• Aucun résultat trouvé

Heterogenous Nucleation in Hard Spheres Systems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Heterogenous Nucleation in Hard Spheres Systems"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Heterogenous Nucleation in Hard Spheres Systems

Sven Dorosz and Tanja Schilling

University of Luxembourg

Theory of Soft Condensed Matter,

Universit´e du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, L-1511 Luxembourg sven.dorosz@uni.lu

1 Setup

We studied a super- saturated fluid of hard spheres in contact with a triangular substrate.

1 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4

lattice constant a [σ]

1,005 1,01 1,015 1,02

number density ρ instantaneous growth

nucleation limit of stability

• Will the substrate induce different nucleation pathways?

• Where does the nucleation happen?

• What are the consequences of the mismatch between substrate and equilibrium crystal lattice constant?

• What is the crystal structure of the nucleus?

• How does the substrate change the nucleation rate?

• Related work [1, 5, 3, 2]

2 How does one detect crystallites?

Observables for the Local Bond Ordering [4]:

In 3d: For all particles i with n(i) neighbours, define

¯

q6m(i) := 1 n(i)

n(i)

X

j=1

Y6m ~rij

,

where Y6m ~rij

are the spherical harmonics (with l=6).

In 2d: For all particle i with n(i) neighbours, define

ψ¯6(i) := 1 n(i)

n(i)

X

j=1

ei6θ(rij) ,

with θ(rij) angle between vector ~rij and an arbitrary fixed axis in the plane.

Allow rij < 1.4 between particle i and its neighbour j. Crystalline particles

colorcoded ”green”) if n > 10.

colorcoded ”light brown” if n > 5.

(left) q~6(i) · q~6(j) < 0.7 and (right) q~6(i) · q~6(j) > 0.7

3 Simulation details

N = 220200 (216000 bulk + 4200 substrate) particles N σ3/V = 1.005 (η = 0.526) − 1.02 (η = 0.534)

Corresponding chemical potentials −∆µ ≃ 0.50 − 0.54 kBT D denotes the diffusion constant

4 Snapshots of the system a < a

sp

System made of 216000 + 4200 particles. a=1.1 and ρ = 1.01

(left) t = 5 · D and (right) t = 100 · D

⇒ Complete layer growth onto the substrate

Analysis of the fully wetted substrate

(left) perpendicular density profile (right) defect density η for the nth layer

0 5 10 15

distance to the substrate z [σ]

0 0,002 0,004 0,006 0,008

density ρ(z)

t = 600 D t = 300 D t = 6 D

1 2 3 4 5

layer n

0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5

defect density η

a=1.01σ a=1.05σ a=1.10σ

1 2 3 4 5

layer n

3400 3600 3800 4000 4200

# of particles in layer N(n)

⇒ Induced defects are compensated in the first 3 layers

(left) top view (right) side view

⇒ Crystal grows in random hexagonal closed packing (RHCP)

5 Snapshots of the system a > a

sp

System made of 216000 + 4200 particles. a=1.4 and ρ = 1.01

(left) t = 20 · D and (right) t = 150 · D

⇒ Droplet formation on the substrate

Time evolution of the largest cluster/droplet

0 100 200 300 400 500

t D after critical nucleus is formed

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

# of solid particles in cluster

ρ=1.01 ρ=1.0175 ρ=1.02

100 1000

# particles in crystallite

1 10

principal moments of gyration tensor

R¬e

z

R¬e

z

R||e

z

⇒ Analysis of the droplets shows non-spherical droplets even up to 4000 particles.

Effective nucelation rates due to the substrate

1,005 1,01 1,015 1,02 1,025

denstiy ρ

0 5e-06 1e-05 1,5e-05 2e-05

nucleation rate [σ5 /6D l]

a=1.15σ a=1.2σ a=1.25σ a=1.3σ a=1.35σ a=1.4σ

a

1,1 1,15 1,2 1,25 1,3 1,35 1,4

lattice constant a [σ]

5e-06 1e-05 1,5e-05

nucleation rate [σ5 /6D l] ρ=1.01ρ=1.015

ρ=1.02

⇒ Decreasing nucleation rate with increasing mismatch to the substrate

References

[1] M. Heni and H. L¨owen. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:3668–3671, 2000.

[2] S. Pronk and D. Frenkel. Phys. Rev. Lett., 90(25):255501, 2003.

[3] T. Schilling, S. Dorosz, H. J. Sch¨ope, and G. Opletal. J. of Phys: Cond. Matter, 23(19), 2011.

[4] P. J. Steinhardt, D. R. Nelson, and M. Ronchetti. Phys. Rev. B, 28(2), 1983.

[5] W.-S. Xu, Z.-Y. Sun, and L.-J. An. Journal of Chemical Physics, 132(14):144506, 2010.

Références

Documents relatifs

Minimum free energy paths for nucleation (MFEPs) of a single nucleus in an infinite matrix are computed with the string method in the framework of the continuum theory of nucleation

In this work, we investigate this superstabilization effect in the context of classical nucleation theory in multicomponent solutions and we derive an analytical expression for

The linear Boltzmann equation has been derived (globally in time) from the dynamics of a tagged particle in a low density Lorentz gas, meaning that.. • the obstacles are

In Figure 7, we show that the mean size of the largest crystallite can be described by a growth law that is approximately exponential with time once the nucleation event has set

Find the first collision for each particle Insert into collision list - don’t execute yet Then execute earliest collision.. Find next collision of the two particles ⇒ update the

What are the consequences of the mismatch between substrate and equilibrium crystal lattice constant. What is the crystal structure of

We have recently published results on the crystallization mechanism in hard spheres that were obtained by a brute force MC simulation [6]. Here we will add results on nucleation

Keywords and phrases Hard-sphere Model, Markov Chain, Partition Function, Gibbs