• Aucun résultat trouvé

Second order waves before and after the floor work in the OEB in 2010 : Part B

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Second order waves before and after the floor work in the OEB in 2010 : Part B"

Copied!
137
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: Technical Report, 2013-02-06

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/21270174

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Second order waves before and after the floor work in the OEB in 2010 : Part B

Zaman, Hasanat; McKay, Shane; NRC Ocean, Coastal and River Engineering

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=900a3d0d-b1ee-427d-a6d5-18b35dd9c751 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=900a3d0d-b1ee-427d-a6d5-18b35dd9c751

(2)

OCRE-TR-2013-004

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA OCEAN, COASTAL AND RIVER ENGINEERING

Second order waves before and after

the floor work in the OEB in 2010:

Part B

Technical Report - UNCLASSIFIED

Hasanat Zaman Shane McKay February, 2013

(3)

REPORT NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER

DATE

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION DISTRIBUTION

TITLE

AUTHOR(S)

CORPORATE AUTHOR(S)/PERFORMING AGENCY(S) PUBLICATION (Journal or Conference name)

SPONSORING AGENCY(S)

RAW DATA STORAGE LOCATION(S)

PEER REVIEWED

MODEL # PROP

EMBARGO PERIOD

PROJECT (NPArC) GROUP (NPArC)

PROGRAM (NPArC) FACILITY (NPArC)

KEY WORDS PAGES TABLES FIGS.

SUMMARY

Report Documentation Page

OCRE - GOCF

2013 6 February

Wave quality, 2nd order waves, unwanted free waves i, 132, App 1-2 2

OCRE-TR-2013-004 PJ2414-26 UNCLASSIFIED UNLIMITED

Second order waves before and after the floor work in the OEB in 2010: Part B

Hasanat Zaman and Shane McKay

NRC Ocean, Coastal and River Engineering

NRC-ST. JOHN’S

--- --- Research

--- St. John's: P.O. Box 12093, Arctic Ave, St. John's, NL A1B 3T5

This is a continuation of the work reported in TR-2013-003. In summer 2010, the south-west side trenches (0.3m x 0.4m) under and in front of the wave makers in the OEB have been permanently filled-up to provide a homogeneous bottom and uniform water depth all over the basin. This work is to understand the improvement of the wave quality after the floor work. Two sets of

experimental data comprised of mono- and bi-chromatic waves before and after the floor work are used to identify the impact of the development work on the generation of unwanted second order free waves in the OEB. In this report results are compared between the measured energies at different probe locations and also second order wave components before and after the floor work in the OEB. Comparisons are shown in terms of measured wave energies, primary waves, bounded waves and unwanted second order free waves elevations. In this report 0.8m of water depth is considered. In most of the cases it is observed from the results that the shallower the wave the better the wave quality after the floor work.

(4)

National Research Council Conseil national de recherches Canada Canada Ocean, Coastal and River Génie océanique, côtier et fluvial Engineering

Second order waves before and after the floor work in the OEB in

2010: Part B

Technical Report UNCLASSIFIED

OCRE-TR-2013-004

Hasanat Zaman and Shane McKay

(5)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No

ABSTRACT ...1

1. INCIDENT WAVE CONDITIONS ...1

2. DATA ANALYSES...2

2.1 COMPARISONS - 1: Monochromatic waves ... 2

2.2 COMPARISONS - 2: Bichromatic waves ...2

3. LWAVE utilization ...3

4. RESULTS ...3

5. CONCLUSIONS...3

REFERENCES ...3

Appendix-I Compares energy distribution and second order wave components for mono-chromatic wave over 0.8m water depth at different probe locations. ...5

Appendix-II Compares energy distribution and second order wave components for bi-chromatic wave over 0.8m water depth at different probe locations. ... 48

(6)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 1

ABSTRACT

This is a continuation of the work reported in OCRE-TR-2013-003 (Second order waves before and after the floor work in the OEB in 2010: Part-A). In summer 2010, the south-west side trenches (width 0.4m and depth 0.3m) under and in front of the wave makers in the OEB have been permanently filled-up to provide a homogeneous bottom and uniform water depth all over the basin. This work is to understand the improvement of the wave quality after the floor work. In this work two sets of experimental data comprised of mono- and bi-chromatic waves before and after the floor work are used to identify the impact of the development work on the generation of unwanted second order free waves in the OEB. The first set of wave data (called before from now on) was obtained from the experimental work before the trenches were filled-up and the second set of data (called after from now on) was obtained from the experiment after the trenches were filled up. In the experiments both mono- and bi-chromatic wave are considered for 0.8m water depths. Results for 0.8m water depth are reported in this report (Part-B). Results for 0.4m, 0.5m and 0.6m water depth were reported in Part-A. Comparisons of the data were done for identical wave conditions.

