HAL Id: hal-00894044
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00894044
Submitted on 1 Jan 1994
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Increase of egg weight with age in normal and dwarf,
purebred and crossbred laying hens
F Minvielle, P Mérat, Jl Monvoisin, G Coquerelle, A Bordas
To cite this version:
Original
article
Increase of
egg
weight
with
age
in normal and
dwarf, purebred
and
crossbred
laying
hens
F
Minvielle,
P
Mérat JL Monvoisin G
Coquerelle,
A Bordas
Institut National de la RechercheAgronornique,
Laboratoire deGénétique
Factorielle78!352
Jouy-en-Josas cedex,
France(Received
2 November 1993;accepted
2 June1994)
Summary - An
exponential
curve, W = P -Q
exp(-Rt)
was fitted to eggweights
(W)
of individual hens from 8
genetic
groups tested for eggproduction
from 18-51 weeks of age(t).
The groups were constituted of the combination of genotype at the sex-linked dwarfism locus(normal
ordwarf)
and line(White
Leghorn,
BrownEgg
and bothreciprocal
crosses).
Theleast-squares
mean of the residual standard deviation about the curve was between1.27 and 1.74 g in the 8 groups and estimated values of the initial
P-Q
and mature egg Pweights
were between 26.9 and 33.9 g and 56.9 and 65.8 g,respectively.
Effects of genotype and line as well as heterosis were estimated for both eggweights
and for rate ofgrowth
relative to theremaining expected growth
(R).
R was smaller for dwarf hens which thusreached mature egg
weight
later than normal females.Significant
heterosis was found forboth egg
weights
of dwarf hens(12.6
and9.5%)
and for the initial eggweight
of normalones
(12.8%).
Negative
heterosis for R obtained for dwarf hens(-17.4%)
corresponded
toa flatter egg
weight
curve of these crossbreds.egg weight
/
age of hen/
heterosis/
dwarfism/
exponential curveRésumé - Évolution comparée du poids de l’oeuf avec l’âge de la poule chez des femelles normales ou naines et pures ou croisées. On a
ajusté
individuellement unecourbe de la
forme
W = P -Q
exp(-Rt)
aupoids
del’ceuf
(W)
mesuré entre 18 et 51 semd’âge
(t)
chez despoules
de8 groupes génétiques définis
par la corn.binaison dugénotype
au locus de nanisme lié au sexe(normal
ounain)
et de lalignée
(souche
Leghorn
blanche,
souche àceuf
brun et leurs croisementsréciproques).
L’écart type résiduelaprès
ajustement
de la courbeexponentielle
aux valeurs depoids,
évalué pourchaque
groupe parla méthode des moindres
carrés,
apris
des valeurscomprises
entre1,27
et1,74
g. De lamême
manière,
les estimations despoids
dupremier
œuf (P - Q)
étaient situées entre 26,9 9et
3.i,9
g, et celles del’ceuf
à maturité entre 56,9 et 65,8 g d’autre part. On a évalué leseffets
dugénotype
et de lalignée
et l’hétérosis pour lespoids
del’ceuf
et l’accroissement depoids journalier
relativement aupoids
restant à gagner(R).
La valeur de R étaitinférieure
que les
femelles
normales. Un hétérosissignificatif
a été obtenu pour les 2poids d’ceuf
chezles
poules
naines(12,6
et9,5%)
et pour lepoids
du premierceuf
chez lesfemelles
normales(12,8%).
L’hétérosisnégatif
trouvé pour R chez lespoules
naines(-17,4%)
correspond
aufait
que la courbe dupoids
del’ceuf
étaientplus aplatie
chez les croisés de cegénotype.
poids de l’aeuf
/
âge de la poule/
hétérosis / nanisme/
courbe exponentielleINTRODUCTION
Egg
weight
increasescurvilinearly
with age of hen(Cowen
etal,
1964).
Although
itmight
beadvantageous
to haveegg-laying
hensproducing quickly
andregularly
eggs within a limitedweight
range(Poggenpoel
andDuckitt,
1988),
few works haveanalyzed
therelationship
between eggweight
and age, or evaluated itsvariability.
