COMMENTS & FEEDBACK

(1)

(2)

Although this report was commissioned by the Department for Transport (DfT), the findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the DfT. The information or guidance in this document (including third party information, products and services), is provided by DfT on an ‘as is’ basis, without any representation or endorsement made and without warranty of any kind whether express or implied.

Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website www.dft.gov.uk

Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown.

You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail:

psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk.

Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.

COMMENTS & FEEDBACK

The UK Roads Liaison Group would welcome any comments and feedback on this Code of Practice, so that it may be reviewed, improved and refined to give the sector the best support possible.

If you wish to make a comment, or report any broken weblinks, please send an email to ukrlg@ciht.org.uk with the header, ‘Feedback on Well-managed Highway Infrastructure: A Code of Practice’.

(3)

i

WELL-MANAGED HIGHWAY

INFRASTRUCTURE: A CODE OF PRACTICE

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDATION 1 – USE OF THE CODE

This Code, in conjunction with the UKRLG Highway Infrastructure Asset Management Guidance, should be used as the starting point against which to develop, review and formally approve highway infrastructure maintenance policy and to identify and formally approve the nature and extent of any variations.

RECOMMENDATION 2 – ASSET MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

An Asset Management Framework should be developed and endorsed by senior decision makers. All activities outlined in the Framework should be documented.

(HIAMG Recommendation 1)

RECOMMENDATION 3 – ASSET MANAGEMENT POLICY AND STRATEGY

An asset management policy and a strategy should be developed and published.

These should align with the corporate vision and demonstrate the contribution asset management makes towards achieving this vision. (HIAMG Recommendation 3)

RECOMMENDATION 4 – ENGAGING AND COMMUNICATING WITH STAKEHOLDERS Relevant information should be actively communicated through engagement with relevant stakeholders in setting requirements, making decisions and reporting

performance. (Taken from HIAMG Recommendation 2)

RECOMMENDATION 5 – CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER AUTHORITIES

To ensure that users’ reasonable expectations for consistency are taken into account, the approach of other local and strategic highway and transport authorities,

especially those with integrated or adjoining networks, should be considered when developing highway infrastructure maintenance policies.

RECOMMENDATION 6– AN INTEGRATED NETWORK

The highway network should be considered as an integrated set of assets when developing highway infrastructure maintenance policies

RECOMMENDATION 7 – RISK BASED APPROACH

A risk based approach should be adopted for all aspects of highway infrastructure maintenance, including setting levels of service, inspections, responses, resilience, priorities and programmes.

RECOMMENDATION 8 – INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

Information to support a risk based approach to highway maintenance should be collected, managed and made available in ways that are sustainable, secure, meet any statutory obligations, and, where appropriate, facilitate transparency for network users.

(12)

x RECOMMENDATION 9 – NETWORK INVENTORY

A detailed inventory or register of highway assets, together with information on their scale, nature and use, should be maintained. The nature and extent of inventory collected should be fit for purpose and meet business needs. Where data or information held is considered sensitive, this should be managed in a security- minded way.

RECOMMENDATION 10 – ASSET DATA MANAGEMENT

The quality, currency, appropriateness and completeness of all data supporting asset management should be regularly reviewed. An asset register should be maintained that stores, manages and reports all relevant asset data.

RECOMMENDATION 11 – ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Asset management systems should be sustainable and able to support the

information required to enable asset management. Systems should be accessible to relevant staff and, where appropriate, support the provision of information for

stakeholders. (HIAMG Recommendation 12)

RECOMMENDATION 12 – NETWORK HIERARCHY

A network hierarchy, or a series of related hierarchies, should be defined which include all elements of the highway network, including carriageways, footways, cycle routes, structures, lighting and rights of way. The hierarchy should take into account current and expected use, resilience, and local economic and social factors such as industry, schools, hospitals and similar, as well as the desirability of continuity and of a consistent approach for walking and cycling.

RECOMMENDATION 13 – WHOLE LIFE / DESIGNING FOR MAINTENANCE

Authorities should take whole life costs into consideration when assessing options for maintenance, new and improved highway schemes. The future maintenance costs of such new infrastructure are therefore a prime consideration.

RECOMMENDATION 14 – RISK MANAGEMENT

The management of current and future risks associated with assets should be embedded within the approach to asset management. Strategic, tactical and operational risks should be included as should appropriate mitigation measures.

RECOMMENDATION 15 – COMPETENCIES AND TRAINING

The appropriate competency required for asset management should be identified, and training should be provided where necessary. (HIAMG Recommendation 10)

RECOMMENDATION 16 – INSPECTIONS

A risk-based inspection regime, including regular safety inspections, should be developed and implemented for all highway assets.

(13)

xi RECOMMENDATION 17 – CONDITION SURVEYS

An asset condition survey regime, based on asset management needs and any statutory reporting requirements, should be developed and implemented.

RECOMMENDATION 18 – MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND CLAIMS

Records should be kept of all activities, particularly safety and other inspections, including the time and nature of any response, and procedures established to ensure efficient management of claims whilst protecting the authority from unjustified or fraudulent claims.

RECOMMENDATION 19 – DEFECT REPAIR

A risk-based defect repair regime should be developed and implemented for all highway assets.

RECOMMENDATION 20 – RESILIENT NETWORK

Within the highway network hierarchy a 'Resilient Network' should be identified to which priority is given through maintenance and other measures to maintain economic activity and access to key services during extreme weather.

