• Aucun résultat trouvé

Part 2. Scalification

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Part 2. Scalification"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

54

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

|

Vol 57: January • JanVIEr 2011

Praxis | Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Series

O

nce a complaint (eg, depression, anxiety, loneliness) has been “goalified”1 (eg, happiness, calmness, com- munity), the next step is “scalification.”

Scalification is most easily defined with an example:

Accountability is the primary purpose of scalifying (eg, patient-to-self, patient-to-doctor, and doctor-to-patient).

The main application of scalification is for those psycho- logical interventions with a medium level of formality—

not likely to be a “one-off,” but not likely to be full-on

“psychotherapy” either. One-offs don’t need scales, and formal psychotherapy lacks credibility without more for- mal psychometry (eg, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory).

Scalification continues with a “why-not-worse” ques- tion to reinforce the patient’s locus of control:

The final component in scalifying is a “how-make- better” question:

The “how-make-better” question might have to be repeated: it’s not uncommon for the patient to slip back into “complaint mode” at this time. Sometimes even re- goalifying is required:

The doctor ends with a behavioural prescription—which is ideally recorded in the chart.

An excellent opening question on follow-up is as follows:

If there was good adherence and a good outcome, make sure you point out the correlation. If the link seems causal, say so. Many chronic patients have erro- neously concluded that mood is randomly determined.

To us causal connections are obvious, but to those with

“learned helplessness” they are not.

In the common scenario of poor adherence and a poor outcome, linger awhile. It’s vitally important that patients learn from natural consequences. Consider ask- ing a question like “What do you make of that?” and pausing. Diving in too early with anesthetizing empathy can impair learning, and in the long run can be iatro- genic (this issue will be addressed in greater depth in a future article).

In the unfortunate scenario of good adherence and poor outcome, begin with a good dose of empathy.

Emphasize that efforts are essential even without a 100% guarantee of mood improvement. Discuss lag effects (if appropriate). Collaboratively explore whether another experiment with the same behavioural pre- scription is warranted, and tweak as required.

Scalification is both a measurement tool and an inter- vention with an important role in psychological situa- tions with medium formality.

Dr Dubord teaches cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Toronto. In this series of Praxis articles, he outlines the core principles and practices of medical CBT, his adaptation of orthodox CBT for primary care.

acknowledgment

I thank the following CBT Blue 2010 participants for their helpful critique of this paper: Dr Chuck Adamson, Dr Ray Bouchard, and Dr Sandra Wismer.

Correspondence

Greg Dubord, e-mail [email protected] reference

1. Dubord G. Part 1. Goalification. Can Fam Physician 2010;56:1312.

Next month: The Reward Chart

Part 2. Scalification

Greg Dubord

MD

Pt: Doc, I’m so depressed [elaborates].

Dr: [Accurate empathic statement, then goalifying] It sounds like your goal is to make yourself happier. Have I got that right?

Pt: [Responding rapidly] Yes, I guess you could say that.

Dr: [Scalifying] OK, well let’s imagine a 0-to-10 scale of happiness, where 0 was your most depressed, and 10 was your happiest. Where are you along that scale today?

Dr: Sorry to interrupt, but when you say you’re so depressed, you’re also saying that happiness is your goal, right?

Dr: [Empathy, then …] You say 3. What are some of things you’re doing to keep it from being a 2?

Dr: What are you willing to commit to [or experiment with]

doing to try to make it a 4 between now and our next appointment?

Dr: Last time we agreed that you have a goal of happiness, and you said you were 3 on a 0-to-10 scale. You were doing A and B to keep it from getting worse, and said you’d try doing C and D to try to make it better. Where are you on our happiness scale today?

Références

Documents relatifs

On a des fonctions pour lire (un octet ou une ligne de texte ou tout ce qui reste à lire) ou écrire (un octet ou un texte)3. L’accès est par défaut séquentiel : il faut imaginer

Problème corrigé par Microsoft au niveau du système, en proposant deux modes d’ouverture des fichiers (pour chaque mode déjà existant) : Mode binaire Lit (resp. écrit) exactement

The boot record program uses this data to determine the drive being booted from and the location of the partition on the disk. If no active partition table enty is found,

The main operational hypothesis proposed here suggests that by increasing the number of involved actors, the difficulties and obstacles affecting the cooperation (for

Develop a matlab code to deal with the supervised classification problem while using the Nearest Neighbour algorithm associated to the Frechet distance2. Can you find a drawback to

The content of the Code includes procedural rights and duties (e.g. right to fair and impartial treatment, right to be heard, access to file, duty to state reasons), substantive

In two experiments (N=80 each), inducing empathy by means of a text (Study 1) or a video clip (Study 2) prior to playing a video game caused differential effects on cognitions

5.1 LIGHT SCATTERING FROM HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT P-4BCMU SOLUTIONS IN TOLUENE AT ROOM TEMPERATURE. The corresponding critical