• Aucun résultat trouvé

Data in support of a harmine-derived beta-carboline in vitro effects in cancer cells through protein synthesis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Data in support of a harmine-derived beta-carboline in vitro effects in cancer cells through protein synthesis"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

RESEARCH OUTPUTS / RÉSULTATS DE RECHERCHE

Author(s) - Auteur(s) :

Publication date - Date de publication :

Permanent link - Permalien :

Rights / License - Licence de droit d’auteur :

Bibliothèque Universitaire Moretus Plantin

Institutional Repository - Research Portal

Dépôt Institutionnel - Portail de la Recherche

researchportal.unamur.be

University of Namur

Data in support of a harmine-derived beta-carboline in vitro effects in cancer cells

through protein synthesis

Carvalho, Annelise; Chu, Jennifer; Meinguet, Céline; Kiss, Robert; Vandenbussche, Guy;

Masereel, Bernard; Wouters, Johan; Kornienko, Alexander; Pelletier, Jerry; Mathieu,

Véronique

Published in:

Data in Brief

DOI:

10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.006

Publication date:

2017

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Link to publication

Citation for pulished version (HARVARD):

Carvalho, A, Chu, J, Meinguet, C, Kiss, R, Vandenbussche, G, Masereel, B, Wouters, J, Kornienko, A, Pelletier,

J & Mathieu, V 2017, 'Data in support of a harmine-derived beta-carboline in vitro effects in cancer cells through

protein synthesis', Data in Brief, vol. 12, pp. 546-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.006

General rights

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners

and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.

• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.

• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain

• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ?

Take down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately

and investigate your claim.

(2)

Data Article

Data in support of a harmine-derived

beta-carboline in vitro effects in cancer cells

through protein synthesis

Annelise Carvalho

a

, Jennifer Chu

b

, Céline Meinguet

c

,

Robert Kiss

a

, Guy Vandenbussche

d

, Bernard Masereel

c

,

Johan Wouters

c

, Alexander Kornienko

e

, Jerry Pelletier

b

,

Véronique Mathieu

a,

*

a

Laboratoire de Cancérologie et Toxicologie Expérimentale, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

b

Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada

cNamur Medicine and Drug Innovation Center (NAMEDIC-NARILIS), Université de Namur, Namur, Belgium d

Laboratory for the Structure and Function of Biological Membranes, Faculté des Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

e

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA*

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history: Received 18 March 2017 Received in revised form 2 May 2017

Accepted 3 May 2017 Available online 5 May 2017 Keywords:

beta-carboline protein synthesis cancer cells

a b s t r a c t

A harmine-derived beta-carboline, CM16, inhibits cancer cells growth through its effects on protein synthesis, as described in“A harmine-derived beta-carboline displays anti-cancer effects in vitro by targeting protein synthesis” (Carvalho et al., 2017)[1]. This data article provides accompanying data on CM16 cytostatic evaluation in cancer cells as well as data related to its effects on transcription and translation. After confirming the cytostatic effect of CM16, we investigated its ability to arrest the cell cycle in the glioma Hs683 and SKMEL-28 melanoma cell lines but no mod-ification was evidenced. According to the global protein synthesis inhibition induced by CM16 [1], transcription phase, a step prior to mRNA translation, evaluated by labelled nucleotide incorporation assay was not shown to be affected under CM16 treatment in the two cell lines. By contrast, mRNA translation and particularly the initiation step were shown to be targeted by CM16 in [1]. To

Contents lists available at

ScienceDirect

journal homepage:

www.elsevier.com/locate/dib

Data in Brief

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.006

2352-3409/& 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

DOI of original article:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.03.034

nCorrespondence to: Laboratoire de Cancérologie et Toxicologie Expérimentale– Faculté de Pharmacie – Université Libre de

Bruxelles [ULB] Campus de la Plaine – Boulevard du Triomphe – 1050 Brussels – Belgium. Tel: þ32 478 317 388 E-mail: vemathie@ulb.ac.be

(3)

further decipher those effects, we established herein a list of main actors in the protein synthesis process according to literature survey for comparative analysis of cell lines displaying different sensitivity levels to CM16. Finally, one of these proteins, PERK, a kinase regulating eIF2-α phosphorylation and thereby activity, was evaluated under treatment with CM16 in a cell-free system.

