• Aucun résultat trouvé

Car-lite impacts on housing market and vehicle ownership

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Car-lite impacts on housing market and vehicle ownership"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Car-lite impacts on housing market and vehicle ownership

The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available.

Please share

how this access benefits you. Your story matters.

Citation

Le, Diem-Trinh et al. “Car-lite impacts on housing market and

vehicle ownership.” Transportation Research Procedia, 41 (January

2019): 548-550 © 2019 The Author(s)

As Published

10.1016/J.TRPRO.2019.09.096

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Version

Final published version

Citable link

https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126840

Terms of Use

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License

(2)

ScienceDirect

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

Transportation Research Procedia 41 (2019) 548–550

2352-1465  2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the mobil.TUM18.

10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.096

10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.096 2352-1465

© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the mobil.TUM18.

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect 

Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000

www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia

2214-241X © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of mobil.TUM 2018.

International Scientific Conference on Mobility and Transport

Urban Mobility – Shaping the Future Together

mobil.TUM 2018, 13-14 June 2018, Munich, Germany

Car-lite impacts on housing market and vehicle ownership

Diem-Trinh Le

a 

, Xiaohu Zhang

a

, Roberto Ponce-Lopez

b

, Jingsi Shaw

b

, P. Chris Zegras

b

,

Joseph Ferreira Jr.

b

aSingapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART), 1 CREATE Way, #09-02 CREATE Tower, Singapore 138602 bMassachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, 02139, United States

© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of mobil.TUM 2018.

Keywords: Type your keywords here, separated by semicolons ; 1. Problem Statement

Transportation and city planners around the world have been showing increasing interest in reducing the number of motorized vehicles and pursuing “car-lite” neighborhood designs. In Singapore in particular, as a small island-nation with one of the world’s highest population densities, the government’s recent rhetoric has pushed a car-lite vision (GovTech, 2017; MCI, 2017; URA, 2017). In fact, a people-centered and car-lite neighborhood is one of the three main pillars that shape the Urban Redevelopment Authority’s vision for future neighborhoods. To manage the number of cars, the government has implemented road taxes and restricted the number of certificates of entitlement to register a car. Several efforts have also been made to promote alternative transportation options, such as active mobility modes, and to explore autonomous vehicles (AVs) for mobility services. With the current pace of technology development, the technological feasibility of such policies to reduce cars seems inevitable. However, will such a transportation scenario be welcomed by the people? When accessibility is improved, by using, for example, AVs for first mile/last mile connection, will people give up their cars? Will urban designs that enable better connectivity to amenities be attractive enough to change households’ preferences for housing locations? Answering these questions is fundamental to understanding whether AVs can help realize the ‘car-lite’ vision.

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect 

Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000

www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia

2214-241X © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of mobil.TUM 2018.

International Scientific Conference on Mobility and Transport

Urban Mobility – Shaping the Future Together

mobil.TUM 2018, 13-14 June 2018, Munich, Germany

Car-lite impacts on housing market and vehicle ownership

Diem-Trinh Le

a 

, Xiaohu Zhang

a

, Roberto Ponce-Lopez

b

, Jingsi Shaw

b

, P. Chris Zegras

b

,

Joseph Ferreira Jr.

b

aSingapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART), 1 CREATE Way, #09-02 CREATE Tower, Singapore 138602 bMassachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, 02139, United States

© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of mobil.TUM 2018.

Keywords: Type your keywords here, separated by semicolons ; 1. Problem Statement

Transportation and city planners around the world have been showing increasing interest in reducing the number of motorized vehicles and pursuing “car-lite” neighborhood designs. In Singapore in particular, as a small island-nation with one of the world’s highest population densities, the government’s recent rhetoric has pushed a car-lite vision (GovTech, 2017; MCI, 2017; URA, 2017). In fact, a people-centered and car-lite neighborhood is one of the three main pillars that shape the Urban Redevelopment Authority’s vision for future neighborhoods. To manage the number of cars, the government has implemented road taxes and restricted the number of certificates of entitlement to register a car. Several efforts have also been made to promote alternative transportation options, such as active mobility modes, and to explore autonomous vehicles (AVs) for mobility services. With the current pace of technology development, the technological feasibility of such policies to reduce cars seems inevitable. However, will such a transportation scenario be welcomed by the people? When accessibility is improved, by using, for example, AVs for first mile/last mile connection, will people give up their cars? Will urban designs that enable better connectivity to amenities be attractive enough to change households’ preferences for housing locations? Answering these questions is fundamental to understanding whether AVs can help realize the ‘car-lite’ vision.

