• Aucun résultat trouvé

Associative and quasitrivial operations on finite sets

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Associative and quasitrivial operations on finite sets"

Copied!
38
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Associative and quasitrivial operations

on finite sets

Jean-Luc Marichal

University of Luxembourg Luxembourg

(2)
(3)

Single-peaked orderings

Motivating example (Romero, 1978)

Suppose you are asked to order the following six objects in

decreasing preference:

a

1

:

0 sandwich

a

2

:

1 sandwich

a

3

:

2 sandwiches

a

4

:

3 sandwiches

a

5

:

4 sandwiches

a

6

:

more than 4 sandwiches

(4)

Single-peaked orderings

a1: 0 sandwich a2: 1 sandwich a3: 2 sandwiches a4: 3 sandwiches a5: 4 sandwiches

a6: more than 4 sandwiches

after a good lunch: a1≺ a2≺ a3≺ a4≺ a5≺ a6 if you are starving: a6≺ a5≺ a4≺ a3≺ a2≺ a1

(5)

Single-peaked orderings

(6)
(7)

Single-peaked orderings

Definition (Black, 1948)

Let ≤ and  be total orderings on Xn= {a1, . . . , an}.

Then  is said to besingle-peaked w.r.t. ≤if for any ai, aj, ak ∈ Xn such that ai < aj < ak we have aj ≺ ai or aj ≺ ak.

Let us assume that Xn= {a1, . . . , an} is endowed with the ordering a1< · · · < an For n = 4 a1≺ a2≺ a3≺ a4 a4≺ a3≺ a2≺ a1 a2≺ a1≺ a3≺ a4 a3≺ a2≺ a1≺ a4 a2≺ a3≺ a1≺ a4 a3≺ a2≺ a4≺ a1 a2≺ a3≺ a4≺ a1 a3≺ a4≺ a2≺ a1

(8)

Single-peaked orderings

Recall that aweak ordering(ortotal preordering) on Xn is a binary relation - on Xn that is total and transitive.

Defining a weak ordering on Xn amounts to defining an ordered partition of Xn

C1≺ · · · ≺ Ck

where C1, . . . , Ck are the equivalence classes defined by ∼ For n = 3, we have 13 weak orderings

(9)

Single-peaked orderings

Definition

Let ≤ be a total ordering on Xnand let - be a weak ordering on Xn. We say that - is weakly single-peaked w.r.t. ≤ if for any ai, aj, ak ∈ Xn such that ai < aj < ak we have aj≺ ai or aj ≺ ak or ai ∼ aj ∼ ak.

(10)
(11)
(12)

Connectedness and Contour plots

Let F : Xn2→ Xn be an operation on Xn= {1, . . . , n}

Definition

The points (u, v ) and (x , y ) of X2

n are said to beF -connectedif F (u, v ) = F (x , y )

The point (x , y ) of X2

(13)
(14)

Connectedness and Contour plots

Definition

For any x ∈ Xn, theF -degree of x, denoteddegF(x ), is the number of points (u, v ) 6= (x , x ) such that F (u, v ) = F (x , x )

(15)
(16)

Quasitriviality

Definition

F : Xn2→ Xn is said to be

quasitrivial(orconservative) if

F (x , y ) ∈ {x , y } (x , y ∈ Xn)

idempotentif

F (x , x ) = x (x ∈ Xn)

Fact. If F is quasitrivial, then it is idempotent

(17)

Quasitriviality

Let ∆Xn = {(x , x ) | x ∈ Xn}

Fact

F : Xn2→ Xn is quasitrivial iff it is idempotent

every point (x , y ) /∈ ∆Xn is F -connected to either (x , x ) or (y , y )

r r r r r r r r r 1 2 3 r r r r r r r r r @ @ @ @ @ @ 1 2 3

(18)

Neutral and annihilator elements

Definition

e ∈ Xn is said to be aneutral elementof F : Xn2→ Xnif F (x , e) = F (e, x ) = x , x ∈ Xn

(19)

Neutral and annihilator elements

Proposition

Assume that F : Xn2→ Xnis quasitrivial.

e ∈ Xn is a neutral element of F iff degF(e) = 0

a ∈ Xnis an annihilator element of F iff degF(a) = 2n − 2.

(20)

Associative, quasitrivial, and commutative operations

Theorem

Let F : X2

n → Xn. The following assertions are equivalent.

(i) F is associative, quasitrivial, and commutative (ii) F = max for some total ordering  on Xn The total ordering  is uniquely determined as follows:

x  y ⇐⇒ degF(x ) ≤ degF(y )

Fact. There are exactly n! such operations

(21)

Associative, quasitrivial, and commutative operations

Theorem

Let F : X2

n → Xn. The following assertions are equivalent.

(i) F is associative, quasitrivial, and commutative (ii) F = maxfor some total ordering  on Xn

(iii) F is quasitrivial and {degF(x ) | x ∈ Xn} = {0, 2, 4, . . . , 2n − 2}

(22)

Associative, quasitrivial, and commutative operations

Definition. F : X2

n → Xn is said to be ≤-preserving for some total ordering ≤ on Xn if for

any x , y , x0, y0∈ Xnsuch that x ≤ x0and y ≤ y0, we have F (x , y ) ≤ F (x0, y0)

Theorem

Let F : X2

n → Xn. The following assertions are equivalent.