Please refer to report “Second order waves before and after the floor work in the OEB

in 2010: Part-A” for description of the experiments, experimental setup, data acquisition

etc..

1. INCIDENT WAVE CONDITIONS

In the experiments both mono- and bi-chromatic waves of different wave periods, wave heights and water depths are used. See Zaman and Mak (2007) and Zaman et al (2010) for several cases of mono- and bi-chromatic waves before the floor work and Zaman et al (2011) and Zaman et al (2013) after the floor work. Tables 2a and 2b show different incident wave conditions that we used in the experiments. In the tables below T1

and T2 are wave periods, H1 and H2 are the wave heights, h is the water depth, L is the

wave length and h/L is the relative water depth.

Table 2a Mono-chromatic incident wave parameters (h=0.8m) T1 (s) H1 (m) h(m) h/L

M8-1 2.370 0.06 0.8 0.133 M8-2 3.035 0.08 0.8 0.100 M8-3 4.105 0.06 0.8 0.071 Table 2b Bi-chromatic incident wave parameters (h=0.8m) T1 (s) h(m) H1 (m) T2 (s) H2 (m) h/L

B8-1 1.00 0.8 0.06 0.90 0.06 0.516 B8-2 1.55 0.8 0.02 1.45 0.02 0.236 B8-3 1.55 0.8 0.08 1.45 0.08 0.236 B8-4 2.12 0.8 0.08 2.02 0.08 0.153

(7)

2 OCRE-TR-2013-004

The bottom of the basin was flat and the blanking plates were deployed to cover the north beach.

2. DATA ANALYSES

We have analyzed two sets of data, one for before the floor work and the other one is

after the floor work. Different wave conditions and water depths are considered as shown in Tables 2a and 2b. All the data are compared and the results are shown in terms of surface elevations and wave energies across the wave tank at probes 5-4-3-6-7 (Probe-5, Probe-4, Probe-3, Probe-6 and Probe-7) and along the tank at probes 1-2-3-8-9 (Probe-1, Probe-2, Probe-3, Probe-8 and Probe-9), see Fig. 1. Data at Probes 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 are not available for 0.8m water depth.

2.1 COMPARISONS - 1: Monochromatic waves

Tables 2a and 2b respectively, show the incident wave conditions for mono-chromatic waves, respectively over 0.8m (M8) water depths. All the above cases are run with and without trenches condition in front of the south and west wave makers of the OEB. Comparisons of the results are made between both cases, with and without trenches. Results are compared in terms of measured surface elevation data, wave energies and isolated wave components including second order waves across and along the wave tank. Figs. 2a to 7j show the energy distribution, measured surface elevation, isolated primary wave, bounded and second order unwanted free wave components at different probe locations in the basin for the mono-chromatic waves of 0.8m water depth mentioned in Table 2a. Measured water surface elevations, wave energies and isolated primary, bounded and unwanted free waves at across-tank probes 5-4-3-6-7 and at the along-tank probes 1-2-3-8-9 are plotted together to show the differences in the amplitudes after and before the floor work. Unwanted free waves are reproduced due to the mismatch of the boundary conditions at the wave paddle and due to the displacement of the wave paddle from its zero position.

It is observed from the results that the smaller the relative water depth h L (i.e.

shallower the wave) the better the wave quality after the floor work. For shallower wave it is also noted that the shallower the wave the better the wave energies distributions across the tank for measured, primary, bounded and free waves for after cases. It is perceived that the second order wave components are reduced for shallow waves after the floor work.

2.2 COMPARISONS - 2: Bichromatic waves

Table 2b show the incident wave conditions for bi-chromatic waves over 0.8m (B8) water depths. The above cases are run for: with and without trenches conditions in front of the south and west wave makers of the OEB. Results are again compared between both

(8)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 3

elevation data, wave energies and isolated wave components including second order waves across the wave tank.

Figs. 8a to 19j show the energy distribution, measured surface elevation, isolated primary wave, bounded and second order unwanted free wave components at different probe locations in the basin for the bi-chromatic waves of 0.8m water depth for different incident wave conditions shown in Table 2b. Obtained water surface elevations, wave energies and isolated primary, bounded and unwanted free waves at across-tank probes 5-4-3-6-7 and at the along-tank probes 1-2-3-8-9 are plotted together to show the differences in the component amplitudes after and before the floor work.

3. LWAVE utilization

A NRC-IOT computer code LWAVE that can split a measured surface elevation data set into its component waves is used for the analysis. This code is utilized to isolate the primary waves, bounded second order waves and unwanted free waves from the raw measured data at every probe location.

4. RESULTS

In this experiment 0.8m water depths (h= 0.8m) was used. The incident wave parameters are shown in Table 2a for mono- and Table 2b for bi-chromatic waves.

Results are compared between the measured wave data, before and after the floor work in OEB.