2 Author name / Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000 2. Research Objectives

In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of housing market behaviors and identify the key factors and market forces that result from the adoption of car-lite neighborhoods. In particular, we seek to answer the following questions:

How will households’ perception of transportation system performance change due to car-lite policies such as AV implementation?

How will households’ long-term decisions change (e.g. residential location and vehicle ownership)? How will the urban form change in response to the changes of agents’ attitudes/preferences regarding AV

services?

3. Methods

3.1. Simulation platform

To attempt to answer the research questions, we use an integrated microsimulation model, SimMobility. SimMobility is a system of mobility-sensitive behavioral models integrated in a multi-scale activity-based simulation platform, which considers land-use, transport, and communication interactions (Adnan et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2015). In SimMobility, agent behaviors are modelled at multiple levels and in various timescales, which correspond to three integrated simulators: Long-term (LT), Mid-term (MT), and Short-term (ST). The LT simulator of SimMobility models the behaviors of agents in the housing market, and, ultimately, the commercial real estate market and the job market, in order to simulate the yearly and longer term impacts of alternative future mobility scenarios on residential and workplace locations; vehicle ownership; the density, land use distribution, and value of the built environment (Zhu, Diao, Ferreira, & Zegras, 2017).

3.2. The study area and data

The area selected for the study is located in the center of Singapore as shown on Figure 1. The area covers 7.2km2,

with a population of 131,893 in 2012. The area is one of the oldest residential towns in Singapore and includes a good mix of land uses (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Location of the study area Figure 2: The study area’s land use

Data used in the study were extracted from a synthetic population of households, individuals (Zhu & Ferreira, 2014), and firms (Le, Cernicchiaro, Zegras, & Ferreira, 2016). The population provides the baseline for SimMobility simulation and reflects the reality of Singapore in 2012 (consistent with the transportation network and building data used).

(3)

Diem-Trinh Le et al. / Transportation Research Procedia 41 (2019) 548–550 549

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect 

Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000

www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia

2214-241X © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of mobil.TUM 2018.

International Scientific Conference on Mobility and Transport

Urban Mobility – Shaping the Future Together

mobil.TUM 2018, 13-14 June 2018, Munich, Germany

Car-lite impacts on housing market and vehicle ownership

Diem-Trinh Le

a 

, Xiaohu Zhang

a

, Roberto Ponce-Lopez

b

, Jingsi Shaw

b

, P. Chris Zegras

b

,

Joseph Ferreira Jr.

b

aSingapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART), 1 CREATE Way, #09-02 CREATE Tower, Singapore 138602 bMassachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, 02139, United States

© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of mobil.TUM 2018.

Keywords: Type your keywords here, separated by semicolons ; 1. Problem Statement

Transportation and city planners around the world have been showing increasing interest in reducing the number of motorized vehicles and pursuing “car-lite” neighborhood designs. In Singapore in particular, as a small island-nation with one of the world’s highest population densities, the government’s recent rhetoric has pushed a car-lite vision (GovTech, 2017; MCI, 2017; URA, 2017). In fact, a people-centered and car-lite neighborhood is one of the three main pillars that shape the Urban Redevelopment Authority’s vision for future neighborhoods. To manage the number of cars, the government has implemented road taxes and restricted the number of certificates of entitlement to register a car. Several efforts have also been made to promote alternative transportation options, such as active mobility modes, and to explore autonomous vehicles (AVs) for mobility services. With the current pace of technology development, the technological feasibility of such policies to reduce cars seems inevitable. However, will such a transportation scenario be welcomed by the people? When accessibility is improved, by using, for example, AVs for first mile/last mile connection, will people give up their cars? Will urban designs that enable better connectivity to amenities be attractive enough to change households’ preferences for housing locations? Answering these questions is fundamental to understanding whether AVs can help realize the ‘car-lite’ vision.

