• Aucun résultat trouvé

Contract-based safety verification for autonomous driving

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Contract-based safety verification for autonomous driving"

Copied!
83
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 1-1: The network shows the Manhattan street grid. We verified a part of Manhattan consisting of ca
Figure 3-1: Consider the library ℳ = {
Figure 3-2: (a) The exact Minkowski swept volume between the ego-car and another vehicle, which represents configurations in collision, is shown
Figure 3-3: The dynamic obstacles (black) and the drivable space (grey) are shown for time
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

Consider a safe state xκ at time tκ = κτ , a desired system control uκdes and assume that all new vehicles enter the supervision area safely with a margin τ.. Note that this

Such environment enables the verification of both (i) prop1 , equivalent to the “transformability” of the input model (w.r.t the transformation intent) and (ii) prop2 , equivalent

Keywords: Statistical Model Checking, Simulation, Autonomous Vehicle, Controller.. Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) address the numerous challenges faced by the design of

Automatic method. From the same model Collision_SI the automatic method returns three strategies. For example, our strategy makes use of the two defined interventions brake_base

In the MIRAS study, after the first iteration (coming after a preliminary risk estimation only considering hazard severity), each hazard and possible recommendations were proposed

Un nouveau modèle sportif, la Kadett GT/E avec moteur 1,8 à injection électronique, est exposé pour la première fois à Genève et sera livrable dès cet été dans notre pays..

We built upon the TIOA framework a formal contract-based theory and we established composi- tionality results that allow reasoning with contracts for the satisfaction of timed

If the owner fails to give car access to the con- sumer after they have made the deposit, Algorithm 3 depicts how the owner is penalized for committing a fraudulent action as SC 2