& 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

1. Speci

fications table

Subject area

Biology

More speci

fic

subject area

Protein synthesis inhibition of cancer cells in vitro

Mechanism of action of potential anticancer drug

Type of data

Graphs and table

How data was

acquired

Flow cytometer, microplate reader, search on databases

Data format

Analyzed graphs and raw data retrieval (table)

Experimental

factors

As in the description of the data and materials and methods

Experimental

features

As in the description of the data and materials and methods

Data source

location

Lab. de Cancérologie et Toxicologie Experimentale, Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Brussels, Belgium.

Life Technologies, Madison, USA

Data accessibility

Data is with this article

2. Value of the data



This data offers an extended comprehension of CM16 mechanism of action as a protein synthesis

inhibitor in cancer cells.



Assays performed to evaluate transcription and translation initiation provide valuable data and

may be used as tools in other cell-based investigations of potential protein synthesis inhibitors.



The data presented shows that different methods add to and enrich the investigation of the

mechanism of action of proteins synthesis inhibitors in cancer cells. Therefore, these approaches

might be useful in similar studies.

3. Data

Firstly, data on CM16-induced cytostatic effects is presented. As shown in

[1]

CM16 displays

cytostatic effects at its IC

50

in glioma Hs683, melanoma SKMEL-28 and breast adenocarcinoma

MDA-MB-231 cells. Thus, CM16 effect on the cell cycle of both glioma Hs683 (Fig. 1A) cells and SKMEL-28

(Fig. 1B) are presented. After data showing CM16 inhibiting translation

[1], further investigation on

the effects of CM16 on newly synthesized mRNA (transcription) were carried out and generated the

(4)

data here shown (Fig. 2A-B). CM16 effects on PERK activity, is shown in

Fig. 3. The data on

Table 1

refers to the genes related to translation that were analyzed for their transcriptomic expression in the

cell lines most and least sensitive to CM16 effects, according to the NCI 60-cell-line growth inhibitory

evaluation

[1].

0 50 100 150 3h 6h 24h Positive control Neosy n thetised RNA (%; CT=100%) SKMEL-28 0.5 μM 1.0 μM 5.0 μM A c tinomy c in 25 μ M 0 50 100 3h 6h 24h Positive control Neosynthetised RNA (%; CT=100%) Hs683 0.5 μM 1.0 μM 5.0 μM A c tinomy cin 25 μ M

Fig. 2. Effects of CM16 on newly synthesized mRNA in A: Hs683 and B: SKMEL-28 cell lines. Results are expressed as the mean neosynthesized RNA amounts normalized to the control (100%)7 S.E.M. of six replicates. No significant effects were observed for up to 24 h in the presence of 5.0mM CM16 in those two cell lines, thus we did not further assayed the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% CT 24h 48h 72h Percentage of cells Percentage of cells Hs683 G2/M S G0/G1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% CT 24h 48h 72h SKMEL-28 G2/M S G0/G1

Fig. 1. Cell cycle effects of CM16 on A: Hs683 at 0.1mM; and B: SKMEL-28 at 0.5 mM. Data are expressed as the mean percentage of cells in each phase of the cell cycle of four replicates. As proliferation inhibition were observed on the three cancer models under study at their GI50and the lack of evidence of any effects of CM16 on the cell cycle of Hs683 and SKMEL-28, we did not

(5)

4. Experimental design, materials and methods

4.1. Cell lines and compound

The human cancer cell lines, oligodendroglioma Hs683 (ATCC code HTB-138) and melanoma

SKMEL-28 (ATCC code HTB-72) were herein used. Cells were cultivated at 37

°C with 5% CO

2

in RPMI

culture medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 200U penicillin

–streptomycin, 0.1 mg/ml gentamicin

and 4 mM L-glutamine. CM16 was synthetized as previously described

[2]

and the experiments were

designed with the cell lines described above treated with different concentrations of CM16, based on

its IC

50

.

