• Aucun résultat trouvé

(3) Do Kan complexes form the essential image of the singular functor? (4) Show that the underlying simplicial set of a simplicial group, i.e

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "(3) Do Kan complexes form the essential image of the singular functor? (4) Show that the underlying simplicial set of a simplicial group, i.e"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Master 2: Homotopy Theories 2021-2022

Worksheet 6

HOMOTOPY THEORY OF SIMPLICIAL SETS

Exercise 1(Kan complexes).

(1) Prove that a simplicial setX is a Kan complex if and only if, for anyn >2,06k 6n, and any collectionx0, . . . ,xk−1,xk+1, . . . ,xn ∈Xn−1such thatdj−1(xi)=di(xj), fori< j,i,j ,k, there exists ax∈Xnsuch thatdi(x)=xi, for anyi,k.

(2) Show that the nerve of a group, viewed as a one-point category, is a Kan complex.

(3) Do Kan complexes form the essential image of the singular functor?

(4) Show that the underlying simplicial set of a simplicial group, i.e. after forgetting the group structures, forms a Kan complex.

(5) Show that the standardn-simplicies∆n are not Kan complexes forn>1.

———— ————

Exercise 2(Kan fibration). AKan fibrationis a morphism of simplicial setsp:XYwhich satisfies the following extension property: for every diagram as below, there exists a diagonal map∆n →X which factors it

(?)

Λn

k X

n Y

forn>2and0 6k 6n.

(1) Give a characterisation of a Kan complex in terms of Kan fibrations.

(2) Show that a continuous map f : X → Y is a Serre fibration if and only if the induced morphism of simplicial setSing(f): Sing(X)→Sing(Y)is a Kan fibration.

(3) Give a combinatorial characterisation of a Kan fibration similar to that of a Kan complex given in Question (1) of Exercise 1.

(4) Let p : X Ybe a Kan fibration and let y ∈ Y0 be a vertex of Y. We denote by ∗ the simplicial subset ofYgenerated by y0, that is its smallest simplicial subset containing y0. Show that (thefiber)p−1(∗)is simplicial subset ofXand a Kan complex.

———— ————

Exercise3(Mapping space).

Leti : K,→L be a monomorphism of simplicial sets and let p :X Ybe a Kan fibration. They induce the following commutative diagram

Hom(L,X) Hom(L,Y)

Hom(K,X) Hom(K,Y).

i p

i p

1

(2)

(4) Show that the induced map Hom(L,X) (i

,p)

−−−−−→Hom(K,X)×Hom(K,Y)Hom(L,Y) is a Kan fibration.

Hint. Use the fact thatpsatisfies the following right lifting property:

n

k ×L)∪(Λn

k×K)(∆n×K) X

n×L Y.

p

(5) Show that the pushforwardp:Hom(K,X)Hom(K,Y)is a Kan fibration.

(6) Show that the pullback i : Hom(L,X) Hom(K,X) is a Kan fibration when X is a Kan complex.

———— ————

Exercise 4(Topological homotopy vs simplicial homotopy).

(1) Show that the geometric realisation functor | | : ∆Ens→ Topsends simplicial homotopies to a topological homotopies.

(2) Show that the singular chain functor Sing : Top→ ∆Enssends topological homotopies to simplicial homotopies.

Remark. These two functors induce an equivalence of categories between the homotopy category of CW-complexes and the homotopy category of Kan complexes.

———— ————

Exercise 5 (Classifying space again). We use the same objects and notations as in Exercise 4 of Worksheet 5.

(1) Compute the simplicial homotopy groups of the nerveBGof a group.

(2) Show thatEGis contractible: there exist two morphisms of simplicial sets f : EG→ ∗=∆0 andg:∗ →EGsuch that fg∼id andgf ∼idEG .

(3) Show that the morphism of simplicial setsEGEG/GBGis a Kan fibration.

———— ————

Exercise6(Homotopy groups).

(1) Can one find a Kan complexX, such that eachn-simplexXnis finite, which models the circle?

(2) Compute all the homotopy groups of spheres.

———— ————

Bruno Vallette:vallette@math.univ-paris13.fr. Web page: www.math.univ-paris13.fr/∼vallette/.

2

Références

Documents relatifs

(Top)ex, because Top itself is extensive and has finite limits; on the contrary, the proof is more delicate if one works with HTop, where only weak limits are

Pro category Tow of towers of simplicial sets in a certain category Net of strict Ind-towers, in which we have explicit constructions for all colimits, as well

It is shown in [1] that the exactness, excision, and strong dimension axioms (the latter here stating that the homology group of every convex preconvexity space

closed structure on Czs includes a satisfactory theory of homo- topy equivalences. But, in a similar manner to chain complexes,.. the definitions and applications

finiteness, local finiteness and finite dimension, thus left Kan extensions of homotopy invariant functors from any reasonable category of polyhedra.. or CW-complexes

PROOF: Let N be the category whose objects are (locally noetherian) schemes and whose morphisms are all maps which are.. locally of finite

Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infrac- tion pénale.. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention

Section 6 gives the proof of the third part of our main theorem and provides a formula for the h-vector in terms of homologies of higher nerves in Corollary 6.2.. Section 7 applies