A non-linear
equation
with 3parameters
(mature
eggweight,
eggweight
range andrate of increase of egg
weight)
wasproposed
by Weatherup
and Foster(1980).
They
compared
parameters
of the curves fitted for pure and crossbred hens butthey
didnot evaluate the effect of heterosis on the
shape
of the curve. The sametype
of curve was usedby
Foster et al(1987)
tohelp produce
aweekly
forecast of the numberof class A
(British grading)
eggs in several commercial flocks.Recently,
Shalev and Pasternak(1993)
applied
the method ofWeatherup
and Foster to eggweight
andgrading
for several avianspecies.
Ananalogous
butexponential
curve wasdeveloped
by
Yoo et al(1983)
who estimated theheritability
of the 3parameters
of the curvesobtained for hens from 2 selected lines.
The sex-linked dwarfism gene dw is associated with several unfavourable effects
on egg
traits,
andparticularly
on eggweight
(Merat, 1990).
In a recentwork,
the influence of heterosis on the reduction ofproduction
associated with dw wasexplored
and someadvantage
was found for crossbred dwarf hens(Merat
etal,
1994).
However,
the eggweight
at the age of 43--45 weeks was still about 4 glighter
in dwarf than in normal crossbred hens. In thepresent
study,
the eggweight
increase of normal and dwarf hens of 2parental
pure lines(White
Leghorn
and BrownEgg)
with age and theirreciprocal
crosses werecompared
and the effectsof dw and heterosis on the
shape
of theexponential
curve of eggweight
with timewere estimated in order to
explore
thedynamics
of eggweight
in relation to dw andcrossbreeding.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Birds
Genetic
types
andgenotypes
have been describedpreviously by
M6rat et al(1994).
Briefly,
pure andcrossbred,
normal and dwarfprogenies
were obtained in asingle
hatch from a White
Leghorn
line and a BrownEgg
line(11
DW dw males perline mated to 3 or 4 females
each)
maintained in ourlaboratory.
Hens wereprotein,
2 600kcal/kg
metabolizable energy,3.4%
calcium)
wasprovided
ad libitum.Performances
reported
elsewhere(Merat
etal,
1994)
can be summarized as follows.Both normal and dwarf Brown
Egg purebred
females were heavier at 17 weeks(by
513 and 366 g,
respectively)
and at 52 weeks(by
743 and 495 g,respectively)
than their WhiteLeghorn
counterparts.
They
also startedlaying
earlier(14.8
and 17.7 dearlier,
respectively),
and laid more eggs(22.6
and 23.9 more up to 51 weeks of age,respectively),
which were heavier(by
3.8 and 5.1 g,respectively).
Finally,
crossbredshad intermediate
body weights
butperformed
at the same level as the pure BrownEgg
line for eggproduction
traits. Data and statisticalanalysis
A total of 430 birds were tested for egg
production
from 18 to 51 weeks of age.Weekly,
and then every otherweek,
3 consecutive eggs were collected from eachbird.
Double-yolk,
soft-shelled or broken eggs werediscarded,
the totalweight
of2 normal eggs was recorded and the
corresponding
meanweight
was calculated. Amaximum number of 29
weights
could be obtained for each hen.Fifty-three
henswere excluded because
they
died orstopped laying early.
An
exponential
curve, W = P -Q
exp
(-Rt),
was fitted to the series of eggweights
of eachremaining hen, using
the Nlinprocedure
(SAS
Institute,
1988).
Under this model described
by Brody
(1964)
andapplied
to eggweight by
Yoo et al(1983),
eggweight
(W)
increases with age(t)
and R is the rate ofgrowth
relative to thegrowth
yet
to be made: R =(dW/dt)/(P - W).
Theparameter
Q
is the range of
weights
from initial eggweight
to mature eggweight
and P -Q
is the eggweight
for t =0,
ie at the age of 18 weeks in thisexperiment.
Residual standard deviation about the curve was also calculated as a measure of thegoodness
of fit of the curves to the data. The iterative process failed to converge for 22 hens
(11
normal and 11dwarf).
Correspondingly,
reasonable estimations ofP, Q
and R could not be obtained for them.Inspection
of the actual eggweight
curves ofthese hens revealed that
they
did not reach theself-inhibiting phase
ofdecreasing
slope during
the whole span of theexperiment.