4.2. Analysis of CM16 effects on cell cycle

Cell cycle analysis was performed with

flow cytometry through the measurements of DNA content

with propidium iodide. Hs683 and SKMEL-28 were seeded in cell culture

flasks and left untreated or

treated with CM16 at its respective IC

50

in each cell line for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. The samples were

then centrifuged (10 min, 1500 rcf, 4

°C), resuspended in PBS and pellets were resuspended in cold

ethanol 70% for

fixation. Staining with 0.08 mg/ml propidium iodide solution (0.08 mg/ml PI; 0.2 mg/

ml RNAse in PBS) followed after a PBS wash. The samples were incubated at 37

°C for 30 min and

stored at 4

°C for a few hours. Analysis was performed with the Cell Lab Quanta (Beckman Coulter,

Analis, Suarlée, Belgium). The experiment was performed once in quadruplicate.

4.3. Analysis of CM16 effects on transcription

Neosynthesized RNA was evaluated through incorporation of a nucleoside analog,

5-ethynyl-uri-dine, using the Click iT-RNA HCS (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Merelbeke, Belgium). The

alkyne-containing nucleosides react with a

fluorescent dye containing the azide moiety after their

incor-poration into cellular RNA. Brie

fly, Hs683 or SKMEL-28 cells were seeded and after attachment they

were either left untreated (negative control) or treated with CM16 or the positive control actinomycin

(Life Technologies, Paisley, UK). After the treatment with the analog 5-ethynyl uridine (4 mM) for two

h, the cells were

fixed, stained (Alexa Fluor 488 and 594) and fluorescence readings (ex/em: 495/

520 nm) were carried out in microplate reader (SynergyMX Biotek, Winooski, USA: ex/em: 350/

460 nm). Normalization according to cell number was carried out as described in the user manual

with Hoescht counterstaining. The experiment was performed once in sextuplicate.

4.4. PERK inhibition

PERK activity was evaluated by the Life Technologies screening service (Lantha Screen, Madison,

USA). The in vitro assay used is based on FRET between a terbium-labeled antibody and the

phos-phorylated product of the active kinase: TR-FRET increases proportionally to their binding and

thereby to the quantity of the phosphorylated product. CM16 compound at different concentrations

Fig. 3. PERK kinase activity in vitro in the presence or absence of CM16.

(6)

Table 1

List of genes analyzed for the transcript intensity from the NCI cell line panel. Protein Protein code

(UniProt)

Gene (HGNC Symbol)

Gene code (Entrez Gene) Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 1 P05198 EIF2S1 1965 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 2 P20042 EIF2S2 8894 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 3 P41091 EIF2S3 1968 Translation initiation factor eIF-2B subunit alpha Q14232 EIF2B1 1967 Translation initiation factor eIF-2B subunit beta P49770 EIF2B2 8892 Translation initiation factor eIF-2B subunit gamma Q9NR50 EIF2B3 8891 Translation initiation factor eIF-2B subunit delta Q9UI10 EIF2B4 8890 Translation initiation factor eIF-2B subunit epsilon Q13144 EIF2B5 8893 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E P06730 EIF4E 1977 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 Q13541 EIF4EBP1 1978 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 Q04637 EIF4G1 1981 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 2 P78344 EIF4G2 1982 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 3 O43432 EIF4G3 8672 MAP kinase-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 Q9BUB5 MKNK1 8569 MAP kinase-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 2 Q9HBH9 MKNK2 2872 Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-I P60842 EIF4A1 1973 Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-II Q14240 EIF4A2 1974 Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-III P38919 EIF4A3 9775 Programmed cell death protein 4 Q53EL6 PDCD4 27250 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-1 P63241 EIF5A 1984 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2 Q9GZV4 EIF5A2 56648 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B O60841 EIF5B 9669 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 6 P56537 EIF6 3692 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1 P41567 EIF1 10209 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X-chromosomal P47813 EIF1AX 1964 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, Y-chromosomal O14602 EIF1AY 9086 Probable RNA-binding protein EIF1AD Q8N9N8 EIF1AD 84285 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit A Q14152 EIF3A 8661 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit B P55884 EIF3B 8662 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit H O15372 EIF3H 8667 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit I Q13347 EIF3I 8668 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit M Q7L2H7 EIF3M 10480 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit E P60228 EIF3E 3646 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit F O00303 EIF3F 8665 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 3 Q9NZJ5 EIF2AK3 9451 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 4 Q9P2K8 EIF2AK4 440275 Interferon-induced, double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase P19525 EIF2AK2 5610 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 1 Q9BQI3 EIF2AK1 27102 Elongation factor 1-alpha 1 P68104 EEF1A1 1915 Elongation factor 2 P13639 EEF2 1938 Serine/threonine-protein kinase mTOR P42345 MTOR 2475 RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase P31749 AKT1 207 RAC-beta serine/threonine-protein kinase P31751 AKT2 208 RAC-gamma serine/threonine-protein kinase Q9Y243 AKT3 10000 Ribosomal protein S6 kinase beta-1 P23443 RPS6KB1 6198 Ribosomal protein S6 kinase beta-2 Q9UBS0 RPS6KB2 6199 Myc proto-oncogene protein P01106 MYC 4609 Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha

isoform

P42336 PIK3CA 5290 Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase and

dual-spe-cificity protein phosphatase PTEN

P60484 PTEN 5728 Hamartin Q92574 TSC1 7248 Tuberin P49815 TSC2 7249 Cellular tumor antigen p53 P04637 TP53 7157 Retinoblastoma-associated protein P06400 RB1 5925 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 O15530 PDPK1 5170 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 P28482 MAPK1 5594 Vascular endothelial growth factor A P15692 VEGFA 7742 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein P11021 HSPA5 3309

Data retrieved from: www.proteinatlas.com; www.uniprot.org; www.genenames.org andhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene in

(7)

or the control solutions were mixed with the kinase/substrate/ATP mixture into the wells. After

60 min of reaction at room temperature, the detection mix was added and left to equilibrate for an h

prior to

fluorescence reading.

Acknowledgements

The Ph.D of A.C. is

financially supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de

Nivel Superior (Grant 0674-13/3;CAPES; Brazil). C.M. acknowledges the grant from the Télévie (Grant

7.4529.13; FRS-FNRS; Belgium). R.K. is a director of research with the Fonds National de la Recherche

Scienti

fique (FRS-FNRS; Belgium) that supported the present project (#3.4525.11: Anti-cancéreux

dérivés de l

’harmine from 2010 to 2014). Part of this study is also supported by the grant by the

Belgian Brain Tumor Support (BBTS; Belgium). We thank Mohsin Mssassi for his help during his stay

in the Laboratoire of Cancérologie et Toxicologie Expérimentale (ULB, Belgium). JP acknowledges

grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-106530 and MOP-115126). A.K.

acknowledges the National Cancer Institute (CA186046-01A1) and Welch Foundation (AI-0045).

Transparency document. Supporting information

Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at

http://dx.doi.

org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.006.

References

[1] A. Carvalho, J. Chu, C. Meinguet, R. Kiss, G. Vandenbussche, B. Masereel, et al., A harmine-derived beta-carboline displays anti-cancer effects in vitro by targeting protein synthesis, Eur. J. Pharmacol. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ejphar.2017.03.034.

[2] C. Meinguet, C. Bruyère, R. Frédérick, V. Mathieu, C. Vancraeynest, L. Pochet, et al., 3D-QSAR, design, synthesis and char-acterization of trisubstituted harmine derivatives with in vitro antiproliferative properties, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 94 (2015) 45–55.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.02.044.

Figure

Fig. 2. Effects of CM16 on newly synthesized mRNA in A: Hs683 and B: SKMEL-28 cell lines
Fig. 3. PERK kinase activity in vitro in the presence or absence of CM16.

Références

Documents relatifs

erable advance over the heavy emphasis given in many instructional writ- ings on an interpersonal point of view, which pays relatively little attention 10 the dynamics of the

Erst Kor re la ti ons un ter su chun gen an hand ex- ter ner Be ob ach ter und kli ni scher Out co- me-Pa ra me ter wer den klar stel len kön- nen, in wie weit mit zu neh

The imputation procedure should, in particular, attempt to preserve the relationships between all variables that might be jointly analyzed in future studies based on the imputed

In this study, we exposed cultured human differentiated muscle cells to bear serum collected during winter and summer periods, and measured the impact on cell protein content

- Les interactions potentiellement graves lors de chaque prise d’alcool (occasionnelle ou chronique) sont entre autres: une interférence avec les effets centraux (entre autres

Also, a proper formulation of a priori knowledge should distinguish between empir- ical knowledge of propositions that can be known a priori and true a priori

Pour ce travail, il a été choisi d’étudier l’impact sur la qualité des couches générées de plusieurs paramètres de dépôt dont -1- le temps durant lequel