RECOMMENDATION 21 – CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION

The effects of extreme weather events on highway infrastructure assets should be risk assessed and ways to mitigate the impacts of the highest risks identified.

RECOMMENDATION 22 – DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE

Drainage assets should be maintained in good working order to reduce the threat and scale of flooding. Particular attention should be paid to locations known to be prone to problems, so that drainage systems operate close to their designed efficiency.

RECOMMENDATION 23 – CIVIL EMERGENCIES AND SEVERE WEATHER EMERGENCIES PLANS

The role and responsibilities of the Highway Authority in responding to civil emergencies should be defined in the authority’s Civil Emergency Plan. A Severe Weather Emergencies Plan should also be established in consultation with others, including emergency services, relevant authorities and agencies. It should include operational, resource and contingency plans and procedures to enable timely and effective action by the Highway Authority to mitigate the effects of severe weather on the network and provide the best practicable service in the circumstances.

RECOMMENDATION 24 – COMMUNICATIONS

Severe Weather and Civil Emergencies Plans should incorporate a communications plan to ensure that information including weather and flood forecasts are received through agreed channels and that information is disseminated to highway users through a range of media.

(14)

xii RECOMMENDATION 25 – LEARNING FROM EVENTS

Severe Weather and Civil Emergencies Plans should be regularly rehearsed and refined as necessary. The effectiveness of the Plans should be reviewed after actual events and the learning used to develop them as necessary.

RECOMMENDATION 26 – PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK A performance management framework should be developed that is clear and accessible to stakeholders as appropriate and supports the asset management

strategy. (HIAMG Recommendation 4)

RECOMMENDATION 27 – PERFORMANCE MONITORING

The performance of the Asset Management Framework should be monitored and reported. It should be reviewed regularly by senior decision makers and when

appropriate, improvement actions should be taken. (HIAMG Recommendation 13)

RECOMMENDATION 28 – FINANCIAL PLANS

Financial plans should be prepared for all highway maintenance activities covering short, medium and long term time horizons.

RECOMMENDATION 29 – LIFECYCLE PLANS

Lifecycle planning principles should be used to review the level of funding, support investment decisions and substantiate the need for appropriate and sustainable long

term investment. (HIAMG Recommendation 6)

RECOMMENDATION 30 – CROSS ASSET PRIORITIES

In developing priorities and programmes, consideration should be given to prioritising across asset groups as well as within them.

RECOMMENDATION 31 – WORKS PROGRAMMING

A prioritised forward works programme for a rolling period of three to five years should be developed and updated regularly. (HIAMG Recommendation 7)

RECOMMENDATION 32 – CARBON

The impact of highway infrastructure maintenance activities in terms of whole life carbon costs should be taken into account when determining appropriate

interventions, materials and treatments.

RECOMMENDATION 33 – CONSISTENCY WITH CHARACTER

Determination of materials, products and treatments for the highway network should take into account the character of the area as well as factoring in whole life costing and sustainability. The materials, products and treatments used for highway

maintenance should meet requirements for effectiveness and durability.

(15)

xiii RECOMMENDATION 34 – HERITAGE ASSETS

Authorities should identify a schedule of listed structures, ancient monuments and other relevant assets and work with relevant organisations to ensure that

maintenance reflects planning requirements.

RECOMMENDATION 35 – ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, NATURE CONSERVATION AND BIODIVERSITY

Materials, products and treatments for highway infrastructure maintenance should be appraised for environmental impact and for wider issues of sustainability. Highway verges, trees and landscaped areas should be managed with regard to their nature conservation value and biodiversity principles as well as whole-life costing, highway safety and serviceability.

RECOMMENDATION 36 – MINIMISING CLUTTER

Opportunities to simplify signs and other street furniture and to remove redundant items should be taken into account when planning highway infrastructure

maintenance activities.

(16)

xiv

(17)

1

WELL-MANAGED HIGHWAY

INFRASTRUCTURE

PART A. OVERARCHING

PRINCIPLES

(18)

2

(19)

3

SECTION A.1.

INTRODUCTION

A.1.1. PRINCIPLES AND CONTEXT OF THIS CODE

A.1.1.1. This document is the first edition of ‘Well-managed Highway Infrastructure’. It replaces Well-maintained Highways, Management of Highway Structures and Well-lit Highways.

A.1.1.2. The Code is intended to apply throughout the United Kingdom. Production has been overseen by the UK Roads Liaison Group (UKRLG) and its Roads, Bridges and Lighting Boards. It is recognised that there are differences in approach to some matters in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, which are not always detailed in the Code, but general principles are set out.

A.1.1.3. The Code is designed to promote the adoption of an integrated asset

management approach to highway infrastructure based on the establishment of local levels of service through risk-based assessment. It also includes guidance on some additional topics.

A.1.1.4. The Code is produced as a single document to emphasise the integrated approach to highway network infrastructure assets. Overarching matters are dealt with in Part A and additional asset specific matters in Parts B, C and D.

A.1.1.5. Delivery of a safe and well maintained highway network relies on good evidence and sound engineering judgement. The intention of this Code is that Authorities will develop their own levels of service and the Code therefore provides guidance for authorities to consider when developing their approach in accordance with local needs, priorities and affordability.

