• Aucun résultat trouvé

Engaging village communities in designing ‘climate smart’ landscapes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Engaging village communities in designing ‘climate smart’ landscapes"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Regional Forum on Climate Change (RFCC) LOW CARBON AND CLIMATE RESILIENT SOCIETIES: BRIDGING SCIENCE, PRACTICE AND POLICY 01‐03 July, 2015 – A.I.T, Bangkok

TS13: PARTICIPATORY APPROACHES FOR 

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION 

Engaging village communities in 

designing ‘climate smart’ landscapes

Sisavath PHIMMASONE

Department of Agricultural Land Management

(DALaM) MAF Lao PDR

Engaging village communities in 

designing ‘climate smart’ landscapes

(2)

Outline

Participatory Land Use Planning for low carbon 

emission landscapes,

Empowering village communities in implementing the 

Community‐based Agricultural Development Plan,

Creating an enabling environment for a landscape 

approach to agroecology

EU‐GCCA Eficas NUDP/CA (AFD)

Location of the project 

districts and villages

(3)

Participatory Land Use Planning

for low carbon emission landscapes

Bourgoin J., Castella J.C., Hett C., Lestrelin G., Heinimann A. (2013) Engaging local communities in low emissions land use planning: a case study in Laos. Ecology and Society 18 (2): 9.

Land Use   Planned activities  Permanent crop Want to fence permanent crop area with barbed wires. Rotational crop Want to plant new crops to feed animals or improve the  soil. Are not interested in improved fallows Plantation Wish to plant coffee and castor beans and increase  teak plantations. Improve pasture Want to create an improved pasture area. Paddy Improved irrigation for the existing paddy area;  Build new paddy areas up to 9.6 ha.

Community‐based Agricultural 

Development Planning (CADP)

• Action plan that engages the whole village over several years, • Negotiated and implemented by the village community and  district extension agents together, • Support of multiple partners is sought for implementation, • Clear indicators for implementation and monitoring

(4)

Land Use   Planned activities  Area ‐ location Who is  involved Inputs: labour, knowledge(training)  assistance  Milestones  &Indicators(date of work  completion, etc.) Budget resources share  Permanent  crop Want to fence permanent crop  area with barbwires. Rotational  crop Want to plant new crops to  feed animals or improve the  soil. Are not interested in  improved fallows because. Plantation Wish to plant coffee and castor  beans and increase teak  plantations. Improve  pasture Want to create an improved  pasture area. Paddy Improved irrigation for the  existing paddy area;  Build new paddy areas  up to 9.6 ha. Garden Would like to increase and  improve home gardening. village

communities ProjectDAFO

Village Action Plan

CADP Implementation steps (4‐day process)

Opening village meeting

Socio‐economic data collection

Focus group discussions

– Problem census (men / women) – Wood, wildlife and NTFP – Village population trends – Land use systems (crop – livestock): input‐output parameters

Land management and regulations (3D model, maps)

Activity planning

– Discussion on innovative practices – Land management rules, indicators – Field visits, site selection, volunteer households

Closing village meeting

(5)

Day 1. Opening village meeting

Introduction of the project team

Presentation of the members of the Village Land 

Management Committee (VLMC)

Objectives of the meeting and activities that will 

take place in the village

Team 1

Team 2

Day 1. Data collection

Household survey

Focus group discussions

•Problem census

(6)

Day 1‐2. Data collection

Team 1

Participatory mapping

Up‐dating 3D model

Team 2

•Cropping and livestock systems  analysis •Input – output parameters

Focus group discussions

Team 1&2

Data compilation and 

analysis

Team 2

Day 3. Data collection and field visit

Field visit ‐ activity planning

Focus group: landscape managt

Focus group: practices

Field visit ‐ activity planning

(7)

Land management and regulations

(8)

Day 4. Action plan – village meeting

Reviewing development options

Refining village action plan

Village meeting led by village committee

Conclusion:

towards a landscape approach to agroecology

Engaging the whole village community in landscape 

level management of agricultural innovations

Visualization Learning Improved negotiation participatory landscape design Diagnosis

(9)

Engaging the whole village community in landscape 

level management of agricultural innovations

Anticipate problems and negotiate solutions

 Free roaming livestock prevent large adoption of agroecological practices (damage of succession crops during the dry season,   forage overgrazing, limited manure collection etc.)  Productivity gains from conservation agriculture reinvested in  expansion of agricultural land (forest encroachment)  Mechanized tillage service and use of chemical herbicides constrain  the development of alternative cropping systems

Conclusion:

towards a landscape approach to agroecology

Engaging the whole village community in landscape level 

management of agricultural innovations

Anticipate organizational problems and negotiate solutions

Scaling‐up and dissemination of innovative practices 

through coordination mechanisms and partnerships with 

multiple stakeholder groups (e.g. development projects, 

NGOs, universities, research institutions)

PPP mechanisms Private  Public  Farmers  Groups

Conclusion:

towards a landscape approach to agroecology

(10)

Thank you for your attention…

Références

Documents relatifs

Barbara Rita Barricelli • Virpi Roto Torkil Clemmensen • Pedro Campos Arminda Lopes • Frederica Gon ç alves Jos é Abdelnour-Nocera (Eds.)..

Total abundance and number of species of Collembola in individual core samples (5 cm diameter, 10 cm depth) according to main land use types in the six land use units

and settlements for pastoral systems, housing and home fields for agro-pastoral systems) have positive greenhouse gas balances (more emissions than sequestra- tion,

I will present documented examples from around the world to show how agroecology contributes to the three priorities of CSA, particularly in the context of

This research is supported by the EFICAS project (Landscape Management and Conservation Agriculture Development for Eco-Friendly Intensification and Climate resilient

This example shows that rural stakeholders, as part of local communi- ties, can construct, use, and master complex tools such as a geographic information system. They do so by

Ultimately, if local communities are not granted strong forest tenure and carbon rights, REDD+ could actually further marginalize local stakeholders, who are already

Based on the history of research in the Mauguio area, and no doubt influenced by the general habits of researchers who work on Mediterranean landscapes, the