Programme ARGAGE 2021/ ARGAGE 2021 Program

(1)

Programme ARGAGE 2021/ ARGAGE 2021 Program

MERCREDI 10 NOVEMBRE 2021, MATINEE / WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2021, MORNING 08:45-09:15

09:15-09:20 09:20-09:30

ENREGISTREMENT / REGISTRATION ACCUEIL – salle RE48 / WELCOME – room RE48

Mot du Décanat – Prof Elena Smirnova, Vice-doyenne / A word from the deanship – Pr. Elena Smirnova, Vice-dean 09:30-10:30 Conférence plénière – salle RE48 / Keynote lecture – room RE48

Marcin Lewiński, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentation

10:30-11:00 PAUSE-CAFÉ / COFFEE BREAK

SALLE/ROOM RE48 RE46 RE42

CONFÉRENCES INDIVIDUELLES /

INDIVIDUAL TALKS PANEL PANEL

11:00-11:30 Yeliz Demir and Jos M. A. Hornikx. What Kind of Evidence Is Most Persuasive to Turkish University Students? A Study on the Effect of Evidence Type and Evidence Quality on Persuasiveness

Oral Argumentation of Elementary School Children – Practices, Competences, Multimodality, Methods

1. Vivien Heller and Nora Schönfelder. A Developmental Perspective on Gaze and Multimodal Stands Displays in Children’s Argumentations

2. Martin Luginbühl, Tamara Koch, Daniel Müller-Feldmeth, Chantal Wanderon.

Analyzing Argumentative Episodes With and Without Explicit Descent of Elementary School Children: Sequential Organizations and Structures

3. Judith Kreuz and Nina Gregori.

Practices of Oral Argumentation in the Class Council

Argumentation et motifs modaux au-delà des frontières linguistiques et génériques 1. Claudia Ricci. L’extraction systématique des motifs modaux : étapes et choix méthodologiques

2. Aylin Pamuksaç et Linda Sanvido. Les motifs modaux dans les constructions argumentatives de la finalité et de la concession : étude des paramètres de variation

3. Cyrielle Montrichard et Corinne Rossari.

Proximité ou éloignement des domaines modaux en relation avec la concession et la finalité

11:30-12:00 Jennifer Schumann. Do People Spot the Disagreement in Straw Man Fallacies? An Experimental Approach

12:00-12:30 Annette Hautli-Janisz, Katarzyna Budzynska and Chris Reed. What Is Too Much

Implicitness in Argumentation?

12:30-13:00 Didier Maillat. Debunking Misinformation: A Pragmatic Theory of Nudging

13:00-14:30 REPAS / MEAL

Le Romarin, Rue de la Maladière 62

(2)

MERCREDI 10 NOVEMBRE 2021, APRES-MIDI / WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2021, AFTERNOON

CONFÉRENCES INDIVIDUELLES / INDIVIDUAL TALKS

14:30-15:00 Céline Schöpfer. L’esprit critique comme rejet de l’argument d’autorité… vraiment ?

Christoph Lumer. Argument Schemes, Argument Types – A Critique and a Proposal

Kati Hannken-Illjes and Elisabeth

Kleschatzky. Argumentation in Antenatal Care Consultations: How It Starts.

15:00-15:30 Diane Liberatore. Être de mauvaise foi : une stratégie argumentative moins « mauvaise » qu’il n’y paraît

Brooke Stanley and Michael Hoppmann.

Incel Argumentation: Identifying Argument Schemes in Online Fringe Groups

Jarmila Bubikova-Moan and Margareth Sandvik. Multimodal Claim-Making: A Digital Literacy Project in Primary School 15:30-16:00 Corentin Denuc. Lexique et schémas

argumentatifs - L’exemple des mots terroriste et résistant

Alaric Kohler. From Misunderstanding to a Better Understanding: How to Describe Multiple Points of View on a Question

Damien Nzamickale. Discussions de la dot chez les Bapunu du Gabon : contribution à une étude de l'interaction argumentative 16:00-16:30 Justine Simon. Quand l’interdiscursivité et la

narrativité se mettent au service de l’argumentativité. Analyse des tweets intericoniques s’opposant à la LPPR / LPR

Katarzyna Budzynska and Rory Duthie.

Natural Language Appeals to Ethos in Political Discourse

17:00-18:00 Conférence plénière – salle R48 / Keynote lecture – room R48

Andrea Rocci, Université de la Suisse italienne (USI)

Beyond But. Concession and Counterargument from Discourse Structure to Inference

18:00-19:30 Apéritif convivial / Friendly reception

Salon rouge, Espace Gilbert Facchhinetti, Maladière

(3)

JEUDI 11 NOVEMBRE 2021, MATINEE / THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2021, MORNING

Henrike Jansen, University of Leiden (NL)

Finding the Argumentative Pattern of an “I’m Not Stupid” Argument: The Importance of Naturally Occurring Data

INDIVIDUAL TALKS PANEL PANEL

10:30-11:00 Daniel Weiss. The Pancake Analogy: A Spotlight on Russian Political Cuisine

La médiatisation discursive et ses impacts argumentatifs : les peuples indigènes mis en lumière

1. Ana Lúcia Tinoco Cabral. Les indigènes par eux-mêmes dans la Covid-19 :

l’argumentation d’une identité 2. Rosalice Pinto. Schématisation et Stéréotypes : pour une re(construction) argumentative des représentations de la communauté indigène brésilienne.