A.1.1.6. Changing from reliance on specific guidance and recommendations in the

previous Codes to a risk-based approach determined by each Highway Authority will involve appropriate analysis, development and gaining of approval through authorities’ executive processes. Some authorities may be able to implement a full risk-based approach immediately. Others may require more time and may choose to continue with existing practices for an interim period, in which case the previous Codes will remain valid for them until the earlier of when they have implemented their approach or a period of two years from the date of publication of this Code.

A.1.1.7. In the interest of route consistency for highway users, all authorities, including strategic, local, combined and those in alliances, are encouraged to collaborate in determining levels of service, especially across boundaries with neighbours responsible for strategic and local highway networks. Boundaries are not usually apparent to users and authorities should be aware of the possibility of distinct changes to levels of service through a risk-based local approach, both across authority boundaries and between roads with different character within an authority.

A.1.1.8. All Highway Authorities should consider adoption of new and emerging

technologies as part of their highway service. This should include consideration of new ideas, methods of working and innovation in order to drive greater efficiency.

(20)

4 A.1.1.9. References to third party documents and web sites are included throughout to

provide further information and support on various topics, but are not to be seen as part of the Code of Practice. References are to the version current at the time of this Code’s publication, unless otherwise indicated.

A.1.2. STATUS OF THE CODE

A.1.2.1. This Code of Practice is not statutory but provides Highway Authorities with guidance on highways management. Adoption of the recommendations within this document is a matter for each Highway Authority, based on their own legal interpretation, risks, needs and priorities.

A.1.3. GUIDANCE HIERARCHY

A.1.3.1. The UKRLG guidance hierarchy is shown in Figure 1. This diagram is updated from the UKRLG Highway Infrastructure Asset Management Guidance (HIAMG) to reflect this single Code replacing Well-maintained Highways, Well-lit Highways and Management of Highway Structures. It is intended that Part A of this Code should also apply to Management of Electronic Traffic Equipment.

Figure 1 – Hierarchy of Guidance

A.1.3.2. The HIAMG sets out the approach to asset management. This Code refers extensively to the HIAMG and is intended to be useful additional guidance.

Topics covered in the HIAMG are referred to, but not repeated in this Code.

Nothing in this Code supersedes the HIAMG, unless specifically stated.

A.1.3.3. The HIAMG sets out the activities that support asset management:

 the context of asset management;

 the asset management planning process; and

 enablers to support implementation of asset management.

(21)

5 A.1.3.4. In Scotland and Wales, the principles and recommendations of the HIAMG are

accepted, however, CSS Wales and the Society of Chief Officers of

Transportation in Scotland (CSSW/SCOTS) have jointly developed practical Asset Management Guidance for use in Scotland and Wales. Topics covered in the CSSW/SCOTS Asset Management Guidance are referred to, but not repeated in this Code. This Code is not intended to supersede the

CSSW/SCOTS Highway Asset Management Guidance, unless specifically stated.

A.1.4. TERMINOLOGY

A.1.4.1. For the purposes of this Code publicly understood definitions are used for the major parts of the highway. There are also differences in definitions across the various legal systems in the UK that would be inappropriate to repeat at length.

In such cases the English term is used. The main relevant definitions are:

 The term ‘highway’ is used to include ‘road’ and ‘street’.

 The term ‘authority’ is used to include all forms of national and local authorities having responsibility for highway infrastructure management.

 The term ‘carriageway’ is used for facilities used by motor vehicles.

 The term ‘footway’ is used for that part of a highway over which the public have a right of way on foot only, e.g. segregated surfaced paths used by pedestrians. ‘Footway’ includes the commonly understood use of the term

‘pavement’. The term ‘remote footway’ is used where a footway is not immediately adjoining a carriageway. The term ‘housing footway’ is used for those footways serving predominantly housing areas which may be

unadopted as public highways but have established public rights of access and may be maintained separately by the housing authority. Users will make no distinction and will consider the footway network as a whole.

 The term ‘footpath’ is used for the majority of Public Rights of Way (PROW).

 The term ‘cycle route’ is used as the collective term for facilities used by cyclists. These include cycle lanes on carriageways, cycle tracks adjacent to or away from carriageways, on carriageway provision with cycle symbols and shared use facilities.

A.1.4.2. Some supporting documents use industry terms. These are not used in the Code, but are referenced for completeness. The main items are:

 The industry term ‘running surface’ is used as the collective term for all hardened surfaces within the highway, including carriageways, footways and cycle routes.

 The industry term ‘pavement’ is used for the construction of running surfaces, particularly carriageways.

(22)

6

A.1.5. RELATED ACTIVITIES

A.1.5.1. There are a number of related functions that are not dealt with in detail by this Code, but which could affect and be affected by highway infrastructure

maintenance activity. They have the potential for value to be added through co- operation and co-ordination. Such functions include:

 network management, including implementation of the traffic management duty, or equivalent;

 highway development control, including securing funds associated with developer obligations;

 integrated street management, including cleansing; and

 town centre management, including use of public space.

A.1.6. MAINTENANCE PRACTICE

A.1.6.1. Maintenance types contribute in varying degrees to the core objectives of safety, customer service, serviceability and sustainability. Levels of service and delivery arrangements should be established having regard to these objectives and be focussed on outcomes, rather than on inputs mainly related to maintenance type.

