R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
G IORGIO B USETTO F RANCO N APOLITANI
On some questions concerning permutable subgroups of finitely generated groups and projectivities of perfect groups
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 87 (1992), p. 303-305
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1992__87__303_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1992, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
On Some Questions Concerning Permutable Subgroups
of Finitely Generated Groups and Projectivities
of Perfect Groups.
GIORGIO BUSETTO - FRANCO NAPOLITANI
(*)
A
subgroup
H of a group G is calledpermutacble (or quasinormal)
inG if HK = KH for every
subgroup
K of G.Let G be a
finitely generated
group and Hpermutable subgroup
ofG with trivial core
HG .
In[2] (see
also[3],
p.217),
thefollowing
ques- tions areposed:
Is H
finite?
Is H contained in thehypercentre of
G?The aim of this note is to show the existence of a
finitely generated
p-group G
containing
apermutable subgroup
H such thatH/HG
is infi-nite and not contained in the
hypercentre
of Thus the answer tothe
questions
stated above isnegative. Moreover,
the group G is per- fect and there exists anautoprojectivity
ofG, namely
anautomorphism
of its lattice of
subgroups,
notpreserving
normalsubgroups.
This ob-servation allows us to solve a
problem
raised in a natural way when M.Suzuki
[6,
Theorem15,
p.51]
showed that in the case of finiteperfect
groups
projectivities
preservenormality, namely
if thisproperty
holdswithout the
hypothesis
that the group is finite.In our
argument
extended Tarski p-groups ofexponent p n,
forn ;
3,
are considered[5].
We recall that a group G is an extended Tars- ki p-group ifG/G p
is a Tarski group, 1 and for everysubgroup
Xof G either X GP or X ; GP. The existence of extended Tarski p-
(*) Indirizzo
degli
AA.: G. BUSETTO:Dipartimento
di Matematica, Via Mez-zocannone 8, 80134
Napoli;
F. NAPOLITANI:Dipartimento
di Matematica Pura eApplicata,
Via Belzoni 7, 35100 Padova.304
groups of any
exponent
for asufficiently large prime p
has beenproved by
Ashmanov and Ol’shanskii[1,
Remark4].
THEOREM. There is a
prime
p and aperfect finitely generated
p- group Gcontaining
apermutable subgroups
H such thatHIHG is infi-
nite and not contained in the
hypercentre of Moreover,
there isan
autoprojectivity of
G notpreserving
norrnalsubgroups.
PROOF. Let p be a
prime
such that there exists an extended Tarskip-group T of
exponent p 3
and let A =T P;
thenT /A
is a Tarski group.Let M be the group
algebra
ofT /A
over the field with p elements and let N be theaugmentation
ideal of M. SinceT /A
is afinitely generated
group, N is a
finitely generated right
ideal of M. Thusthe
semidirectproduct
G =N x T,
where the action of T over N is the one inducedby
the natural action of
T /A
over Nby right multiplication,
is afinitely generated
group.Moreover,
if B =(leo)
is theunique subgroup
of orderp of
T,
theni3i (G)
= NB iselementary abelian; also,
sinceT /A
is per-fect,
it isstraightforward
to show that N =N 2
as ideal ofM,
and so wehave
(G), G] = [N, G]
= N.Therefore,
since T isperfect,
G is alsoperfect.
Let H » N be a maximalsubgroup
of notcontaining
B.If is
finite,
then for someinteger t
we haveHG >
~
(G), tG]
=N,
and so H =N, against
theassumption.
ThusH/HG
isinfinite.
Moreover, H/HG
intersectstrivially
thehypercentre AHG
of
G/HG .
We show that H is
permutable
inG, namely
thatH~g~ _ (g) H
forevery g E G. This is obvious
if g
E HA.Otherwise g
is of the form g = xy with x ET ~A
andy E N;
in this case, since x acts on N as an automor-phism
of order p, it follows that~g ~°2 ~
=(Xp2)
= B. Thus(g)OI (G) =
- ~g>H.
It remains to show that there exists an
autoprojectivity
of G notpreserving
normalsubgroups.
Thus,
let e2 ,... ~
be a basis for N and define theautomorphism
1"of
Di (G) by putting eo
= eo ei ,ei
= ei for0, 1.
Let a be theidentity
ofG /B. Clearly
for everysubgroup
U of G either U ~~1 (G)
orU ~ B and U" = UT whenever B ~ U:::;
S~1 (G)
since z induces the iden-tity
on the factor group01 (G)/B.
Thus we canapply [4,
Lemma2.5]:
the map p defined
by putting
UP = UT if(G)
and UF = U7 if U isnot contained in
01 (G),
is anautoprojectivity
ofG;
and N is a normalsubgroup
of G such that itsprojective image
NP =... )
is notnormal in G.
We leave the
following question
open: is a finite core-free per- mutablesubgroup
of a group G contained in thehypercentre
of G?305 REFERENCES
[1] I. S. ASHMANOV - A. Yu. OL’SHANSKII, On abelian and central extensions
of aspherical
groups, Soviet Math. (Iz. VUZ), 29 (1985), pp. 65-82.[2] J. C. LENNOX, On
quasinormal subgroups of
certainfinitely generated
groups, Proc.
Edimburgh
Math. Soc., 26 (1983), pp. 25-28.[3] J. C. LENNOX - S. E. STONEHEWER, Subnormal
subgroups of
groups, Oxford MathematicalMonographs
(1987).[4] R. SCHMIDT, Normal
subgroups
and latticeisomorphisms of finite
groups, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 30 (1975), pp. 287-300.[5] R. SCHMIDT,
Gruppen
mit modularenUntergruppenverband,
Arch. Math., 46 (1986), pp. 118-124.[6] M. SUZUKI, Structure
of a
group and the structureof
its latticeof subgroups, Erg.
der Math., Heft 10,Springer, Berlin-Gottingen-Heidelberg
(1956).Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 21