• Aucun résultat trouvé

Exam 3 Report 12/7/2018

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Exam 3 Report 12/7/2018"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

1

Exam 3 Report 12/7/2018

1. Summary

Total number of students 12

Attended 12

Missed 0

Number of problems 5

Average grade 76.2

Standard deviation of grades 11.2

2. Grade distribution

3. Comparison with past years

0 0 0

2

1

4 4

1

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

0-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100

Number of Students

Grade

Total Grade Distribution

76.4 81.9 82.8 81.5 84.0 81.2 80.1 85.8 80.3

11.2 12.2 9.6 11.8 12.7 13.5 11.6 10.9 14.1

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0

2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2010 2009

Grade

Year

Comparison with Previous Years

Average Standard Deviation Average Over 2009-2018

(2)

2 4. Individual problem breakdown

5. Grade distribution per problem

7.98 7.79 7.56 7.42 7.46

1.44

2.39

1.56 1.62 1.98

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00

1 2 3 4 5

Grade

Problem

Individual scores per problem

Average

Standard Deviation

0 0 0

2

1

4

2

3

1

0 0

1 1 1

6

2

0

1

0 0

3

4

3

1

0 0

1

3 3

0

3

2 1

0 0

2 2

3

2 2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

0-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10

Number of Students

Grade

Grade distribution per problem

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5

(3)

3 6. Comments

• Some students did not complete problems due to difficulty and/or time constraint PROBLEM 1

• Some student did not calculate the radius or the angle

• Some student did not use the Bernoulli equation for pressure calculation PROBLEM 2

• Many student did not know the definition of friction velocity

• Some student did not calculate the local Reynolds number correctly

• Some student did not use the correct equations for the friction factor calculation PROBLEM 3

• Few student made wrong assumption when simplifying the N-S equation

• Many student had difficulty solving the simplified N-S equation

• Some students did not apply correct B.C.’s Problem 4

• Many students had difficulty applying the energy equation for non-uniform velocity profile

• Some students did not know they needed to use CV method for drag calculation Problem 5

• Some students made mistakes when calculating the PI terms

• Some student did not calculate moment about point 1 to calculate drag

• Many student struggled to setup and solve system of equation for the velocity calculation (I suspect this is due to the time constraint)

Références

Documents relatifs

Thus each mathematical symbol (G, L,. .) has a single definite meaning inside each exercise, but might have different meanings from an exercise to another.. It is not required to

Exercises for the preparation to the final

We construct 2-surfaces of prescribed mean curvature in 3- manifolds carrying asymptotically flat initial data for an isolated gravitating system with rather general decay

In a class C network, the first three fields of the address are assigned by the NIC to designate the network, and the last field is left open for you to designate hosts on

The immediate aim of this project is to examine across cultures and religions the facets comprising the spirituality, religiousness and personal beliefs domain of quality of life

Notice that, for the particular case of the nonlinear charac- teristic function based upon the Bernoulli law, the problem of parameter ζ larger than unity has been solved previously

Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique.. We have by a simple calculation From this and the fact that 9D is bounded we have. here we have used

It is, however, not very probable that similar citizen programmes will be set up for flora and insects in the near future, even though national structures with the means to