A.1.6.2. The main types of maintenance are as follows:

 reactive – responding to inspections, complaints or emergencies;

 routine – regular schedule, generally for lamp replacement, patching,

cleaning, grass cutting and landscape maintenance, cleaning bridge drainage;

 programmed – flexibly planned schemes primarily of reconditioning or structural renewal;

 regulatory – inspecting and regulating the activities of others;

 Winter Service; and

 resilience and emergencies.

A.1.7. LIMITATIONS TO THE CODE OF PRACTICE

A.1.7.1. The Code is not intended as a detailed technical reference for all aspects of highway infrastructure maintenance or to repeat technical guidance available elsewhere. Areas referred to but not dealt with in detail include:

 highway improvement and new construction;

 network management, including management of utilities;

 management and maintenance of Public Rights of Way; and

 management of street cleansing.

(23)

7

A.1.8. FURTHER ADVICE AND GUIDANCE

A.1.8.1. The Highways Maintenance Efficiency Programme (HMEP) has developed a wide range of guidance on topics from asset management to procurement. This is available from the HMEP homepage or via the weblinks below.

Asset Management

 Highway Infrastructure Asset Management Guidance

 Asset Management E-learning Toolkit

 Guidance on the Management of Highways Drainage Assets

 Lifecycle Planning Toolkit, incorporating default carriageway deterioration models

 The Potholes Review

Collaboration & Change

 Maximising Client and Provider Collaboration in Highways Maintenance Services

 Local Highway Authorities Collaborative Alliance Toolkit

 Creating the Culture to Deliver Toolkit

 A LEAN Toolkit for Highway Services

 Shared Services Toolkit

Procurement, Contracting and Standardisation

 The Standard Form of Contract for Highways Maintenance Services

 Guidance on a Standard Specification and Standard Details for Local Highway Maintenance

 Procurement Route Choices Toolkit for Highways Maintenance Services

 Supply Chain Collaboration Toolkit

 Collaborative Contracting Strategy

A.1.8.2. Transport Scotland and SCOTS have developed a range of guidance on collaboration and service improvement:

 www.improvementservice.org.uk/roads-collaboration-programme.html

 https://khub.net/web/roads-collaboration-programme

 www.transportscotland.gov.uk

 http://www.improvementservice.org.uk/benchmarking/

(24)

8

 https://khub.net/web/scots-society-of-chief-officers-of-transportation-in- scotland-

A.1.8.3. The UKRLG carried out a study into the provision of design and maintenance guidance for Local Highway Authorities. Through consultation with local authority practitioners, the study identified examples of relevant good practice documents that have been produced around the UK. 48 examples of good practice documents collated from local authorities from across the UK can be found at the CIHT’s Transport Advice Portal.

A.1.8.4. The same study identified gaps in guidance and produced new guidance documents to address these gaps:

 Whole Life Costing for Option Appraisal of Maintenance Schemes for Local Authorities

 Provision of Road Restraint Systems on Local Highway Authority Roads

 Departures from Standards: Procedures for Local Highway Authorities

A.1.8.5. The Potholes Review, Prevention and a Better Cure makes 17 recommendations that will, if implemented, provide an improvement in highway maintenance and reduce the number of potholes occurring. There are three key messages:

prevention is better than cure; right first time for better repairs; clarity for the public.

A.1.8.6. Guidance on implementing disabled persons parking places in Scotland has been produced by SCOTS.

A.1.8.7. Planning for Walking has been published by the Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation.

A.1.8.8. Street Design for All, 2014, provides an update to advice and good practice.

A.1.8.9. Guidance on design for cycling may be found in the Department for Transport LTN2/08 Cycle infrastructure design (2008), the Welsh Government’s Active Travel Design Guidance (2014), and Transport for London’s “London Cycling Design Standards” (2014) which includes specific advice on designing for cyclists at roadworks.

A.1.8.10. In 2016, Sustrans published their Greenway management handbook, which provides guidance on how to manage traffic free cycle and walking routes or

‘greenways’ for the benefit of both people and wildlife.

A.1.8.11. Guidelines for Motorcycling has been published by the Institute of Highway Engineers.

A.1.8.12. SCOTS has published guidance on the management of tributes placed at the scene of road deaths.

(25)

9

SECTION A.2.

POLICY FRAMEWORK

A.2.1. USING THE CODE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ASSET MANAGEMENT POLICY

A.2.1.1. Asset management policy is dealt with in the UKRLG Highway Infrastructure Asset Management Guidance Document, Part B. This document should be referred to and the advice below considered supplementary.

A.2.1.2. Asset management is widely accepted as a means to deliver a more efficient and effective approach to management of highway infrastructure assets through longer term planning and ensuring that levels of service are defined and achievable for available budgets. It supports making the case for funding, for better communication with stakeholders, and facilitates a greater understanding of the contribution highway infrastructure assets make to economic growth and social well-being of local communities.

A.2.1.3. Authorities have certain legal obligations with which they need to comply, and which may be the subject of claims for loss or personal injury or of legal action by those seeking to establish non-compliance by authorities. It is recognised that in such cases, the Code may be considered to be a relevant consideration. Where authorities elect in the light of local circumstances to adopt policies or

approaches different from those suggested by the Code, it is essential that they are identified, together with the reasoning for such differences, be approved by the authority’s Executive and published.

