• Aucun résultat trouvé

A scientific note on the dynamics of labor devoted to nectar foraging in a honey bee colony: number of foragers versus individual foraging activity

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A scientific note on the dynamics of labor devoted to nectar foraging in a honey bee colony: number of foragers versus individual foraging activity"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00891747

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00891747

Submitted on 1 Jan 2000

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

A scientific note on the dynamics of labor devoted to

nectar foraging in a honey bee colony: number of

foragers versus individual foraging activity

Corinna Thom, Thomas Seeley, Jürgen Tautz

To cite this version:

(2)

The identity of each marked bee that left or entered the hive and both the departure and arrival times of the trips were recorded. A nec-tar forager was defined as a bee that, after a trip of 10 min or longer, unloaded at least once a day liquid to a receiver bee. Between 0 and 67% of the workers engaged in nectar foraging on a given day, with a mean of 34 ±18% per day. The percent nectar foragers in the colony changed significantly between days in 5 of 6 observation periods (Fig. 1), most likely as a reaction to changing nectar availability. Over-all, 66% of the nectar foragers made 1–4 for-aging trips per day, 34% made 5–10 trips, and no bee made more than 10 foraging trips per day. The mean number of trips per nectar forager per day was 3.5 ±1.3. The majority of the nectar foragers (over 70%) for-aged for 4.5 h or less, even though there were approximately 15 h of daylight each day. The mean activity level (number of foraging trips.bee–1.day–1) of the nectar foragers in the

colony changed significantly between days in only 1 of the 6 observation periods (Fig. 1). The results of this study suggest that the honey bee colony adjusted its daily foraging effort mainly by changing the number of nectar Division of labor is common to all insect

societies and is regarded as one of the most important factors in their ecological success. A key feature of the division of labor in insect colonies is its plasticity. Changing the labor effort devoted to a task with regard to its urgency enables a colony to respond adap-tively to changes in external and internal con-ditions [1, 2]. Honey bee colonies (Apis

mel-lifera) can be expected to adjust the labor

devoted to nectar foraging, because foraging conditions strongly fluctuate. The proportion of a colony’s workers engaged in nectar for-aging and the activity of each nectar forager are two parameters that might be involved in the adjustment [2]. In this study we measured for the first time both the proportion and the activ-ity of nectar foragers in a honey bee colony. From May to July 1999, 6 random samples of each 50 bees were taken from a colony with about 4 000 bees that was housed in a 3-frame observation hive. The bees in each sample were individually marked, and observed over a period of 3 successive days (except the first period lasting 2 days). Observations started at 05.00 and lasted without interruption until 19.00–21.00 or until foraging activity stopped.

Scientific note

A scientific note on the dynamics of labor devoted

to nectar foraging in a honey bee colony:

number of foragers versus individual foraging activity

Corinna THOMa, b*, Thomas Dyer SEELEYb, Jürgen TAUTZa

aLehrstuhl für Verhaltensphysiologie und Soziobiologie, Zoologie II,

Biozentrum der Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany bDepartment for Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University,

Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

(Received 6 June 2000; accepted 15 July 2000)

Apis mellifera / division of labor / nectar foraging

Apidologie 31 (2000) 737–738 737

© INRA/DIB-AGIB/EDP Sciences

* Correspondence and reprints

(3)

C. Thom et al.

738

foragers rather than the activity of the nectar foragers. Increasing the number of foragers that collect simultaneously might enable the colony to exploit ephemeral nectar sources faster and thus more efficiently than an indi-vidual increase of necessarily successive for-aging flights.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Robin Kimmerer for providing space and facilities at the CLBS where pilot stud-ies were done, David C. Gilley for reading the manuscript and discussion, and Kathrin Schome-rus for help with the observations. Financial sup-port came from the German Merit Foundation, the U.S. NSF grant (IBN 96-30159), and the GK 200 of the University of Würzburg.

Note scientifique sur la dynamique du tra-vail consacré à la récolte du nectar dans une colonie d’abeilles domestiques : nombre de butineuses par opposition à l’activité individuelle de butinage.

Eine wissenschaftliche Notiz zur Arbeits-dynamik des Nektareintrags in einem Honigbienenvolk: Anzahl von Arbeiterin-nen versus individueller Sammelaktivität. REFERENCES

[1] Robinson G.E., Regulation of division of labor in insect societies, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37 (1992) 637–665.

[2] Seeley T.D., The wisdom of the hive, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.

Figure 1. A) presents the percentage of the colony that foraged for nectar. Good weather (> 18 °C,

no rain) is indicated by an open sun, medium weather (15–18 °C, light rain showers) by a half-filled sun, and bad weather (< 15 °C, rain) by a filled sun. B) shows the mean number of trips per nectar for-ager per day with one standard deviation. Stars indicate observation periods with significant changes (p < 0.05) of values between days.

A)

Références

Documents relatifs

Lanes 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9 are thorax samples, the adjacent lanes are (a) the semen collected from that drone using a micropipette, and (b) forceps-collected semen from

hives had large amounts of adult bees and brood relative to 2005 data, with associated food demands, resulting in little gain in food stores and thus little change in WCRAW, de- spite

Average (±SEM) number of pollen (top) or non-pollen foragers (bottom) returning to honey bee colonies within a 5-min interval after the addition of either an ocimene pheromone

Inspecting activity of focal foragers During the “inspection hour” over 4 days of testing per colony, the average total number of inspections of the empty feeder by focal foragers

We provided the foraging honey bees with a large flower array, allowed bees to naturally land on the array, and then counted how many bees visited and landed on focal flowers

Effect of site, strain of bees and year on perseitol content (%; mean + SE) of honey samples from colonies placed in 4 avocado orchards in Israel in 2001.... Foragers of both

When we experimentally raised a colony’s pollen need from one day to the next, we found that the colony boosted the labor devoted to pollen collecting (mea- sured in terms of the

Amoeboid movement of semen could be critical to the transfer of sperm from oviducts to the spermatheca because it would allow the semen to spread into any air pocket formed at