• Aucun résultat trouvé

for provisioning ecosystem services in agroforestry systems. Costa Rica

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "for provisioning ecosystem services in agroforestry systems. Costa Rica"

Copied!
14
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Participatory simulation to test incentives

for provisioning ecosystem services

in agroforestry systems. Costa Rica

C O M U N I CAT I O N P R E S E N T E D I N E C O S U M M I T 2 0 1 6 « E C O L O G I C A L S U S TA I N A B I L I T Y: E N G I N E E R I N G C H A N G E »

2 9 A U G U S T - 1 S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 6 , L E C O R U M , M O N T P E L L I E R , F R A N C E

agroforestry systems with perennial crops

BONIFAZI Mathilde (SupAgro / CIRAD); LE COQ Jean-François (CIRAD ART-Dev); FERRAND Nils (IRSTEA G Eau); SIBELET Nicole (CIRAD Innovation); RAPIDEL Bruno (CIRAD System)

(2)

Introduction

Coffee provisionning

ecosystem services

and disservices

Farming

practices

Regulating

and supporting

ecosystem services

Agro-ecosystems

Farms and watershed

Instruments

Promote

Limit

(3)

Introduction

Which instruments to foster adoption of

agro-environmental practices rebalancing

ecosystem services / disservices provision ?

Objective 1: Characterize ecosystem services/disservices provision, agro-environmental practices and farmer’s strategic managements

Objective 2: Analyze the actual instruments and their effects

Objective 3: Identify and test instruments to trigger the adoption of agro-environmental practices H1: Lack of instruments to support farmers to develop agro-environmental practices:

little-known, technically more complicated and/or costly

H2: Actual instruments inaccessible and/or inappropriate to the agro-ecosystems and farmers’ situation

(4)

Study area

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY Legal framework

Payment for ecosystem services Ecolabel

Costa Rica

Los Santos – Llano Bonito

COFFEE SECTOR

1rst area of national coffee production High productivity and quality coffee

600 family farms Shade grown Coffee (but low shade diversity) ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Watershed with soil erosion,

Nitrogen contamination, Biodiversity loss

(5)

Method

7 Institutional interviews

30 semi-structured interviews of coffee producers

 Analyze the diversity of their production systems  Response to existing policies

Construction and test of a Role Playing Game with 13 farmers among the ones interviewed

 Test instruments

Bibliography about instruments, role playing games, ecosystems services and coffee production

(6)

Practices and ecosystem services analyze

Fertilization Shade trees mangement Weed management Buffer zones (vegetal hedge) Drainage Waterway protection Practices

Ecosystem services and disservices

Terraces

(7)

Results

 Goal 1

5 types according to:

The part of coffee in the income

The area of coffee in the farm

The type of workforce in coffee production

The type of economics activities in the household

The number of persons working in coffee production

(8)

Results

Goal 2

No Payments for environmental services (PES) in the area

• Constraints of land ownership

• Conditions about trees not adapted to the coffee production

All the producers certified by eco-labels

• Environmental criteria not precise • Without recurrent control

Law of protection of the waterway

• Generally not respected • No control

(9)

Results

 Goal 3

Construction of the model for the role playing game

Fertilization Shade trees mangement Weed management Buffer zones (vegetal hedge) Drainage Waterway protection Practices

Ecosystem services and disservices

Terraces

Role of the gamer = simplified types

(10)

Results

Goal 3

Dynamic

of one round in the role playing game

Choice of the practices and adoption or not of the instrument proposed

Presentation of the scenario

Play on the individual card table Calculations of the individual and collective results

(11)

Results

,

3rd Turn :

Green credits for a reduce use of inputs and plots arrangement with terraces

2nd Turn:

Payment for Environmental Services (PES)

for adoption of highly shaded coffee and protection of water line

1st Turn:

Enforcement of the law prohibiting coffee production on water line

Results

 Goal 3

(12)

12

Evolution of the game units compared to the reference turn (without instruments)

Ecosystem services compromises and disservices in the game

Evolution of the erosion units

Evolution of the nitrogen contamination units

Evolution of the coffee units

Evolution of the biodiversity units

Results

 Aim 3

Enforcement of the law turn

Green credits turn

PSE turn

Evolution of the units produced in the watershed by the gamers

We observed too different effects of the instruments depended on the role game of the gamers. In the game:

• PES and green credits are the most effective incentives to reduce environmental impacts without decreasing coffee production.

• Enforcement of the law impacts negatively coffee production.

(13)

13

Existing instruments are currently not effective in the region but farmers would

be responsive to some of the new incentives.

Economics and voluntary incentives (PSE and green credits) with decentralized

and inter-institutional governance seem adapted to the farm’s local

techno-economic constraints and the environmental issues of the territory.

The sensibility of farmers to instruments would be dependent on the

socio-economic criteria related to their household.

Conclusion

Some limits :

The agro-ecosystem and the instruments were simplified in the game.

Few simulation (Only 13 farmers participated).

(14)

Thank you for

your attention

Références

Documents relatifs

only biodiversity is maximised as a conservation strategy, (4) Balanced: timber recovery, carbon and biodiversity conservation are balanced as a multi- functionality strategy, (5)

Agroforestry systems have shown promising advantages in providing a number of key ecosys- tem services and many of them are directly linked with the soil compartment, such as fertility

PECSII- 2017 will advance from the momentum and insights gained during the PECS 2015.  Eighteen transdisciplinary projects and five cross-cutting working groups have been

The study site was selected because of its relevance for the production of multiple ecosystem services (agricultural production, carbon sequestration, cattle farming,

Households were categorised based on their functional characteristics, which included their orientation to produce coffee and state of coffee management whereas fields were

By using the same methodology, the alternatives were grouped into 3 different clusters (Figure 2): Cluster A for alternatives with complete or partial surface

– Synergy between local services (water and scenic beauty) – Biodiversity conservation contributes to local services (water) – Prioritizing carbon may not favor local services.

Barnaud, Cécile Drawing on ecosystem services thinking to highlight social interdependencies and foster collective