RECOMMENDATION 1 – USE OF THE CODE

This Code, in conjunction with the UKRLG Highway Infrastructure Asset Management Guidance, should be used as the starting point against which to develop, review and formally approve highway infrastructure

maintenance policy and to identify and formally approve the nature and extent of any variations.

RECOMMENDATION 2 – ASSET MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

An Asset Management Framework should be developed and endorsed by senior decision makers. All activities outlined in the Framework should be documented. (HIAMG Recommendation 1) RECOMMENDATION 3 – ASSET MANAGEMENT POLICY AND STRATEGY An asset management policy and a strategy should be developed and published. These should align with the corporate vision and demonstrate the contribution asset management makes towards achieving this vision.

(HIAMG Recommendation 3) A.2.1.4. Authorities should also be conscious of HIAMG Recommendations 8, 9 and 14

(Leadership and Commitment, Making the Case for Asset Management and Benchmarking) in respect to asset management.

(26)

10

A.2.2. STAKEHOLDERS AND COMMUNICATION

A.2.2.1. Stakeholder expectations and the importance of good communications and liaison are dealt with in the UKRLG Highway Infrastructure Asset Management Guidance Document, Part A. This document should be referred to and the advice below considered supplementary.

A.2.2.2. Arrangements should be established to facilitate the involvement of all authority elected members, employees, contractors and agents in building commitment and pride in the highway maintenance service and maximising individual contributions to the process of continuous improvement.

A.2.2.3. Many aspects of the maintenance process are highly technical and may be difficult to explain, but it is important that legal duties and obligations are understood. Users’ concerns may tend to focus on the short term, more visible deficiencies in the network rather than the underlying less apparent problems.

CIHT has published a document Involving the Public and Other Stakeholders which provides guidance on this topic.

RECOMMENDATION 4 – ENGAGING AND COMMUNICATING WITH STAKEHOLDERS

Relevant information should be actively communicated through

engagement with relevant stakeholders in setting requirements, making decisions and reporting performance.

(Taken from HIAMG Recommendation 2)

A.2.3. OTHER AUTHORITIES

A.2.3.1. Consultation will be necessary with other local, combined and strategic Highway Authorities, especially adjoining authorities, as part of the duty to manage the network and to ensure that users’ reasonable requirements for consistency of service and integrated programming of works are considered and taken into account.

A.2.3.2. Responsibility for assets on authority boundaries, e.g. river bridges, should be agreed with adjoining authorities.

A.2.3.3. It may be appropriate for authorities to enter into agreements with adjacent or other authorities for certain aspects of service to be carried out by one authority on behalf of the other. Guidance on provision of shared services is provided by HMEP.

A.2.3.4. Consultation and coordination will also be required with utilities, public transport operators and other key stakeholders.

A.2.3.5. Consultation and agreements should be recorded.

RECOMMENDATION 5 – CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER AUTHORITIES To ensure that users’ reasonable expectations for consistency are taken into account, the approach of other local and strategic highway and transport authorities, especially those with integrated or adjoining

networks, should be considered when developing highway infrastructure maintenance policies.

(27)

11

A.2.4. INTEGRATED NETWORK MANAGEMENT

A.2.4.1. Highway infrastructure management policy needs to be developed integrally with the overall management of the network. Transport users, whatever their mode, do not distinguish between many categories of road, or types of work, whether maintenance or improvement. It is irrelevant to them who is undertaking the work, whether local authority, contractor or utility. They expect the network to be managed and maintained holistically to provide consistent and appropriate levels of service and the ability to change modes as easily as possible.

A.2.4.2. Planning for highway maintenance should take into account and add value to other elements of local transport policy and strategy wherever possible, including supporting economic growth, regeneration, public health, resilience, emergency services, walking and cycling, bus and freight partnerships, casualty reduction and prevention, travel planning, safer routes to school, and routes to stations and other interchange facilities.

A.2.4.3. Authorities should have regard to the totality of highway network management functions, including asset management, traffic management, parking and other regulatory functions.

A.2.4.4. Authorities should consider the needs of all road users, particularly vulnerable users, in planning and managing the network. This has special implications for maintenance, as when schemes are planned and programmed there may be an opportunity to incorporate added value to the safety, priority, integrity or quality of:

 footways and crossing facilities (particularly for vulnerable users);

 cycle routes and crossing facilities;

 riders of motorcycles;

 equestrians and crossing facilities;

 facilities for public transport and users (and also to influence reliability); and

 facilities for freight movement.

A.2.4.5. Planning and budgeting for highway maintenance should also recognise that integrated transport, especially in urban areas, is likely to result in a more complex and diverse streetscene. Good design may limit the scale of more complex signage, but a wider range of more expensive signs, road markings, coloured surfacing and other materials may be necessary for management.

When considering these features, authorities should take into account the potential cost of keeping this more complex arrangement in good order.

A.2.4.6. Policies, priorities and programmes for highway maintenance should have particular regard to the principles of sustainability.

A.2.4.7. When determining the balance between structural, preventative and reactive maintenance, the principle that “prevention is better than cure” should be adopted.

(28)

12 A.2.4.8. In areas where public transport is not regulated, routes of services may be less

predictable and vary more frequently. Close liaison with operators will be necessary if works are to be co-ordinated so as to minimise disruption to public transport users. Other forms of public transport, including light rail and guided bus schemes, bring their own challenges for maintenance, especially Winter Service.