For every variabledescribing
theshape
of the eggweight
curve(namely
P, P - Q, R
and the residual standarddeviation)
of theremaining
356hens,
a2-way
analysis
of variance with interactionwas
performed.
The main effects weregenotype
at the sex-linked dwarfism locus(normal
ordwarf)
andgenetic
type
(Leghorn,
BrownEgg, Leghorn
x BrownEgg,
BrownEgg
xLeghorn).
Variables withsignificantly positively
skewed distributions(P,
Q,
andR)
were transformed with thelog
transformation(Gill, 1978)
and thenanalyzed,
withoutchanging
thesignificance
of the effects or the heterosis. Thereforeresults are
given
on untransformed data. Means of lines within eachphenotype,
normal and
dwarf,
werecompared
alsoby
the Student-Newman-Keulsprocedure.
Correlations with
parameters
of theexponential
eggweight
curve and with eggproduction
traits(egg
number,
age at first egg, eggweight
at end of test andbody
weights
at 17 and 52 weeks ofage)
were calculated both within and acrossgenotypes.
From linear combinations of
least-squares
means, heterosis was estimated for bothnormal and dwarf
hens,
crossbredadvantage
was calculated for eachreciprocal
crossand
reciprocal
crossbredperformances
werecompared.
Allanalyses
wereperformed
RESULTS
Least-squares
means for the variables that describe theshape
of the eggweight
curve, with the
significance
levels of main effects andinteractions,
are listed in table 1. Dwarf birds had smaller eggweights
(P
<0.05),
bothinitially
and atmaturity,
a lower rate ofchange
of eggweight
increment and a smaller residualstandard deviation about the curve
(P
<0.001).
Initial eggweight
line differences(P
<0.05),
withlarger
eggs from crossbreds than from WhiteLeghorn
hens,
persisted only
marginally
(P
<0.10)
in mature eggweight,
but moreclearly
amongdwarf hens.
Only marginal
line differences(P
<0.10)
were found for the rate ofchange
in eggweight
increment but the residual standard deviation about the curve wassignificantly
lower(P
<0.001)
in the WhiteLeghorn
line.Correlations with
parameters
of theexponential
eggweight
curve and severalproduction
traits recordedduring
theexperiment
arepresented
in table II.’
Correlations between the rate R and the other
parameters
of theexponential
curve were
significant
(P
<0.001)
andnegative
for both normal and dwarf hens. Mature eggweight,
P,
was associatedpositively
(P
<0.001)
withQ
and P -Q
tothe same extent in normal and dwarf females. Initial egg
weight,
P — Q,
hadpositive
correlations withQ
in dwarf hens(P
<0.05)
and with the residual standard deviation in normal females(P
<0.05).
For both
types
offemales,
mature eggweight,
P,
waspositively
correlated withactual
body weight
at thebeginning
(P
<0.05)
and the end(P
<0.01)
of the testperiod
and with mean eggweight
(2-week
egg collection at 43 weeks ofage)
(P
<0.001).
However,
it was not associated with age at first egg and it wascorrelated
negatively
(P
<0.05)
with egg number of normal hens. Total eggweight
gain,
Q,
washardly
associated withbody
weights
and was not correlated with age at first egg.However,
it increased with mean eggweight
(P
<0.01)
and decreased withhigher
egg number(P
<0.001)
in normal females. Initial eggweight,
P -Q,
was correlated with all 5
traits,
similarly
in dwarf and normal hens. Associationwas
negative
only
with age at first egg(P
<0.01).
The rate R wassignificantly
correlated with egg number of dwarf females
only
(P
<0.05).
Larger
residual standard deviation was associated withhigher body weights
(P
<0.01)
and eggweight
(P
<0.05)
of normalhens,
and withhigher
17-weekbody
weight (P
<0.05)
of dwarf females.Correlations between
production
traits aregiven
here for the sake ofcomplete-ness.
They
werequite
similar for bothtypes
of hens. Correlations of egg numberwith egg
weight
were theonly non-significant
values(P
>0.05).