Appendix-I compares energy distribution and second order wave components for mono-chromatic wave over 0.8m water depth at different probe locations.

Appendix-II compares energy distribution and second order wave components for bi-chromatic wave over 0.8m water depth at different probe locations.

5. CONCLUSIONS

Comparisons of the results for surface elevations and energy propagations between the measured data before and after the floor work are shown. Deep water wave (h Lt0.5)

will not be affected by the floor and the wave starts to feel the bottom when the relative water depth (h L) is less than 0.5. So the smaller the value of h Lmeans more the

effects of the bottom on the propagating waves. From the data it is observed that after the floor work, the wave quality in the tank improved for the shallow water where the floor effect is essentially an important issue. For intermediate and deep water case this change or improvement is insignificant.

(9)

4 OCRE-TR-2013-004

John’s.

Zaman, M. H., Baddour, E. and Mckay, S. (2011): Wave propagation before and after the floor work in the OEB in 2010, TR-2011-16, March, National Research Council Canada, Institute for Ocean Technology.

Zaman, M. H., Peng, H., Baddour, E., Spencer, D. and Mckay, S. (2010): Identifications of spurious waves in the wave tank with shallow water, 29th Int. Conf. on offshore Mech. and Arctic Eng. (OMAE-2010), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Shanghai, China, on CD-ROM.

Zaman, M. H. and L. Mak (2007): Second order wave generation technique in the laboratory, 26th Int. Conf. on offshore Mech. and Arctic Eng. (OMAE-2007), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), San Diego, USA, on CD-ROM.

(10)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 5

Appendix – I

Energy distribution and second order wave components for monochromatic wave over 0.8m water depth

Probes array: Probes: 1-2-3-8-9 Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(11)

6 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 2a: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(12)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 7

Fig. 2b: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(13)

8 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 2c: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(14)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 9

Fig. 2d: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(15)

10 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 3a: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-1 M8-1 : REGP8_H0P06_T2P370

(16)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 11

(17)

12 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 3c: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-3 M8-1 : REGP8_H0P06_T2P370

(18)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 13

(19)

14 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 3e: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-5 M8-1 : REGP8_H0P06_T2P370

(20)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 15

(21)

16 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 3g: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-7 M8-1 : REGP8_H0P06_T2P370

(22)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 17

(23)

18 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 3i: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-9 M8-1 : REGP8_H0P06_T2P370

(24)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 19

(25)

20 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 4a: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(26)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 21

Fig. 4b: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(27)

22 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 4c: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(28)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 23

Fig. 4d: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(29)

24 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 5a: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-1 B8-2 : REGP8_H0P08_T3P035

(30)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 25

(31)

26 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 5c: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-3 B8-2 : REGP8_H0P08_T3P035

(32)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 27

(33)

28 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 5e: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-5 B8-2 : REGP8_H0P08_T3P035

(34)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 29

(35)

30 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 5g: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-7 B8-2 : REGP8_H0P08_T3P035

(36)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 31

(37)

32 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 5i: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-9 B8-2 : REGP8_H0P08_T3P035

(38)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 33

(39)

34 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 6a: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(40)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 35

Fig. 6b: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(41)

36 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 6c: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(42)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 37

Fig. 6d: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(43)

38 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 7a: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-1 B8-3 : REGP8_H0P08_T4P105

(44)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 39

(45)

40 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 7c: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-3 B8-3 : REGP8_H0P08_T4P105

(46)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 41

(47)

42 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 7e: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-5 B8-3 : REGP8_H0P08_T4P105

(48)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 43

(49)

44 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 7g: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-7 B8-3 : REGP8_H0P08_T4P105

(50)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 45

(51)

46 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 7i: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-9 B8-3 : REGP8_H0P08_T4P105

(52)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 47

(53)

48 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Appendix – II

Energy distribution and second order wave components for bichromatic wave over 0.8m water depth

Probes array: Probes: 1-2-3-8-9 Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(54)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 49

Fig. 8a: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(55)

50 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 8b: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(56)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 51

Fig. 8c: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(57)

52 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 8d: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(58)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 53

(59)

54 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 9b: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-2 B8-1 : BIP8_H0P06_T1P0_T0P9

(60)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 55

(61)

56 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 9d: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-4 B8-1 : BIP8_H0P06_T1P0_T0P9

(62)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 57

(63)

58 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 9f: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-6 B8-1 : BIP8_H0P06_T1P0_T0P9

(64)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 59

(65)

60 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 9h: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-8 B8-1 : BIP8_H0P06_T1P0_T0P9

(66)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 61

(67)

62 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 9j: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-10 B8-1 : BIP8_H0P06_T1P0_T0P9

(68)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 63

Fig. 10a: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(69)

64 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 10b: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(70)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 65

(71)

66 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 10d: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(72)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 67

(73)

68 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 11b: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-2 B8-2 : BIP8_H0P02_T1P55_T1P45