A.2.4.9. Manual for Streets, 2007, provides guidance on effective street design where appropriate, for a range of practitioners involved in the planning, design, provision and approval of new residential streets and modifications to existing ones. Manual for Streets 2, 2010 explains how the principles can be applied more widely. In Scotland, the relevant document is Designing Streets.

A.2.4.10. It may be appropriate for authorities to develop a series of related policies for specific assets or for specific activities, e.g.:

 highways;

 footways;

 cycle routes;

 structures;

 lighting;

 trees;

 designing for maintenance;

 skidding resistance; and

 sustainability.

RECOMMENDATION 6– AN INTEGRATED NETWORK

The highway network should be considered as an integrated set of assets when developing highway infrastructure maintenance policies.

A.2.5. RISK BASED APPROACH

A.2.5.1. Authorities should adopt a risk-based approach and a risk management regime for all aspects of highway maintenance policy. This will include investment, setting levels of service, operations, including safety and condition inspections, and determining repair priorities and replacement programmes. It should be undertaken against a clear and comprehensive understanding and assessment of the likelihood of asset failure and the consequences involved.

A.2.5.2. There are no prescriptive or minimum standards in this Code. Adoption of a risk based approach, taking account of the advice in the Code, will enable authorities to establish and implement levels of service appropriate to their circumstances.

RECOMMENDATION 7 – RISK BASED APPROACH

A risk based approach should be adopted for all aspects of highway

infrastructure maintenance, including setting levels of service, inspections, responses, resilience, priorities and programmes.

(29)

13

A.2.6. SECURITY MINDED APPROACH

A.2.6.1. Authorities should adopt a security-minded approach to their assets, information and people through understanding and routine application of appropriate and proportionate security measures to deter and/or disrupt hostile, malicious, fraudulent and criminal behaviours or activities. To support such an approach, the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure has published Passport to Good Security.

A.2.7. INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

A.2.7.1. Information is fundamental to the development of infrastructure maintenance policy and to the ability to communicate effectively with stakeholders. Effective and sustainable management of that information, which is likely to arise from many sources, and the distribution of that information to stakeholders and network users is crucial.

A.2.7.2. A risk-based approach to highway maintenance needs to be founded on information that is sufficiently robust to enable decisions on levels of service to be taken and reviewed over time.

A.2.7.3. Records of construction and maintenance treatments should be kept to inform lifecycle plans. Information on mobile electronic devices used by maintenance practitioners in the field can support their decision making and reporting of asset condition and defects in real time.

A.2.7.4. Authorities should be aware of the need to identify and protect information which could impact on the safety and security of individuals, sensitive assets and systems and the benefits which the sensitive asset or system exist to deliver, through the adoption of a security-minded approach to the handling and management of data and information.

A.2.7.5. From time to time, governments may require specific information to be reported, either to themselves or publicly, e.g. on authorities’ websites, and authorities’

information systems should facilitate this.

A.2.7.6. The Building Information Modelling (BIM) approach, sometimes known as Better Information Management, is being introduced into the construction industry. It involves supply chain collaboration in the creation and use of intelligent three- dimensional models and accompanying data and information to drive efficiency, aid communication and facilitate better management of assets over their

lifecycle. The Department for Transport and UKRLG have produced BIM Guidance for Infrastructure Bodies.

A.2.7.7. The British Standards Institution has published a series of Standards: BS 1192:2007, PAS 1192-2:2013, PAS 1192-3:2014, BS 1192-4:2014, PAS 1192- 5:2015 and BS 8536-1:2015.

RECOMMENDATION 8 – INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

Information to support a risk-based approach to highway maintenance should be collected, managed and made available in ways that are sustainable, secure, meet any statutory obligations, and, where appropriate, facilitate transparency for network users.

(30)

14

SECTION A.3.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK

A.3.1. GENERAL AND SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS

A.3.1.1. General duties and powers are dealt with in this Part of the Code. Duties and powers related to specific assets, e.g. highways, structures and lighting, are dealt with in the relevant parts of the Code.

A.3.1.2. Much of highway infrastructure maintenance activity is based upon statutory powers and duties contained in legislation and precedents developed over time as a result of claims and legal proceedings. Some important aspects of these statutory powers and duties are noted in this section. The UK Highway Liability Joint Task Group has developed guidance on Highway Risk and Liability Claims.

A.3.1.3. All those involved in highway maintenance, including members of authorities, should have a clear understanding of their duties and powers, their implications, and the procedures used to manage and mitigate risk.

A.3.1.4. Specific legislation mentioned is generally that for England. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland often have equivalent or similar legislation and the phrase ‘or equivalent’ following mention of an Act of Parliament is intended to refer to these.

Nothing in or omitted from this Code can, of course, supersede the law.

A.3.2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Duty of Care

A.3.2.1. There are many specific duties and powers, but even in the absence of specific duties and powers, authorities have a general duty of care to users and the community to maintain the highway in a condition fit for its purpose. This

principle should be applied to all decisions affecting policy, priority, programming and implementation of highway maintenance works.

Health and Safety

A.3.2.2. The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, or equivalent, together with the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015, or equivalent, provide for a requirement for highway, traffic and street authorities to carry out work in a safe manner and establish arrangements for the management of construction works.