3. Maria das Graças Soares Rodrigues. La polarisation des points de vue vis-à-vis du vaccin contre la covid-19 chez des

indigènes brésiliens

Dimitris Serafis and Stavros

Assimakopoulos. Beyond Language in Argumentation: Multimodal Perspectives on Public Discourses and Discrimination 1. Jens Elmelund Kjeldsen. Can View Be Argumentative – And How Can We Study This? Press Photographic

Representations of Immigrants in Immigration Crisis?

2. Dimitris Serafis. Arguing Against (?) Hate Speech: Multimodal Argumentation in the Video This Is Racism

3. Stavros Assimakopoulos and Anna Piata. The Argumentative Dynamics of Visual Metaphor: Framing the “Refugee Crisis” in Political Cartoons in Greece 11:00-11:30 Sara Greco, Chiara Mercuri, Barbara De

Cock and Rebecca Schär. Victims or Agents for Change? Argumentative Strategies Related to Women’s Discursive Representations in the Social Media Debate Surrounding Sustainable Fashion

11:30-12:00 Michał B. Paradowski and Marta

Gawinkowska. (Some) Swearwords Non- Trivially Change Their Offensiveness in Translation

12:00-12:30

12:30-14:00 REPAS / MEAL

Le Romarin, Rue de la Maladière 62

(4)

JEUDI 11 NOVEMBRE 2021, APRES-MIDI / THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2021, AFTERNOON

14:00-14:30 Sülün Aykurt-Buchwalter. Les modalités à travers l’argumentation. Une analyse contrastive de productions écrites en français et en turc

Jérôme Jacquin. The Argumentative Orientation of French Verbs of Appearance in a Contrastive Corpus of Political

Debates and Work Meetings

Ton van Haaften and Maarten van Leeuwen. The Identification and Analysis of Argumentative Strategies: Integrating Insights From Argumentation Theory and Linguistic Stylistics

14:30-15:00 Sara Cigada. Les émotions dites dans le discours des médiateurs

Christian Geddo and Johanna

Miecznikowski. Argument Schemes as Tools of Semantic Analysis.

Reconstructing Evidential Arguments Referring to Sensory Perception

Jean H.M. Wagemans. Reformulating Natural Arguments Into Their Canonical Form

15:00-15:30 Michel Dufour. Is O. Ducrot’s ‘Negation Law’

Fallacious?

Elena Battaglia. On the Relation Between Evidentiality and Argumentation: Sources of Knowledge as Arguments in

Conversation

Martin Hinton. An Informal Argument Pragmatics – Evaluating Argumentation Processes

15:30-16:00 Franziska Maria Keller. Markers of

Epistemic Modality in Argumentative Texts

Martín Pereira-Fariña, Katarzyna Budzynska and Marcin Koszowy.

Discursive Strategies for Arguing About Contested Cultural Objects: A

Comparative Empirical Approach

Chris Reed, University of Dundee (GB)

Arguments in Dialogue: Structure, Annotation and Mining

19:30 Souper de conférence (optionnel, sur inscription) / Conference dinner (optional, upon registration)

(5)

VENDREDI 12 NOVEMBRE 2021, MATINEE / FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2021, MORNING

10:00-10:30 CAFÉ DU MATIN / MORNING COFFEE

INDIVIDUAL TALKS PANEL

10:30-11:00 Daniel De Oliveira Fernandes and Steve Oswald. Implicit Meaning in Argumentation:

Functions, Uses and Norms

Margherita Luciani and Josephine

Convertini. Patients and Psychotherapists Using Concessive Counter Argumentation:

Reframing Dysfunctional Premises

Gestes discursifs du savoir

1. Sémir Badir. Gestes du discours philosophique

2. Malika Temmar. Le philosophe et ses gestes : éléments d’analyse du « sujet philosophant »

3. Ingrid Mayeur. Attester

(personnellement) d’une activité de recherche dans les blogs en SHS : témoigner et prendre à témoin 11:00-11:30 Álvaro Domínguez Armas and Andrés Soria

Ruiz. Provocative Insinuations

Laura Nadal. Counter-Argumentation, Plausibility, and Processing: An Experimental Study on the Italian Connective Tuttavia

11:30-12:00 Guillaume Bessis and Alda Mari. Genericity and Performativity

Rudi Palmieri, Andrea Rocci and Jose Alfonso Lomeli Hernandez. Arguing by Questioning Across Different Institutional Contexts: A Comparative Study of Questions in Political Press Conferences and Financial Earnings Conference Calls 12:00-12:30 Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria. Le reframing

dans la médiation des conflits : une étude argumentative

Elisa Angiolini, Josephine Convertini and Antonio Iannaccone. The Role of

Argumentation in Children’s Joint Activities

12:30-13:00 MOTS DE CLÔTURE – salle RE48 / FINAL ANNOUNCEMENTS – room RE48