(74)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 69

(75)

70 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 11d: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-4 B8-2 : BIP8_H0P02_T1P55_T1P45

(76)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 71

(77)

72 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 11f: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-6 B8-2 : BIP8_H0P02_T1P55_T1P45

(78)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 73

(79)

74 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 11h: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-8 B8-2 : BIP8_H0P02_T1P55_T1P45

(80)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 75

(81)

76 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 11j: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-10 B8-2 : BIP8_H0P02_T1P55_T1P45

(82)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 77

Fig. 12a: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(83)

78 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 12b: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(84)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 79

Fig. 12c: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(85)

80 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 12d: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(86)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 81

(87)

82 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 13b: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-2 B8-3 : BIP8_H0P08_T1P55_T1P45

(88)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 83

(89)

84 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 13d: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-4 B8-3 : BIP8_H0P08_T1P55_T1P45

(90)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 85

(91)

86 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 13f: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-6 B8-3 : BIP8_H0P08_T1P55_T1P45

(92)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 87

(93)

88 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 13h: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-8 B8-3 : BIP8_H0P08_T1P55_T1P45

(94)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 89

(95)

90 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 13j: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-10 B8-3 : BIP8_H0P08_T1P55_T1P45

(96)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 91

Fig. 14a: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(97)

92 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 14b: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(98)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 93

Fig. 14c: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(99)

94 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 14d: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(100)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 95

(101)

96 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 15b: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-2 B8-4 : BIP8_H0P06_T2P12_T2P02

(102)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 97

(103)

98 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 15d: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-4 B8-4 : BIP8_H0P06_T2P12_T2P02

(104)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 99

(105)

100 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 15f: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-6 B8-4 : BIP8_H0P06_T2P12_T2P02

(106)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 101

(107)

102 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 15h: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-8 B8-4 : BIP8_H0P06_T2P12_T2P02

(108)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 103

(109)

104 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 15j: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-10 B8-4 : BIP8_H0P06_T2P12_T2P02

(110)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 105

Fig. 16a: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(111)

106 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 16b: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(112)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 107

Fig. 16c: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(113)

108 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 16d: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(114)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 109

(115)

110 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 17b: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-2 B8-5 : BIP8_H0P08_T2P22_T2P0

(116)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 111

(117)

112 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 17d: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-4 B8-5 : BIP8_H0P08_T2P22_T2P0

(118)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 113

(119)

114 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 17f: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-6 B8-5 : BIP8_H0P08_T2P22_T2P0

(120)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 115

(121)

116 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 17h: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-8 B8-5 : BIP8_H0P08_T2P22_T2P0

(122)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 117

(123)

118 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 17j: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-10 B8-5 : BIP8_H0P08_T2P22_T2P0

(124)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 119

Fig. 18a: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(125)

120 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 18b: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 1-2-3-8-9

(126)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 121

Fig. 18c: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(127)

122 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 18d: Comparisons between high frequency wave energy Probes: 5-4-3-6-7

(128)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 123

(129)

124 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 19b: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-2 B8-6 : BIP8_H0P08_T3P33_T2P85

(130)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 125

(131)

126 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 19d: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-4 B8-6 : BIP8_H0P08_T3P33_T2P85

(132)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 127

(133)

128 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 19f: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-6 B8-6 : BIP8_H0P08_T3P33_T2P85

(134)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 129

(135)

130 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 19h: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-8 B8-6 : BIP8_H0P08_T3P33_T2P85

(136)

OCRE-TR-2013-004 131

(137)

132 OCRE-TR-2013-004

Fig. 19j: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-10 B8-6 : BIP8_H0P08_T3P33_T2P85

Figure

Fig. 2a: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy  Probes: 1-2-3-8-9
Fig. 2c: Comparisons between primary and low frequency wave energy  Probes: 5-4-3-6-7
Fig. 3b: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-2
Fig. 3e: Isolated wave components from measured wave data at Probe-5   M8-1 : REGP8_H0P06_T2P370
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

Mais nous n'y avons pas renoncé, puisque nous menons actuellement des discussions avec certains pays arabes (notamment la Jordanie) pour lancer une université

More specifically, these results highlight how food waste might be a consequence of negative experiences following purchase with promotions, how food waste is perceived by

a comparison with existing, it would probably be evaluated on equal terms with other innovations that have overcome preference inertia. In short, there is another question to

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

We consider the general case of an impurity moving with wave vector K 6= 0: Then the quasi-particle acquires a finite lifetime in its initial momentum channel because it can

In this contribution we probe the underlying gravitational potential of the Milky Way by fitting the long (> 70 ◦ ) and narrow GD-1 stellar stream with a realistic family of

General 3D equation of instability cones as well as of the 3D bifurcation domain limit are given for every incrementally piece-wise linear constitutive model.. In the second part,