A.3.2.3. All those involved in the planning, management and delivery of highway

infrastructure maintenance services should receive training and regular updating, as necessary, in health and safety requirements of the service.

Localism

A.3.2.4. The Localism Act 2011 predominantly applies to England and confers on local authorities the power, with certain limitations, to do anything that individuals generally may do for the benefit of the authority, its area, or persons resident or present in its area. It also introduced measures such as the community right to challenge.

(31)

15 Best Value

A.3.2.5. The Local Government Act 2000, or equivalent, provides for the general duty of best value and aims to improve local services in terms of both cost and quality.

Duties and Powers for Highway Maintenance

A.3.2.6. There are a number of specific pieces of legislation that provide the basis for duties and powers relating to highway maintenance.

Main Highways Provisions

A.3.2.7. The Highways Act 1980, or equivalent, sets out the main duties and powers of Highway Authorities. In particular it imposes a duty to maintain highways maintainable at public expense. Almost all claims against authorities relating to highway functions arise from alleged breach of this section.

A.3.2.8. The Act provides a defence against action relating to alleged failure to maintain on grounds that the authority has taken such care as in all the circumstances was reasonably required to secure that the part of the highway in question was not dangerous for traffic. A key difference in Scotland is that there is no

equivalent defence against alleged failure to maintain, although case law will have established some basis for this.

A.3.2.9. Where an authority exercises a power to install new infrastructure, e.g. lighting, safety barriers, etc, it will become responsible for its maintenance.

Winter Service

A.3.2.10. The Highways Act 1980, or equivalent, and the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003 in England set out duties for Winter Service.

Traffic Management

A.3.2.11. The Traffic Management Act 2004, or equivalent, sets out a number of provisions including Highways England Traffic Officers, local authority duty for network management, permits for work on the highway, increased control of utility works, and increased civil enforcement of traffic offences.

A.3.2.12. The Act establishes a duty for local traffic authorities ‘to manage their road network with a view to achieving, so far as may be reasonably practicable having regard to their other obligations and policies, to secure the expeditious

movement of traffic on the authority’s road network, and to facilitate the

expeditious movement of traffic on road networks for which another authority is the traffic authority’. The term ‘traffic’ specifically includes pedestrians, so the duty requires the authority to consider all road users.

A.3.2.13. The duty is not limited to the actions of the department responsible for traffic within an authority, so authorities will need to consider the duty when exercising their powers under any legislation where this impacts on the operation of the road network. Authorities are required to appoint a Traffic Manager to administer the network management duty. Authorities are expected to operate the Act even- handedly, applying conditions and enforcement activity equally to their own and utilities works.

(32)

16 Utility Companies

A.3.2.14. Various companies and agencies have statutory powers and obligations to work in the highway. Their activity in the highway is regulated by the New Roads and Streetworks Act 1991, or equivalent, and by the Traffic Management Act 2004, or equivalent.

Public Rights Of Way

A.3.2.15. Responsibilities for Public Rights of Way (PROW) (Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 in England) vary considerably throughout the UK, but in general authorities are required to maintain records and ensure that ways are adequately signposted, maintained and free from obstruction. In urban areas PROW can present wider problems relating to issues such as crime. Certain legislation can facilitate closure of rights of way where deemed appropriate.

Related Powers and Duties

A.3.2.16. Duties and powers contained in the Highways Act, or equivalent, sit within a much broader legislative framework specifying a wider range of duties and powers. These include, or equivalents:

 New Roads and Street Works Act 1991;

 Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984;

 Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016;

 Road Traffic Act 1988 – provides a duty for Highway Authorities to promote road safety, including a requirement to undertake accident studies and take such measures as appear appropriate to prevent such accidents occurring;

 Road Traffic Reduction Act 1997;

 Flood and Water Management Act 2012 or equivalent Flood Risk

Management (Scotland) Act 2009 – aims to reduce the flood risk associated with extreme weather. Provides for better, more comprehensive management of flood risk for people, homes and businesses;

 Transport Act 2000 – designation of quiet lanes or a home zones;

 Active Travel Act (Wales) 2013 – legislates for the provision of routes designed for cycling and walking;

 Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 – environmental and countryside issues with which highways operations must comply;

 Environmental Protection Act 1990 – provides the statutory basis for other environmental issues, in particular waste management, with which highway maintenance operations must comply; and

 Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005.

(33)

17 A.3.2.17. There is also a framework of legislation not specifically related to highways

functions, but dealing with wider community issues with which the services are involved. These include, or equivalents:

 Equality Act 2010;

 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994;

 Human Rights Act 1998;

 Freedom of Information Act 2000;

 Local Government Acts; and

 Civil Contingencies Act 2004.

(34)

18

SECTION A.4.

STRATEGY AND HIERARCHY

A.4.1. HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

A.4.1.1. Development of a highway infrastructure asset management strategy is dealt with in the UKRLG Highway Infrastructure Asset Management Guidance (HIAMG), Part B. This document should be referred to and the advice below considered supplementary.

A.4.1.2. The asset management strategy sets out how the asset management policy is to be achieved, how long term objectives for managing the highway are to be met and how the strategy is to be implemented, including setting targets and

measuring performance. It sets clear direction, provides links with other relevant documents, such as corporate plans, and sets out the benefits of investing in the highway infrastructure. It should be a clear, public-facing message.

