Paul Gatabazi, Sileshi Fanta Melesse & Shaun Ramroop
School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Sciences,University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg Campus South Africa
Email: [email protected]
α
β
β β β β
ψ = 𝑒𝛽𝑘
β ψ
β β β
β
β β β β
β
𝐵𝑘(𝑡) = ∫ 𝛽0𝑡 𝑘(𝑣)𝑑𝑣
β
β β 𝐵𝑘(𝑡) = ∫ 𝛽0𝑡 𝑘𝑑𝑣 = 𝛽𝑘𝑡
𝑌𝑖(𝑡) = {1, if individual 𝑖 is at risk at time 𝑡0, Otherwise.
𝑑𝑁𝑖(𝑡) = ∑𝑝𝑘=0𝑌𝑖(𝑡)𝑥𝑖𝑘(𝑡)𝑑𝐵𝑘(𝑡) + 𝑑𝑀𝑖
d𝐁̂(t) = [(𝐗(t))′𝐗(t)]−1(𝐗(t))′d𝐍(t).
p-value (P) Interpretation
P > 0.1 No evidence to reject the null hypothesis
0.05 < P ≤ 0.1 Slight evidence against the null hypothesis 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05 Moderate evidence against the null hypothesis 0.001 < P ≤ 0.01 Strong evidence against the null hypothesis
P ≤ 0.001 Overwhelming evidence against the null hypothesis
𝐁̂(t) = ∫ [(𝐗(t))𝑡 ′𝐗(t)]−1(𝐗(t))′d𝐍(t)
0
= ∑𝑡𝑗≤𝑡[(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝐗(𝑡𝑗)]−1(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝑦𝑗
𝐁̂(t)
Var[𝐁̂(t)] =
∑𝑡𝑗≤𝑡[(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝐗(𝑡𝑗)]−1(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝐃(𝑡𝑗)𝐗(𝑡𝑗)[(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝐗(𝑡𝑗)]−1
𝜷̂(𝑡𝑗) = [(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝐗(𝑡𝑗)]−1(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝑦𝑗
Var[𝜷̂(𝑡𝑗)] =
[(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝐗(𝑡𝑗)]−1(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝐃(𝑡𝑗)𝐗(𝑡𝑗)[(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝐗(𝑡𝑗)]−1
α
𝐵̂𝑘(𝑡) = ±𝑧𝛼
2√𝜎̂𝑘𝑘(𝑡)
β ∀ 𝜖
β β
∆𝐵̂𝑘(𝑡) β
∆𝐵̂𝑘(𝑡) β
𝐵̂𝑘(𝑡) β
β
𝐮̂ = ∑ 𝐊𝑡𝑗 𝑗𝜷̂(𝑡𝑗) 𝜷̂(𝑡𝑗)
𝑆̂𝐾𝑀(𝑡𝑗−1) 𝑆̂𝐾𝑀(𝑡𝑗−1)
𝑡𝑗−1 𝑆̂𝐾𝑀(𝑡0) =
1
𝑆̂𝐾𝑀(𝑡𝑗−1)/se 𝛽̂𝑘𝑘(𝑡𝑗) 𝛽̂𝑘𝑘(𝑡𝑗)
𝐮̂
Var̂ (𝐮̂) = ∑ 𝐊𝑗Var[𝜷̂(𝑡𝑗)𝐊′𝑗]
𝑡𝑗
= ∑ 𝐊𝑡𝑗 𝑗[(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝐗(𝑡𝑗)]−1(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝐃(𝑡𝑗)𝐗(𝑡𝑗)[(𝐗(𝑡𝑗))′𝐗(𝑡𝑗)]−1𝐊′𝑗
𝑧𝑢𝑘 = 𝑢̂𝑘
se(𝑢̂𝑘)
𝑢̂𝑘 𝐮̂
se(𝑢̂𝑘) Var̂ (𝐮̂)
uk
z
α
β α
β α
𝐵(𝑡) = ∫ 𝛽(𝑣)𝑑𝑣0𝑡 α
β
(a) APGAR=4/10 to APGAR=6/10 (b) APGAR=7/10 and above .
(
≤