Table III contains
percentage
superiority
for eachreciprocal
cross andheterosis,
separately
for dwarf and normalhens,
withcorresponding
comparisons
of crossbredsuperiority.
Heterosis of initial eggweight,
P -Q,
wassignificant
(P
< 0.01 orP <
0.001)
for all crossbredtypes
but it was not different between normal and dwarf hens. Atmaturity,
heterosis for eggweight,
P,
wassignificant
(P
< 0.05or P <
0.01)
for dwarf hensonly. Negative
heterosis(P
< 0.10 or P <0.05)
wasobtained for the rate of
change
R of the eggweight
curve of dwarf females. Crossbredadvantage
was not different in the 2reciprocal
crosses,except
for R in normal hens(P
<0.05).
There was some heterosis(P
<0.10)
of the samemagnitude
in normalDISCUSSION
Residual standard deviation about the non-linear curve fitted to egg
weights
is a measure of thegoodness
of fit of the curve to the data. Values between 1.27 and 1.74 g obtained in thisexperiment
(table I)
comparefavourably
with those around 2 greported by Weatherup
and Foster(1980)
and Yoo et at(1983).
While the former authors did not find any effect of the breed on the residual standarddeviation,
aconsistently
smaller value(table I)
was found for the WhiteLeghorn
line usedin this
study,
and moregenerally
for dwarf hens.However,
this observation maybe scale related as both White
Leghorn
and dwarf hens laid smaller eggs.Indeed,
correlation of residual standard deviation with mean egg
weight
was 0.20 for normalhens and was -0.01
(not significant)
for dwarf females while the correlation withinitial egg
weight, P-Q,
was 0.15 for normal hens(table II).
On the otherhand,
noassociation was found between residual standard deviation and mature egg
weight,
P,
in eithertype
of hens.Moreover,
as dwarf hensproduce
fewer defective eggs(Merat,
1990),
their eggweight
increase with agemight
also be moreregular.
The observed egg
weight
waslarger
in the BrownEgg
line than in the WhiteLeghorn
line(Merat
etat,
1994),
as was the case for the initial eggweight
(P -
Q)
estimated for normal and for dwarf hens(31.9
versus 29.1 g and 30.0 versus 26.9g).
This could beexpected
as the BrownEgg
line was a heavier line(Merat
etat,
1994).
However,
thecorresponding
values of heterosis(table III)
weresurprisingly
large,
and
yet
agreed
well with actual values above10%
(data
notshown)
measured from all 68 eggs obtained at 20 weeks of age. Heterosis for initial eggweight
wasthe same in the 2
genotypes,
a reflection of the fact that P -Q
was associated with all mainproduction
traits to the same extent in normal and dwarf females(table
II).
Asanticipated, adjusted
mature eggweight
waslarger
than the observed mean eggweight
at 43-45 weeks of agereported by
M6rat et at(1994)
but theranking
of thepurebreds
and crossbreds withingenotype
wasquite
similar to that in theirreport,
with little differences between lines(table I).
Atmaturity,
while normalLeghorns
hadcaught
up with the 3 other normaltypes
for eggweight,
dwarfLeghorns
still had smaller eggweight
(table I),
which induced thesignificant
positive
heterosisreported
for dwarfs(table
III).
Negative
correlation of Pwith
egg number(table II)
in normal hens buffered mature eggweight
differences between crossbreds andpurebreds
that could have beenanticipated
from initial eggweights,
thereby reducing
heterosis. On thecontrary,
the absence of a similar correlation indwarf hens allowed maintenance of heterosis at
maturity
for thisgenotype.
Good correlations betweenQ
and P were to beexpected
as the range of eggweight,
Q,
is extended moreby
raising
its upperlimit, P,
thanby decreasing
itslower
end,
P -Q.
As a matter offact,
nosignificant
negative
correlation wasfound between
Q
and P -Q.
Furthermore,
thepositive
correlations found between initial and mature eggweights
reflect the obviousbiological
association between the 2 traits. On the otherhand,
thepositive
correlation betweenQ
and P -Q
in dwarf hens does not have astraightforward explanation.
As initial eggweight
wasThe smaller rate of
change
in eggweight
increment(table
I)
for dwarf hens(egg
weight
curve wasflatter)
delayed
attainment of mature eggweight.