A.4.1.3. The core objectives for maintenance could be considered to be:

Network Safety complying with statutory obligations; and

meeting users’ needs for safety.

Customer Service user experience/satisfaction;

communication;

information; and levels of service.

Network Serviceability ensuring availability;

achieving integrity;

maintaining reliability;

resilience; and managing condition.

(35)

19 Network Sustainability minimising cost over time;

maximising value to the community; and

maximising environmental contribution.

A.4.1.4. The Customer Service objective will apply to the highway service overall, as users may not be able easily to distinguish between maintenance and improvement works. Management of highway infrastructure assets affects Customer Service through a variety of factors within each of Network Safety, Network Serviceability and Network Sustainability.

A.4.1.5. Each of the Network objectives can be affected to a different extent by several different highway maintenance operations. For example:

 network availability can be affected by weight restricted structures, resilience of improvement and maintenance works, Winter Service, regulatory activity, deficiency of drainage systems and by planning and programming of

maintenance schemes;

 network integrity can be assisted by consistent, joined up and effective permanent and temporary signing, by ensuring consistent standards of maintenance on cycle routes between segregated and non-segregated sections, and providing consistent accessibility standards, for example through the use of dropped kerbs on key pedestrian routes, especially those used by disabled people, older people, or those using prams; and

 environmental contributions can be made through verge management plans, maintaining local distinctiveness through use of local materials, reducing sign clutter, use of recycled products, noise-reducing surfacing, energy efficient light sources, and profiled street lighting levels.

A.4.1.6. Every aspect of maintenance for each element of the highway infrastructure has the potential to contribute to some extent to a number of the above objectives.

For example, the contribution to the safety objective is affected by:

 the condition of the asset;

 the resilience of the asset;

 the time for attending to defects recorded in inspections and reported by users;

 the quality of management and service delivery;

 the effectiveness of materials and treatments used; and

 the effective co-ordination of programmes with works affecting the highway by utilities, developers or other local authorities.

(36)

20 A.4.1.7. Particular aspects of highway maintenance may have wider impacts than the

immediate local implementation issues. For example, the need to address carriageway defects could compromise, at least temporarily, public transport convenience and reliability. Work at night to minimise disruption may have noise and cost implications, and bridge works may require lengthy diversions.

Arrangements should be put in place to identify the potential for such conflicts at an early stage, to resolve them, and to mitigate the effects as effectively as possible.

A.4.1.8. Users will expect reasonable continuity of safety and serviceability with

neighbouring Highway Authorities, particularly at the higher end of the network hierarchy and with services such as Winter Service, but also at the lower levels of hierarchy where safety is a prime consideration. In such cases, serious discontinuities in levels of service should be avoided through consultation and agreement. The Code of Practice for the Co-ordination of Street Works and Works for Road Purposes and Related Matters published to support the Traffic Management Act provides specific advice on this.

A.4.1.9. Inter-authority co-ordination, at both the strategic and operational level, can bring other benefits in terms of cost and resource management, levels of service and user perception. Opportunities for such co-operation include:

 integrated route management;

 optimisation of cross boundary service provision;

 optimised programming and procurement;

 shared traffic management and publicity;

 avoidance of multiple user delays; and

 research, development and innovation.

A.4.1.10. The Department for Transport commissioned a research project on highway service levels, focusing on getting an improved understanding, in qualitative terms, of the levels of service the public expects for the surface of carriageways, cycle routes and footways.

A.4.2. NETWORK INVENTORY

Asset Data

A.4.2.1. Asset data is dealt with in the UKRLG Highway Infrastructure Asset Management Guidance, Part B. This document should be referred to and the advice below considered supplementary.

A.4.2.2. Highway Authorities have a legal duty to keep a register containing such

information as may be prescribed with respect to maps and statements of roads that are maintainable at public expense, which is primarily used for Land Charge Searches.

A.4.2.3. There is also a requirement to maintain information for the purpose of:

COMMENTS & FEEDBACK

COMMENTS & FEEDBACK

WELL-MANAGED HIGHWAY

INFRASTRUCTURE: A CODE OF PRACTICE

CONTENTS

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

WELL-MANAGED HIGHWAY

INFRASTRUCTURE

PART A. OVERARCHING

PRINCIPLES

SECTION A.1.

INTRODUCTION

A.1.1. PRINCIPLES AND CONTEXT OF THIS CODE

A.1.2. STATUS OF THE CODE

A.1.3. GUIDANCE HIERARCHY

A.1.4. TERMINOLOGY

A.1.5. RELATED ACTIVITIES

A.1.6. MAINTENANCE PRACTICE

A.1.7. LIMITATIONS TO THE CODE OF PRACTICE

A.1.8. FURTHER ADVICE AND GUIDANCE

SECTION A.2.

POLICY FRAMEWORK

A.2.1. USING THE CODE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ASSET MANAGEMENT POLICY

A.2.2. STAKEHOLDERS AND COMMUNICATION

A.2.3. OTHER AUTHORITIES

A.2.4. INTEGRATED NETWORK MANAGEMENT

A.2.5. RISK BASED APPROACH

A.2.6. SECURITY MINDED APPROACH

A.2.7. INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

SECTION A.3.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK

A.3.1. GENERAL AND SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS

A.3.2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

SECTION A.4.

STRATEGY AND HIERARCHY

A.4.1. HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

A.4.2. NETWORK INVENTORY