier (*)
:
C. Palmiere:
A. Dominguez:
P. Mangin:
S. GrabherrUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine Lausanne–Geneva, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 21, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland e-mail: christine.chevallier@chuv.ch
C. Chevallier
:
F. Doenz:
S. BinaghiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
P. Vaucher
:
P. ManginUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine Lausanne–Geneva, University of Geneva, Michel-Servet 1, 2011 Geneva 4, Switzerland A. Dominguez
University of Health Sciences (HESAV), Rue du Bugnon 19, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
Int J Legal Med (2014) 128:577 DOI 10.1007/s00414-013-0950-4