(i) F is associative, quasitrivial, and commutative (ii) F = maxfor some total ordering  on Xn

(iii) F is quasitrivial and {degF(x ) | x ∈ Xn} = {0, 2, 4, . . . , 2n − 2}

(23)

Associative, quasitrivial, and commutative operations

Definition.

Auninorm on Xn is an operation F : Xn2→ Xnthat has a neutral element e ∈ Xn

and is

associative commutative

(24)

Associative, quasitrivial, and commutative operations

Theorem

Let F : X2

n → Xn. The following assertions are equivalent.

(i) F is associative, quasitrivial, and commutative (ii) F = maxfor some total ordering  on Xn

(iii) F is quasitrivial and {degF(x ) | x ∈ Xn} = {0, 2, 4, . . . , 2n − 2}

(iv) F is quasitrivial, commutative, and ≤-preserving for some total ordering ≤ on Xn

(25)

Associative, quasitrivial, and commutative operations

Assume that Xn= {1, . . . , n} is endowed with the usual total ordering ≤n

defined by 1 <n· · · <nn Theorem

Let F : X2

n → Xn. The following assertions are equivalent.

(i) F is quasitrivial, commutative, and ≤n-preserving (⇒ associative)

(ii) F = maxfor some total ordering  on Xnthat is single-peaked w.r.t. ≤n

(26)

Associative, quasitrivial, and commutative operations

Remark.

There are n! operations F : Xn2→ Xn that are associative, quasitrivial, and commutative.

There are 2n−1 of them that are ≤

(27)

Associative and quasitrivial operations

Examples of noncommutative operations

(28)

Associative and quasitrivial operations

Definition.

Theprojection operationsπ1: Xn2→ Xnand π2: Xn2→ Xn are respectively defined by

(29)

Associative and quasitrivial operations

Assume that Xn= {1, . . . , n} is endowed with a weak ordering -Ordinal sum of projections

osp-: Xn2→ Xn -6 π1or π2 π1or π2 max max

(30)

Associative and quasitrivial operations

Theorem (L¨anger 1980, Kepka 1981)

Let F : Xn2→ Xn. The following assertions are equivalent.

(i) F is associative and quasitrivial

(ii) F = osp- for some weak ordering - on Xn The weak ordering - is uniquely determined as follows:

(31)
(32)

Associative and quasitrivial operations

How to check whether a quasitrivial operation F : Xn2→ Xnis associative?

1. Order the elements of Xn according to the weak ordering - defined by

x - y ⇐⇒ degF(x ) ≤ degF(y )

(33)

Associative and quasitrivial operations

Which ones are ≤-preserving?

(34)

Associative and quasitrivial operations

Assume that Xn= {1, . . . , n} is endowed with the usual total ordering ≤n defined by 1 <n· · · <nn

Theorem

Let F : Xn2→ Xn. The following assertions are equivalent.

(i) F is associative, quasitrivial, and ≤n-preserving

(35)
(36)
(37)

Final remarks

1. We have introduced and identified a number of integer sequences in http://oeis.org

Number of associative and quasitrivial operations: A292932 Number of associative, quasitrivial, and ≤n-preserving operations: A293005

Number of weak orderings on Xnthat are weakly single-peaked w.r.t. ≤n: A048739

· · ·

(38)

Some references

N. L. Ackerman.

A characterization of quasitrivial n-semigroups.

To appear in Algebra Universalis.

S. Berg and T. Perlinger.

Single-peaked compatible preference profiles: some combinatorial results.

Social Choice and Welfare 27(1):89–102, 2006.

D. Black.

On the rationale of group decision-making.

J Polit Economy, 56(1):23–34, 1948

T. Kepka.

Quasitrivial groupoids and balanced identities.

Acta Univ. Carolin. - Math. Phys., 22(2):49–64, 1981.

H. L¨anger.

The free algebra in the variety generated by quasi-trivial semigroups.

Semigroup forum, 20:151–156, 1980.

N. J. A. Sloane (editor).

The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences.

Références

Documents relatifs

Special software tools cover customized software engineering tools like software specification, design, coding and testing tools on the first floor, SCM and SQA tools on the

in collaboration with Miguel Couceiro and Jean-Luc Marichal University of Luxembourg... Graphical interpretation of the

As we will see, quasitrivial, associative, and nondecreasing operations are characterized in terms of weak orderings through the so-called single-peakedness property introduced

in collaboration with Miguel Couceiro and Jean-Luc Marichal University of Luxembourg... Graphical interpretation of the

With those three bridging functions, we hope to see similarities and properties that allow us to establish a more general method of reasoning with arithmetic, sets, cardinalities

Vis said to be closed under inverse images ofaperiodic morphisms if for any finite monoids M and M', if M' e _F and q&gt; : M -* M' is an aperiodic functional morphism, then MeV..

When X is a finite set or an algebraic curve, several authors have given criteria for I to be generated by quadrics (cf.. As the results and conjectures

KONJAGIN, Estimates for the number of sums and products and for expo- nential sums over subgrups in finite fields of prime order. CHANG, A sum-product estimate in