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect 

Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000

www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia

2214-241X © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of mobil.TUM 2018.

International Scientific Conference on Mobility and Transport

Urban Mobility – Shaping the Future Together

mobil.TUM 2018, 13-14 June 2018, Munich, Germany

Car-lite impacts on housing market and vehicle ownership

Diem-Trinh Le

a 

, Xiaohu Zhang

a

, Roberto Ponce-Lopez

b

, Jingsi Shaw

b

, P. Chris Zegras

b

,

Joseph Ferreira Jr.

b

aSingapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART), 1 CREATE Way, #09-02 CREATE Tower, Singapore 138602 bMassachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, 02139, United States

© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of mobil.TUM 2018.

Keywords: Type your keywords here, separated by semicolons ; 1. Problem Statement

Transportation and city planners around the world have been showing increasing interest in reducing the number of motorized vehicles and pursuing “car-lite” neighborhood designs. In Singapore in particular, as a small island-nation with one of the world’s highest population densities, the government’s recent rhetoric has pushed a car-lite vision (GovTech, 2017; MCI, 2017; URA, 2017). In fact, a people-centered and car-lite neighborhood is one of the three main pillars that shape the Urban Redevelopment Authority’s vision for future neighborhoods. To manage the number of cars, the government has implemented road taxes and restricted the number of certificates of entitlement to register a car. Several efforts have also been made to promote alternative transportation options, such as active mobility modes, and to explore autonomous vehicles (AVs) for mobility services. With the current pace of technology development, the technological feasibility of such policies to reduce cars seems inevitable. However, will such a transportation scenario be welcomed by the people? When accessibility is improved, by using, for example, AVs for first mile/last mile connection, will people give up their cars? Will urban designs that enable better connectivity to amenities be attractive enough to change households’ preferences for housing locations? Answering these questions is fundamental to understanding whether AVs can help realize the ‘car-lite’ vision.

2 Author name / Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000 2. Research Objectives

In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of housing market behaviors and identify the key factors and market forces that result from the adoption of car-lite neighborhoods. In particular, we seek to answer the following questions:

How will households’ perception of transportation system performance change due to car-lite policies such as AV implementation?

How will households’ long-term decisions change (e.g. residential location and vehicle ownership)? How will the urban form change in response to the changes of agents’ attitudes/preferences regarding AV

services?

3. Methods

3.1. Simulation platform

To attempt to answer the research questions, we use an integrated microsimulation model, SimMobility. SimMobility is a system of mobility-sensitive behavioral models integrated in a multi-scale activity-based simulation platform, which considers land-use, transport, and communication interactions (Adnan et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2015). In SimMobility, agent behaviors are modelled at multiple levels and in various timescales, which correspond to three integrated simulators: Long-term (LT), Mid-term (MT), and Short-term (ST). The LT simulator of SimMobility models the behaviors of agents in the housing market, and, ultimately, the commercial real estate market and the job market, in order to simulate the yearly and longer term impacts of alternative future mobility scenarios on residential and workplace locations; vehicle ownership; the density, land use distribution, and value of the built environment (Zhu, Diao, Ferreira, & Zegras, 2017).

3.2. The study area and data

The area selected for the study is located in the center of Singapore as shown on Figure 1. The area covers 7.2km2,

with a population of 131,893 in 2012. The area is one of the oldest residential towns in Singapore and includes a good mix of land uses (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Location of the study area Figure 2: The study area’s land use

Data used in the study were extracted from a synthetic population of households, individuals (Zhu & Ferreira, 2014), and firms (Le, Cernicchiaro, Zegras, & Ferreira, 2016). The population provides the baseline for SimMobility simulation and reflects the reality of Singapore in 2012 (consistent with the transportation network and building data used).