Moreover,
negative
heterosis for dwarf crossbreds(table III)
indicates that within the range of ages andweights
observed in thisexperiment
the curve was flatter for those2
genetic
types.
This is confirmedby
theonly
significant
(and
negative)
correlationinvolving
R,
with egg number in dwarfs(table
II),
which indicatesthat,
amongdwarfs,
mature eggweight
would be reached laterby
henslaying
more eggs. Onthe
contrary,
positive
heterosis obtainedonly
for normalLeghorn
x BrownEgg
crossbreds,
showed thatcurvilinearity
was enhancedby
this crossand, therefore,
that mature egg
weight
could be reached earlier.As the
exponential
curve was flatter(for
smaller Rvalues),
mature eggweight,
P,
was reachedlater,
thereby allowing
forlarger
extreme eggweights
and eggweight
range, and for thenegative
correlations found between those traits and R.An ideal egg
weight
curve would be onestarting
at ahigh
initialweight
andquickly
increasing
towards ahigh
mature eggweight.
In thiswork,
favourable combinations for the 3parameters
of the curve were obtained for all normal sizegenetic
types except
the pureLeghorn,
andparticularly
for theLeghorn
x BrownEgg
cross with its fast rate of increase.Among
dwarf groups, pureLeghorns
were even more at adisadvantage
as their initial and mature eggweights
were bothsmaller.
Reciprocal
crossbreds hadhigher
initial eggweight
thanpurebreds
but tooklonger
to reach their matureweight,
which was alsolarger,
while pure BrownEgg
had a better rate ofchange.
The interest of the dwarf gene in crossbred hensreported by
M6rat et al(1994)
for eggproduction
traits was somewhat confirmedhere for the evolution of egg
weight,
butincreasing
R in crossbred dwarfs would make them even moreacceptable
for eggproduction.
More
generally,
thepresent
study
confirmed the value of theexponential
curveto describe the increase of egg
weight
with age for severalgenetic
types.
It has also shown that theshape
of the curve was affectedby
genetic
differences between linesthrough
its 3parameters.
Theexpected
crossbredadvantage
for eggweight
was alsoobtained
by
comparing
values of thecorresponding
parameters
forpurebreds
and crossbreds.Heterosis,
however,
wasgenerally higher
thanusually reported
fromactual
measurements,
maybe
becausethey
were made beforematurity
(constant
egg
size)
was reached.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The technical assistance of the staff at the
Poultry Experimental
Unit in La Mini6re isgreatly appreciated.
Gratefulacknowledgment
is made to M Chalot forpreparing
dataand M Boitard for data transfer.
Special
thanks to an anonymous and tenacious reviewerfor constructive and
stimulating
comments.REFERENCES
Brody
S(1964)
Bioenergetics
andGrowth,
IlafnerPublishing Company,
New York,524-54
3
Foster
WH,
RobertsonDV, Belyavin
CG(1987)
Forecasting
eggproduction
in commercial flocks. Br Poult Sci28,
623-630Gill JL
(1978)
Design
andAnalysis of Experiments
in the Animal and MedicalSciences,
vol 1, 1st
ed,
The Iowa StateUniversity Press, Ames, IA,
USA 154-155M6rat P
(1990)
Pleiotropic
and associated effects ofmajor
genes. In:Poultry Breeding
and Genetics
(RD
Crawford,
ed),
Elsevier, Amsterdam,
429-467M6rat
P,
Minvielle F, BordasA, Coquerelle
G(7994)
Heterosis in normal versus dwarflaying
hens. Poult Sci 73, 1-6Poggenpoel DG,
Duckitt JS(1988)
Genetic basis of the increase in eggweight
withpullet
age in a WhiteLeghorn
flock. Br Poult Sci 29, 863-867SAS Institute
(1988)
SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. SAS InstituteInc, Cary, NC,
USA ShalevBA,
Pasternak H( 1993)
Increment of eggweight
with hen age in various commercialavian
species.
Br Poult Sci34,
915-924Weatherup STC,
Foster WH(1980)
Adescription
of the curverelating
eggweight
andage of hen. Br Poult Sci 21, 511-519
Yoo