(4)

550 Diem-Trinh Le et al. / Transportation Research Procedia 41 (2019) 548–550

Author name / Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000 3

3.3. Scenario description

For the purpose of this study, we define “car-lite scenario” as the situation where significant accessibility improvement is possible through first mile/ last mile transport connection and neighborhood redesign. The expected changes in the transportation performance and accessibility are then incorporated into the housing market models and vehicle ownership choice model.

4. Expected results

The results simulate households’ responses to car-lite policies with regards to choices of residential location and vehicle ownership. Improved accessibility and effective marketing campaigns can make housing units in car-lite neighborhood more attractive. However, car-lite impacts can also affect housing market price and the timing, density, and type of development. It is also expected that households in car-lite neighborhoods may give up their vehicles, whereas households that neither live nor work in car-lite neighborhoods may relocate to these neighborhoods and re-evaluate their vehicle ownership. Scenario simulations, and various tests of the sensitivity of results to behavioral assumptions, enable estimation of the net effects of car-lite plans that address neighborhood redesign, account for transportation regulation and transit service, and allow for the introduction of disruptive transportation technologies.

References

Adnan, M., Pereira, F. C., Lima, C. A., Kakali, B., Lovric, M., S., R., … M.E., B.-A. (2016). SimMobility: A Multi-scale Integrated Agent-based Simulation Platform. In Paper Presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the

Transportation Research Board Forthcoming in Transportation Research Record.

GovTech. (2017). Driving the car-lite transformation. Retrieved from

https://www.tech.gov.sg/TechNews/Opinions/2017/08/Driving-the-car-lite-transformation

Le, D.-T., Cernicchiaro, G., Zegras, C., & Ferreira, J. (2016). Constructing a Synthetic Population of Establishments for the Simmobility Microsimulation Platform. Transportation Research Procedia, 19(Supplement C), 81–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.070

Lu, Y., Basak, K., Carrion, C., Loganathan, H., Adnan, M., Pereira, F. C., … Ben-Akiva, M. E. (2015). SimMobility Mid-Term Simulator: A State of the Art Integrated Agent Based Demand and Supply Model. In In

Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting.

MCI. (2017). New Housing Precincts Going Green And Car Lite. Retrieved from

https://www.reach.gov.sg/participate/discussion-forum/2017/10/17/new-housing-precincts-going-green-and-car-lite

URA. (2017). Designing Neighbourhoods for the Future. Retrieved from https://www.ura.gov.sg/uol/media-room/news/2017/Oct/pr17-67

Zhu, Y., Diao, M., Ferreira, J., & Zegras, P. C. (2017). Simulating the effect of land use and housing market on urban mobility. In TRB 96th Annual Meeting.

Zhu, Y., & Ferreira, J. (2014). Synthetic Population Generation at Disaggregated Spatial Scales for Land Use and Transportation Microsimulation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research

Figure

Figure 1: Location of the study area  Figure 2: The study area’s land use

Références

Documents relatifs

In this model, price dispersion comes from two sources: first, the bargaining power of the parties, since different bargaining powers lead to different selling prices for

We use the model to discuss social housing and family insurance, the case for mortgage unemployment insurance, regulations on the use of …xed-term contracts, the impact of

Meanwhile, as in Tables 1 and 2, HMR does not directly a¤ect labor market outcomes and reduces youth emancipation, whereas job protection on regular jobs reduces youth employment

This assumption seems plausible when observing the trends in the number of transactions and the total tax base of the Régime de Droit Commun from January 2012 to October 2015

The model emphasizes that the support for PF increases with the size of social networks, the default probability on the rent, the proportion of foreigners, and market

Prediction 1 D ETECTING CUSTOMER DISCRIMINATION IN THE HOUSING MARKET If black tenants are less likely to have a type-2 landlord than white tenants, then there are prejudiced Whites

In contrast, our “spatial block”, that is housing frictions combined to higher commute costs, explain well low mobility and a quite sizeable increase in unemployment : while taxes

When µ = 1, the eviction procedure is fast, and the long-run supply of housing is high, resulting into a low rent and a low matching rate for landlords: this is equivalent,